Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:02:57.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenetic development of Pa element cup microsculpture in Lochriea commutata (Branson and Mehl, 1941) (Conodonta, Carboniferous): taxonomic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Peter H. von Bitter  and
Rodney D. Norby
Peter H. von Bitter
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Palaeontology, Royal Ontario Museum, and Department of Geology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 2C6
Rodney D. Norby
Affiliation:
lllinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, 61820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cup nodes on Lochriea commutata Pa elements bear microsculpture fields composed of polygonal microsculpture. As Pa elements grow larger, the cup nodes and their microsculpture fields increase in size during early to middle growth. With subsequent growth, cup nodes may broaden transversely, split, fuse, or cease to broaden; similarly, their microsculpture fields may increase in size, split, or disappear as the element gets larger. The loss of microsculpture fields results in the loss of polygonal microsculpture.

The presence of polygonal microsculpture on the cup nodes of Pa elements of the holotype of Lochriea montanaensis Scott, 1942, on topotype Pa elements of L. commutata (Branson and Mehl, 1941), as well as on L. commutata Pa elements from diverse localities, suggests that this micromorphological feature cannot be used to distinguish them. Instead, these similarities support the practice of treating L. montanaensis as a junior synonym of L. commutata. The fact that cup node, microsculpture field, and polygonal microsculpture development are closely related to growth and ontogeny and are variable in the larger growth stages suggests that these morphological features should be used with caution in taxonomy. This lack of reliability contrasts with the taxonomic utility of pustulose micrornamentation on the homeomorphic Pa elements of the Permian genus Sweetognathus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , July 1994 , pp. 861 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belka, Z. 1985. Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy in the northeastern part of the Moravia-Silesia Basin. Acta Geologica Polonica, 35:33–60.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Devon/Karbon-Grenze. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 19:1–64.Google Scholar
Branson, C. C., Huffman, G. G., and Strong, D. M. 1965. Geology and oil and gas resources of Craig County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 99:1–109.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1941. New and little known Carboniferous conodont genera. Journal of Paleontology, 15:97–106.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S., and Rexroad, C. B. 1982. An evaluation of statistical reconstructions of multielement conodont taxa from middle Chesterian rocks (Carboniferous) in southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 56:959–969.Google Scholar
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1985. Ride, W. D. L. et al. (eds.), International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in association with British Museum (Natural History), London and University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 338 p.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., and Straka, J. J. 1974. Late Mississippian and Early Pennsylvanian conodonts, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 152:1–144.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H., and Rexroad, C. B. 1986. Conodonts from the Imo Formation (upper Chesterian), north-central Arkansas. Geologica et Paleontologica, 20:113–123.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. 1980. Preliminary report on the restudy of conodonts from the Barnett Formation, p. 103–107, 184-185. In Windle, D. L. Jr. (ed.), Geology of the Llano Region, central Texas. Guidebook to the Annual Field Trip of the West Texas Geological Society, Publication 80-73.Google Scholar
Norby, R. D. 1976. Conodont apparatuses from Chesterian (Mississippian) strata of Montana and Illinois. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 295 p.Google Scholar
Norby, R. D., and Rexroad, C. B. 1985. Vogeignathus, a new Mississippian conodont genus. Indiana Geological Survey, Occasional Paper, 50:1–14.Google Scholar
Purnell, M. A., and von Bitter, P. H. 1992. Vogeignathus Norby and Rexroad (Conodonta): new species from the Lower Carboniferous of Atlantic Canada and northern England. Journal of Paleontology, 66:311–332.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B., and Horowitz, A. S. 1990. Conodont paleoecology and multielement associations of the Beaver Bend Limestone (Chesterian) in Indiana. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 118:493–537.Google Scholar
Ritter, S. M. 1986. Taxonomic revision and phylogeny of post-Early Permian crisis bisseili–whitei Zone conodonts with comments on late Paleozoic diversity. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 20:139–165.Google Scholar
Sansom, I. J., Smith, M. P., Armstrong, H. A., and Smith, M. M. 1992. Presence of the earliest vertebrate hard tissues in conodonts. Science, 256:1308–1311.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1942. Conodont assemblages from the Heath Formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 16:293–300.Google Scholar
Stone, J. J. 1991. Arundian (Lower Carboniferous) conodonts from south Wales. Special Papers in Palaeonotology, 46:1–63.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The conodonta: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology, and evolutionary history of a long-extinct animal phylum. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 10, 212 p.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H., and Austin, R. L. 1984. The Dinantian Taphrognathus transatianticus conodont zone of Great Britain and Atlantic Canada. Palaeontology, 27:95–111.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H., and Merrill, G. K. 1990. Effects of variation on the speciation and phylogeny of Dipiognathodus. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 118:105–129.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H., and Plint-Geberl, H. A. 1982. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Codroy Group (Lower Carboniferous), western Newfoundland, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19:193–221.Google Scholar