Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:48:20.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oribatid mite fossils from a terrestrial Devonian deposit near Gilboa, New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Roy A. Norton ,
Patricia M. Bonamo ,
James D. Grierson  and
William A. Shear
Roy A. Norton
Affiliation:
1S.U.N.Y. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York 13210 and Research Associate, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois 60605
Patricia M. Bonamo
Affiliation:
2Department of Biology, S.U.N.Y. Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13901
James D. Grierson
Affiliation:
2Department of Biology, S.U.N.Y. Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13901
William A. Shear
Affiliation:
3Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, Virginia 23943
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fourteen oribatid mite fossils have been recovered from a terrestrial Devonian deposit near Gilboa, New York; they allow an approximate doubling of the known age of the group. Two species are represented by specimens complete enough to allow descriptions. Protochthonius gilboa n. gen. and sp. is the earliest derivative known member of the Enarthronota, and comprises the monobasic new family Protochthoniidae. Devonacarus sellnicki n. gen. and sp. also represents a monobasic new family, Devonacaridae; it may also be an early derivative enarthronote mite, but its relationships are uncertain. Two other species are represented at the site, but meaningful descriptions are not possible with available material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , March 1988 , pp. 259 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balogh, J., and Mahunka, S. 1979. New taxa in the system of the Oribatida (Acari). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 71:279–290.Google Scholar
Banks, H. P., Bonamo, P. M., and Grierson, J. D. 1972. Leclerqia complex gen. et sp. nov., a new lycopod from the late Middle Devonian of eastern New York. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 14:19–40.Google Scholar
Banks, H. P., Grierson, J. D., and Bonamo, P. M. 1985. The flora of the Catskill clastic wedge. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 201, p. 125–141.Google Scholar
Dubinin, V. B. 1962. Class Acaromorpha: mites, or gnathosomic chelicerate arthropods, p. 447–473. In Rodendorf, B. B. (ed.), Fundamentals of Palaeontology. Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R., Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1939. Quelques genres d'acariens appartenant au groupe des Endeostigmata. Annales des Science Naturelle, Zoologie (11), 2:1–122.Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1949. Formules anales, gastronotiques, génitales et aggénitales du développement numérique des poils chez les oribates. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 74:201–225.Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1954. Étude sur les Palaeacaroïdes (acariens, oribates). Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (sér. A, Zoologie), 7:179–274.Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1958. Au sujet du naso et de son oeil infère chez les oribates et les Endeostigmata (acariens). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 30:427–435.Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1961. Considérations numérique sur les poils génitaux des oribates. Acarologia, 3:620–636.Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1969. Considérations sur le classement des oribates. Leur division en 6 groupes majeurs. Terminologie en soma. Acarologia, 11:127–153.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der. 1972. A revised classification of the mites (Arachnidea, Acarida) with diagnoses, a key, and notes on phylogeny. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 47:273–292.Google Scholar
Hammer, M., and Wallwork, J. A. 1979. A review of the world distribution of oribatid mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata) in relation to continental drift. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter, 22:1–31.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. 1923. On some arachnid remains from the Old Red Sandstone. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9th ser.), 12:455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivolutsky, D. A., and Druk, A. Ya. 1986. Fossil oribatid mites. Annual Review of Entomology, 31:533–545.Google Scholar
Norton, R. A. 1985. Aspects of the biology and systematics of soil arachnids, particularly saprophagous and mycophagous mites. Quaestiones Entomologicae, 21:523–541.Google Scholar
Norton, R. A., Bonamo, P. M., Grierson, J. D., and Shear, W. A. 1987. Fossil mites from the Devonian of New York State. Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Acarology. Bangalore, August, 1986. (In press.)Google Scholar
Norton, R. A., O'Connor, B. M., and Johnston, D. E. 1983. Systematic relationships of the Pediculochelidae (Acari: Acariformes). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 85:493–512.Google Scholar
Shear, W. A., Bonamo, P. A., Grierson, J. D., Rolfe, W. D. I., Smith, E. L., and Norton, R. A. 1984. Early land animals in North America: evidence from Devonian age arthropods from Gilboa, New York. Science, 224:492–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zachvatkin, A. A. 1952. The division of the Acarina into orders and their position in the system of the chelicerata. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., 14:5–46 (in Russian).Google Scholar