Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:36:12.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology, phylogeny, and systematic revision of genera in the Dimyidae (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Pteriomorphia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Thomas R. Waller
Thomas R. Waller*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences in the mineralogy of hinge teeth and inner shell layers in the family Dimyidae form the basis for a revision of genera. The stem genus Atreta (Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous) has aragonitic denticulate hinge teeth on the right valve articulating with pitted sockets on the left valve. The same arrangement is present in Neoatreta n. gen. (Paleocene? Miocene to Recent) but with the appearance of extensive calcitic overarching of the resilifer. In Dimyella (Eocene to Recent), aragonitic teeth and sockets are still present but are modified into hook shaped denticulate teeth with corresponding sockets. All three of these genera have inner aragonitic crossed-lamellar shell layers that extend well outside the pallial line. In contrast, Dimya (Eocene to Recent) and Basiliomya (Pliocene to Recent) comprise a second clade in which aragonitic hinge teeth are absent and hinge articulation is calcitic, derived from the calcitic rim. Dimya has only weak hinge articulation and has an aragonitic inner shell layer delimited by the pallial line; in Basiliomya calcitic hinge teeth are more prominent and the entire inner shell layer inside the pallial line is foliated calcite. Diploschiza (Cretaceous, Albian to Maastrichtian), here reinstated from synonymy with Atreta, is probably a precursor of the Dimya-Basiliomya clade based on incipient calcitic hinge teeth. Predation pressures probably drove the evolution of this cemented family from its original habitat on hardgrounds in moderately deep water into much greater depths or into cryptic habitats, including submarine caves.

New combinations are Dimyella malnatrensis (Corselli and Bernocchi), D. molokaia (Dall, Bartsch, and Rehder), D. similis (v. Koenen), Neoatreta dissimilis (Tate), N. filipina (Bartsch), N. kaiparaensis (Laws), N. phaidra (Woodring), and N. plana (Martin).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 86 , Issue 5 , September 2012 , pp. 829 - 851
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. and Adams, A. 1853–1858. The Genera of Recent Mollusca, Arranged According to their Organization. J. Van Voorst, London, 1 (1853–1854):484p.; 2(1854–1858):661 p.; 3(1858):136 pls.Google Scholar
d'Archiac, A. 1850. Description des fossiles du groupe Nummulitique recueillis par M. S. P. Pratt et M. J. Delbos aux environs de Bayonne et de Dax. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Series 2, 3:397–456.Google Scholar
Aubry, M-P. and Berggren, W. A. 1999. Appendix 1. Newest Biostratigraphy, p. 38–40. InCollins, L. S. and Coates, A. G.(eds.), A paleobiotic survey of Caribbean faunas from the Neogene of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 357.Google Scholar
Bartsch, P. 1913. The Philippine mollusks of the genus Dimya. Proceedings of the U. S. National Museum, 45 (1983):305–307.Google Scholar
Bayer, F. M. 1971. New and unusual mollusks collected by R/V John Elliott: Pillsbury and R/V Gerda in the tropical western Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science, 21:111–236.Google Scholar
Berry, S. S. 1936. A new Dimya from California. Proceedings of the Malacological Society, 22:126–128.Google Scholar
Berry, S. S. 1944. A second Californian Dimya. Proceedings of the Malacological Society, 26:25–26.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. and Darragh, T. A. 2001. Revision of southern Australian Cenozoic fossil Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 113:1–205.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1944. Beiträge zur Stammesgeschichte der Muscheln. Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Abtreilung der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, 1–2:133–145.Google Scholar
Bittner, A. 1895. Lamellibranchiaten der Alpinen Trias. I: Revision der Lamellibranchiaten von Sct. Cassian. Abhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt (Wien), 18:1–235.Google Scholar
Boss, K. J. 1982. Mollusca, p. 945–1166. InParker, S. P.(ed.), Synopsis and Classification of the Animal Kingdom. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Cairns, S. D. and Wells, J. W. 1987. Neogene paleontology in the northern Dominican Republic. 5. The suborders Caryophyllina and Dendrophyllina (Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Bulletins of American Paleontology, 93 (328):23–43.Google Scholar
Calzada, S. and Astibia, H. 1996. Sobre Plicatula pamplonensis Carez: revisión. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 132:65–69.Google Scholar
