Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:52:18.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New late Oligocene echinoids from the central Western Cascades of Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Robert A. Linder ,
J. Wyatt Durham  and
William N. Orr
Robert A. Linder
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97401
J. Wyatt Durham
Affiliation:
2Department of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley 94720
William N. Orr
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The echinoids Salenia cascadensis n. sp., Stomechinus? dissimilaris n. sp., Glyptocidaris sp., Arbacia abiquaensis n. sp., Lytechinus baldwini n. sp., Gagaria crenularis n. sp., and Kewia marquamensis n. sp. occur in the Late Oligocene (Chattian) Scotts Mills Formation near Silverton, Oregon, just north of 45°N latitude. The echinoids occur in shallow-water sediments deposited among basaltic sea stacks along a rockbound, storm-dominated marginal marine environment. Except for Kewia, these occurrences mark a more northerly limit for these genera in the northeastern Pacific and add to their stratigraphic range.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 6 , November 1988 , pp. 945 - 958
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, W. O. 1980. Miocene stratigraphy and fossils, Cape Blanco, Oregon. Oregon Geology, 42:87–98.Google Scholar
Addicott, W. O. 1983. Biostratigraphy of the marine Neogene sequence at Cape Blanco, southwestern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 774-G, 20 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1853. Synopsis Echinoidea collected by Dr. W. Stimpson on the North Pacific Exploring Expedition. Proceedings Academy Natural Sciences Philadelphia 1853, 356 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1863. List of the echinoderms sent to different institutions in exchange for other specimens, with annotations. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 1:17–18.Google Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1872–1874. Revision of the Echini. Illustrated Catalogue of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, No. VII. University Press, Cambridge, 761 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1883. Reports on the results of dredging. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, X(1):22–23.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1838. Monographies d'Échinodermes vivan et fossil. Neuchâtel, Petipierre, 52 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. 1907. New and characteristic species of fossil mollusks from the oil-bearing Tertiary formations of southern California. Proceedings U.S. National Museum, 32:525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. B. 1915. In W. B. Clark and M. W. Twitchell, The Mesozoic and Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 54, 341 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1850. Descriptions of one new Cretaceous, and seven new Eocene fossils. Academy of Natural Science Philadelphia Journal, ser. 2, 2:39–41.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1941. Cenozoic regular echinoids of Eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology, 15:1–20.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1959. Cenozoic echinoids of Eastern United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 321, 106 p.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., and Herouard, E. 1903. Traité de Zoologie Concrete, V. III. Les Echinodermes. Paris, Imprimerie Fernand Schmidt, 495 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desor, E. 1855–1858. Synopsis des échinides Fossiles. Geneva. Ch. Reinwald, Paris; Kriedel and Nieder, Wiesbaden, 490 p.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1889. A revision of the genera and great groups of the Echinoidea. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 23, 311 p.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M., and Sladen, W. P. 1882–1886. Fossil Echinoidea of Western Sind and the coast of Baluchistan and of the Persian Gulf, from Tertiary formations. Paleontology Indica, ser. 14, 1, Pt. 3, 392 p.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1955. Classification of clypeasteroid echinoids. University of California Publications, Geological Sciences, 4:73–197.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1966. Clypeasteroids, p. U450–491. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Echinodermata 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Etherington, T. J. 1931. Stratigraphy and fauna of the Astoria Miocene of southwest Washington. University of California Publications, Geological Sciences, 20:31–142.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B., and Pawson, D. L. 1966. Echinacea, p. U367–U440. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Echinodermata 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Grant, U. S. IV, and Hertlein, L. G. 1938. The West American Cenozoic Echinoidea. University of California at Los Angeles Publications in Math and Physical Sciences, 2:226.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1835. On the genera distinguishable in Echinus. Proceedings Zoological Society, 3, 58 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1855. Arrangement of the families of Echinoida. Proceedings Zoological Society for 1855, 36 p.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1900. The Echinoidea, p. 282–332. In Lankaster, E. R., (ed.), A Treatise on Zoology, Pt. III, The Echinoderms. Adam and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. J. 1969. The Oligocene marine molluscan fauna of the Eugene Formation in Oregon. University of Oregon Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 16, 112 p.Google Scholar
