Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:49:34.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New bivalve taxa from the Tucumcari Formation (Cretaceous, Albian), New Mexico, and the biostratigraphic significance of the basal Tucumcari fauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Barry S. Kues
Barry S. Kues*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131-1116
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Basal strata of the Tucumcari Formation south of San Jon, New Mexico, contain a bivalve assemblage different from that of the remainder of the formation. Ceratostreon texanum and two new species herein described (Gyrostrea hinchada, Plicatula quayensis) are the dominant faunal elements of these basal strata. A fourth bivalve, long known as Lopha quadriplicata, ranges downward approximately to the upper limit of C. texanum. However, reevaluation of the taxonomy of this and related species indicates that 1) they have little in common with typical representatives of Lopha and are grouped in a new genus, Peilinia, and 2) specimens from the Tucumcari and related formations formerly assigned to L. quadriplicata are a separate new species, P. levicostata, which appeared in the southern Western Interior before P. quadriplicata appeared in eastern Texas and Oklahoma. The biostratigraphic ranges of several widely distributed bivalves are utilized with ammonite range zones to refine the correlation of several southern Western Interior sequences with the classic lower Washita sequence of Texas and Oklahoma. Because ammonites are rare in the western area, bivalves are locally more important in establishing the age of some exposures. For example, the boundary between or slight overlap of the successive zones of C. texanum and P. levicostata in eastern New Mexico and west-central Texas marks the position of the Craginites serratescens ammonite zone to the east. Strata previously called Kiamichi and Duck Creek in west-central Texas are best considered part of the Tucumcari Formation, representing deposition that occurred mainly earlier than the main Tucumcari sequence in New Mexico.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 5 , September 1997 , pp. 820 - 839
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1918. The Weno and Pawpaw formations of the Texas Comanchean. University of Texas Bulletin, 1856:1–172.Google Scholar
Adkins, W. S. 1928. Handbook of Texas Cretaceous fossils. University of Texas Bulletin, 2838:1–385.Google Scholar
Ash, S. R., and Clebsch, A. Jr. 1961. Cretaceous rocks in Lea County, New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 424-D:D139–D142.Google Scholar
Bishop, B. A. 1967. Stratigraphic study of the Kiamichi Formation of the Lower Cretaceous of Texas. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:159–180.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1910. Monografía geológica y paleontológica del Cerro de Muleros cerca de Ciudad Juárez, Estado de Chihuahua, y descripcion de la fauna cretácea de la Encantada, placer de Guadalupe, Estado de Chihuahua. Instituto Geológico de México Boletin, 25:1–193.Google Scholar
Brand, J. P. 1953. Cretaceous of Llano Estacado of Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas at Austin Report of Investigations, 20:1–59.Google Scholar
Brand, J. P., and Mattox, R. B. 1972. Pre-Dakota Cretaceous formations in northwestern Texas and northeastern New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 23:98–104.Google Scholar
Bullard, F. M. 1926. Geology of Marshall County Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geology Survey Bulletin, 39:1–101.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1977. Characteristic marine molluscan fossils from the Dakota Sandstone and intertongued Mancos Shale, west–central New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1009:1–30.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1985. The Lower Cretaceous ammonite Schloenbachia leonensis Conrad var. equidistans Cragin. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1641-A:1–4.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1987. An ammonoid fauna from the Glencairn Shale Member of the Lower Cretaceous Purgatoire Formation, Baca County, Colorado, New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 38:217–222.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A., Merewether, E. A., Fouch, T. D., and Obradovich, J. D. 1994. Some Cretaceous shorelines in the Western Interior of the United States, p. 393–413. In Caputo, M. V., Peterson, J. A., and Franczyk, K. J. (eds.), Mesozoic Systems of the Rocky Mountain Region, USA, Rocky Mountain Section, SEPM.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1857. Description of Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils, p. 141–174. In Emory, W. H., Report on the United States and Mexican boundary survey, Volume I, 34th Congress, 1st Session, Executive Document 108.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., et al. 1969. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Volumes 1, 2, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, p. N1–N952.Google Scholar
Cragin, F. W. 1893. A contribution to the invertebrate paleontology of the Texas Cretaceous. Geological Survey of Texas, Annual Report, 4:139–296.Google Scholar
Cragin, F. W. 1894. New and little-known Invertebrata from the Neocomian of Kansas. American Geologist, 14:1–12.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. W. 1967. Georgetown Limestone, central Texas, including discussion of Kingena wacoensis. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:240–255.Google Scholar
Dobrovolny, E., Bates, R. L., and Summerson, C. H. 1946. Geology of Northwestern Quay County, New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Preliminary Map 62.Google Scholar
Dyman, T. S., Merewether, E. A., Molenaar, C. M., Cobban, W. A., Obradovich, J. D., Weimer, R. J., and Bryant, W. A. 1994. Stratigraphic transects for Cretaceous rocks, Rocky Mountains and Great Plains Regions, p. 365–391. In Caputo, M. V., Peterson, J. A. and Franczyk, K. J. (eds.), Mesozoic Systems of the Rocky Mountain Region, U.S.A. Rocky Mountain Section SEPM.Google Scholar
Fallin, J. A. T. 1988. Hydrogeology of Lower Cretaceous strata under the southern High Plains of New Mexico. New Mexico Geology, 10:6–9.Google Scholar
Fallin, J. A. T. 1989. Hydrogeology of Lower Cretaceous strata under the southern High Plains of Texas and New Mexico. Texas Waste Development Board Report, 314:1–39.Google Scholar
Ferussac, A. E. De. 1822. Tableaux systématiques des animaux mollusques. Paris and London, 111 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. L., and Rodda, P. U. 1969. Edwards Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Texas: dolomitization in a carbonate platform system. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 53:55–72.Google Scholar
Frost, J. G. 1967. The Edwards Limestone of central Texas, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:133–156.Google Scholar
Harry, H. W. 1985. Synopsis of the supraspecific classification of living oysters (Bivalvia: Gryphaeidae and Ostreidae). Veliger, 28:121–158.Google Scholar
Hill, R. T. 1895. On outlying areas of the Comanche Series in Kansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. American Journal of Science, series 3, 50:205–234.Google Scholar
Holbrook, J. M., and Dunbar, R. W. 1992. Depositional history of Lower Cretaceous strata in northeastern New Mexico: implications for regional tectonics and depositional sequences. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 104:802–813.Google Scholar
Huffman, G. G., Alfonsi, P. P., Dalton, R. C., Duarte-Vivas, A., and Jeffries, E. L. 1975. Geology and mineral resources of Choctaw County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 120:1–39.Google Scholar
Huffman, G. G., Hart, T. A., Olson, L. J., Currier, J. D., and Ganser, R. W. 1978. Geology and mineral resources of Bryan County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 126:1–113.Google Scholar
Huffman, G. G., Bridges, K. F., Ganser, R. W., Holtzman, A. M. Jr., and Merritt, M. L. 1987. Geology and mineral resources of Marshall County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 142:1–126.Google Scholar
Jacka, A. D., and Brand, J. P. 1973. The San Jon section of the Tucumcari Shale, Mesa Rica Sandstone, and Pajarito Shale, p. 44–48. In Phillips, K. A. (ed.), Guidebook of interpretation of depositional environments from selected exposures of Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks in north–central New Mexico. Panhandle Geological Society, Amarillo, Texas.Google Scholar
Jones, T. S. 1938. Geology of Sierra de la Pena and paleontology of the Indidura Formation, Coahuila, Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 49:69–149.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1965. Middle and late Turonian oysters of the Lopha lugubris group: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 148(6):1–92.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important Cretaceous macrofossils, Western Interior basin, U.S.A. The Mountain Geologist, 14:225–274.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1984. Paleobiogeography and evolutionary response dynamic in the Cretaceous Western Interior seaway of North America. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 27:273–306.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., and Caldwell, W. G. A. 1993. The Western Interior basin in space and time, p. 1–30. In Caldwell, W. G. E. and Kauffman, E. G. (eds.), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 39.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., Sageman, B. B., Kirkland, J. I., Elder, W. P., Harries, P. J., and Villamil, T. 1993. Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous Western Interior basin, North America, p. 397–434. In Caldwell, W. G. E. and Kauffman, E. G. (eds.), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 39.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Wright, C. W., and Chancellor, G. R. 1983. The Cretaceous ammonite Eopachydiscus and the origin of the Pachydiscidae. Palaeontology, 26:655–662.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1986a. Paleontology and correlation of a Lower Cretaceous (Albian) outlier in Roosevelt County, New Mexico Geology, 8:88–94.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1986b. Fossils from the Mesa Rica Sandstone(?) of Cuervo Hill, Guadalupe County, New Mexico. New Mexico Geology, 8:23.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy and variability of three Texigryphaea (Bivalvia) species from their Lower Cretaceous (Albian) type localities in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 63:454–483.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S., and Lucas, S. G. 1987. Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleontology in the Dry Cimarron Valley, New Mexico, Colorado and Oklahoma. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 38:167–198.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S., and Lucas, S. G. 1993. Stratigraphy, paleontology and correlation of Lower Cretaceous exposures in southeastern New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook 44:245–260.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S., Lucas., S. G., Kietzke, K., and Mateer, N. J. 1985. Synopsis of Tucumcari Shale, Mesa Rica Sandstone and Pajarito Shale paleontology, Cretaceous of east–central New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 36:261–281.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. A. P. M. De. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres, ou tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux [edit. 1]. Deterville, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Lang, W. B. 1947. Occurrence of Comanche rocks in Black River Valley, New Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 31:1472–1478.Google Scholar
Lucas, S. G. 1991. Cretaceous Dakota Group outlier, Sacramento Mountains, Otero County, New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 42:261–264.Google Scholar
Lucas, S. G., and Kisucky, M. J. 1988. Type and reference section of the Tucumcari, Mesa Rica and Pajarito Formations, Cretaceous of east–central New Mexico. New Mexico Geology, 10:82–89.Google Scholar
Malchus, N. 1990. Revisions der Kreide-Austern (Bivalvia: Pteriomorpha) Ägyptens (Biostratigraphic, Systematik). Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A, 125:1–231.Google Scholar