Carez, L. 1881. Étude des terrains crétacés et tertiares du nord de l'Espagne. Libraire Savy, Paris, 327p.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R. 1996. The shell and ligament, p. 75–168. InKennedy, V. S., Newell, R. I. E., and Eble, A. F.(eds.), The Eastern Oyster . Maryland Sea Grant College, University of Maryland System, College Park.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R. and Palmer, R. E. 1979. A new mineralized layer in the hinge of the oyster. Science, 206:691–693.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1980. Environmental and biological controls of bivalve shell mineralogy and microstructure, p. 69–113. InRhoads, D. C. and Lutz, R. A.(eds.), Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1990. Evolutionary significance of shell microstructure in the Palaeotaxodonta, Pteriomorphia and Isofilibranchia (Bivalvia: Mollusca), p. 135–296. InCarter, J. G.(ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. and Lutz, R. A. 1990. Part 2, Bivalvia (Mollusca), p. 5–28. InCarter, J. G.(ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Vol. II, Atlas and Index. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Checa, A. G., Esteban-Delgado, F. J., and Salas, C. 2011. Crenulations of the hinge plate of pectinoideans. Acta Zoologica, 92:344–354.Google Scholar
Checa, A. G. and Jiménez-Jiménez, A. P. 2003. Rib fabrication in Ostreoidea and Plicatuloidea (Bivalvia, Pteriomorphia) and its evolutionary significance. Zoomorphology, 122:145–159.Google Scholar
Chen, Jinhua, Stiller, F., and Komatsu, T. 2006. Protostrea from the Middle Triassic of southern China, the earliest dimyoid bivalve? Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 2006:148–164.Google Scholar
Coan, E. V., Scott, P. V., and Bernard, F. R. 2000. Bivalve Seashells of Western North America. Marine Bivalve Mollusks from Arctic Alaska to Baja California. Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, viii +784p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1866a. Note on the genus Gadus, with descriptions of some new genera and species of American fossil shells. American Journal of Conchology, 2 (1):75–78.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1866b. Descriptions of new species of Tertiary, Cretaceous, and Recent shells. American Journal of Conchology, 2:104–106.Google Scholar
Corselli, C. and Bernocchi, A. 1992. A revision of the Mediterranean Plio-Pleistocene Dimyidae Fischer, 1886. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 97:661–676.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1903. Rectifications de nomenclature. Revue Critique de Paléozoologie, 7:67–68.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. and Peyrot, A. 1914. Conchologie Néogénique de l'Aquitaine, Tome 2, Livraison 11 et Supplément. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 68:205–496.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1964. Notes concerning the taxonomy and nomenclature of fossil Bivalvia (mainly Mesozoic). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 36:39–40.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. and Hertlein, L. G. 1969. Family Dimyidae P. Fischer, 1886, p. N382. InMoore, R. C. and Teichert, C.(eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1883. A remarkable molluscan type. Science, 1:51.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1886. Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877–78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879–80), by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer “Blake,” Lieut.-Commander C. D. Sigsbee, U.S.N., and Commander J. R. Bartlett, U.S.N., commanding. XXIX. Report on the Mollusca, Part I. Brachiopoda and Pelecypoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, in Cambridge, 12:171–318.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H., Bartsch, P., and Rehder, H. P. 1938. A manual of the recent and fossil marine pelecypod mollusks of the Hawaiian Islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 153:1–233.Google Scholar
Darragh, T. A. and Kendrick, G. W. 1991. Maastrichtian Bivalvia (excluding Inoceramidae) from the Miria Formation, Carnarvon Basin, northwestern Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement 36:1–102.Google Scholar
Doncieux, L. 1911. Catalogue descriptif des fossiles Nummulitiques de l'Aude et de Herault. Deuxième partie (fascicule II). Corbières Septentrionales. Annales de l'Université de Lyon, sér. I Sciences, Médecine, fascicule 30:1–199.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1951. A contribution to the study of the Eocene in western Pakistan and western India. B. The description of the Lamellibranchia from standard sections in the Rakhi Nala and Zinda Pir areas of the western Punjab and in the Kohat District. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 235:311–482.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. I. von. 1868. Lethaea Rossica, ou paléontologie de la Russie, vol. 2, sect. 2, Période moderne, E. Schweizerbart. Stuttgart, 1304p., atlas of 40 pls.Google Scholar
Elder, W. P. 1996. Bivalves and gastropods from the middle Campanian Anacacho Limestone, south central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 70:247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Étallon, A. 1862. Études paléontologiques sur les terrains Jurassiques du Haut-Jura. Monographie de l'etage Corallien. A. Vertébrés, Articulés, Mollusques. Memoires de la Société d'Emmulation Département Doubs, Paris, Série 3, 6:1–250.Google Scholar
Feldtmann, F. R. 1963. Some pelecypods from the Cretaceous Gingin Chalk, Western Australia, together with descriptions of the principal chalk exposures. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 46:101–125.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. H. 1886. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchiologique. F. Savy, Paris, xxv +1369p.Google Scholar
Forti Esteves, I. R. 1984. Recent bivalves (Palaeotaxodonta and Pteriomorphia) from the Brazilian continental shelf. Pesquisas (Porto Alegre, Brazil), 16:190–226.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T. 1979. Genesis, environments, and ecology of Jurassic hardgrounds. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 158:1–63.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T. and Werner, W. 1988. The Upper Jurassic Bivalvia of Portugal. Part II. Pteriomorphia (Pterioida exclusive Ostreina). Comunicaçöes dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal, 74:105–164.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. and Van de Poel, L. 1973. Les Bivalvia du Danien et du Montien de la Belgique. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Mémoire No. 175:1–89.Google Scholar
Grobben, C. 1894. Zur Kenntniss der Morphologie, der Verwandtschaftsverhältniss und des Systems der Mollusken. Sitzungsberichten der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematische-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 103:63–68.Google Scholar
Gu, Zhiwei, Baoyu, Huang, Chuzhen, Chen, et al. 1976. Fossil Lamellibranchiata of China. Science Press, Beijing, vi + 580 p. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. and Dall, W. H. 1896. Descriptions of Tertiary fossils from the Antillean region. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 19:303–331.Google Scholar
Habe, T. 1971. Dimyidae in Japan and its adjacent areas. The Veliger, 13:330–333.Google Scholar
Hagenow, F. von. 1842. Monographie der Rügen'schen Kreideversteinerungen. III. Molluscken. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, Paläontologie, 1842:528–575.Google Scholar
Harry, H. W. 1985. Synopsis of the supraspecific classification of living oysters (Bivalvia: Gryphaeidae and Ostreidae). The Veliger, 28:121–158.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2001a. Taxonomy and phylogeny of cementing Triassic bivalves (families Prospondylidae, Plicatulidae, Dimyidae and Ostreidae). Palaeontology, 44:339–373.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2001b. Die Muschelfauna der Nayband-Formation (Obertrias, Nor-Rhät) des östlichen Zentraliran. Beringeria (Würzburger geowissenswchaftliche Mitteilungen), 29:1–181.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2004. Early Mesozoic evolution of alivincular bivalve ligaments and its implications for the timing of the ‘Mesozoic marine revolution'. Lethaia, 37:165–172.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2006. Shell mineralogical trends in epifaunal Mesozoic bivalves and their relationship to seawater chemistry and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Facies, 52:417–433.Google Scholar
Hayami, I. and Kase, T. 1996. Characteristics of submarine cave bivalves in the northwestern Pacific. American Malacological Bulletin, 12:59–65.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. 1902. Scientific results of the trawling expedition of H.M.C.S. “Thetis,” off the coast of New South Wales, in February and March, 1898, Part 2: Mollusca. Part I. Brachiopoda and Pelecypoda. Australian Museum Memoir, 4:287–324.Google Scholar
Heinberg, C. 1999. Lower Danian bivalves, Stevns Klint, Denmark: continuity across the K/T boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 154:87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iredale, T. 1936. Australian molluscan notes. No. 2, Records of the Australian Museum, 19:267–340.Google Scholar
Kendrick, G. W. and Vartak, A. V. 2007. Middle Cretaceous (Cenomanian) bivalves from the Ksarai Formation, Uttattur Group, of the Cauvery Basin, south India. Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 72:1–101.Google Scholar
Koenen, A. von. 1893. Das Norddeutsche Unter-Oligocän und seine Mollusken-Fauna. Lieferung 5: 3. Pelecypoda. Abhandlungen zur geologischen Specialkarte von Preussen un den Thüringischen Staaten, 10:1006–1248.Google Scholar
Krumbeck, L. 1924. Die Brachiopoden, Lamellibranchiaten und Gastropoden der Trias von Timor II, Paläontologischer Teil, p. 1–275. InWanner, J.(ed.), Paläontologie von Timor, Part 22. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nägele), Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kuroda, T. 1928. Two families new to the molluscan fauna of Japan. Venus, 1:10–15.Google Scholar
Kuroda, T. 1929–1935. An illustrated catalogue of the Japanese shells, parts 1–16. Venus, Supplement 1 (3):154p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1801. Système des Animaux Sans Vertèbres. Chez Deterville, Paris, 432p.Google Scholar
Laws, C. R. 1944. The molluscan faunule at Pakaurangi Point, Kaipara, No. 3. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 73:297–312.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, editio decima, reformata 1 (Regnum animale). Salvii, Stockholm, 824p.Google Scholar
Loriol, P. De. 1900. Étude sur les mollusques et Brachiopodes de l'Oxfordien inférieur ou zone à Ammonites Renggeri du Jura Lédonien. Mémoires de la Société paléontologique Suisse, 27:1–196.Google Scholar
Malchus, N. 2000. Early shell stages of the Middle Jurassic bivalves Camptochlamys (Pectinidae) and Atreta (Dimyidae) from Poland. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 66:577–581.Google Scholar
Margolis, S. V. and Carver, R. E. 1974. Microstructure of chalky deposits found in shells of the oyster . The Nautilus, 88:62–65.Google Scholar
Martin, K. 1883–1887. Paleontologische Ergebnisse von Tiefbohrungen auf Java, nebst allgemeineren Studien über das Tertiär von Java, Timor und einiger anderer Inseln. Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museum in Leiden, Series 1, 3:1–380.Google Scholar
Martin, K. 1909–1910. Die Fossilien von Java, Lamellibranchiata. Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museum in Leiden (N. F.), 1:333–386.Google Scholar
Maxwell, P. A. 1978. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on some New Zealand Cenozoic Mollusca, with descriptions of new taxa. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 5:15–46.Google Scholar
Menke, K. T. 1830. Synopsis methodica molluscorum generum omnium et specierum earum, quae in Museo Menkeano adservantur; cum synonymia critica et novarum specierum diagnosibus. Editio altera, auctior et emendatior. Pyrmonti, sumtibus Georgi Uslar. xiv +168p.Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. 1969. A new genus and species of Dimyidae from the Caribbean coast of Mexico. Journal de Conchyliologie, 107:137–141.Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. 1978. The western Atlantic Dimyidae. Bulletin of the American Malacological Union, Inc., 1977:41–43Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P. 1900. Die Priabonaschichten und ihre Fauna, im Zusammenhange mit gleichalterigen und analogen Ablagerungen vergleichend betrachtet. Palaeontographica, 47:1–136.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1850. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques & rayonnés. Vol. 1. Masson, Paris, 394p.Google Scholar
Paulay, G. 2003. Marine Bivalvia (Mollusca) of Guam. Micronesica, 35–36:218–243.Google Scholar
Pchelintseva, G. T. 1960. Semejstwo Prospondylidae fam. nov., p. 78–87. InEberzin, A. G., (ed.), Osnavy paleontologii. Mollyuski - pantsirnye, dvustvorchatye, lopatonogie (Fundamentals of paleontology. Molluscs - Loricata, Bivalvia, Scaphopoda). Isdastelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1937. New species of marine Mollusca from New Zealand. Discovery Reports, 15:153–222.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature ou tableau de l'Univers du des corps organisés. C. S. Rafinesque, from the Press of Jean Barravecchia, Palermo, 225p.Google Scholar
Rao, N. K. 1964. Occurrence of the pelecypod genus Diploschiza Conrad in the Cretaceous rocks of Trichinopoly, India. Current Science, 33:143–145.Google Scholar
Ríos, E. C. 2009. Compendium of Brazilian Sea Shells, Second Edition, Editora Evangraf Ltd., Rio Grande, RS, Brazil, viii +668p.Google Scholar
Rouault, A. 1850. Descriptions des fossiles du Terrain Éocéné des environs de Pau. Mémoires de la Société Geologique de France, Series 2, 3:457–502.Google Scholar
Sacco, F. 1897. I Molluschi del terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria, pt. 23, Pelecypoda (Ostreidae, Anomiidae e Dimyidae). Carlo Claussen, Torino, 67p.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. B., Jung, P., and Biju-Duval, B. 1986. Neogene paleontology in the northern Dominican Republic. 1. Field surveys, lithology, environment, and age. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 89:1–79.Google Scholar
Schafhautl, K. E. 1863. Süd-Bayers Lethaea Geognostica. Von L. Voss, Leipzig; Williams and Norgate, London; F. Savy; Paris. xvi +487pp.Google Scholar
Seguenza, G. 1879. Le formazioni terziarie nella provincia di Reggio (Calabria). Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, ser. 3, 6:1–446.Google Scholar
Sokolow, N. 1905. Die Mollusken-Fauna von Mandrikowka. I. Pelecypoda. Prionodesmacea. Mémoires du Comité Géologique, New Series, 18:1–82.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1971. Part N: Bivalvia, 3: Oysters, p. N953–N1224. InMoore, R. C. and Teichert, C.(eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1934. The genus Diploschiza from the Upper Cretaceous of Alabama and Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 8:273–280.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1935. Further notes on the Cretaceous pelecypod genus Diploschiza. Journal of Paleontology, 9:388–392.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1937. Stratigraphic relations of the Austin, Taylor, and equivalent formations in Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 186-G:133–146.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D. 1998. Late Cretaceous Mollusca from the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. Alcheringa, 22:29–85.Google Scholar
