Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:58:03.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multicellular Alga with Exceptional Preservation from the Ediacaran of Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Stephen M. Rowland  and
Margarita G. Rodriguez
Stephen M. Rowland
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USA, ; and
Margarita G. Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USA, ; and
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elainabella deepspringensis new genus new species is a one-mm-wide, non-biomineralized, three-dimensionally preserved fossil with segmented branches and apparent cellular structure. A single specimen was recovered from an interval of black shale within the Ediacaran portion of the Esmeralda Member of the Deep Spring Formation at Mt. Dunfee in Esmeralda County, Nevada. We interpret the fossil to be the thallus of a multicellular alga of uncertain division. EDS spectral analysis indicates that the exceptional preservation is not due to phosphatization or pyritization. Rather, it appears to be a case of Burgess Shale-type preservation, involving the kerogenization of non-mineralizing organisms. The fossil-bearing shale is closely associated with stromatolites, and we suggest that E. deepspringensis may have been an epibiont on stromatolites or other firm substrates. This is the first multicellular alga and the first occurrence of Burgess Shale-type preservation reported from the Ediacaran of Laurentia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 263 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S. Y., Babcock, L. E., and Hollingsworth, J. S. 2011. Revised stratigraphic nomenclature for parts of the Ediacaran–Cambrian Series 2 succession in the southern Great Basin, U.S.A. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 42:105–114.Google Scholar
Antcliffe, J. B., Gooday, A. J., and Brasier, M. D. 2011. Testing the protozoan hypothesis for Ediacaran fossils: A developmental analysis of Palaeopascichnus . Palaeontology, 54:1,157–1,175.Google Scholar
Bold, H. C. and Wynne, M. J. 1985. Introduction to the Algae: Structure and Reproduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 720 p.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 2003. Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian explosion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43:166–177.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N.J., Knoll, A. H., and Swett, K. 1988. Exceptional preservation of fossils in an upper Proterozoic shale. Nature, 334:424–427.Google Scholar
Cai, Y. and Hua, H. 2007. Pyritization in the Gaojiashan biota. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52:645–650.Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Schiffbauer, J. D., Hua, H., and Xiao, S. 2012. Preservational modes in the Ediacaran Gaojiashan Lagerstätte: pyrtitization, aluminosilicification, and carbonaceous compression. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 326–328:109–117.Google Scholar
Corsetti, F. A. and Hagadorn, J. W. 2000. The Precambrian–Cambrian transition: Death Valley, United States. Geology, 28:299–302.Google Scholar
Corsetti, F. A. and Hagadorn, J. W. 2003. The Precambrian–Cambrian transition in the Southern Great Basin, USA. The Sedimentary Record, 1:4–8.Google Scholar
Corsetti, F. A. and Kaufman, A. J. 1994. Chemostratigraphy of Neoproterozoic–Cambrian units, White-Inyo region, eastern California and western Nevada: implications for global correlation and faunal distribution. Palaios, 9:211–219.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Kennedy, M. J., and Droser, M. L. 2005. A new hypothesis for organic preservation of Burgess Shale taxa in the middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation, House Range, Utah. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeocology, 220:193–205.Google Scholar
Gevirtzman, D. A. and Mount, J. F. 1986. Paleoenvironments of an earliest Cambrian (Tommotian) shelly fauna in the southwestern Great Basin, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 56:412–421.Google Scholar
Grant, S. W. F. 1990. Shell structure and distribution of Cloudina, a potential index fossil for the terminal Proterozoic. American Journal of Science, 290A:261–294.Google Scholar
Grotzinger, J. P., Bowring, S. A., Saylor, B. Z., and Kaufman, A. J. 1995. Biostratigraphic and geochronologic constraints on early animal evolution. Science, 270:598–604.Google Scholar
