Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:30:06.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the taxonomic status of Cycnorhamphus and Gallodactylus (Pterosauria: Pterodactyloidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

S. Christopher Bennett
S. Christopher Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of Systematics and Ecology and Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-2454
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the rarest pterosaurs from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone of southern Germany is Pterodactylus suevicus. Only two specimens are known: the holotype, consisting of a virtually complete skeleton described by Quenstedt (1855); and a second specimen, consisting of only postcranial elements described by Wagner (1858) and lost during World War II (Wellnhofer, 1970). Seeley (1870) noted that P. suevicus differed from P. antiquus, the type species of Pterodactylus, in a number of significant points. Therefore, he placed P. suevicus in a new genus, Cycnorhamphus. Seeley (1870:111) gave the following diagnosis of Cycnorhamphus:

“Nares very small, looking upward from a swan-like beak. The middle hole of the skull very large and elongated and lateral. Neck long. Wing-metacarpal long. Four joints in wing-finger. Ilium widening in front. Epipubic bones meeting mesially. The type is Pterodactylus suevicus (Quenstedt).”

The character “nares very small” was the result of a misinterpretation of depressions on the premaxillae that probably resulted from crushing, and “middle hole of the skull” referred to the confluent naris and antorbital fenestra, which Seeley apparently considered the antorbital fenestra alone.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , March 1996 , pp. 335 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, S. C. 1993. The ontogeny of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs. Paleobiology, 19:92–106.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. C. 1994. Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea). Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum University of Kansas, 169, 70 p.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. C. In press. Year-classes of pterosaurs from the Solnhofen Limestone of Germany: taxonomic and systematic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.Google Scholar
Fabre, J. A. 1976. Un nouveau Pterodactylidae du Gisement de Canjuers (VAR) Gallodactylus canjuersensis nov. gen., nov. sp. Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés), 62:35–70.Google Scholar
Fraas, O. 1878. Über Pterodactylus suevicus, Qu. von Nusplingen. Palaeontographica, 25:163–174.Google Scholar
Howse, S. C. B. 1986. On the cervical vertebrae of the Pterodactyloidea (Reptilia: Archosauria). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 88:307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huene, F. von. 1956. Paläontologie und Phylogenie der Niederen Tetrapoden. Jena, 716 p.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J. 1955. Traité de Paleontologie. Volume 5. Amphibiens. Reptiles. Oiseaux. Masson, Paris, 1113 p.Google Scholar
Plieninger, F. 1901. Beitrage zur Kenntnis das Flugsaurier. Palaeontographica, 48:65–90.Google Scholar
Plieninger, F. 1907. Die Pterosaurier der Juraformation Swabens. Palaeontographica, 53:209–313.Google Scholar
Plieninger, F. 1929. Pterosauria. Fossilium Catalogus. I: Animalia, Pars 45. W. Junk, Berlin, 84 p.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. 1854. Briefliche Mitteilungen an Prof. Bronn. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, 1854:270.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. 1855. Über Pterodactylus suevicus im lithographischen Schiefer Württembergs. Tübingen, 52 p.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1956. Osteology of the Reptiles. University of Chicago Press, 772 p.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1870. The Ornithosauria: An Elementary Study of the Bones of Pterodactyles. Cambridge, 135 p.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1891. The ornithosaurian pelvis. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 6, 7:237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1901. Dragons of the Air: An Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles. Methuen and Co., 239 p.Google Scholar
Unwin, D. M. 1992. The phylogeny of the Pterosauria, p. 57A. In Abstracts of Papers, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 12.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. 1858. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der urweltlichen Fauna des lithographischen Schiefers. 1. Abteilung, Saurier. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Wissenschaftlichen Klasse, Abhandlungen, 8:417–528.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1970. Die Pterodactyloidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Wissenschaftlichen Klasse, Abhandlungen, Heft 141, 133 p.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1978. Pterosauria. Handbuch der Palaeoherpetologie, Teil 19. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 82 p.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1991. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Pterosaurs. Salamander Books, Ltd., London. 192 p.Google Scholar