Tashiro, M. 1978. On some interesting bivalves from the Cretaceous Himenoura Group in Kyushu. Transactions and Proceedings of the Paleontological Society of Japan, New Series, 110:319–329.Google Scholar
Tashiro, M. and Otsuka, M. 1980. Bivalve fossils from the uppermost formation of the Upper Himenoura Subgroup in Amakusa-Shimojima Island, Kyushu (Part 1). Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kochi University, Series E, Geology, 1:41–57.Google Scholar
Tate, R. 1886. The lamellibranchs of the older Tertiary of Australia (Part I.). Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 8:96–158.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D., Kennedy, W. J., and Hall, A. 1969. The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction. Nuculacea-Trigonacea. Bulletin of The British Museum (Natural History, Zoology), Supplement 3:1–125.Google Scholar
Tomasovych, A. 2004. Microfacies and depositional environment of an Upper Triassic intra-platform carbonate basin: the Fatric Unit of the West Carpathians (Slovakia). Facies, 50:77–105.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation. An Ecological History of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, xv +527p.Google Scholar
Vincent, E. 1930. Études sur les mollusques montiens du Poudingue et de Tufeau de Ciply. Memoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 46:1–115.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1979. Observations on the genus Dimya (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the Cenozoic faunas of the western Atlantic region. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 15:33–53.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1969. The evolution of the stock (Mollusca: Bivalvia), with emphasis on the Tertiary and Quaternary species of eastern North America. Journal of Paleontology Memoir, Supplement, 43:125p.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1978. Morphology, morphoclines and a new classification of the Pteriomorphia (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 284:345–365.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1980. Scanning electron microscopy of shell and mantle in the order Arcoida (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 313:1–58.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1986. A new genus and species of scallop (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) from off Somalia, and the definition of a new tribe Decatopectinini. The Nautilus, 100:39–46.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1991. Evolutionary relationships among commercial scallops (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pectinidae), p. 1–73. InShumway, S. E.(ed.), Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 2011. Neogene paleontology of the northern Dominican Republic. 24. Propeamussiidae and Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pectinoidea) of the Cibao Valley. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 381:1–198.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. and Stanley, G. D. Jr. 2005. Middle Triassic pteriomorphian Bivalvia (Mollusca) from the New Pass Range, west-central Nevada: Systematics, biostratigraphy, paleoecology, and paleobiogeography. Journal of Paleontology Memoir, Supplement, 79:64p.Google Scholar
Watson, H. 1930. On the anatomy and affinities of Plicatula. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 19:25–31.Google Scholar
Welle, J. 1998. Die Molluskenfauna des Rupeltons im Tagebau Amsdorf westlich von Halle, Systematic und Paläoökologie. Münstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Paläontologie, 85:137–187.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1982. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (Pelecypods: Propeamussiidae to Cuspidariidae; additions to families covered in P306-E; additions to gastropods; cephalopods). U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 306-F:541–759.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. P. 1864. Note on Plicatula sigillina, an undescribed fossil of the Upper Chalk and Cambridge: Phosphate-bed. Geological Magazine, 1:112–114.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1973. Functional morphology with particular reference to hinge and ligament in Spondylus and Plicatula and a discussion on relations within the superfamily Pectinacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 267:173–208.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1978. On the Dimyidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) with special reference to Dimya corrugata Hedley and Basiliomya goreaui Bayer. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 44:357–375.Google Scholar
Zelinskaya, V. A., Kulitschenko, G., Makarendo, D. E., and Soroyan, E. A. 1968. Paleontological Reference Book; I. Bivalved Mollusca, Paleogene and Miocene, Ukrainia. Academii Nauk, Inst. Geol. Nauk, Ukraine S.S.R., 297p.Google Scholar