Hagadorn, J. W. and Waggoner, B. 2000. Ediacaran fossils from the southwestern Great Basin, United States. Journal of Paleontology, 74:349–359.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. and Aitken, J. D. 1979. Precambrian biota from the Little Dal Group, Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 16:150–166.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H. 1961. Limestone-building algae and algal limestones. Colorado School of Mines, Boulder, Colorado, 297 p.Google Scholar
Lee, R. E. 1999. Phycology, 3/e. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 614 p.Google Scholar
Margulis, L. and Chapman, M. J. 2009. Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth, 4/e. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 659 p.Google Scholar
Mount, J. F., Gevirtzman, D. A., and Signor, P. W. III. 1983. Precambrian–Cambrian transition problem in western North America: Part I. Tommotian fauna in the southwestern Great Basin and its implications for the base of the Cambrian System. Geology, 11:224–226.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. K. and Rowland, S. M. 2002. Microbiolite reefs at the close of the Proterozoic Eon: the Middle Member Deep Spring Formation at Mt. Dunfee, Nevada, p. 97–118. In Corsetti, F. A. (ed.), Proterozoic–Cambrian of the Great Basin and beyond. The Pacific Section SEPM, Book 93, Fullerton, California.Google Scholar
Parsons, S. M. 1996. Sequence stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the lower member of the Deep Spring Formation: implications for the Neoproterozoic–Cambrian boundary in the Basin and Range Province, western United States. MS thesis, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 181 p.Google Scholar
Raven, P. H., Evert, R. F., and Eichhorn, S. E. 1999. Biology of Plants, 6/e. New York, W. H. Freeman, 944 p.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. M. and Corsetti, F. A. 2002. A brief history of research on the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary of the southern Great Basin, p. 79–85. In Corsetti, F. A. (ed.), Proterozoic–Cambrian of the Great Basin and Beyond. The Pacific Section SEPM, Book 93, Fullerton, California.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. M., Oliver, L. K., and Hicks, M. 2008. Ediacaran and early Cambrian reefs of Esmeralda County, Nevada: non-congruent communities within congruent ecosystems across the Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic boundary, p. 83–100. In Duebendorfer, E. M. and Smith, E. I. (eds.), Field Guide to Plutons, Volcanoes, Faults, Reefs, Dinosaurs, and Possible Glaciation in Selected Areas of Arizona, California, and Nevada: Geological Society of America Field Guide 11, doi:10.1130/2008.fld01(04).Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III, McMenamin, M. A. S., Gevirtzman, D. A., and Mount, J. F. 1983. Two new pre-trilobite faunas from North America. Nature, 303:415–418.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III, Mount, J. F., and Onken, B. R. 1987. A pre-trilobite shelly fauna from the White-Inyo region of eastern California and western Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 61:425–438.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. H. 1970. Upper Precambrian and lower Cambrian strata of the southern Great Basin, California and Nevada. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 620, 206 p.Google Scholar
Waggoner, B. and Hagadorn, J. W. 2002. New fossils from terminal Neoproterozoic strata of Southern Nye County, Nevada, p. 87–96. In Corsetti, F. A. (ed.), Proterozoic–Cambrian of the Great Basin and Beyond. The Pacific Section SEPM, Book 93, Fullerton, California. Shan Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Zhang, Y., and Knoll, A. H. 1998. Three-dimensional preservation of algae and animal embryos in a Neoproterozoic phosphorite. Nature, 391:553–558.Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Yuan, X., Steiner, M., and Knoll, A. H. 2002. Macroscopic carbonaceous compressions in a terminal Proterozoic shale: a systematic reassessment of the Miaohe biota, South China. Journal of Paleontology, 76:347–376.Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Knoll, A. H., Yuan, X., and Pueschel, C. M. 2004. Phosphatized multicellular algae in the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China, and the early evolution of florideophyte red algae. American Journal of Botany, 91:214–227.Google Scholar
Yuan, X., LI, J., and Cao, R. 1999 A diverse metaphyte assemblage from the Neoproterozoic black shales of South China. Lethaia, 32:143–155.Google Scholar
Zhu, M., Babcock, L.E., and Peng, S. 2006. Advances in Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology: integrating correlation techniques, paleobiology, taphonomy and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeoworld, 15:217–222.Google Scholar