Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:56:30.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latest Cretaceous and early Tertiary Tudiclidae and Melongenidae (Gastropoda) from the Pacific Slope of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Louella R. Saul
Louella R. Saul*
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Division, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four species belonging in Tudiclidae and one in Melongenidae have been confused with perissityids. The new genus Rapopsis is proposed for a tudiclid species, R. joseana n. sp. of early Maastrichtian age. Three other tudiclid species may belong in the Tethyan genus Pyropsis, P. fantozzii n. sp. of early to middle Paleocene age, P. striata (Stanton, 1896) of later Paleocene age, and ?P. gabbi (Stanton, 1896) probably of early to middle Paleocene age. The melongenid genus Protobusycon, represented by P. judithae n. sp. of late Paleocene age, has not previously been recognized in eastern Pacific faunas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 6 , November 1988 , pp. 880 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R. T. 1959. The family Vasidae in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 20–403–20–473.Google Scholar
Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1863. Descriptions of new species of shells, chiefly from the Cumingian collection. Zoological Society of London. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings for 1863, p. 428–435.Google Scholar
Basterot, M. B. de. 1825. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Bordeaux. Univalves. Société d'histoire naturelle de Paris, Mémoires, 2:17–100.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., and Flynn, J. J. 1985. Jurassic to Paleogene: Pt. 2. Paleogene geochronology and chronostratigraphy. p. 141–186. In Snelling, N. J. (ed.), The Chronology of the Geological Record. Geological Society of London, Memoir 10.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1918. The San Lorenzo series of middle California. University of California Publications, Department of Geology, Bulletin, 11:45–234.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1929. Stratigraphy and faunal horizons of the Coast Ranges of California. Privately published, Berkeley, 132 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1855. Report on the fossil shells collected in California by W. P. Blake, geologist of the expedition under the command of Lieut. Williamson, R. S., U.S. Topographical Engineers, 1852, p. 5–20. In The preliminary geological report of W. P. Blake, U.S. 33rd Congress, 1st session, House Executive Document no. 129 (July, 1855).Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia, Journal, 2nd ser., 4:275–298.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1901. Essais de palćoconchologie comparée. Paris. Vol. 4, 293 p.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1925. Cretaceous Gastropoda from Portuguese East Africa. Transvaal Museum, Annals, 11:201–216.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M.(revised by F. E. Eames). 1971. Tertiary Faunas. Volume 1. The Composition of the Faunas. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, 571 p.Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E. 1914. Fauna of the Martinez Eocene of California. University of California Publications, Department of Geology, Bulletin, 8:61–180.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1974. Revision of the Gastropoda of the Fox Hills Formation, Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) of North Dakota. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 66:131–253.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J., and Marwick, J. 1937. The Wangaloan and associated molluscan faunas of Kaitangata–Green Island Subdivision. New Zealand Geological Survey, Palaeontological Bulletin, 15, 140 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1880–1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique. F. Savy, Paris, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1861. Synopsis of the Mollusca of the Cretaceous formation, including the geographical and stratigraphical range and synonomy. American Philosophical Society, Proceedings, 8:57–257.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 1:57–243.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, Vol. 2, 299 p.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971. A review of the Muricacea. The Echo, 4:35–36.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1767. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio duodecima, reformata. Stockholm, Vol. 1, Regnum animale, Pt. 2, p. 533–1327.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. 1917. The Wangaloa Beds. New Zealand Institute, Transactions and Proceedings, 49:450–460.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. N. 1925. A contribution to the paleontology of the Martinez Eocene of California. University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences, Bulletin, 15:397–466.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1973. The origin and evolution of the Neogastropoda. Malacologia 12:295–338.Google ScholarPubMed
Popenoe, W. P., and Saul, L. R. 1987. Evolution and classification of the Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary gastropod Perissitys. Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Contributions in Science, 380, 37 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyses de la nature ou tableau de l'universe et des corps organises. Palermo, 224 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radwin, G. E., and D'Attilio, A. 1971. Muricacean supraspecific taxonomy based on the shell and the radula. The Echo, 4:55–67.Google Scholar
Radwin, G. E., 1976. Murex shells of the world. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 284 p.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum …: pars secunda continens Conchylia …. J. C. Trappii, Hamburg, 109 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983. Turritella zonation across the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 125, 164 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R.In press. New Cretaceous and early Tertiary Perissityidae (Gastropoda) from the Pacific slope of North America. Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Contributions in Science.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. F. 1817. Essai d'un nouveau systéme des habitations des vers testacés. Copenhagen, 287 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. T. 1975. Age, correlation, and possible Tethyan affinities of mollusks from the Lodo Formation of Fresno County, California, p. 464–483. In Weaver, D. W., Hornaday, G. R., and Tipton, A. (eds.), Conference on Future Energy Horizons of the Pacific Coast: Paleogene Symposium and Other Selected Technical Papers. Pacific Sections, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, and Society of Exploration Geologists, Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1964. Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia, and Basommatophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff Formations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 331-B, p. 153–344.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1896. The faunal relations of the Eocene and Upper Cretaceous on the Pacific Coast. U.S. Geological Survey, 17th Annual Report, Pt. 1, p. 1011–1060.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1923. Invertebrate fossils of the Upper Cretaceous formations. North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey, 5:1–402.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrate fossils of the Navarro Group of Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 4101, 641 p.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1867. The Gastropoda. Geological Survey of India, Memoirs, Palaeontologia Indica, Ser. V, Cretaceous fauna of southern India, 2(1–4):1–204.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. W., and Sohl, N. F. 1962. An outline of gastropod classification. Malacologia, 1:7–32.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1939. Molluscan faunas of the Domengine and Arroyo Hondo Formations of the California Eocene. New York Academy of Sciences, Annals, 38:246 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, B. 1917. An Upper Cretaceous Fulgur. American Journal of Science, ser. 4, 43:293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, B. 1926. The fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 137, 272 p.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1905. Contribution to the palaeontology of the Martinez Group. University of California Publications, Department of Geology, Bulletin, 4:101–123.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1953. Eocene and Paleocene deposits at Martinez, California. University of Washington Publications in Geology, 7, 102 p.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6. Borntraeger, Berlin, 1639 p.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1907. Die Lamellibranchiaten, Gastropoden, etc. der obern Kreide Südpatagoniens. Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg im Breisgau, Berichte 15:97–166.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1983a. Late Paleocene (“Martinez Provincial Stage”) molluscan fauna from the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California, p. 61–70. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1983b. New late Paleocene molluscs from the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Journal of Paleontology, 57:1282–1304.Google Scholar