Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:20:00.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Permian conchostracans (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) from continental deposits in the Moscow Syneclise, Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2018

Frank Scholze ,
Valeriy K. Golubev ,
Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki ,
Joerg W. Schneider  and
Andrey G. Sennikov
Frank Scholze
Affiliation:
TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Geological Institute, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Str. 2, 09599 Freiberg, Germany 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉 Kazan Federal University, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kremlyovskaya str. 4, 420008Kazan, Russia
Valeriy K. Golubev
Affiliation:
Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya str. 123, Moscow, 117647Russia 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉 Kazan Federal University, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kremlyovskaya str. 4, 420008Kazan, Russia
Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki
Affiliation:
Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 〈[email protected]〉
Joerg W. Schneider
Affiliation:
TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Geological Institute, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Str. 2, 09599 Freiberg, Germany 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉 Kazan Federal University, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kremlyovskaya str. 4, 420008Kazan, Russia
Andrey G. Sennikov
Affiliation:
Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya str. 123, Moscow, 117647Russia 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉 Kazan Federal University, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kremlyovskaya str. 4, 420008Kazan, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Moscow Syneclise on the East European Platform is an important area for the study of the continental biota of late Permian to Early Triassic age in continuous sections. This study attempts a taxonomic description of the late Permian conchostracan fauna of this area. The rich, new material was collected, bed by bed, during geological and paleontological excavations of lacustrine and fluvial deposits of the Obnora Formation and Vokhma Formation of the late Permian Zhukovian Regional Stage near the towns of Vyazniki and Gorokhovets. The conchostracan fauna of the Zhukovian Regional Stage consists predominantly of Pseudestheria and less frequently of Palaeolimnadiopsis. In the earliest Triassic Vokhmian Regional Stage, a more diverse fauna including Euestheria, Magniestheria, Cornia, Palaeolimnadiopsis, and Rossolimnadiopsis was already recorded. The preliminary taxonomic determination of the pseudestheriids from the Zhukovian Regional Stage is intended to serve as a prerequisite for future studies of late Permian conchostracan biostratigraphy on the regional to interregional scale.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 72 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aref’ev, M.P., Kuleshov, V.N., and Pokrovskii, B.G., 2015, Carbon and oxygen isotope composition in upper Permian–Lower Triassic terrestrial carbonates of the East European Platform: A global ecological crisis against the background of an unstable climate: Doklady Earth Sciences, v. 460, p. 11–15.Google Scholar
Aristov, D.S., et al., 2013, Fossil insects of the middle and upper Permian of European Russia: Paleontological Journal, v. 47, p. 641–832.Google Scholar
Astrop, T.I., and Hegna, T.A., 2015, Phylogenetic relationships between living and fossil spinicaudatan taxa (Branchiopoda Spinicaudata): Reconsidering the evidence: Journal of Crustacean Biology, v. 35, p. 339–354.Google Scholar
Bachmann, G.H., and Kozur, H.W., 2004, The Germanic Triassic: Correlations with the international chronostratigraphic scale, numerical ages and Milankovitch cyclicity: Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften B, v. 26, p. 17–62.Google Scholar
Bajdek, P., Qvarnström, M., Owocki, K., Sulej, T., Sennikov, A.G., Golubev, V.K., and Niedźwiedzki, G., 2016, Microbiota and food residues including possible evidence of pre-mammalian hair in upper Permian coprolites from Russia: Lethaia, v. 49, p. 455–477.Google Scholar
Bajdek, P., Owocki, P., Sennikov, A.G., Golubev, V.K., and Niedźwiedzki, G., 2017, Residues from the upper Permian carnivore coprolites from Vyazniki in Russia—key questions in reconstruction of feeding habits: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 482, p. 70–82.Google Scholar
Balabanov, Yu.P., Fetisova, A.M., Golubev, V.K., and Sennikov, A.G., 2016, Paleomagnitnaya i paleontologicheskaya kharakteristika pogranichnykh otlozheniy permi i triasa yuga Moskovskoy sineklisy: The General Stratigraphic Scale and Methodological Problems of Regional Stratigraphic Scales of Russia, Materials of the Interdepartmental Work Meeting, St. Petersburg, 17–20 October 2016: St. Petersburg, VSEGEI Press, p. 18–20 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Becker, A., and Nawrocki, J., 2014, Magnetostratigraphy of the Buntsandstein (Lower Triassic) in the Gorzów Wielkopolski IG 1 borehole, eastern German Basin in Poland: Evidence of substantial diachronism of palynostratigraphic macrospore zones: Geological Quarterly, v. 58, p. 369–378.Google Scholar
Benton, M.J., 1995, Diversification and extinction in the history of life: Science, v. 268, p. 52–58.Google Scholar
Benton, M.J., 2003, When Life Nearly Died. The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time: London, Thames & Hudson, 336 p.Google Scholar
Beyrich, W., 1857, 2. Protokoll der Juni-Sitzung: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 9, p. 374–377.Google Scholar
Bjerager, M., Seidler, L., Stemmerik, L., and Surlyk, F., 2006, Ammonoid stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution across the Permian-Triassic boundary in East Greenland: Geological Magazine, v. 143, p. 635–656.Google Scholar
Bronn, H.G., 1850, Über Gampsonyx fimbriatus Jordan aus der Steinkohlen-Formation von Saarbrücken und vom Murg-Thal: Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-Kunde, v. 1850, p. 575–583.Google Scholar
Cao, C., Wang, W., Liu, L., Shen, S., and Summons, R.E., 2008, Two episodes of 13C-depletion in organic carbon in the latest Permian: Evidence from the terrestrial sequences in northern Xinjiang, China: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 270, p. 251–257.Google Scholar
Carbonaro, F.A., Rohn, R., and Ghilardi, R.P., 2013, Conchostráceos Palaeolimnadiopsis (Spinicaudata, Crustacea) do Grupo Bauru (Cretáceo Superior, Bacia Bauru): Taxonomia, Paleoecologia e Paleobiogeografia: Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, v. 16, p. 283–296.Google Scholar
Chu, D., Tong, J., Yu, J., Song, H., and Tian, L., 2013, The Conchostracan fauna from the Kayitou Formation of western Guizhou, China: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 52, p. 265–280 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Chu, D., Yu, J., Tong, J., Benton, M.J., Song, H., Huang, Y., Song, T., and Tian, L., 2016, Biostratigraphic correlation and mass extinction during the Permian-Triassic transition in terrestrial-marine siliciclastic settings of South China: Global and Planetary Change, v. 146, p. 67–88.Google Scholar
Chu, D., Tong, J., Benton, M.J., Yu, J., and Huang, Y., 2017, Mixed continental-marine biotas following the Permian-Triassic mass extinction in South and North China: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.10.028 (in press).Google Scholar
Cuvelier, J., Hennion, M., Gallego, O., and Vachard, D., 2015, Palaeontological collections of Lille University—Sciences and Technologies. II—Diplostraca (types and figured specimens): Annales de la Société géologique du Nord, v. 22, no. 2, p. 119–134.Google Scholar
Defretin-Lefranc, S., 1965, Etude et révision de Phyllopodes Conchostracés en provenance d’U.R.S.S: Annales Société Géologique du Nord, v. 85, p. 15–48.Google Scholar
Depéret, C., and Mazeran, P., 1912, Les Estheria du Permien d’Autun: Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle d’Autun, v. 25, p. 165–174.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Oliveira, L.G., and Rohn, R., 2008, Conchostráceos com Linhas de Crescimento Recurvadas Junto à Margem Dorsal (Famílias Palaeolimnadiopseidae e Perilimnadiidae) da Formação Rio do Rasto, Permiano Superior, Bacia do Paraná, Brasil: Geologia USP Série Científica, v. 8, p. 41–52.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Oliveira, L.G., and Rohn, R., 2010, Leaiid conchostracans from the uppermost Permian strata of the Paraná Basin, Brazil: Chronostratigraphic and paleobiologic implications: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 29, p. 371–380.Google Scholar
Foster, C.B., Stephenson, M.H., Marshall, C., Logan, G.A., and Greenwood, P., 2002, Revision of Reduviasporonites Wilson 1962: Description, illustration, comparison and biological affinities: Palynology, v. 26, p. 35–58.Google Scholar
Frank, P.W., 1988, Conchostraca: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 62, p. 399–403.Google Scholar
Gallego, O.F., 2005, First record of the family Palaeolimnadiopseidae Defretin-Le Franc, 1965 (Crustacea–Conchostraca) in the Triassic of Argentina: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 18, p. 223–231.Google Scholar
Gastaldo, R.A., Kamo, S.L., Neveling, J., Geissman, J.W., Bamford, M., and Looy, C.V., 2015, Is the vertebrate-defined Permian-Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin, South Africa, the terrestrial expression of the end-Permian marine event?: Geology, v. 43, p. 939–942.Google Scholar
Gastaldo, R.A., Neveling, J., Looy, C.V., Bamford, M.K., Kamo, S.L., and Geissman, J.W., 2017, Paleontology of the Blaauwater 67 and 65 farms, South Africa: Testing the Daptocephalus/Lystrosaurus biozone boundary in a stratigraphic framework: PALAIOS, v. 32, p. 349–366.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S.C., 2011, Estheriids (fossil conchostracan) of Indian Gondwana: Palaeontologia Indica, v. 54, p. 1–145.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S.C., 2012, An overview of fossil conchostraca of Indian Gondwana and new contributions to Gondwana geology in global context: Indian Journal of Geosciences, v. 66, p. 1–26.Google Scholar
Gilder, S., Zhao, X., Coe, R., Meng, Z., Courtillot, V., and Besse, J., 1996, Paleomagnetism and tectonics of the southern Tarim basin, northwestern China: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, no. B10, p. 22015–22031.Google Scholar
Golubev, V.K., 2017a, K voprosu o granitse permi i triasa na Vostochno-Evropeyskoy platforme: Paleostrat-2017, Paleontological Institute, Moscow, Abstracts, p. 21–22 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Golubev, V.K., 2017b, Stratigrafia pogranichnykh otlozheniy permi i triasa Russkoy plity i permotriasovyy krisis vostochnoevropeyskoy ekosistemy: Kazan Golovkinsky Stratigraphic Meeting 2017, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Abstracts Volume, p. 61–62 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Golubev, V.K., Sennikov, A.G., Minikh, A.V., Minikh, M.G., Kukhtinov, D.A., Balabanov, Yu.P., and Silantiev, V.V., 2012a, Granitsa permi i triasa na yugo-vostoke Moskovskoy sineklisuy: Problems of Paleoecology and Historical Geoecology, Compilation of scientific materials of the All-Russian scientific conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Professor Vitaly Georgiyevich Ochev: Saratov, Saratov State Technical University Press, p. 144–150 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Golubev, V.K., Minikh, A.V., Balabanov, Yu.P., Kukhtinov, D.A., Sennikov, A.G., and Minikh, M.G, 2012b, Opornyy razrez permi i triasa v Zhukovom ovrage u g. Gorokhovets, Vladimirskaya oblast: Bulletin of the Regional Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Commission on the Center and the South of the Russian Platform, v. 5, p. 49–82 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Golubev, V.K., Kotlyar, G.V., Silantiev, V.V., Arefiev, M.P., Balabanov, Yu.P., Naumcheva, M.A., Molostovskaya, I.I., Minikh, A.V., and Minikh, M.G., 2015, The Permian General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia and its correlation with the International Stratigraphic Scale: XVIII International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian, August 11–15, Kazan, Russia, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Abstracts Volume, p. 67.Google Scholar
Goretzki, J., 2003, Biostratigraphy of Conchostracans: A key for the interregional correlations of the continental Palaeozoic and Mesozoic—Computer-aided pattern analysis and shape statistics to classify groups being poor in characteristics [Ph.D. dissertation]: Freiberg, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 243 p., 64 pls.Google Scholar
Gorsky, V.P., Gusseva, E.A., Crasquin-Soleau, S., and Broutin, J., 2003, Stratigraphic data of the middle–late Permian on Russian Platform: Geobios, v. 36, p. 533–558.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D., and Ogg, G.M., 2012, The Geologic Time Scale 2012: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1144 p.Google Scholar
Hauschke, N., 2014, Conchostraken als Zeitmarken und Faziesanzeiger in kontinentalen Ablagerungen der Trias: Fallbeispiele aus Sachsen-Anhalt und dem östlichen Niedersachsen: Abhandlungen und Berichte für Naturkunde, v. 34, p. 19–55.Google Scholar
Holub, V., and Kozur, H., 1981, Revision einiger Conchostracen-Faunen des Rotliegenden und biostratigraphische Auswertung der Conchostracen des Rotliegenden: Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, v. 11, p. 39–94.Google Scholar
Jones, R., 1862, A Monograph of the Fossil Estheriae: London, Palaeontological Society, 134 p., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Jones, R., and Woodward, H., 1899, Contributions to fossil Crustacea: Geological Magazine, N. S., v. 6, p. 388–395.Google Scholar
Karasev, E.V., 2013, Formal system of dispersed leaf cuticles of pteridosperms (Peltaspermaceae) from the Permian and Triassic of the Russian Platform: Paleontological Journal, v. 47, p. 335–349.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1954, Fossil Estherians and allied fossils: Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo section 2, v. 9, p. 1–192.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1973, On the classification of the fossil Conchostraca and the discovery of estheriids in the Cretaceous of Borneo: Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, v. 13, p. 47–72.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Hauschke, N., 2008, Estheriella bachmanni n. sp., the ancestral form of the radially-ribbed Triassic Estheriella Weiss: Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften, v. 30, p. 11–20.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Seidel, G., 1983, Revision der Conchostracen-Faunen des unteren und mittleren Buntsandsteins. Teil I: Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften, v. 11, p. 295–423.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Sittig, E., 1981, Das “Estheria” tenella-Problem und zwei neue Conchostracen-Arten aus dem Rotliegenden von Sulzbach (Senke von Baden-Baden, Nordschwarzwald): Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, v. 11, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Weems, R.E., 2010, The biostratigraphic importance of conchostracans in the continental Triassic of the northern hemisphere: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 334, p. 315–417.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Weems, R.E., 2011, Detailed correlation and age of the continental late Changhsingian and earliest Triassic beds: Implications for the role of the Siberian Trap in the Permian-Triassic biotic crisis: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 308, p. 22–40.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., Martens, T., and Pacaud, G., 1981, Revision von “Estheria” (Lioestheria) lallyensis Depéret & Mazeran, 1912 und “Euestheria” autunensis Raymond, 1946: Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften, v. 9, p. 1437–1445.Google Scholar
