Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:03:24.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occurrence of the spatangid echinoid Maretia arguta (Clark) in the Middle Eocene of Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Louis G. Zachos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Echinoid fragments were reported by Zachos (1990) from a Weches Formation (Clairborne) outcrop on Hooker Creek in Burleson County, Texas. Enough fragments have been found at the latter locality to piece together a composite identifiable as a species of the spatangid genus Maretia, most likely M. arguta. This species has not previously been reported outside of Clarke County, Mississippi. A search of the stratigraphic collections of the Texas Memorial Museum in Austin, Texas, has uncovered several previously unidentified specimens of M. arguta from two Weches localities, at Kickapoo Shoals on the Trinity River in Houston County and at Nacogdoches in Nacogdoches County. In addition, spatangoid fragments, some of which are attributable to M. arguta, are common in collections from the Weches and Cook Mountain Formations.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 148 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, H. L., and Twitchell, M. W. 1915. The Mesozoic and Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 54, 341 p.Google Scholar
Claus, C. F. W. 1876. Grundzüge der Zoologie, 3rd ed. Marburg and Leipzig, 822 p.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1942. Cenozoic irregular echinoids of eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology, 16:1–62.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1959. Cenozoic echinoids of eastern United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 321, 106 p.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. 1980. The invertebrate macropaleontology of the Clarke County, Mississippi, area. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology, Bulletin 122, 377 p.Google Scholar
Gaskell, B. A. 1991. Extinction patterns in Paleogene benthic foraminiferal faunas: relationship to climate and sea level. Palaios, 6:2–16.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1825. An attempt to divide the Echinida or sea eggs, into natural families. Annals of Philosophy, Series 2, 10:423–431.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1855. Catalogue of the Recent Echinida or sea eggs in the British Museum. Part I. Echinida Irregularia. London, 69 p.Google Scholar
Jones, G. D. 1983. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy and depositional history of the middle Eocene rocks of the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of Land Resources, Geological Survey Section, Special Publication 8, 80 p.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1980. The echinoids of the middle Eocene Warley Hill Formation, Santee Limestone, and Castle Hayne Limestone of North and South Carolina. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 39, 102 p.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Th. 1951. A Monograph of the Echinoidea, Volume 5, Number 2, Spatangoida II. C. A. Reitzel, Copenhagen, 593 p.Google Scholar
Ricoy, J. U., and Brown, L. F. 1977. Depositional systems in the Sparta Formation (Eocene) Gulf Coast Basin of Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 27:139–154.Google Scholar
Shinn, E. A. 1968. Burrowing in recent lime sediments of Florida and the Bahamas. Journal of Paleontology, 42:879–894.Google Scholar
Siesser, W. G. 1983. Paleogene calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy: Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology, Bulletin 125, 61 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1980. The structure and arrangement of echinoid tubercles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (B) 289:1–54.Google Scholar
Tedesco, L. P., and Wanless, H. R. 1991. Generation of sedimentary fabrics and facies by repetitive excavation and storm infilling of burrow networks, Holocene of South Florida and Caicos Platform, B.W.I. Palaios, 6:326–343.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. P. 1942. The Claiborne. Mississippi State Geological Survey Bulletin 48, 96 p.Google Scholar
Weimer, R. J., and Hoyt, J. H. 1964. Burrows of Callianassa major Say, geologic indicators of littoral and shallow neritic environments. Journal of Paleontology, 38:761–767.Google Scholar
Zachos, L. G. 1990. Type locality designation for the middle Eocene echinoid Fibularia texana (Twitchell). Journal of Paleontology, 64:659.Google Scholar