Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:10:16.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New genera of Cenozoic muricid gastropods, with comments on the mode of formation of the labral tooth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Geerat J. Vermeij
Geerat J. Vermeij*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Center for Population Biology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of previously unstudied shell characters reveals the existence of three new genera of Cenozoic muricid neogastropods. These are the new genera Muregina (type species: Murex lugubris Broderip, 1833; ?early Miocene, Pliocene to Recent, eastern tropical Pacific); Kestocenebra (type species: Murex curvicosta Grateloup, 1840; early to late Miocene, Europe); and Edithais (type species: Concholepas drezi Vokes, 1972; early to late Miocene, circumtropical).

A review of muricids with a labral tooth (a ventrally directed projection on the outer lip) shows that this structure forms in several distinct ways. It may form at the end of an external groove (as in Muregina) or cord (as in Kestocenebra), grow continuously or discontinuously, and lie at positions ranging from the upper end of the siphonal canal to just below the middle of the outer lip. The labral tooth evidently evolved independently several times, often quite recently in genera such as Muregina, in which older representatives lack a labral tooth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 5 , September 1998 , pp. 855 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amano, K., Vermeij, G. J., and Narita, K. 1993. Early evolution and distribution of the gastropod genus Nucella, with special reference to Miocene species from Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan (new series), 171:237–248.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L. 1873. I molluschi del terreni Terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria. Parte 1: Cephalopoda, Pteropoda, Gasteropoda (Muricidae e Tritonidae). Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (serie 2), 27:33–294.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L., and Michelotti, G. 1841. Saggio orittografico sulla classe dei gasteropodi fossili dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (serie 2), 3:93–174.Google Scholar
Berry, S. S. 1959. Notices of new eastern Pacific Mollusca—III. Leaflets in Malacology, 1:107–114.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. 1970. Taxonomic position of Lippistes pehuensis Marwick with a review of the species of Concholepas (Gastropoda, Muricidae). Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 2:39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Maxwell, P. J. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 58, 518 p.Google Scholar
Blaineville, H. M. D. de. 1832. Disposition méthodique des espèces récentes et fossiles des genres Pourpre, Ricinule, Licorne, et Concholépas de M. de Lamarck, et description des espèces nouvelles ou peu connues, faisant partie de la collection de Muséum de'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle Paris, 1:189–263.Google Scholar
Broderip, W. J. 1833. Characters of new species of Mollusca and Conchifera, collected by Mr. Cuming. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for 1833:4–8.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1789. Encyclopédie méthodique. Histoire naturelle des vers. Paris, 344 p.Google Scholar
Bucquoy, D., Dautzenburg, P., and Dollfus, G. 1882. Les mollusques marins de Roussillon. Fasc. 1, Murex, et al. Paris, Baillière & Fils, 40 p.Google Scholar
Carrington, A. J., and Kennedy, B. F. 1969. Pleistocene molluscs from the Namaqualand coast. Annals of the South African Museum, 52:189–223.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1918. The San Lorenzo series of middle California: a stratigraphic and paleontologic study of the San Lorenzo Oligocene series of the general region of Mount Diablo, California. University of California Publications, Bulletins of the Department of Geology, 11:45–234.Google Scholar
Collins, T. M., Frazer, K., Palmer, A. R., Vermeij, G. J., and Brown, W. M. 1996. Evolutionary history of northern hemisphere Nucella (Gastropoda, Muricidae): molecular, morphological, ecological, and paleontological evidence. Evolution, 50:2287–2304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, T. A. 1837. Description of new marine shells from Upper California—collected by Thomas Nuttall, Esq. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7:227–268.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1863. Catalogue of the Miocene shells of the Atlantic slope. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 14:559–582.Google Scholar
Cooke, A. H. 1918. On the radula of the genus Acanthina, G. Fischer. Proceedings of the Malacological society of London, 13:6–11.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1903. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée, volume 5. Paris, 215 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M., and Peyrot, M. A. 1924. Conchologie néogènique de l'Aquitaine. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 75:71–144, 193-318.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1915. Notes of the species of the molluscan subgenus Nucella inhabiting the northwest coast of America and adjacent regions. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 49:557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, R. K., and Ponder, W. F. 1964. Some notes on the gastropod, Zelippistes benhami (Suter). Records of the Dominion Museum 5:63–72.Google Scholar