Israelsky, M. C. 1923. Some new forms of West Coast fossil Echinoidea. University of California Publications, Geological Sciences, 14(11):377–396.Google Scholar
Kew, W. S. W. 1920. Cretaceous and Cenozoic Echinoidea of the Pacific Coast. University of California Publications, Geological Sciences, 12:23–236.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1963. Tertiary Echinoids from the Caloosahatchee and Tamiami Formations of Florida. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 145(5):1–60.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M., and Lawson, M. H. 1978. Index of living and fossil echinoids. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 34, 182 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1816. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres, t. 3; 1840, 2nd ed., t. 3, Les Radiaires, 59 p.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. 1914. In Lambert, J. and Thiéry, P., Essai de Nomenclature Raisonnée des Échinides, Fascicule IV, p. 241–320. Libraire L. Ferrière, Chaumont.Google Scholar
Linder, R. A. 1987. Preferential selection of heavy minerals by fossil sand dollars. Sixth International Echinoderm Conference, Victoria, B.C., August 23–28, 1987, Program, with Abstracts.Google Scholar
Linder, R. A., and Durham, J. W. 1987. Paleobiogeographic importance of new mid-Tertiary echinoids from the Oregon northwestern Western Cascades. Sixth International Echinoderm Conference, Victoria, B.C., August 23–28, 1987, Program, with Abstracts.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, ed. 10, Vol. 1, Regnum Animale. Holmiae, 824 p.Google Scholar
Miller, P. R., and Orr, W. N. 1986. The Scotts Mills Formation: mid-Tertiary geologic history and paleogeography of the central Western Cascade Range, Oregon. Oregon Geology, 48:139–151.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Vokes, H. E., 1953. Lower Tertiary crinoids from northwestern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 233:113–143.Google Scholar
Morishita, A. 1955. Notes on Echinarachnius in Japan. Memoirs of the College of Science, University of Kyoto, ser. B, 22:223–236.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T. 1904. Danish Expedition to Siam 1899–1900. II. Echinoidea (I). Memoires de l' Academie Royale des Sciences et des Lettres de Danemark, Copenhague, 7 ser., Section des Sciences, VI, 1, 123 p.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T. 1935. A Monograph of the Echinoida (Bothriocidaroida, Melonechinoida, Lepidocentroida, and Stirodonta). C. A. Reitzel, Copenhagen, 2, 647 p.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T. 1942 New Echinoidea (Camarodonta). Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening i København, 106:225–232.Google Scholar
Nagao, T. 1928. Palaeogene fossils of the islands of Kyushu, Japan, Pt. 2. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University (Sendai, Japan), ser. 2, Geology, 12:11–140.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1935. On some fossil echinoids from northeastern Japan. Saito Ho-on Kai Mus Research Bulletin, 5:131–172.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1940. On the Japanese species of Echinarachnius, p. 803–832. In Jubilee Publication Commemoration of Professor H. Yabe's 60th Birthday. Published by “Yabekyoju Kanreki Kinen Kai.”Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1966. The echinoid fauna from Japan and adjacent regions, Pt. I. Palaeontological Society of Japan Special Papers, 11, 277 p.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1968. The echinoid fauna from Japan and adjacent regions, Pt. II. Palaeontological Society of Japan Special Papers, 13, 489 p.Google Scholar
Pomel, A. 1883. Classification méthodique et général des échinides vivants et fossils. Alger, 132 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, M. 1960. Two new species of Kewia from Japan. Transactions and Proceedings Palaeontological Society of Japan, N.S., 39:307–310.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1984. Echinoid Paleobiology. George Allen & Unwin, London, 190 p.Google Scholar
Troschel, F. H. 1872. Die Familie der Echinocidaren. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 1872:293–356.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. D. 1974. Fossil and Recent sand dollar echinoids of Alaska. Jounal of Paleontology, 48:105–123.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1942. Paleontology of the marine Tertiary formations of Oregon and Washington. University of Washington Publications in Geology, 5(1–3), 789 p.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A., Kaar, R. F., Durham, J. W., and Allison, E. C. 1964. The echinoid genus Salenia in the eastern Pacific. Palaeontology, 7:331–349.Google Scholar