Krassilov, V., and Karasev, E., 2008, First evidence of plant–arthropod interaction at the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Volga Basin, European Russia: Alavesia, v. 2, p. 247–252.Google Scholar
Krassilov, V., and Karasev, E., 2009. Paleofloristic evidence of climate change near and beyond the Permian-Triassic boundary: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 284, p. 326–336.Google Scholar
Kukhtinov, D.A., Lozovsky, V.R., Afonin, S.A., and Voronkova, E.A., 2008, Non-marine ostracods of the Permian–Triassic transition from sections of the East European platform: Bollettino della Società geologica italiana, v. 127, p. 717–726.Google Scholar
Latreille, M., 1817, Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base à l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction à l’anatomie comparée, par M. le Cher, Cuvier, Avec figures, dessinées d’après nature, Tome III, contenant les crustacés, les arachnides et les insects: Paris, Deterville, 653 p.Google Scholar
Lebedev, O.A., Sennikov, A.G., Golubev, V.K., Krupina, N.I., Niedzwiedzki, G., and Sulej, T., 2015, The first find of Permian ceratodontids (Dipnoi, Osteichthyes) in Russia: Paleontological Journal, v. 49, p. 1112–1124.Google Scholar
Li, G., and Matsuoka, A., 2012, Jurassic clam shrimp (“conchostracan”) faunas in China: Science reports of Niigata University (Geology), v. 27, p. 73–88.Google Scholar
Linder, F., 1945, Affinities within the Branchiopoda, with notes on some dubious fossils: Arkiv För Zoologi, v. 37, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1761, Fauna Svecica, Sistens Animalia Sveciae Regni: Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa Per Classes & Ordines, Genera & Species, Cum Differentiis Specierum, Synonymis Auctorum, Nominibus Incolarum, Locis Natalium, Descriptionibus Insectorum. Stockholmiae, Sumru & Literis Direct: Stockholm, Laurentii Salvii, 578 p.Google Scholar
Lipatova, V.V., and Lopato, A.Yu., 2000, Triasovye listonogie rakoobrasnye Evrasii i ikh stratigraficheskoe znachenie: Moscow, Geos, 124 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Liu, S.-W., 1985, An SEM study on the conchostracan genus Polygrapta : Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 24, p. 625–629.Google Scholar
Liu, S.-W., and He, Z.-J., 2000, Marine conchostracans from the “Sunjiagou Formation” of Qishan, Shaanxi: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 39, p. 230–236.Google Scholar
Lozovsky, V.R., 1992, The Permian-Triassic boundary in continental series of Laurasia and its correlation with the marine scale: International Geology Review, v. 34, p. 1008–1014.Google Scholar
Lozovsky, V.R., 1997, The Permian-Triassic boundary in continental sequences: Prace Panstwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, v. 157, p. 51–62.Google Scholar
Lozovsky, V.R., and Kukhtinov, D.A., 2007, Vyaznikian Stage—youngest subdivision of Upper Permian in European Russia: Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists, Geological Series, v. 82, p. 17–26 [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Lozovsky, V.R., Balabanov, Yu.P., Karasev, E.V., Novikov, I.V., Ponomarenko, A.G., and Yaroshenko, O.P., 2016, The terminal Permian in European Russia: Vyaznikovian Horizon, Nedubrovo Member, and Permian–Triassic boundary: Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, v. 24, p. 364–380.Google Scholar
Lutkevich, E.M., 1937, O nekotorykh Phyllopoda SSSR: Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo Paleontologicheskogo Obshchestva, v. 11, p. 60–70 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Lutkevich, E.M., 1938, Triassic Estheriae from the upper strata of the Tungussk Series: Transactions of the Arctic Institute, v. 101, p. 155–164.Google Scholar
Martens, T., 1983, Zur Taxonomie und Biostratigraphie der Conchostraca (Phyllopoda, Crustacea) des Jungpaläozoikums der DDR, Teil I: Freiberger Forschungshefte, v. C382, p. 7–105.Google Scholar
Martens, T., and Lucas, S.G., 2005, Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of Conchostraca (Branchiopoda, Crustacea) from two nonmarine Pennsylvanian and lower Permian localities in New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 30, p. 208–213.Google Scholar
Mendes, J.C., 1954, Conchostracos Permianos do Sul do Brasil, in Lange, F.W., ed., Paleontologia do Paraná: Curitiba, Publicado pela Comissao do Centenário do Paraná, Museu Paranaense, p. 153–163.Google Scholar
Minikh, A.V., Minikh, M.G., and Andrushkevich, S.O., 2014, Ikhtiofauna terminalnoy permi v okrestnostyakh g. Vyazniki: Izvestiya of Saratov University, New Series, Earth Sciences, 14, p. 91–96 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Minikh, A.V., Arefiev, M.P., and Golubev, V.K., 2015a, A new fish species of the genus Isadia (Actinopterygii, Eurynotoidiformes) from the new locality on the Malaya Northern Dvina River (terminal Permian, Vologda Region): Paleontological Journal, v. 49, p. 615–626.Google Scholar
Minikh, M.G., Minikh, A.V., Sennikov, A.G., Golubev, V.K., and, Kogan, I., 2015b, Novye dannye o predstavitelyakh fauny pozvonochnykh v vyatskom yaruse verkhney permi basseyna Verkhney Volgi: Nedra Povolzhiya i Prikaspiya, v. 82, p. 28–35 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Molin, V.A., and Novozhilov, N.I., 1965, Dvustvorchatye listonogie permi i triasa severa SSSR: Moscow, Nauka, 117 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Molostovskaya, I.I., 2010, O granitse permi i triasa v razreze Zhukova ovraga: Izvestia Vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy, Geologia i razvedka, v. 3, p. 10–14 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Morton, J.D., Whiteside, D.I., Hethke, M., and Benton, M.J., 2017, Biostratigraphy and geometric morphometrics of conchostracans (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) from the Late Triassic fissure deposits of Cromhall quarry, UK: Palaeontology, v. 60, p. 349–374.Google Scholar
Naugolnykh, S.V., 2005, Upper Permian flora of Vjazniki (European part of Russia), its Zechstein appearance, and the nature of the Permian/Triassic extinction: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 30, p. 226–242.Google Scholar
Neveling, J., Gastaldo, R.A., Kamo, S.L., Geissman, J.W., Looy, C.V., and Bamford, M.K., 2016, A review of stratigraphic, geochemical, and paleontologic data of the terrestrial end-Permian record in the Karoo Basin, South Africa, in Linol, B., and De Wit, M.J., eds., The Origin and Evolution of the Cape Mountains and Karoo Basin: Basel, Springer International Publishing, Regional Geology Reviews, p. 151–157, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40859-0_15.Google Scholar
Newell, A.J., Sennikov, A.G., Benton, M.J., Molostovskaya, I.I., Golubev, V.K., Minikh, A.V., and Minikh, M.G., 2010, Disruption of playa–lacustrine depositional systems at the Permo-Triassic boundary: Evidence from Vyazniki and Gorokhovets on the Russian Platform: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 167, p. 695–716.Google Scholar
Newell, A.J., Benton, M.J., Kearsey, T., Taylor, G., Twitchett, R.J., and Tverdokhlebov, V.P., 2012, Calcretes, fluviolacustrine sediments and subsidence patterns in Permo-Triassic salt-walled minibasins of the south Urals, Russia: Sedimentology, v. 59, p. 1659–1676.Google Scholar
Niedźwiedzki, G., Bajdek, P., Qvarnström, M., Sulej, T., Sennikov, A.G., and Golubev, V.K., 2016, Reduction of vertebrate coprolite diversity associated with the end-Permian extinction event in Vyazniki region, European Russia: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 450, p. 77–90.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E., 1954, Tupilakosaurus heilmani n. g. et n. sp. An interesting batrachomorph from the Triassic of East Greenland: Meddelelser om Grønland udgivne af Kommissionen for Videnskabelige Undersøgelser i Grønland, v. 72, p. 5–33.Google Scholar
Novikov, I.V., 2015, On the age of Early Triassic Tupilakosaurus fauna of Eastern Europe: Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy, Geologiya i razvedka, v. 5, p. 8–13 [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1946, Novye Phyllopoda iz permskikh i triasovykh otlozheniy Nordvik-Chatangskogo rayona: Nedra Arktiki, v. 1, p. 172–202 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1958a, Conchostraca du Permien et du Trias du Littoral de la Mer des Lptev et de la Toungounzka inférieure: Annales du Service d’Information Geologique du Bureau de Recherches géologiques, géophysiques, et minières, v. 26, p. 15–80.Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1958b, Conchostraca de la Super Famille des Limnadiopseidea superfam. nov.: Annales du Service d’Information Geologique du Bureau de Recherches géologiques, géophysiques, et minières, v. 26, p. 95–128.Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1958c, Nouveaux conchostraca fossiles: Annales du Service d’Information Geologique du Bureau de Recherches géologiques, géophysiques, et minières, v. 26, p. 7–14.Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1959, Novye permskie i triasovye Conchostraca iz yuzhnoy Belorussii, Priuralia i Yakutii: Materialy k Osnovam Paleontologii, v. 3, p. 84–103 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1960, Dvustvorchatye listonogie rakoobraznye iz nizhnego triasa Yaroslavskoy oblasti: Kraevedcheskie Zapiski, v. 4, p. 336–344 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Novozhilov, N.I., 1970, Vymershie Limnadioidei. Conchostraca—Limnadioidea: Moscow, Nauka, 237 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Olempska, E., 2004, Late Triassic spinicaudatan crustaceans from southwestern Poland: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 49, p. 429–442.Google Scholar
Orlova, E.F., 1990, New data on the conchostracans Rohdendorfium and Bipemphigus from the Permotriassic volcanogenic deposits of the Tunguska syneclise: Paleontological Journal, v. 24, no. 2, p. 28–38.Google Scholar
Orlova, E.F., and Sadovnikov, G.N., 2009, Distribution and microsculpture of Limnadiidae, Falsiscidae, and Glyptoasmussiidae (Conchostraca) of the terminal Permian of Siberia: Paleontological Journal, v. 43, p. 631–639.Google Scholar
Orr, P.J., Briggs, D.E.G., and Kearns, S.L., 2008, Taphonomy of exceptionally preserved crustaceans from the upper Carboniferous of southeastern Ireland: PALAIOS, v. 23, p. 298–312.Google Scholar
Owocki, K., Niedźwiedzki, G., Sennikov, A.G., Golubev, V.K., Janiszewska, K., and Sulej, T., 2012, Upper Permian vertebrate coprolites from Vyazniki and Gorokhovets, Vyatkian Regional Stage, Russian Platform: PALAIOS, v. 27, p. 867–877.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Sha, J., and Liao, H., 2015, Exceptional preservation of clam shrimp (Branchiopoda, Eucrustacea) eggs from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota and implications for paleoecology and taphonomy: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 369–376.Google Scholar
Pearse, A.S., 1912, Notes on phyllopod Crustacea: Report of the Michigan Academy of Science, v. 14, p. 191–197.Google Scholar
Peng, Y., and Shi, G.R., 2009, Life crises on land across the Permian–Triassic boundary in South China: Global and Planetary Change, v. 65, p. 155–165.Google Scholar
Pindakiewicz, M., Tałanda, M., Sennikov, A., Niedźwiedzki, G., and Sulej, T., 2015, The latest Permian-earliest Triassic microvertebrate fauna from the Vyazniki, Russia: 13th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontologists, Opole, Poland, 8–12 July, Abstracts, p. 68.Google Scholar
Ptaszyński, T., and Niedźwiedzki, G., 2004, Conchostraca (muszloraczki) z najniższego pstrego piaskowca Zachełmia, Góry Świętokrzyskie: Przegląd Geologiczny, v. 52, p. 1151–1155 [in Polish with English summary].Google Scholar
Ptaszyński, T., and Niedźwiedzki, G., 2006, Pstry piaskowiec w Górach Świętokrzyskich: chronostratygrafia i korelacja litostratygraficzna z Basenem Turyńskim: Przegląd Geologiczny, v. 54, p. 525–533 [in Polish with English summary].Google Scholar
Raymond, P.E., 1946, The genera of fossil conchostracan—An order of bivalved crustacean: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy, v. 96, p. 217–370.Google Scholar
Reed, F.R.C., 1929, New fossil Phyllopoda from Brazil: Serviço Geológico e Mineralógico do Brasil Boletim, v. 34, p. 2–17.Google Scholar
Reible, P., 1962, Die Conchostraken (Branchiopoda, Crustacea) der Germanischen Trias: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, v. 114, p. 169–244.Google Scholar
Reichow, M.K., et al., 2009, The timing and extent of the eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 277, p. 9–20.Google Scholar
Sadovnikov, G.N., 2015, Paleoecological characterization of the middle Siberian Trappean Plateau at the end of the period of its formation (near the Permian–Triassic boundary): Paleontological Journal, v. 49, p. 89–99.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., and Lucas, S.G., 2015, Late Carboniferous-Permian-Early Triassic Nonmarine-Marine Correlation: Call for global cooperation: Permophiles, v. 61, p. 28–35.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., and Scholze, F., 2016, Late Pennsylvanian–Early Triassic conchostracan biostratigraphy: A preliminary approach: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 450, doi:10.1144/SP450.6.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., et al., 2014a, Report on the activities of the Nonmarine-Marine Correlation Working Group for 2014—Program for 2015 and future tasks: Permophiles, v. 60, p. 31–36.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., Rössler, R., Werneburg, R., Scholze, F., and Voigt, S., 2014b, The Carboniferous–Permian basins in Saxony, Thuringia, and Saxony-Anhalt of East Germany: Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen des Instituts für Geologie der TU Bergakademie Freiberg, v. 46, p. 55–121.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., Lucas, S.G., Trümper, S., Stanulla, C., and Krainer, K., 2016, Carrizo Arroyo, central New Mexico—A new late Paleozoic taphotype of arthropod Fossillagerstätte, in Frey, B.A., Karlstrom, K.E., Lucas, S.G., Williams, S., Zeigler, K., Mclemore, V., and Ulmer-Scholle, D.S., eds., Geology of the Belen Area: Fall Field Conference Guidebooks, 67, p. 377–386.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., et al., 2017, Report on the activities of the Late Carboniferous–Permian–Early Triassic Nonmarine-Marine Correlation Working Group for 2016 and 2017: Permophiles, v. 65, p. 16–24.Google Scholar
Scholze, F., and Schneider, J.W., 2015, Improved methodology of ‘conchostracan’ (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) classification for biostratigraphy: Newsletters on Stratigraphy, v. 48, p. 287–298.Google Scholar
Scholze, F., Golubev, V.K., Niedźwiedzki, G., Sennikov, A.G., Schneider, J.W., Silantiev, V.V., 2015, Early Triassic Conchostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the terrestrial Permian–Triassic boundary sections in the Moscow syncline: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 429, p. 22–40.Google Scholar
Scholze, F., Schneider, J.W., and Werneburg, R., 2016, Conchostracans in continental deposits of the Zechstein-Buntsandstein transition in central Germany: Taxonomy and biostratigraphic implications for the position of the Permian-Triassic boundary within the Zechstein Group: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 449, p. 174–193.Google Scholar
Scholze, F., Wang, X., Kirscher, U., Kraft, J., Schneider, J.W., Götz, A.E., Joachimski, M.M., and Bachtadse, V., 2017a, A multistratigraphic approach to pinpoint the Permian-Triassic boundary in continental deposits: The Zechstein–Lower Buntsandstein transition in Germany: Global and Planetary Change, v. 152, p. 129–151.Google Scholar
Scholze, F., Abu Hamad, A., Schneider, J.W., Golubev, V.K., Sennikov, A.G., Voigt, S., and Uhl, D., 2017b, An enigmatic ‘conchostracan’ fauna in the eastern Dead Sea region of Jordan: First records of Rossolimnadiopsis Novozhilov from the Early Triassic Ma’in Formation: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 466, p. 314–325.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., 2017, New Data on Synecology of Vyazniki Terrestrial Community (Terminal Permian, Central Russia): Paleontological Journal, v. 51, p. 402–413.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., and Golubev, V.K., 2005, Unique Vyazniki biotic complex of the terminal Permian from the central Russia and the global ecological crisis at the Permo-Triassic boundary: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletins, v. 30, p. 302–304.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., and Golubev, V.K., 2006, Vyazniki Biotic Assemblage of the Terminal Permian: Paleontological Journal, v. 40, p. S457–S481.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., and Golubev, V.K., 2012, On the faunal verification of the Permo–Triassic boundary in continental deposits of Eastern Europe: 1. Gorokhovets–Zhukov Ravine: Paleontological Journal, v. 46, p. 313–323.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., and Golubev, V.K., 2017, Sequence of Permian tetrapod faunas of Eastern Europe and the Permian–Triassic ecological crisis: Paleontological Journal, v. 51, p. 600–611.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.G., Gubin, Yu.M., Golubev, V.K., Bulanov, V.V., Ivakhenko, M.F., and Kurkin, A.A., 2003, A new Oryctocenosis of the aquatic vertebrate community from the late Permian of Central Russia: Paleontological Journal, v. 37, p. 417–424.Google Scholar
Shen, S.-Z., Crowley, J.L., Wang, Y., Bowring, S.A., Erwin, D.H., Sadler, P.M., Cao, C.-Q., Rothman, D.H., Henderson, C.M., Ramezani, J., Zhang, H., Shen, Y., Wang, X.-D., Wang, W., Mu, L., Li, W.-Z., Tang, Y.-G., Liu, X.-L., Liu, L.-J., Zeng, Y., Jiang, Y.-F., and Jin, Y.-G., 2011, Calibrating the end-Permian mass extinction: Science, v. 334, p. 1367–1372.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., 1985, Classification and evolution of family Paleolimnadiopseidae (Conchostraca): Scientia Sinica (Series B), v. 28, p. 888–896.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., 2006, Kenyaestheria, a new genus of Conchostraca from the Lower Triassic of Kenya: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 45, p. 175–181.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Garassino, A., and Teruzzi, G., 2002, Studies on Permo-Trias of Madagascar. 4. Early Triassic conchostracans from Madagascar: Atti della Società italiana di scienze naturali e del Museo civico di storia naturale di Milano, v. 143, p. 3–11.Google Scholar
Shen, Y.-B., Gallego, O., Buchheim, H.P., and Biaggi, R.E., 2006, Eocene conchostracans from the Laney Member of the Green River Formation, Wyoming, USA: Journal of Paleontology, v. 80, p. 447–454.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M.A., Ochev, V.G., Lozovskii, V.R., and Novikov, I.V., 2000, Tetrapod biostratigraphy of the Triassic of Eastern Europe, in Benton, M.J., Shishkin, M.A., Unwin, D.M., and Kurochkin, E.N., eds., The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 120–139.Google Scholar
Silantiev, V.V., 2014, Permian nonmarine bivalve zonation of the East European Platform: Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, v. 22, p. 1–27.Google Scholar
Silantiev, V.V., 2016, Permian non-marine bivalves of East European Platform: Stratigraphic distribution and correlation: Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists, Geological Series, v. 91, p. 49–65 [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Smith, R.M.H., and Botha-Brink, J., 2014, Anatomy of a mass extinction: Sedimentological and taphonomic evidence for drought-induced die-offs at the Permo-Triassic boundary in the main Karoo Basin, South Africa: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 396, p. 99–118.Google Scholar
Soussi, M., Niedźwiedzki, G., Tałanda, M., Dróżdż, D., Sulej, T., Boukhalfa, K., Mermer, J., and Błażejowski, B., 2017, Middle Triassic (Anisian-Ladinian) Tejra red beds and Late Triassic (Carnian) carbonate sedimentary records of southern Tunisia, Saharan Platform: Biostratigraphy, sedimentology and implication on regional stratigraphic correlations: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 79, p. 222–256.Google Scholar
Stigall, A.L., Hembree, D.I., Gierlowski-Kordesch, E.H., and Weismiller, H.C., 2014, Evidence for a dioecious mating system in Early Jurassic Hardapestheria maxwelli gen. et sp. nov. (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) from the Kalkrand Formation of Namibia: Palaeontology, v. 57, p. 127–140.Google Scholar
Stordal, F., Svensen, H.H., Aarnes, I., and Roscher, M., 2017, Global temperature response to century-scale degassing from the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 471, p. 96–107.Google Scholar
Strok, N.I., Gorbatkina, T.E., and Lozovsky, V.R., 1984, Verkhnepermskie i nizhnetriasovye otlozhenia Moskovskoy sineklizy: Moscow, Nedra, 140 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Szurlies, M., Geluk, M.C., Krijgsman, W., and Kürschner, W.M., 2012, The continental Permian–Triassic boundary in the Netherlands: Implications for the geomagnetic polarity time scale: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 317/318, p. 165–176.Google Scholar
Tasch, P., 1958, Novojilov’s classification of fossil conchostracans—A critical evaluation. Part I. Family Leaiidae: Journal of Paleontology, v. 32, p. 1094–1106.Google Scholar
Tasch, P., 1969. Branchiopoda, Order Conchostraca, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. R. Arthropoda 4. Lawrence, The University of Kansas and The Geological Society of America, p. 141–163.Google Scholar
Tasch, P., 1987. Fossil Conchostraca of the southern hemisphere and continental drift: Geological Society of America Memoirs, v. 165, p. 1–290.Google Scholar
Tassi, L.V., Monti, M., Gallego, O.F., Zavattieri, A.M., and Lara, M.B., 2013, The first spinicaudatan (Crustacea: Diplostraca) from Permo-Triassic continental sequences of South America and its palaeoecological context: Alcheringa, v. 37, p. 189–201.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.K., Tucker, C., Twichett, R.J., Kearsey, T., Benton, M.J., Newell, A.J., Surkov, M.V., and Tverdokhlebov, V.P., 2009, Magnetostratigraphy of Permian/Triassic boundary sequences in the Cis-Urals, Russia: No evidence for a major temporal hiatus: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 281, p. 36–47.Google Scholar
Thomas, S.G., Tabor, N.J., Yang, W., Myers, T.S., Yang, Y., and Wang, D., 2011, Palaeosol stratigraphy across the Permian–Triassic boundary, Bogda Mountains, NW China: Implications for palaeoenvironmental transition through earth’s largest mass extinction: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 308, p. 41–64.Google Scholar
Tintori, A., 1990, Estherids from the Kalkschieferzone (Triassic) of Lombardy (N. Italy): Estratto da Atti del Quarto Simposio di Ecologia e Paleoecologia delle Comunità Bentoniche, Sorrento, 1–5 Novembre 1988: Torino, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, p. 95–105.Google Scholar
Varentsov, I.M., 1955, O sostave i rasprostranenii roda dvustvorchatykh listonogikh rakoobraznykh Palaeolimnadiopsis v paleozoe: Doklady Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., v. 104, p. 310–312 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Voronkova, E.A., 2014, Volganelloidea Mandelstam ostracodes from the key section of the terminal upper Permian strata of the Russian Platform: Paleontological Journal, v. 48, p. 484–487.Google Scholar
Wan, M., Yang, W., Liu, L., and Wang, J., 2017, Ductoagathoxylon jimsarensis gen. nov. et sp. nov., a gymnospermous stem from the Wuchiapingian (upper Permian) Wutonggou Formation in the Junggar Basin, northern Bogda Mountains, northwestern China: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 241, p. 13–25.Google Scholar
Warren, A., 1999, Karoo tupilakosaurid: A relict from Gondwana: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 89, p. 145–160.Google Scholar
Webb, J.A., 1978, A new Triassic Palaeolimnadiopsis (Crustacea: Conchostraca) from the Sydney Basin, New South Wales: Alcheringa, v. 2, p. 261–367.Google Scholar
Webb, J.A., 1979, A reappraisal of the palaeoecology of conchostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, v. 158, p. 259–275.Google Scholar
Weems, R.E., and Lucas, S.G., 2015, A revision of the Norian conchostracan zonation in North America and its implications for Late Triassic North American tectonic history: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 67, p. 303–317.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R., Steyer, J.S., Sommer, G., Gand, G., Schneider, J.W., and Vianey-Liaud, M., 2007, The earliest tupilakosaurid amphibian with diplospondylous vertebrae from the late Permian of southern France: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 27, p. 26–30.Google Scholar
Yin, H., Zhang, K., Tong, J., Yang, Z., and Wu, S., 2001, The global stratotype section and point (GSSP) of the Permian-Triassic boundary: Episodes, v. 24, p. 102–114.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Cao, C.-Q., Liu, X.-L., Mu, L., Zheng, Q.-F., Liu, F., Xiang, L., Liu, L.-J., and Shen, S.-Z., 2016, The terrestrial end-Permian mass extinction in South China: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 448, p. 108–124.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.S., Niu, S.W., Tian, S.G., Xing, E.Y., Su, K., Cao, J., and Wang, J.T., 2012, The discovery of conchostracan fossils in the upper Permian Linxi Formation of Linxi area, Inner Mongolia, and its geological significance: Geological Bulletin of China, v. 39, p. 1394–1403.Google Scholar