DeVries, T. J. 1995. Concholepas Lamarck, 1801 (Neogastropoda: Muricoidea): a Neogene genus native to South America. Veliger, 38:284–297.Google Scholar
DeVries, T. J. 1997. A review of the genus Chorus Gray, 1847 (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from western South America. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 30:125–145.Google Scholar
DeVries, T. J., and Vermeij, G. J. 1997. Herminespina: new genus of Neogene muricid gastropod from Peru and Chile. Journal of Paleontology, 71:610–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, W. K. 1959. The gastropod genus Pterorytis. American Museum Novitates, 1974:1–8.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J. 1927. A further commentary on New Zealand molluscan systematics. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 57:320–485.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1807. Muséum Démidoff ou catalogue systématique et raisonné des curiosités de la nature et de l'art…, part 3. Moscow, 339 p.Google Scholar
Fulton, H. C. 1917. Molluscan notes. III. 10. On the priority of Murex aduncus, Sow., over Murex falcatus, Sow. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 12:238.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. 1963. Les Muricacea et Buccinacea fossiles du Cénozoïque étranger des collections de L'Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique. L'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Mémoires, Deuxième Série, 74, 179 p.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima tertia. Lipsiae:3021–3910.Google Scholar
GrateloupJ. P. S., de J. P. S., de. 1840. Atlas 1, Univalves. Actes de la Société Linéenne de Bordeaux, Atlas:1–20, 45 plates.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1853. On the division of ctenobranchous gasteropodous Mollusca into larger groups and families. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (2), 11:124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmannsen, A. N. 1846. Indicis generum malakozoorum…, Volume 1. Cassellis, 637 p.Google Scholar
Hoernes, M. 1853. Die fossilen Mollusken von Wien. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichs-Anstalt, 3:209–296.Google Scholar
Hoernes, M., and Auinger, M. 1885. Die Gasteropoden der Meeres-Ablagerungen der ersten und zweiten Miocän Mediterran-Stufe in der Osterreichisch-Ungarischen Monarchie. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichs-Anstalt, 12:193–232.Google Scholar
Houart, R. 1992. The genus Chicoreus and related genera (Gastropoda: Muricidae) in the Indo-West Pacific. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (A, Zoologie), 154, 188 p.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, F. P. 1880. Division méthodique de la famille des Purpuridae. Le Naturaliste, Journal des Échanges et des Nouvelles, 2(42):335–336.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971. Seashells of tropical West America. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, 1064 p.Google Scholar
Kool, S. P. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rapaninae (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). Malacologia, 35:155–259.Google Scholar
LamarckJ. B. P. A., de J. B. P. A., de. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres. Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
LamarckJ. B. P. A., de J. B. P. A., de. 1816. Tableau encyclopédique des trois règnes de la nature. Vingt-troisième partie. Mollusques et polypes divers. Paris, Madame Veuve Agasse:391–488.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, ed. 10, volume 1. Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1926. New Tertiary Mollusca from North Taranaki. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 56:317–331.Google Scholar
Michelotti, G. 1841. Monografia del genere Murex ossia enumerazione delle principali specie dei terreni sopracretacei dell'Italia. Vicenza, Italy, Tipografia Tremeschin, 27 p.Google Scholar
Montfort, P. D. 1810. Conchyliogie systématique. Paris, 676 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1964. Neogene Mollusks from Northwestern Ecuador. Ithaca, New York, Palontological Research Institute, 256 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A., and Harbison, A. 1953. Pliocene Mollusca of southern Florida with specieal reference to those from North Saint Petersburg. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Monograph 8, 457 p.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1834-47. Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale, Mollusques. Volume 5, pt. 3. Paris, 758 p. (reference from Keen, 1971).Google Scholar
Perry, G. 1810. Arcana, or the Museum of Natural History; Containing the Most Recent Discovered Objects …. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G. 1811. Conchology, or the Natural History of Shells: Containing a New Arrangement of the Genera and Species, Illustrated by Coloured Engravings Executed from the Natural Specimens, and Including the Latest Discoveries. London, W. Miller.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1988a. Neogene History of Tropical American Mollusks: Biogeography and Evolutionary Patterns of Tropical Western Atlantic Mollusca. Charlottesville, Virginia, Coastal Education and Research Foundation, 217 p.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1988b. New gastropods from the Maryland Miocene. Bulletin of Paleomalacology, 1:69–82.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., and Vokes, E. H. 1988. A revision of the Indo-West Pacific fossil and Recent species of Murex s.s. and Haustellum (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement B 160 p.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1934. Upper Pliocene fossils from Cape Runaway. Records of the Australian Institute and Museum, 1:261–274.Google Scholar
Pusch, G. G. 1837. Polens Pälentologie: oder, Abbildung und Beschreibung der vorzuglichsten und der noch unbeschriebenen Petrefakten aus den Gebirgsformationen in Polen, Volhynien und den Karpathen nebst einigen allgemeinen Beitragen …. Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart's Verlagshandlung, 218 p.Google Scholar
Radwin, G. E., and D'Attilio, A. 1976. Murex Shells of the World. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, 284 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1814. Analyse de la nature, ou, Tableau de l'univers et des corps organisés. Palerme, Aux depens de l'auteur, 1815.Google Scholar
Rambur, P. 1862. Diagnose d'un Concholepas fossile des Faluns de Touraine. Journal de Conchyliologie, 10:86.Google Scholar
Récluz, M. C. 1851. Description de quelques coquille nouvelles. Journal de Conchyliologie, 2:194–216.Google Scholar
Röding, J. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum …. Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Sieber, R. 1958. Systematische Übersicht der Jungtertiären Gastropoden des Wiener Beckens. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 62:123–192.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1821. The Genera of Recent and Fossil Shells. Volume 1(1821-25). London (reference from Keen, 1971).Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1834-1841. The Conchological Illustrations, Murex. London, Sowerby (reference from Houart, 1992).Google Scholar
Suter, H. 1902. Description of a new species of Separatista from New Zealand. Journal of Malacology, 9:65–66.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology; or the Natural Classification of Shells and shellfish. London, Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 416 p.Google Scholar
Tate, R. 1894. Unrecorded genera of the older Tertiary of Australia including diagnoses of some new genera and species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 27:167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournouër, R. 1875. Étude sur quelques espèces de Murex fossiles du falun de Pontlevoy, en Touraine. Journal de Conchyliologie, 23:144–167.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. 1880. Manual of Conchology, volume 2, Muricidae, Purpuridae. Privately published, 289 pp.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1993. Spinucella, a new genus of Miocene to Pleistocene muricid gastropods from the eastern Atlantic. Contributions to Tertiary and Quaternary Geology, 30:19–27.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Houart, R. 1996. The genus Jaton (Muricidae, Ocenebrinae), with the description of a new species from Angola, West Africa. Iberus, 14:83–91.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Kool, S. P. 1994. Evolution of labral spines in Acanthais, new genus, and other rapanine muricid gastropods. Veliger, 37:414–424.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Vokes, E. H. 1997. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic region. Part XII—The subfamily Ocenebrinae (in part). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology 29:69–118.Google Scholar
Vignon, P. 1931. Les dents du labre et les rapports qu'elles nouent avec les sillons, les cordons et les varices chez les gastéropodes. Journal de Conchyliologie, 75:242–272.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1963. Notes on Cenozoic Muricidae from the western Atlantic region, with descriptions of new taxa. Tulane Studies in Geology, 1:151–163.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1971. Catalogue of the genus Murex Linné (Mollusca: Gastropoda); Muricinae, Ocenebrinae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 61, 141 p.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1972. Notes on the fauna of the Chipola Formation. Part—VII. On the occurrence of the genus Concholepas (Gastropoda: Thaididae), with the description of a new species. Tulane Studies in Geology an. Paleontology, 10:31–33.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1988. Muricidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of the Esmeraldas beds, northwestern Ecuador. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 21:1–50.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1990. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic region. Part VIII—Murex s.s., Haustellum, Chicoreus, and Hexaplex; additions and corrections. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 23, 96 p.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1992. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic region. Part IX—Pterynotus, Poirieria, Aspella, Dermomurex, Calotrophon, Acantholabia, and Attiliosa; additions and corrections. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 25, 108 p.Google Scholar
Watters, W. A., and Fleming, C. A. 1972. Contributions to the geology and palaeontology of Chiloe Island, southern Chile. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London (B), 263:369–408.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1959. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama: description of Tertiary mollusks (gastropods: Vermetidae to Thaididae. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 306-B, 239 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar