Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:51:48.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microforaminiferal linings from the Early Devonian of eastern Australia, and their generic placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Theresa Winchester-Seeto  and
K. N. Bell
Theresa Winchester-Seeto
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecostratigraphy and Palaeobiology, School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, N.S.W., Australia, 2109
K. N. Bell
Affiliation:
Museum of Victoria, Swanston St., Melbourne, Australia 3000
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microforaminiferal linings assigned to 10 known genera have been recovered from Early Devonian (Lochkovian to Late Emsian) limestones from Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland. These organic linings have been identified by comparison with normal-sized agglutinated foraminiferan genera known to occur in the associated sediments. Microforaminiferal linings with smooth walls and reticulate sculptured walls were present and the possible implications of these (diagenetic, relict structure, naked homeomorphs, or processing artifact) are discussed. Evidence is presented that Ordovicina may have a bilamellar organic wall lining.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , March 1994 , pp. 200 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, H., and Hemleben, C. 1988. Constructional aspects in test formation of some agglutinated foraminifera. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 41:13–21.Google Scholar
Bermudez, P. J., and de Rivero, F. C. 1963. Estudio sistematico de los Foraminiferos quitinosos, microgranulares y arenaceos. Ediciones de la Biblioteca, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, 398 p.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1871. On Saccammina carteri, a new foraminifer from the Carboniferous limestone of Northumberland. Annal. and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 7:177–184.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1878. On the reticularian and radiolarian Rhizapoda (Foraminifera and Polycystina) of the North Polar Expedition of 1875-76. Annal. and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 1:425–440.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1879. Notes on some of the reticularian Rhizopoda of the Challenger Expedition, Part 1. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society, 19:20–63.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1881. Notes on some of the reticularian Rhizopoda of the Challenger Expedition, Part 2, Further notes on new species. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society, 21:31–71.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1884. Report on the foraminifera dredged by HMS Challenger, during the years 1873-1876. Report of the Scientific Results, Zoology, 9:1–814.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. 1869. On the rhizopodal fauna of the deep sea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 18:59–62.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. G., Gooday, A. J., and Jones, A. R. 1989. The morphology, internal organization and taxonomic position of Rhizammina algaeformis Brady, a large, agglutinated deep-sea foraminifer. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 19:115–125.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., and Guber, A. L. 1968. Production of pollen-sized “microforaminifera” from “normal foraminifera.” Micropaleontology, 14:361–362.Google Scholar
Conkin, J. E., and Conkin, B. M. 1979. Illustrated key to the genera of Paleozoic smaller foraminifera of the United States. University of Louisville Studies in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, No. 11, 21 p.Google Scholar
Cross, A. T., Thompson, G. G., and Zaitzeff, J. B. 1966. Source and distribution of palynomorphs in bottom sediments, southern part of Gulf of California. Marine Geology, 4:467–524.Google Scholar
DeLaca, T. E. 1986. The morphology and ecology of Astrammina rara. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 16:216–223.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., and Herouard, E. 1896. Traité de Zoologie Concrète, Tome 1. La Cellule et les Protozoaires. Paris, 584 p.Google Scholar
Echols, D. J., and Schaeffer, K. M. M. 1960. Microforaminifera of the Marianna Limestone (Oligocene), from Little Stave Creek, Alabama. Micropaleontology, 6:399–415.Google Scholar
Eichwald, C. E. von. 1830. Zoologia specialis, Volume 2. D. E. Eichwaldus, Vilnae, 323 p.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1938. Neue mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 19:223–243.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1971. Die Mikrofauna der Ostseekalke (Ordovizium). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 137:337–357.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1977. Mikrofossilien in organischer Substanz aus den Middle Nodular Beds (Wenlock) von Dudley, England. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1977:25–35.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1978. Mikrofossilien in organischer Substanz aus dem Unteren Wenlock vom Wrens Nest, Dudley, England. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1978:282–290.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. J. 1933. A Manual of Foraminifera. The Principia Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 483 p.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. T., and Barker, W. W. 1988. Test ultrastructure and taphonomy of the monothalamous agglutinated foraminifer Cribrothalammina, n.gen., alba (Heron-Allen and Earland). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 18:130–136.Google Scholar
Gooday, A. J. 1986. Soft-shelled foraminifera in meiofaunal samples from the bathyal northeast Atlantic. Sarsia, 71:275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooday, A. J., and Claugher, D. 1989. The genus Bathysiphon (Protista, Foraminiferida) in the northeast Atlantic: SEM observations on the wall structure of seven species. Journal of Natural History, 23:591–611.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. 1894. Systematische Phylogenie. Theil 1, Systematische Phylogenie der Protisten und Pflanzen. Georg Reimer, Berlin, 400 p.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H. 1960. New observations on Pelosphaera cornuta. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 11:54–56.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H. 1962. The significance of an “inner chitinous lining” in saccamminid organization, with special reference to a new Saccammina (Foraminifera) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science, 5:375–389.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H. 1964. The biology of foraminifera. International Review of General and Experimental Zoology, 1:1–45.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 1973. Test structure in foraminifera. Annual Review of Microbiology, 27:471–488.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1957. Eleven new genera of foraminifera. U.S. National Museum, Bulletin 215:223–232.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1964. Sarcodina, chiefly “Thecamoebians” and Foraminiferida, p. C1–c900. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. C, Protista 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1989. Implications of wall composition and structure in agglutinated foraminifers. Journal of Paleontology, 63:769–777.Google Scholar
Magloire, L., and Taugourdeau, P. 1973. Microfossiles incertae sedis dans le Cenomanien d'Algerie. Revue de Micropaléontologie, 16:97–100.Google Scholar
Mawson, R. 1987. Early Devonian conodont faunas from Buchan and Bindi, Victoria, Australia. Palaeontology, 30:251–297.Google Scholar
Mawson, R., Talent, J. A., Bear, V. C., Benson, D. S., Brock, G. A., Farrell, J. R., Hyland, K. A., Pyemont, B. D., Sloan, T. R., Sorentino, L., Stewart, M. I., Trotter, J. A., Wilson, G. A., and Simpson, A. G. 1988. Conodont data in relation to resolution of stage and zonal boundaries for the Devonian of Australia. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, 14:485–527.Google Scholar
McKee, E. D., Chronic, J., and Leopold, E. B. 1959. Sedimentary belts in the lagoon of Kapingamarangi Atoll. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 43:501–562.Google Scholar
Melia, M. B. 1984. The distribution and relationship between palynomorphs in aerosols and deep-sea sediments off the coast of northwest Africa. Marine Geology, 58:345–371.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. 1808. Conchyliologie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles, Volume 1. F. Schoell, Paris, 400 p.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1973. Wall structure of some agglutinated Foraminiferida. Palaeontology, 16:777–786.Google Scholar
Paris, F. 1981. Les chitinozoaires dans le Paléozoique du sud-ouest de l'Europe. Mémoires de la Société géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne, 26:1–412.Google Scholar
Pichler, R. 1971. Mikrofossilien aus dem Devon de südlichen Eifeler Kalkmulden. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 52:315–357.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1862. Entwurf einer systematischen Zusammenstellung der Foraminiferen. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, mathematische-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 44:355–396.Google Scholar
Rhumbler, L. 1895. Entwurf eines natürlichen Systems der Thalamophoren. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, mathematische-physikalische Klasse, Abhandlungen, 1:51–98.Google Scholar
Rhumbler, L. 1911. Die Foraminiferen (Thalamophoren) der Plankton-Expedition. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humbolt-Stiftung, Kiel and Leipzig, 3(C):1–331.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1875. Zoologische Ergebnisse der Nord-seefahrt vom 21 Juli bis 9 September, 1872, 1. Rhizopoden. 11. Komission für Untersuchungen der Deutschen Meere in Kiel, Jahresberichte, 1872–73:99–114.Google Scholar
Schwab, D., and Plapp, R. 1983. Quantitative chemical analysis of the shell of the monothalamous foraminifer Allogromia laticollaris Arnold. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 13:69–71.Google Scholar
Stancliffe, R. P. W. 1989. Microforaminiferal linings: their classification, biostratigraphy and paleoecology, with special reference to specimens from British Oxfordian sediments. Micropaleontology, 35:337–352.Google Scholar
Tappan, H., and Loeblich, A. R. 1965. Foraminiferal remains in palynological preparations. Revue de Micropaléontologie, 8:61–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. A. 1989. Documentation of conodont assemblages across the Lochkovian-Pragian (Early Devonian) boundary at Wellington, central New South Wales, Australia. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 117:117–171.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. R., and Hoffmeister, W. S. 1952. Small Foraminifera. The Micropaleontologist, 6:26–28.Google Scholar
Winchester-Seeto, T. 1993. Chitinozoa from the Early Devonian (Lochkovian-Pragian) Garra Limestone, central New South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 67:738–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. 1949. The structure of the wall of the test in the Foraminifera: its value in classification. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 104:229–255.Google Scholar