Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:34:26.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new, large, Late Pleistocene demosponge from southeastern Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby  and
Kevin J. Cunningham
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, S-389 Eyring Science Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4606, USA,
Kevin J. Cunningham
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, 3110 SW 9th Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Spectacular exposures of large, upright, vase- to barrel-shaped, late Pleistocene sponges are dramatically exposed as part of the Miami Limestone along margins of the C-100C Canal in east-central Miami-Dade County, southeastern Florida. the discovery of this sponge reef by K. J. Cunningham was made in 2004, during a routine drive across the bridge above the C-100C Canal on S.W. 97th Avenue in Miami-Dade County, southeastern Florida. A second location, where comparable sponges are exposed in walls of a burrow lake, was also discovered by K. J. Cunningham in 2004 upon visiting the site after personal communication with L. Noblick, Montgomery Botanical Center, and S. Zona, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, about similarly shaped geologic structures. Subsequently, the C-100C Canal location was documented and some of the sponges were collected and thin sections and samples were sent to J. K. Rigby for examination and evaluation. This paper, on the description and possible taxonomy of the sponges, is a result of that joint effort.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 788 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, M. M. 1967. Carbonate sand bodies of Florida and the Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 37:556–591.Google Scholar
Bergquist, P. R. 1978. Sponges. Hutchinson, London, 268 p.Google Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N., and Van Beveren, M. 1982. Les Démosponges du plateau continental der Kerguelen-Heard. Comité national français des recherches antarctiques, 52:1–175.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M. W. 1936. A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular, and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication No. 467 (Papers of the Dry Tortugas Laboratory, v. 30), p. i–iii, 1-225.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M. W. 1949. Sponges of the western Bahamas. American Museum Novitates, no. 1431, 25 p.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M. W. 1953. Sponges of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 2(3):511–557.Google Scholar
Duchassaing de Fonbressin, P., and Michelotti, G. 1864. Spongiaires de la mer Caraïbe. Natuurkundige verhandelingen van de Hollandsche maatschalppij der wetenschappen te Haarlem, 21(2):1–124.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M., and Rigby, J. K. 2004. Paleozoic Demosponges, p. 9–274. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Halley, R. B., Shinn, E. A., Hudson, J. H., and Lidz, B. H. 1977. Pleistocene barrier bar seaward of ooid shoal complex near Miami Florida. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 61:519–526.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. S., Cooper, L. D., and Coniglio, M. 1984. Late Pleistocene carbonates of the Florida Keys, p. 291–306. In Carbonates in subsurface outcrop. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Core Conference. Calgary.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, J. E., Stockman, K. W., and Multer, H. G. 1967. Miami Limestone of Florida and its Recent Bahamian counterpart. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 79:175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. N. A., and Van Soest, R. W. M. 2002. Order Poecilosclerida Topsent, 1928, p. 403–408. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. Von. 1888. Descriptive catalogue of the sponges in the Australian Museum, Sydney. The Australian Museum. Taylor and Francis, London, 260 p.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. 1953. Sur une nouvelle classification des Démosponges. Académie des Sciences (Paris), Comptes Rendus de séances, 236:853–855.Google Scholar
Manconi, R., and Pronzato, R. 2002. Suborder Spongilla subord. nov.: Freshwater Sponges, p. 921–1019. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, E. A. 1900. Sponges—phylum Porifera, p. 107–147. In Lankaster, E. R. (ed.), A Treatise on Zoology, p. 2, The Porifera and Coelenterata. Adam and Charles Black, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Multer, H. G., Gischler, E., Lundberg, J., Simmons, K. R., and Shinn, E. A. 2002. Key Largo Limestone revisited: Pleistocene shelf-edge facies, Florida Keys, USA. Facies, 46:229–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R. D. 1977. Depositional framework of Pleistocene rocks in south Florida, p. 131–198. In Enos, Paul and Perkins, R. D. (eds.), Quaternary sedimentation in south Florida. Geological Society of America Memoir, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 427–446. In Encyclopaedia Brittanica (ninth edition). Adam and Charles Black, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Topsent, É. 1928. Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Mediterranée. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques du Prince Albert 1st de Monaco, 74:1–376.Google Scholar
Van Soest, R. W. M. 2002. Suborder Myxillina Hadju, Van Soest & Hooper, 1994, p. 515–520. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, R. W. M., and Hooper, J. N. A. 2002a. Order Haplosclerida Topsent, 1928, p. 831–832. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, R. W. M., and Hooper, J. N. A. 2002b. Suborder Haplosclerina Topsent, 1928, p. 833–834. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, R. W. M., and Hooper, J. N. A. 2002c. Suborder Petrosina Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren, 1982, p. 891–892. In Hooper, J. N. A. and Van Soest, R. W. M. (eds.), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of the Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedenmayer, F. 1977. Shallow-water sponges of the western Bahamas. Experientia (Supplementum), 28, 287 p.Google Scholar