Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:41:50.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Miocene three-toed horse Protohippus (Mammalia, Equidae) from southern Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Bruce J. Macfadden  and
James L. Dobie
Bruce J. Macfadden
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-7800 ([email protected])
James L. Dobie
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5414
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dental and postcranial remains of a donkey-sized, three-toed, primitive horse were collected from the “Undifferentiated Miocene” Ecor Rouge Sand (which underlies the widespread Citronelle Formation) from the Mauvilla site in southern Alabama. These fossils probably pertain to a single individual of Protohippus gidleyi Hulbert, 1988. This represents an exceedingly rare occurrence of a late Tertiary land mammal from the central Gulf Coastal Plain and allows comparisons with better-known, contemporaneous land-mammal assemblages from Florida. Based on the known biochronology of Protohippus gidleyi from other localities, and the stratigraphic position of the Mauvilla record, the age of: 1) the Ecor Rouge Sand is late Miocene (latest Clarendonian to early Hemphillian landmammal “age”), between 9.0 to 6.5 Ma; and 2) the overlying Citronelle Formation near its type locality in southern Alabama is therefore late Miocene or younger.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 149 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gray, J. E. 1821. On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository Review, 15:296–310.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. Jr. 1988. Calippus and Protohippus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla, Equidae) from the Miocene (Barstovian-early Hemphillian) of the Gulf Coastal Plain. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences, 32:221–340.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. Jr. 1989. Phylogenetic interrelationships and evolution of North American late Neogene Equinae, p. 176–196. In Prothero, D. R. and Schoch, R. M., (eds.), The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. Jr. and Whitmore, F. C. Jr. 1997. Early Hemphillian mammals from the Mauvilla Local Fauna, Alabama Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Abstracts of Papers, 17:54A.Google Scholar
Isphording, W. C. and Flowers, G. C. 1983. Differentiation of unfossiliferous clastic sediments: Solutions from the southern portion of the Alabama-Mississippi Coastal Plain. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 17:59–83.Google Scholar
Isphording, W. C. and Lamb, G. M. 1971. Age and origin of the Citronelle Formation in Alabama. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 82:775–780.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1858. Notice of remains of extinct Vertebrata, from the Valley of the Niobrara River collected during the exploring expedition of 1857, in Nebraska, under the command of Lieut. G. K. Warren, U. S. Top. Eng., by Dr. F. V. Hayden, geologist to the expedition. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, 10:20–29.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1869. The extinct mammalian fauna of Dakota and Nebraska, including an account of some allied forms from other localities, together with a synopsis of the mammalian remains from North America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Series 2, 7, 472 p.Google Scholar
Manning, E. M., and MacFadden, B. J. 1989. Pliocene three-toed horses from Louisiana, with comments on the Citronelle Formation. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 22:35–46.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1918. Equidae of the Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene of North America. Iconographic type revision. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 2:1–326.Google Scholar
Sisson, S. and Grossman, J. D. 1953. The Anatomy of Domesticated Animals. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 972 pp.Google Scholar
Stirton, R. A., 1940. Phylogeny of North American Equidae. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 25:165–198.Google Scholar
Tedford, R. H., and Hunter, M. E. 1984. Miocene marine-nonmarine correlations, Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains, North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 47:129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedford, R. H., Skinner, M. F., Fields, R. W., Rensberger, J. M., Whistler, D. P., Galusha, T., Taylor, B. E., Macdonald, J. R., and Webb, S. D. 1987. Faunal succession and biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian interval (late Oligocene through earliest Pliocene epochs) in North America, p. 153–210. In Woodburne, M. O., (ed.), Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Geochronology and Biostratigraphy. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar