Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T11:49:53.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogeny and variation in Glyptopleura costata (McCoy) (Ostracoda: Mississippian, Chesterian) from Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. D. Hoare
R. D. Hoare*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Large collections of Glyptopleura costata (McCoy, 1844) from the Maxville Limestone in central Ohio contain four instars and adults. The juveniles provide a basis for understanding the orderly development of the complex ornamentation of costae characteristic of Glyptopleura. Dimorphism is prominent with heteromorphs and adult tecnomorphs readily identifiable, primarily in adults. Progressive development of the ornamentation in juveniles, significant variation in adult ornamentation, and dimorphism has led to a proliferation of proposed taxa.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , September 1991 , pp. 760 - 766
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blumenstengel, H. 1977. Zur Gattung Glyptopleura Girty (Ostracoda) aus dem Dinant von Rugen. Zeitschrift fur Geologische Wissenschaften, 5:1235–1251.Google Scholar
Brayer, R. C. 1952. Salem Ostracoda of Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 26:162–174.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L. 1941. Chester ostracodes of Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigations No. 77, 101 p.Google Scholar
Coryell, H. N., and Brackmier, G. 1931. The ostracode genus Glyptopleura. The American Midland Naturalist, 12:505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coryell, H. N., and Johnson, S. C. 1939. Ostracoda of the Clore limestone. Journal of Paleontology, 13:214–224.Google Scholar
Crane, M. J., and Kelly, W. A. 1956. A new occurrence of Mississippian Ostracoda in Michigan. Journal of Paleontology, 30:869–875.Google Scholar
Croneis, C., and Bristol, H. M. 1939. New ostracodes from the Menard formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 34:65–102.Google Scholar
Croneis, C., and Funkhouser, H. J. 1938. New ostracodes from the Clore formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 33:331–360.Google Scholar
Croneis, C., and Gale, A. S. Jr. 1938. New ostracodes from the Golconda formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 33:251–295.Google Scholar
Croneis, C., and Gutke, R. L. 1939. New Ostracodes from the Renault formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 34:33–63.Google Scholar
Croneis, C., and Thurman, F. A. 1938. New ostracodes from the Kinkaid formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 33:297–330.Google Scholar
Delo, D. M. 1930. Some Upper Carboniferous Ostracoda from the shale basin of western Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 4:152–178.Google Scholar
Dewey, C. P. 1990. On Glyptopleura henbesti Croneis & Gutke, p. 5–8. In Athersuch, J., Horne, D. J., Siveter, D. J., and Whittaker, J. E. (eds.), A Stero-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 17.Google Scholar
Egorov, V. G. 1950. Ostrakody franskogo iarusa russkoi platformy; I, Kloedenillide. Moscow-Leningrad, Vsesoiuznyi Neftianoi Nauchoissledovatelskii Geologorazved-ochnyi Institut, Moscow, Filial, 175 p.Google Scholar
Geis, H. L. 1932. Some ostracodes from the Salem limestone, Mississippian, of Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 6:149–188.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1910. New genera and species of Carboniferous fossils from the Fayetteville shale of Arkansas. New York Academy of Science Annals, 20:189–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1915. The fauna of the Batesville Sandstone of northern Arkansas. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 593, 170 p.Google Scholar
Harlton, B. W. 1927. Some Pennsylvanian Ostracoda of the Glenn and Hoxbar formations of southern Oklahoma and of the upper part of the Cisco formation of northern Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 1:203–212.Google Scholar
Harlton, B. W. 1929. Pennsylvanian Ostracoda from Menard County, Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 2901:139–161.Google Scholar
Harris, R. W., and Lalicker, C. G. 1932. New Upper Carboniferous Ostracoda from Oklahoma and Kansas. American Midland Naturalist, 13:396–409.Google Scholar
Harris, R. W., and Jobe, T. C. 1956. Chester Foraminifera and Ostracoda from the Ringwood Pool of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 39, 41 p.Google Scholar
Jones, T. R., and Kirkby, J. W. 1866. Some Carboniferous species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 18:32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. R., and Kirkby, J. W. 1885a. Notes of the Carboniferous Ostracoda of the North-West of England. Geological Magazine, Ser. 3, 2:535–541.Google Scholar
Jones, T. R., and Kirkby, J. W. 1885b. On some Carboniferous species of the Ostracodous Genus Kirkbya Jones. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 15:174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. R., and Kirkby, J. W. 1896. On Carboniferous Ostracoda from Ireland. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Society of Dublin, Ser. 2, 6:173–204.Google Scholar
Jones, T. R., and Brady, G. S. 1884. Monograph of the British Fossil Bivalved Entomostraca From the Carboniferous Formations. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, 92 p.Google Scholar
Kellett, B. 1933. Ostracodes of the Upper Pennsylvanian and the Lower Permian strata of Kansas: I. The Aparchitidae, Beyrichiidae, Glyptopleuridae, Kloedenellidae, Kirkbyidae, and Youngiellidae. Journal of Paleontology, 7:59–108.Google Scholar
Latham, M. H. 1932. Scottish Carboniferous Ostracoda. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57:351–395.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1844. A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Fossils of Ireland. Dublin, 207 p.Google Scholar
Morey, P. S. 1935. Ostracoda from the Amsden formation of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 6:474–482.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. 1978. The Carboniferous, p. 121–166. In Bate, R. H. and Robinson, E. (eds.), A Stratigraphical Index of British Ostracoda. Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1942. Ostracodes from the Upper Mississippian of Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 16:152–163.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1951. Instars and shell morphology of Eoleperditia fabulites. Journal of Paleontology, 25:321–326.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1961. Family Glyptopleuridae, p. Q184. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Q) Arthropoda 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. H. 1953. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in Cytherella bullata. Journal of Paleontology, 27:471–480.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. H. 1958. A study of Pseudobythocypris pediformis, a new name for an old ostracod. American Midland Naturalist, 59:120–137.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1969. Revision of some of Girty's invertebrate fossils from the Fayetteville Shale (Mississippian) of Arkansas and Oklahoma—Ostracodes. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 606-F:41–59.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1975. Mississippian Ostracoda of the Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) of Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 848-G, 19 p.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1988. Revision of the Late Mississippian new ostracode genera in Coryell and Johnson 1939. Micropaleontology, 34:52–62.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1891. New and little-known American Paleozoic Ostracoda. Part III, Carboniferous species. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 13:200–211.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1872. Some Ostracoda from the Carboniferous of Ireland. Ninth Annual Report of the Belfast Naturalists Field Club:35 p.Google Scholar
Young, J. 1893. Notes on the group of Carboniferous Ostracoda found in the strata of western Scotland, with a revised list of general and species. Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow (1888–1892), 9:301–312.Google Scholar