Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T17:20:50.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Late Eocene mollusks from localized limestone deposits formed by subduction-related methane seeps, southwestern Washington

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Richard L. Squires  and
James L. Goedert
Richard L. Squires
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Northridge 91330 and 15207 84th Avenue Ct. NW, Gig Harbor, Washington 98335
James L. Goedert
Affiliation:
Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The trochid archaeogastropod Margarites (Pupillaria) columbiana n. sp., the mytilid bivalve Modiolus (Modiolus) willapaensis n. sp., and the vesicomyid bivalve Calyptogena chinookensis n. sp. are described from the earliest known fossil communities associated with subduction-related methane seeps. The communities are in very localized limestones of late middle to late Eocene age along the southwestern margin of Washington. These limestones contain large numbers of chemosynthetic bivalves and worm tubes, as well as other macrobenthos, that colonized around cool-temperature methane seeps along the landward slopes of an ancient subduction-zone complex.

Calyptogena chinookensis n. sp.is the earliest known species of this genus, which was previously known from Miocene to Recent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , May 1991 , pp. 412 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1856. The Genera of Recent Mollusca; Arranged According to Their Organization. Vol. 2. John Van Voorst, London, 661 p.Google Scholar
Armentrout, J. M. 1967. The Tarheel and Empire Formations—geology and paleontology of the type sections, Coos Bay, Oregon. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, 155 p.Google Scholar
Armentrout, J. M., Hull, D. A., Beaulieu, J. D., and Rau, W. W. 1983. Correlation of Cenozoic stratigraphic units of western Oregon and Washington. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Oil and Gas Investigation 7, 90 p.Google Scholar
Boss, K. J., and Turner, R. D. 1980. The giant white clam from the Galapagos Rift, Calyptogena magnifica species novum. Malacologia, 20:161–194.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. A. 1989. A Mio-Pliocene methane seep fauna and associated authigenic carbonates in shelf sediments of the Quinault Formation, SW Washington. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 21:A290.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1925. Pelecypoda from the marine Oligocene of western North America. University of California, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 15:69–136.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. L. 1798. Tableau elémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Baudoni, Paris, 247 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1891. On some new or interesting west American shells obtained from the dredgings of the U.S. Fish Commission steamer Albatross in 1888, and from other sources [Albatross Report]. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 14:173–191.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1909. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of the Pacific coast. I. The Miocene of Astoria and Coos Bay, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 59, 278 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H., and Simpson, C. T. 1901. The Mollusca of Porto Rico. U.S. Fisheries Commission Bulletin, 20:351–524.Google Scholar
Danner, W. R. 1966. Limestone resources of western Washington. Washington Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin, 52:1–474.Google Scholar
DeLise, K. C. 1967. Biostratigraphy of the San Emigdio Formation, Kern County, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 68:1–67.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1944. Megafaunal zones of the Oligocene of northwestern Washington. University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences Bulletin, 27:101–212.Google Scholar
Férussac, A. E. 1822. Tableaux Systématiques des Animaux Mollusques. Paris, 111 p.Google Scholar
Goedert, J. L., and Squires, R. L. 1990. Eocene deep-sea communities in localized limestones formed by subduction-related methane seeps, southwestern Washington. Geology, 18:1182–1185.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1849. On the shells collected by the United States Exploring Expedition. Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, 3:89–92.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. The classification of the British Mollusca by W. E. Leach, 1818. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20:267–273.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, J., Ohta, S., Tanaka, T., Hotta, H., Matsuzawa, S., and Sakai, H. 1989. Deep-sea communities dominated by the giant clam, Calyptogena soyoae, along the slope foot of Hatsushima Island, Sagami Bay, central Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 71:179–192.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. J. S. 1969. The Oligocene marine molluscan fauna of the Eugene Formation in Oregon. University of Oregon Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 16:1–112.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. J. S. 1980. Paleogene marine gastropods of the Keasey Formation in Oregon. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 78:1–112.Google Scholar
Horikoshi, M. 1989. Hinge structures, their variations and changes during growth, of some Japanese deep-sea, giant white clams, Calyptogena, collected during the “Kaiko” Project. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 71:137–160.Google Scholar
Kanno, S., Amano, K., and Ban, H. 1989. Calyptogena (Calyptogena) pacifica Dall (Bivalvia) from the Neogene System in the Joetsu District, Niigata Prefecture. Transactions of the Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new series, 153:25–35.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1958. Marine Shells of Tropical West America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 624 p.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1969. Family Vesicomyidae Dall, 1908, p. N664. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia, Vol. 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Kulm, L. D., Suess, E., Moore, J. C., Carson, B., Lewis, B. T., Ritger, S. D., Kadko, D. C., Thornburg, T. M., Embley, R. W., Rugh, W. D., Massoth, G. J., Langseth, M. G., Cochrane, G. R., and Scamman, R. L. 1986. Oregon subduction zone: venting, fauna, and carbonates. Science, 231:561–566.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris Mémoire, 1:63–91.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae. Editio decima, reformata, Regnum Animale, Vol. 1. Holmiae, 1,327 p.Google Scholar
Moore, E. J. 1983. Tertiary marine pelecypods of California and Baja California: Nuculidae through Malleidae. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1228-A, 108 p.Google Scholar
Niitsuma, N., Matsushima, Y., and Hirata, D. 1989. Abyssal molluscan colony of Calyptogena in the Pliocene strata of the Miura Peninsula, central Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 71:193–203.Google Scholar
Okada, H., and Bukry, D. 1980. Supplementary modification and introduction of code numbers to the low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation. Marine Micropaleontology, 5:321–325.Google Scholar
Okutani, T., and Métivier, B. 1986. Descriptions of three new species of vesicomyid bivalves collected by the submersible Nautile from abyssal depths off Honshu, Japan. Venus (Japanese Journal of Malacology), 45:147–160.Google Scholar
Phipps, C. J. 1774. A Voyage Towards the North Pole Undertaken by his Majesty's Command in 1773. London, 76 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature; ou, Tableau de l'Universe et des Corps Organisés. Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Rau, W. W. 1986. Geologic map of the Humptulips quadrangle and adjacent areas, Grays Harbor County, Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Geologic Map, GM-33, scale 1:62,500.Google Scholar
Scopoli, J. A. 1777. Introductio ad Historiam Naturalem Sistentes Genera Lapidium, Plantarum et Animum. Vol. 6. Prague, 506 p.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1867–1868. Cretaceous fauna of southern India. Vol. 2. Gastropoda. Palaeontologia Indica, ser. 5, 2:1–498.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II. Wissenschaftliche Evgebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition “Valdivia,” 17:35–382.Google Scholar
Wagner, H. C. 1967. Preliminary geologic map of the Raymond quadrangle, Pacific County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 67-265, scale 1:62,500.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1943. Paleontology of the marine Tertiary formations of Oregon and Washington. University of Washington, Publications in Geology, 5:1–789.Google Scholar
Wells, R. E. 1989. Geologic map of the Cape Disappointment–Naselle River area, Pacific and Wahkiakum Counties, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Map I-1832, scale 1:62,500.Google Scholar