McGill, D. W. 1967. Washita Formations, north Texas, correlated to Georgetown Limestone, central Texas. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:219–239.Google Scholar
Mirkamalov, K. K. 1963. Klassifikatsiya ekzogir. Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Pirody Byulletin, new series, v. 68, Otdel Geologiyan 38:152–153.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, 2206:1–25.Google Scholar
Obradovich, J. D. 1993. A Cretaceous time scale, p. 379–396. In Caldwell, W. G. E. and Kauffman, E. G. (eds.), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 39.Google Scholar
Perkins, B. F. 1960. Biostratigraphic studies in the Comanche (Cretaceous) Series of northern Mexico and Texas. Geological Society of America Memoir, 83:1–138.Google Scholar
Plummer, H. J. 1931. Some Cretaceous Foraminifera in Texas. The University of Texas Bulletin, 3101:109–203, 220-235.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature. Palermo, 225 p.Google Scholar
Rose, P. R. 1972. Edwards Group, surface and subsurface, central Texas. University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 74, 198 p.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1970a. Paleoecology and paleontology of the Lower Cretaceous Kiowa Formation, Kansas. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 52 (Cretaceous 1), 94 p.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1970b. Stratigraphy and sedimentary environments of Lower Cretaceous rocks, Southern Western Interior. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 54:1225–1244.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1974. Bay and shoreface benthic communities in the Lower Cretaceous. Lethaia, 7:315–330.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1975. Patterns of Early Cretaceous molluscan diversity gradients in south-central United States. Lethaia, 8:241–252.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1977. Early Cretaceous environments and paleocommunities in the Southern Western Interior. The Mountain Geologist, 14:155–168.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1986. Biogeographic influences on Early Cretaceous paleocommunities, Western Interior. Journal of Paleontology, 60:197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. W., Fee, D., Magee, R., and Laall, H. 1978. Epeiric depositional models for the Lower Cretaceous Washita Group, north–central Texas. The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 94, 23 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1860. Descriptions of new Cretaceous fossils from Texas. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis, 1:590–610.Google Scholar
Slocki, S. F. 1967. Physical stratigraphy of the Georgetown Limestone equivalents in Tarrant, Denton, and Cooke Counties, Texas. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:183–216.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1947. Studies of some Comanche pelecypods and gastropods. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 211:1–256.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W., and Vaughan, T. W. 1896. Sections of the Cretaceous of El Paso, Texas. American Journal of Science (4), 1:21–26.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1952. Larger invertebrate fossils of the Woodbine Formation (Cenomanian) of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 242:1–226.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1971. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Volume 3, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, p. N953–N1224.Google Scholar
Strain, W. S. 1976. Appendix 2—New formation names in the Cretaceous at Cerro de Cristo Rey, Doña Ana County, New Mexico, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir, 31:77–82.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. M. 1954. The genera of oysters and Australian species. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5:132–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenhofel, W. J. 1924. The geology and invertebrate paleontology of the Comanchean and “Dakota” formations of Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 9:1–128.Google Scholar
Watson, H. 1930. On the anatomy and affinities of Plicatula. Malacological Society of London Proceedings, 19:25–30.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1879. Contribution to invertebrate paleontology, No. 1. Cretaceous fossils of the western states and territories. Report of the U.S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, 11th Annual Report, p. 273–319.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1884. A review of the fossil Ostreidae of North America. U.S. Geological Survey, 4th Annual Report, p. 273–431.Google Scholar
Winton, W. M. 1925. The geology of Denton County. The University of Texas Bulletin, 2544:1–86.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1966. Texas Mojsisovicziinae (Ammonoidea) and the zonation of the Fredericksburg. Geological Society of America, Memoir, 100:1–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K. 1967. Ammonite zonations, Texas Comanchean (Lower Cretaceous). Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Permian Basin Section Publication, 67-8:65–70.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1979. Early Cenomanian and late Albian (Cretaceous) ammonites, especially Lyelliceridae, of Texas and Mexico. University of Texas at Austin, Texas Memorial Museum Bulletin, 26:1–99.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1982. Cretaceous rocks of central Texas—biostratigraphy and lithostratigraphy, p. 111–126. In Maddocks, R. (ed.), Texas Ostracoda, guidebook of excursions and related papers for Eighth International Symposium on Ostracoda. Department of Geosciences, University of Houston.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1986a. Cretaceous marine inundations of the San Marcos Platform, Texas. Cretaceous Research, 7:117–140.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1986b. The Albian-Cenomanian (Lower Cretaceous-Upper Cretaceous) boundary in Texas and northern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 60:1212–1219.Google Scholar
Young, K., and Powell, J. D. 1977. Late-Albian–Turonian correlations in Texas and Mexico. Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice, Tome, 25:1–36.Google Scholar