Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:06:02.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new species of Anartiocystis (Callocystitida, Glyptocystitida) from the Brassfield Formation of central Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Colin D. Sumrall
Colin D. Sumrall*
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Museum Center, Geier Collections and Research Center, 1301 Western Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio 45203-1130 and Department of Geoscience, 121 Trowbridge Hall, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Echinoderm fauna of the Brassfield Formation (Lower Silurian, Early to Middle Llandoverian) contains more than 30 species and is locally common in southern Ohio making it one of the most important Early Silurian faunas known (Foerste, 1919, 1936; Ausich, 1984a, 1984b, 1985, 1986a, 1986b, 1986c, 1987; Ausich and Schumacher, 1984; Ausich and Dravage, 1988). At present, the Brassfield Formation has produced two callocystitid rhombiferans including Brockocystis nodosarius Foerste (1919) and Anartiocystis foerstei Ausich and Schumacker (1984). Neither of these taxa is well-known, being described from a handful of moderately well to poorly preserved specimens each. The discovery of Anartiocystis whitei n. sp., the third callocystitid species known from the Brassfield Formation and second known species of the genus, greatly clarifies the morphology of the genus adding significant information on the plating of the ambulacra and stem.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 76 , Issue 5 , September 2002 , pp. 918 - 920
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410

References

Ausich, W. I. 1984a. Calciocrinids from the Early Silurian (Llandoverian) Brassfield Formation of southwestern Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1167–1185.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1984b. The genus Clidochirus from the Early Silurian of Ohio (Crinoidea: Llandoverian). Journal of Paleontology, 58:1341–1346.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1985. New crinoids and a revision of the superfamily Glyptocrinacea (Early Silurian, Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 59:793–808.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1986a. Early Silurian inadunate crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 60:719–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1986b. Early Silurian rhodocrinitacean crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 60:84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1986c. New camerate crinoids of the suborder Glyptocrinina from the Lower Silurian Brassfield Formation (southwestern Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 60:887–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1987. Brassfield Compsocrinina (Early Silurian crinoids) from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 61:563–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Dravage, P. 1988. Crinoids from the Brassfield Formation of Adams County, Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 62:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Schumacher, G. A. 1984. New Lower Silurian rhombiferan cystoid (Echinodermata, Callocystitidae) from southwestern Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 58:9–15.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa. British Association for the Advancement of Science, Report, 68th Meeting section D (Bristol, 1898), 916–923.Google Scholar
Bernard, F. 1895. Éléments de Paléontologie. J. B. Baillière and Fils, Paris, 612 p.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T. W., and Strimple, H. L. 1978. Systematics and distribution of the Callocystitidae (Echinodermata, Rhombifera). Journal of Paleontology, 52:164–177.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1919. Echinoderms of the Brassfield (Silurian) Formation of Ohio. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University, 19:3–31.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1936. Several new Silurian cephalopods and crinoids, chiefly from Ohio and Hudson Bay. Ohio Journal of Science, 36:261–272.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. A., and Ettensohn, F. R. 1980. The paleontology and paleoecology of a hardground from the Silurian Brassfield Formation. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, 12:178.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. A., and Ettensohn, F. R. 1984. Stratigraphy, depositional environments and regional dolomitization of the Brassfield Formation (Llandoverian) in eastern Kentucky. Southeastern Geology, 25:101–115.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1968. Cystoids, p. S85–S267. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. S, Echinodermata 1(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, New York and Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Echinodermata based on primitive fossil taxa. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 360 p.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D., and Sprinkle, J. 1999. Early ontogeny of the glyptocystitid rhombiferan Lepadocystis moorei, p. 409–414. In Carnevali, M. D. C. and Bonasoro, F. (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1998. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar