Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:05:51.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Ordovician Echinoderms from Northern Illinois and Southern Wisconsin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2017

Dennis R. Kolata
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Echinoderms of the Middle Ordovician Platteville and lower Galena Groups of north-central Illinois and south-central Wisconsin are represented by at least seven classes including the Homoiostelea, Cystoidea, Crinoidea, Stelleroidea, Edrioasteroidea, Cyclocystoidea, Echinoidea, and possibly Holothuroidea. The most abundant and diverse echinoderms are monocyclic and dicyclic inadunate and camerate crinoids, of which the cupulocrinids and glyptocrinids are best represented. Thirteen new species and one new genus of crinoids are described: Cremacrinus guttenbergensis, Anulocrinus forrestonensis, Isotomocrinus minutus, Carabocrinus oogyi, Dendrocrinus? springeri, Merocrinus britonensis, Cupulocrinus plattevillensis, C. molanderi, Reteocrinus rocktonensis, R. spinosus, Traskocrinus mahlburgi (n. gen. et sp.), Rhaphanocrinus buckleyi, Glyptocrinus charltoni, and G. pustulosis. One new species of rhombiferan cystoid, Coronocystis durandensis, is also described. Echinoids of the family Bothriocidaridae (Bothriocidaris solemi n. sp. and Neobothriocidaris templetoni n. sp.) are reported for the first time from North America and appear to be the earliest recorded occurrence. Remains of a third bothriocidarid characterized by coalesced podial pores have also been discovered. Light and scanning electron microscopy of well preserved cyclocystoid specimens reveal a number of previously undescribed morphologic features of the central disc and submarginal ring that may shed some light on their functional morphology.

Cupulocrinus gracilis Ramsbottom from the Upper Drummuck Group Starfish Bed at Thraive Glen near Girvan, Scotland, is here reassigned to C. drummuckensis n. sp.

Echinoderms are associated with an abundant and diverse fauna consisting largely of suspension feeders, primarily strophomenid and orthid brachiopods and trepostome and cryptostome bryozoans. Other common groups include corals, trilobites, sponges, and mollusks. Filamentous brown, foliose red and siphonaceous green algae are associated with the fauna at some localities.

Carbonate rocks of both the limestone and dolostone facies of the Platteville (Briton, Walgreen and Forreston Members) and lower Galene Groups in the study area consist primarily of abundant shelly invertebrates occurring as whole and broken, unabraded, commonly articulated remains “floating” in a calcisiltite matrix that is highly bioturbated. Carbonate sediments appear to have been deposited in a near-to below wave base, highly stable, open marine environment characterized by low depositional slopes, good circulation and low terrigenous influx.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 49 , Issue S7: Paleontological Society Memoir 7. Middle Ordovician echinoderms from northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin , May 1975 , pp. 1 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, A. F., Heyl, A. V. Jr., Behre, C. H. Jr., and Lyons, E. J. 1956. Stratigraphy of Middle Ordovician rocks in the zinc-lead district of Wisconsin, Illinois, and Iowa. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 274-K, p. 251–312.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L., and Fowler, M. L. 1969. Lithostratigraphy and depositional environment of the Eden Shale (Ordovician) in the Tri-state area of Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. J. Geol. 77: 668–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1936. New species of American Edrioasteroidea. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 93(8): 1–33.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1938. Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Pars. 83: Pelmatozoa Palaeozoica. Gravenhage, 194 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic Pelmatozoan Echinoderms. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1896. Merocrinus salopiae n. sp. and another crinoid from the Middle Ordovician of West Shropshire. Geol. Mag. 33:71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1900. The Crinoidea, p. 94–204. In Lancaster, E. R., (ed.) A Treatise on Zoology. Part 3. Adams and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
Begg, J. L. 1934. Notes on Cyclocystoides . Geol. Mag. 71(839):220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. 1854. On some new genera and species of Cystidea from the Trenton Limestone. Canadian J. 2:215–219, 250–253, 268–274.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1857. New species of fossils from Silurian rocks of Canada. Report for the years 1853–1856. Geol. Surv. Canada, p. 245–345.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1858. On the Cystideae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Canadian Organic Remains, Geol. Surv. Canada. Dec. III, p. 9–74.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1859. On the Crinoideae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Canadian Organic Remains, Geol. Surv. Canada. Dec. IV, p. 1–72.Google Scholar
Billings, W. R. 1887. A new genus and three new species of crinoids from the Trenton Formation with notes on a large specimen of Dendrocrinus proboscidiatus . Ottawa Natur. 1:49–54.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1966. Functional morphology of Calceocrinidae with descriptions of some new species. J. Paleontol. 40(3):613–634.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1973. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Paleontographica Americana. 7(46):263–499.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1974. Upper Ordovician xenocrinoids (Crinoidea, Camerata) from Scotland. Univ. of Kansas. Paleontol. Contrib., Paper 67, 25 p.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C., and Veinus, J. 1974. Middle Ordovician crinoids from southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee. Amer. Paleontol. Bull. 66 (283):1–125.Google Scholar
Butts, C. 1926. Paleozoic rocks (Geology of Alabama). Alabama Geol. Surv. Spec. Rep. 14, 312 p.Google Scholar
Calvert, W. L. 1964. Pre-trentonian sedimentation and dolomitization, Cincinnati Arch Province: Theoretical considerations. Amer. Ass. Pet. Geol. Bull. 48(2):166–190.Google Scholar
Carozzi, A. V. 1972. Microscopic Sedimentary Petrography. Robert E. Krieger Publ. Co., Huntington, 485 p.Google Scholar
Carozzi, A. V., and Textoris, D. A. 1967. Paleozoic carbonate microfacies of the eastern stable interior (U.S.A.). Intern. Sed. Pet. Ser., E. G. Brill, Leiden, v. 11, 41 p.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1956. Chazyan and related brachiopods. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., v. 127, 1245 p.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. Y. 1966. Marine Botany: An Introduction. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 371 p.Google Scholar
DeMott, L. L. 1963. Middle Ordovician trilobites of the Upper Mississippi Valley. Unpub. Ph.D. Diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Duff, P. M., Hallam, A., and Walton, E. K. 1967. Cyclic sedimentation. In Developments in Sedimentology, 10, Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 280 p.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1966. Evolution among the Echinoidea. Biol. Rev. 41:368–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichwald, E. 1860. Letheae rossica on Paleontologie de la Russie. Stuttgart, p. 654.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1920. Racine and Cedarville cystids and blastoids with notes on other echinoderms. Ohio J. Sci. 21(2):33–78.Google Scholar
Frizzel, D. L., and Exline, H. 1955. Monograph of fossil holothurian sclerites. Missouri Univ., School of Mines and Metallurgy, Bull. 89, 204 p.Google Scholar
Grant, J. 1881. Description of a new species of Porocrinus from the Trenton Limestone. Ottawa Field Natur. Club Trans. n. 2, p. 42.Google Scholar
Gutschick, R. C. 1954. Holothurian sclerites from the Middle Ordovician of northern Illinois. J. Paleontol. 28(6):827–829.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Paleontology of New York. Volume I. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New York System. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 339 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1952. Paleontology of New York. Volume II. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New York System. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 362 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1872. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils from strata of the age of the Hudson River Group and Trenton Limestone. New York State Mus. Natur. Hist., 24th Annu. Rep., p. 205–224.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1972. Recognition of ancient shallow marine environments, p. 226–287, In Rigby, J. K. and Hamblin, W. K., (ed.) Recognition of ancient sedimentary environments. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Pub. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R. A., and Shergold, J. H. 1971. Cyclocystoides from Early Middle Cambrian rocks of northwestern Queensland, Australia. Palaeontology 14(4):704–710.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. H. 1905. Contributions to the fauna of the Chazy Limestone on Valcour Island, Lake Champlain. Rep. New York State Paleontol. Bull. 80:270–283.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. H. 1915. Some fundamental types of hydrospires with notes on Porocrinus smithi Grant. New York State Mus. Bull. 177:163–166.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H. 1955. The Invertebrates: Echinodermata. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 763 p.Google Scholar
Irving, E. 1964. Paleomagnetism and its application to geological and geophysical problems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 399 p.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Palaeontol. Zeitschr. 3(1):1–128.Google Scholar
Kay, G. M. 1929. Stratigraphy of the Decorah Formation. J. Geol. 37:639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, G. M. 1935. Ordovician System in the Upper Mississippi Valley. Kansas Geol. Soc. Guide-book, 9th Annu. Field Conf., p. 281–295.Google Scholar
Kay, G. M. 1970. Ordovician System. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 16:1059–1065.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1966. Cyclocystoids, p. 188–210. In Moore, R. C., (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(1). Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence, and Geol. Soc. Amer., Boulder.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1972. A new species of Porocrinus from the Middle Ordovician Kimmswick Limestone of Missouri. Univ. Michigan, Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. 24(1):1–32.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V., and Paul, C. R. C. 1968. New species of Porocrinidae and brief remarks upon these unusual crinoids. Univ. Michigan, Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. 22(1):1–32.Google Scholar
Kolata, D. R. 1973. Scalenocystites strimplei, a new Middle Ordovician belemnocystitid solute from Minnesota. J. Paleontol. 47(5):969–974.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1970. Lower and Middle Ordovician crinoids from west-central Utah. Brigham Young Univ. Geol. Stud. 17(1):3–17.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site. (Upper Osagian: Indiana). Univ. California Pub. Geol. Sci., v. 99, 141 p.Google Scholar
Laporte, L. F. 1968. Recent carbonate environments and their paleoecologic implications, p. 229–258. In Drake, E. T., (ed.) Evolution and Environments. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Laporte, L. F. 1971. Paleozoic facies of the central Appalachian shelf. J. Sed. Pet. 41(3):724–740.Google Scholar
Levorson, C. O., and Gerk, A. J. 1972. A preliminary stratigraphic study of the Galena Group of Winneshiek County, Iowa. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 79(3–4):111–122.Google Scholar
Mannil, R. M. 1962. The taxonomy and morphology of Bothriocidaris (Echinoidea). Trudy Inst. Geolog. Akad. Nauk. Eston. SSR, 9:143–190.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851. British Paleozoic fossils. fasc. 1, p. 59–61.Google Scholar
McKee, E. D., and Weir, G. W. 1953. Terminology for stratifications and cross stratifications in sedimentary rocks. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 64:381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1872. Descriptions of a few new species and one new genus of Silurian fossils from Ohio. Amer. J. Sci. 4(3):274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of new crinoidea, etc., from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Philadelphia Acad. Natur. Sci. Proc. p. 155–166.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1868. Paleontology of Illinois. Illinois State Geol. Surv. 3: 289–565.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1883. Glyptocrinus redefined and restricted, Gaurocrinus, Pycnocrinus and Compsocrinus established, and two new species described. J. Cincinnati Soc. Natur. Hist. 6:217–234.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Dyer, C. B. 1878. Contributions to Paleontology. J. Cincinnati Soc. Natur. Hist. 1(1):24–39.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. New genera and species of Echinodermata. Illinois State Mus. Bull. 5:5–53.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895. Description of new species of Paleozoic Echinodermata. Illinois State Mus. Bull. 6:1–62.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1950. Evolution of the Crinoidea in relation to major paleogeographic changes in earth history. Rep. Int. Geol. Cong., 18th Sess. pt. 12, p. 27–53.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952. Crinoids, p. 604–652. In Moore, R. C., Lalicker, C. G., and Fisher, A. G., Invertebrate Fossils. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1962a. Revision of Calceocrinidae. Univ. of Kansas. Paleontol. Contrib., Article 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1962b. Ray structure of some inadunate crinoids. Univ. of Kansas. Paleontol. Contrib., Article 5, 47 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. The evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper 46, 153p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., Jeffords, R. M., and Miller, T. H. 1968. Morphological features of crinoid columns. Univ. of Kansas. Paleontol. Contrib., Article 8, 30 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Strimple, H. L. 1973. Lower Pennsylvanian (Morrowan) crinoids from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Univ. of Kansas. Paleontol. Contrib., Article 60, 84 p.Google Scholar
Nestler, H. 1968. Echinidenreste aus einem Ojlemyr-Geschiebe Ordovizium, FII von Gotland. Geologie 17(10):1219–1225.Google Scholar
Nichols, D. 1967. The origin of echinoderms. Echinoderm Biology. Zool. Soc. London Symp. n. 20, p. 209–229.Google Scholar
Nichols, D. 1972. The water-vascular system in living and fossil echinoderms. Palaeontology 15 (4):519–538.Google Scholar
Opdyke, N. D. 1962. Paleoclimatology and continental drift, p. 41–65. In Runcorn, S. K., (ed.) Continental Drift. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. d'. 1849. Cours élèmentaire de paléontologie et géologie stratigraphiques. Victor Masson, Paris, v. 1, 1–299.Google Scholar
Palmquist, R. C. 1969. The configuration of the Prairie du Chien-St. Peter contact in southwestern Wisconsin: an example of an integrated geological-geophysical study. J. Geol. 77:694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsley, R. L. 1972. The Belemnocystitidae: solutan homeomorphs of the Anomalocystitidae. J. Paleontol. 46:341–347.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1967a. The functional morphology and mode of life of the cystoid Pleurocystites Billings. Echinoderm Biology. Zool. Soc. London, Symp. 20: 105–123.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1967b. New Ordovician Bothriocidaridae from Girvan and a reinterpretation of Bothriocidaris Eichwald. Paleontology 10(4):525–541.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1972. Cheirocystella antiqua gen. et sp. nov. from the Lower Ordovician of western Utah, and its bearing on the evolution of the Cheirocrinidae (Rhombifera: Glyptocystitida). Brigham Young Univ. Geol. Stud. 19(1):15–63.Google Scholar
Philip, G. M. 1965. Plate homologies in inadunate crinoids. J. Paleontol. 39(1):146–149.Google Scholar
Potter, P. E., and Blakely, R. F. 1968. Random processes and lithologic transitions. J. Geol. 76: 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1961. A monograph on British Ordovician Crinoidea. Paleontographical Soc. 114:1–37.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1912. On two new Paleozoic starfish (one of these found near Ottawa), and a new crinoid. Ottawa Natur. 26(7):77–81.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1913. Notes on Cyclocystoides . Canada Geol. Surv. Dep. Mines, Victoria Mem. Mus. Bull. 1:23–32.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1931. Notes on invertebrate fossils. Harvard Coll. Mus. Comp. Zool. Bull. 35(6):203–204.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1904. The Echinodermata of the Missouri Silurian and a new brachiopod. Amer. Geol. 34(5):269–282.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., and Billings, E. 1859. On Cyclocystoides, a new genus of Echinodermata from the Lower and Middle Silurian rocks. Canadian Organic Remains, Geol. Surv. Canada. Dec III, p. 86–90.Google Scholar
Sardeson, F. W. 1925. Ordovicic Crinoidea. Pan-Amer. Geol. 43:55–68.Google Scholar
Sardeson, F. W. 1928. Derivation of the Calceocrinidae. Pan-Amer. Geol. 49(1):35–46.Google Scholar
Sardeson, F. W. 1939. Carabocrinus and species-making. Pan-Amer. Geol. 71:27–38.Google Scholar
Schenk, E. T., and McMasters, J. H. 1956. Procedure in Taxonomy. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 149 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1864. Über einige neue und wenig bekannte Baltisch Silurischen Petrefacten. Mem. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersb. v. 21, ser. 7.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1914. Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Pars. 3: Stelleroidea Palaeozoica. Gravenhage, 53 p.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1915. Revision of Paleozoic Stelleroidea with special reference to North America Asteroidea. Smithsonian Inst. Bull. 88:1–311.Google Scholar
Sieverts-Doreck, H. 1951. Über Cyclocystoides Salter and Billings und eine neue Art aus dem belgischen und rheinischen Devon. Senckenbergiana 32(f14):9–20.Google Scholar
Speden, I. G. 1966. Paleoecology and the study of fossil benthonic assemblages and communities. New Zealand J. Geol. Geophys. 9:408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914. British Paleozoic Asterozoa. Paleontographical Soc. London, Monogr., Part 1, p. 1–56.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1918. British Paleozoic Asterozoa. Paleontographical Soc. London, Monogr. 70(3):109–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spjeldnaes, N. 1960. Ordovician climatic zones. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr. 41:45–77.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911. On a Trenton echinoderm fauna at Kirkfield, Ontario. Canada Dep. Mines, Geol. Surv. Branch, Mem. 15-p, 50 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1971. Stratigraphic distribution of echinoderm plates in the Antelope Valley Limestone of Nevada and California. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 750-D, p. 89–98.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1948. Pleurocystites watkinsi n. sp. from the Bromide Formation of Oklahoma. Amer. J. Sci. 246:761–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1953. A new carpoid from Oklahoma. Washington Acad. Sci. J. 43:105–106.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1961. On Myeinocystites Strimple. Oklahoma Geol. Notes, 21(7):184–185.Google Scholar
Sturtz, B. 1900. Ein weiterer Beitrag zur Kenntniss palaozoischer Asteroiden. Verh. naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl. 56:176–240.Google Scholar
Templeton, J. S., and Willman, H. B. 1952. Guide-book for the 16th Annual Field Conference of the Tri-State Geological Society. Illinois State Geol. Surv. Google Scholar
Templeton, J. S., and Willman, H. B. 1963. Champlainian Series (Middle Ordovician) in Illinois. Illinois Geol. Surv. Bull. 89, 260 p.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H., et al. 1954. Correlation of the Ordovician formations of North America. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 65:247–298.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1879. Descriptions of new genera and species of fossils from the lower Silurian about Cincinnati. J. Cincinnati Soc. Natur. Hist. 2:8–30.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1886. Remarks upon the names Cheirocrinus and Calceocrinus with descriptions of three new generic terms and one new species. Minnesota Geol. Natur. Hist. Surv. Annu. Rep. 14, p. 104–113.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1924. New classification of the “Heterocrinidae.” In Foerste, A. F., Upper Ordovician faunas of Ontario and Quebec. Geol. Surv. Canada Mem. 138, p. 82–104.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Everett, O. 1890. Descriptions of Lower Silurian sponges, p. 209–241. In Worthen, A. W., Geology and Paleontology of Illinois, v. 8.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1879. Revision of the Paleocrinoidea. Pt. 1, Philadelphia Acad. Natur. Sci. Proc. p. 226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Paleocrinoidea. Pt. 3, sec. 1 and 2, Philadelphia Acad. Natur. Sci. Proc. 334 p.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard Coll. Mus. Comp. Zool. Mem. v. 21–22:1–897.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. Fossils from the Groups of New York. New York State Mus. Natur. Hist., Annu. Rep. 35, p. 207–214.Google Scholar
Walker, K. R. 1971. The significance of fossil assemblages from fine-grained sediments: Time-averaged communities (abstra.). Geol. Soc. Amer., Abstr. with Prog. 3(7):783–784.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. W. 1974. New fossils from the Middle Ordovician Platteville Formation of southwest Wisconsin. J. Paleontol. 48(1):78–83.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1966. Phylogeny and distribution of Ordovician trilobites. J. Paleontol. 40(4):696–737.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E. 1946. Echinodermata of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence lowland. Canada Dep. of Res., Geol. Surv. Canada Bull. 4, 64 p.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troosts unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 64:1–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar