Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:03:31.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The genus Xanthilites Bell, 1858 and a new Xanthoid family (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthoidea): New hypotheses on the origin of the Xanthoidea MacLeay, 1838

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Carrie E. Schweitzer
Carrie E. Schweitzer*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, Canton, Ohio 44720,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The xanthoid genus Xanthilites Bell, 1858 is herein restricted to contain only the type species X. bowerbanki and possibly a second species. Xanthilites sensu stricto, Pulalius, Tumidocarcinus, Paratumidocarcinus, and Baricarcinus are placed within the Tumidocarcinidae new family within the Xanthoidea. It is hypothesized that the Carpiliidae, Platyxanthidae, Tumidocarcinidae new family, Zanthopsidae, and at least some subfamilies of the Eriphiidae form a natural group and may belong to a discrete superfamily, based upon paleontological and neontological evidence. The earliest documented occurrence in the fossil record for the xanthoid Platyxanthidae is in Eocene rocks, with the referral herein of a fossil species to the family. The two related families, Eriphiidae and Platyxanthidae, are difficult to distinguish from one another in fossil specimens; diagnoses which take into account preservable characters are provided. Moreover, based upon morphological features the Eriphiidae as currently defined may comprise at least two families. Revision of Xanthilites has resulted in two new genera, Jakobsenius and Rocacarcinus, erected for Xanthilites? cretacea and X. gerthi respectively, both placed within the extinct Palaeoxanthopsidae. The common ancestor of at least some families currently referred to the Xanthoidea may lie within the Palaeoxanthopsidae, which may have embraced “pre-adapted survivor” taxa, surviving the end-Cretaceous extinction event. Goniocypoda tessieri is confirmed as a member of the Hexapodidae, extending the range of that family into the Cretaceous; however, the family is not a likely candidate for embracing the ancestral xanthoids. The illustrated specimen of Menippe frescoensis retains a barnacle epibiont, very rare in the fossil record of decapods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , March 2005 , pp. 277 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguirre-Urreta, M. B., Marenssi, S., and Santillana, S. 1995. A new Eocene crab (Crustacea, Decapoda) from Seymour Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 7:277–281.Google Scholar
Alcock, A. 1898. The family Xanthidae: the Brachyura Cyclometopa, Pt. I, Material for a carcinological fauna of India, No. 3. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 67(II: 1):67–233.Google Scholar
Alcock, A. 1900. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. No. 6. The Brachyura Catometopa or Grapsoidea. Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal, 69, 2(3):279–456.Google Scholar
Artal, P., and Via, L. 1988. Xanthilites macrodactylus pyrenaicus (Crustacea, Decapoda) nueva subespecie del Ilerdiense medio del Pirineo de Huesco. Batalleria, 2:57–61.Google Scholar
Balss, H. 1922. Decapoda Brachyura (Oxyryncha und Brachyryncha) und geographische Übersicht über Crustacea Decapoda: Crustacea VII, p. 70–110, figs. 1–5. In W. Michaelsen, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas (Hamburg), 3 (3).Google Scholar
Balss, H. 1957. Decapoda, VIII: Systematik, p. 1505–1672, figs. 1131–1199. In Bronn, H. G., Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Band 5, Abteilung 1, 7(12).Google Scholar
Bell, T. 1858. A monograph of the fossil malacostracous Crustacea of Great Britain, Pt. I, Crustacea of the London Clay. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London, 44 p.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1930. Vergleichende Stammesgeschichte Grundlagen, Methoden, Probleme unter Besonderer Beruchsichtingung der hoheren Krebse. Fortschrifte Geologie und Palaeontologie, 8:317–586.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1958. Contribução a paleontologia do Estado do Pará, Crostaceos decápodos da Formação Pirabas. Boletimo Museum Paraense Emilio Goeldi, n. s. (geol.), 5:2–48, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1988. Two crabs, Xandaros sternbergi (Rathbun, 1926) n. gen., and Icriocarcinus xestos n. gen., n. sp., from the Late Cretaceous of San Diego County, California, USA, and Baja California Norte, Mexico. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 21:245–257.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A., Feldmann, R. M., and Vega, F. J. 1998. The Dakoticancridae (Decapoda, Brachyura) from the late Cretaceous of North America and Mexico. Contributions to Zoology, 67:237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, E.-L. 1922. Observations complémentaires sur les Crustacés décapodes (Abstraction faite les Carides) provenant des Campagnes de S. A. S. le Prince de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques accomplies sur son yacht par Albert ler Prince Souverain de Monaco, 62:1–106, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Casadío, S., De Angeli, A., Feldmann, R. M., Garassino, A., Hetler, J. L., Parras, A., and Schweitzer, C. E. 2004. New decapod crustaceans (Thalassinidea, Brachyura) from the late Oligocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 73:25–47.Google Scholar
Clark, P. F., and Galil, B. S. 1988. Redescriptions of Tetralia cavimana Heller, 1861 and Trapezia cymodoce Herbst, 1799: first stage zoeas with implications for classification within the superfamily Xanthoidea (Crustacea Brachyura). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 101:853–860.Google Scholar
Coelho, P. A., and Coelho Filho, P. A. 1993. Proposta de classificação da família Xanthidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) através da taxonomia numérica. Revista Brasiliera de Zoologia, 10(4):559–580.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., and Jakobsen, S. L. 1994. A synopsis of the biostratigraphic distribution of the crab genera (Crustacea, Decapoda) of the Danian (Palaeocene) of Denmark and Sweden. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 21:35–46, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., and Rasmussen, H. W. 1992. Upper Cretaceous–Lower Tertiary decapod crustaceans from west Greenland. Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Bulletin, 162:1–46.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., Lee, C., and Noad, J. 2003. Miocene and Pleistocene crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda) from Sabah and Sarawak. Journal of Systematic Paleontology, 1:187–226.Google Scholar
Colosi, G. 1923. Una specie fossile de Gerionide (Decapodi brachiuri). Bolettino della Societá dei Naturalisti in Napoli, 35 (series 2, vol. 15), 37:248–255.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1851. On the classification of the Cancroidea. American Journal of Sciences and Arts, 12(34):121–131.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1853. On the classification and geographical distribution of Crustacea from the report on Crustacea of the United States Exploring Expedition, under Captain Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., during the years 1838–1842. C. Sherman, Philadelphia, p. 1395–1592, 1 map.Google Scholar
Davie, P. J. F. 2002. Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part 2): Decapoda–Anomura, Brachyura, 641 p. In Wells, A. and Houston, W. W. K. (eds.), Zoological Catalogue of Australia, 19.3B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
de Berville, P. 1857. Note sur une nouvelle espèce de Crustacés fossiles trouvé dans le Calcaire Grossier inférieur. Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France, série 2, 14:108–117, pl. 2.Google Scholar
de Haan, W. 1833–1850. Crustacea, p. i–xvii, i–xxxi, ix–xvi, 1–243, pls. A–J, L–Q, 1–55, circ. tab. 2. In Von Siebold, P. F., Fauna Japonica sive Descriptio Animalium, quae in Itinere per Japoniam, Jussu et Auspiciis Superiorum, qui Summum in India Batava Imperium Tenent, Suscepto, Annis 1823–1830 Collegit, Notis, Observationibus et Adumbrationibus Illustravit, J. Müller, Lugduni-Batavorum (=Leiden).Google Scholar
Desbonne, I., and Schramm, A. 1867. Crustacés de la Guadeloupe d'après un manuscrit du… I. Desbonne comparé avec les échantillons de Crustacés de sa collection et les dernières publications de MM. H. De Saussure et W. Stimpson. I. Partie. Brachyures. Published by the authors, 60 p., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. 1904. Brachyura. In Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer “Valdivia” 1898–1899, 6. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 314 p. + atlas, pls. 1–38.Google Scholar
d'Udekem d'Acoz, C. 1999. Inventaire et distribution des Crustacés de l'Atlantique nord-oriental, de la Méditerranée et des eaux continentales adjacentes au nord de 25N. Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Institut d'Écologie et de Gestion de la Biodiversité, Paris, 383 p.Google Scholar
Eydoux, F., and Souleyet, L. F. A. 1842. Voyage autour du monde exécuté pendant les années 1836 et 1837 sur la corvette la Bonite, commandée par M. aillant, etc., Zoologie, p. xxxvii–334, atlas, pls. 1–101. Crustacés, 1, 2nd partie, p. 219–250, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1881. Species insectorum exhibentes eorum differentias specificas, synonyma auctorum, loca natalia, metamorphosin adiectis observationibus, descriptionibus. C. E. Bohnii, Hamburg, viii + 552 p.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1798. Supplementum Entomologiae Systematicae. Proft et Storch, Hafniae (=Copenhagen), 572 p.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1998. Parasitic castration of the crab, Tumidocarcinus giganteus Glaessner, from the Miocene of New Zealand: coevolution within the Crustacea. Journal of Paleontology, 72:493–498.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 2003a. The Decapoda: new initiatives and novel approaches. Journal of Paleontology, 77:1021–1039.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 2003b. Interpreting ecology and physiology of fossil decapod crustaceans. Contributions to Zoology, 72:111–117.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Vega, F. J., and Villamil, T. 1998. Cretaceous extinction of the Tethyan crab family Carcineretidae: a victim of the impact? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 39:A286.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Casadío, S., Chirino-Galvez, L., and Aguirre-Urreta, M. 1995. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Jaguel and Roca formations (Maastrichtian-Danian) of the Neuquén Basin. The Paleontological Society Memoir 43 (supplement to Journal of Paleontology, 69), 22 p.Google Scholar
Förster, R. 1970. Zwei neue brachyure Krebse aus dem Paläozän des Haunsberges nördlich von Salzburg. Mitteilungen Bayerischen Staatsammlung Paläontologische und Historische Geologie, 10:241–252.Google Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B., and Summesberger, H. 1999. New crustacean records from the Late Campanian of the Gschliefgraben (Cretaceous, Austria). Beitrage zur Paläontologie, 24:1–6.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1929. Crustacea Decapoda, p. 1–464. In Pompeckj, J. F. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia, Pt. 41. W. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1930. Neues Krebsreste aus der Kreide. Jahrbuch der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt zu Berlin, 51:1–7, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1960. The fossil decapod Crustacea of New Zealand and the volution of the order Decapoda. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand Geological Survey, Palaeontological Bulletin, 31:5–79.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Decapoda, p. R400–R566, R626–R628. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 4. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1831. Description of a new genus, and some undescribed species of Crustacea, p. 39–40. In Gray, J. E. (ed.), The Zoological Miscellany. Treuttel, Wurtz, London.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1967. Recherches préliminaires sur les groupements naturels chez les Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. IV. Observations sur quelques genres de Xanthidae. Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, second series, 39(4):695–727.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1969. Recherches préliminaires sur les groupements naturels chez les Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. VII. Les Goneplacidae (suite et fin). Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, second series, 41(3):688–724.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1977. Propositions pour une nouvelle classification des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Academie des Sciences (Paris), series D, 285:1049–1052.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1978. Principes d'une classification évolutive des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 112(3):209–292.Google Scholar
Guinot, D., and MacPherson, E. 1987. Révision du genre Pilumnoides Lucas, 1844, avec description de quatre espèces nouvelles et création de Pilumnoidinae subfam. nov. (Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura). Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 4th serie, 9, section A, no. 1:211–247.Google Scholar
Guinot, D., and Tavares, M. 2001. Une nouvelle famille de crabes du Crétacé, et al notion de Podotremata Guinot, 1977 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Zoosystema, 23:507–546.Google Scholar
Harries, P. J., Kauffman, E. G., and Hansen, T. A. 1996. Models for biotic survival following mass extinction, p. 41–60. In Hart, M. B. (ed.), Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction. Geological Society Special Publication No. 102. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, M. E. 1998. A new genus and species of “goneplacid-like” brachyuran crab (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Gulf of California, Mexico, and a proposal for the use of the family Pseudorhombilidae Alcock, 1900. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 111:634–644.Google Scholar
Hilgendorf, F. 1879. Die von Herrn W. Peters in Moçambique gesammelten Crustaceen, bearbeitet von Herrn Dr. F. Hilgendorf. Mitteilungen. Berliner Deutsches Akademie Wissenschaften Berlin, 1878:782–851, pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Huang, J.-F., Hsueh, P.-W., and Ng, P. K. L. 2002. Crabs of the family Hexapodidae (Decapoda: Brachyura) from Taiwan, with description of a new genus and new species. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 22:651–660.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H. 1990. Decapod crustaceans from the Miocene Mizunami Group, Central Japan, Pt. 2, Section Oxyryncha, Cancridea, and Brachyryncha. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 17:1–33, pls. 1–8.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., and Kato, H. 2003a. The family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura): systematics, phylogeny, and fossil records. Paleontological Research, 7(2):129–151.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., and Kato, H. 2003b. The phylogeny, systematics and fossil record of the Goneplacidae MacLeay (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) revisited. Contributions to Zoology, Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans, 72(2–3):147–152.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., and Schweitzer, C. E. 2004. Revision of the genus Glyphithyreus Reuss, 1859 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea) and recognition of a new genus. Paleontological Research, 8(2):143–154.Google Scholar
Kato, H., and Karasawa, H. 1994. Minohellenus macrocheilus sp. nov. (Decapoda: Crustacea) from the Oligocene Ashiya Group, Kyushu, Japan. Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History, 13:51–58.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., and Harries, P. J. 1996. The importance of crisis progenitors in recovery from mass extinction, p. 15–39. In Hart, M. B. (ed.), Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction. Geological Society Special Publication No. 102. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Kossmann, R. 1878. Kurze Notizen über einige neue Crustaceen sowie über neue Fundorte einiger bereits beschriebenen. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 44(1):251–258.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802–1803. Histoire naturelle, général et particulière, des crustacés et des insectes. Vol. 3. DuFart, Paris, 468 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Nouveau dictionnaire d'histoire naturelle, appliquée aus arts, à l'agriculture, à l'economie rurale et domestique, à la médecine, etc. Vol. 10. Déterville, Paris, 404 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. von. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (tenth edition). Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lórenthey, E. 1898. Über die Brachyuren der palaeotologischen Sammlung des bayerischen Staates. Természetrajzi Füzetek, 21:134–152, pls. 10, 11.Google Scholar
MacLeay, W. S. 1838. On the brachyurous decapod Crustacea brought from the Cape by Dr. Smith, p. 53–71, pls. 2–3. In Illustrations of the Annulosa of South Africa; being a portion of the objects of Natural History Chiefly Collected during an Expedition into the Interior of South Africa, under the direction of Dr. Andrew Smith, in the years 1834, 1835, and 1836; Fitted out by “The Cape of Good Hope Association for Exploring Africa.” Smith, Elder, London.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., and Holthuis, L. B. 1981. West African brachyuran crabs (Crustacea Decapoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 306, 379 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., and Holthuis, L. B. 1989. Two new genera and nine new species of geryonid crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Geryonidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102:50–77.Google Scholar
Martin, J. W., and Davis, G. E. 2001. An updated classification of the Recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, no. 39:1–124.Google Scholar
Martins-Neto, R. G. 2001. Review of some Crustacea (Isopoda and Decapoda) from Brazilian deposits (Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic) with descriptions of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, XXXIV(52/53):237–254.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1881. On a collection of Crustacea made by Baron Hermann Maltzam at Goree Island, Senegambia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 5, 8:204–220, 259–281, 364–377, pls. 13–16.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1886. Report of the Brachyura collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, p. 1–362. In Thomson, C. W. and Murray, J. (eds.), Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, Zoology. Johnson Reprints, New York.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, A. 1862–65. Monographie des Crustacés fossiles de la famille Cancériens. Annales de Science Naturelle, Zoologie, series 4, 18(1862):31–85, pls. 1–10; 20 (1863): 273–324, pls. 5–12; series 5, 1 (1864):31–88, pls. 1–10; 3(1865):297–351, pls. 5–13.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, A. 1879a. Description de quelques Crustacés nouveaux. Bulletin de la Societé Philomatique de Paris, series 7, 3:103–110.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, A. 1879b. Études sur les Xiphosures et les Crustacés de la région mexicaine. In Missions scientifiques au Mexique et dans l'Amérique Centrale. Recherches Zoologique de la Faunae Amérique Centrale et Mexique, Mission scientifique au Mexique et dans l'Amerique centrale, Recherches zoologiques, fifth part. Vol. 1, 368 p., 61 pls.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H. 1834–1837. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés. Vol. 1 (1834), 468 p.; Vol. 2 (1837), 532 p.; atlas. Libraire Encyclopedique de Roret, Paris.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H., and Lucas, H. 1843. Crustacés, p. 1–37, pls. 1–17. In D'Orbigny, A., Voyage dans l'Amerique méridionale (le Brésil, la république orientale de l'Uruguay, la république Argentine, la Patagonie, la république du Chili, la république de Bolivia, la république du Pérou), exécuté pendant les années 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832 et 1833, 6(1). Pitois-Levrault, Paris.Google Scholar
Monod, Th. 1956. Hippidea et Brachyura ouest-africains. Mémoires de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire, 45:1–674.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L. 1998. Crabs, p. 1046–1155. In Carpenter, K. E. and Niem, V. H. (eds.), The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific, Vol. 2. Cephalopods, Crustaceans, Holothurians, and Sharks. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L., and Clark, P. F. 2000a. The eumedonid file: a case study of systematic compatibility using larval and adult characters (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 38:225–252.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L., and Clark, P. F. 2000b. The Indo–Pacific Pilumnidae XII. On the familial placement of Chlorodiella bidentata (Nobili, 1901) and Tanaocheles stenochilus Kropp, 1984 using adult and larval characters with the establishment of a new subfamily, Tanaochelinae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Journal of Natural History, 34:207–245.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L., and Guinot, D. 1999. On a new species of deep-water crab of the genus Progeryon (Decapoda, Brachyura, Geryonidae) from Hawaii. Crustaceana, 72:685–692.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L., and Liao, L. M. 2002. On a new species of Euryozius Miers, 1886 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Pseudoziidae) from the Philipppines, with notes on the taxonomy of the genus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 115:585–593.Google Scholar
Ng, P. K. L., Wang, C.-H., Ho, P.-H., and Shih, H.-T. 2001. An annotated checklist of brachyuran crabs from Taiwan (Crustacea: Decapoda). National Taiwan Museum Special Publication Series, Taipei, Taiwan, 11:1–86, 8 pls.Google Scholar
Nyborg, T. G. 2002. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the early to middle Miocene Astoria Formation, Washington and Oregon, U. S. A. Unpublished , , 224 p.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. 1925. Monographierte Gattungen der Krabbenfamilie Xanthidae. I. Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps-och Vitterhets-Samhalles Handlingar, 29(1):1–92, figs. 1–7, pls. 1–5.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. 1893. Abtheilung: Brachyura (Brachyura genuina Boas), II. Unterabtheilung: Cancroidea, 2. Section: Cancrinea, 1. Gruppe: Cyclometopa. Die DecapodenKrebse des Strassburger Museums, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der von Herrn Dr. Döderlein bei Japan und bei den Liu-Kiu-Inseln gesammelten und zur Zeit im Strassburger Museum aufbewahrten Formen, VII. Theil. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie, und Biologie der Thiere, 7:411–495, pl. 17.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'universe et des corps organisée. L'Imprimerie de Jean Barravecchia, Palermo, Italy, 224 p.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1897. A revision of the nomenclature of the Brachyura. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 11:153–167.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1916. Description of a new genus and species of fossil crab from Port Townsend, Washington. American Journal of Science, 41:344–346.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1917. New species of South Dakota Cretaceous crabs. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 52:385–391.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1926. The fossil stalk-eyed Crustacea of the Pacific slope of North America. United States National Museum Bulletin, 138, 155 p.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1930. The Cancroid crabs of America of the families Euryalidae, Portunidae, Atelecyclidae, Cancridae, and Xanthidae. United States National Museum Bulletin, 152, 609 p.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 2, 160 p.Google Scholar
Remy, J. M. 1960. Études paléontologiques et géologiques sur les falaises de Fresco (Cote d'Ivoire). 2. Crustacés. Annals of the Faculty of Science of the University of Dakar, 5:55–64, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Remy, J. M., and Tessier, F. 1954. Décapodes nouveaux de la partie Ouest du Sénégal. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 6(4):185–191, pl. 11.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. 1859. Zur Kenntnis fossiler Krabben. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematische-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 17:1–90, pls. I–XXIV.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. 1819. The Entomologists's Useful Compendium, or an Introduction to the Knowledge of British Insects. Thomas Boys, London, 496 p.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1817–1818. An account of the Crustacea of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1(1–2):1817: 57–63, 65–80, 97–101, 155–160, 161–169, pl. 4; 1818: 235–253, 313–316, 317–319, 374–380, 381–401, 423–441.Google Scholar
Schafhäutl, K. E. 1863. Südbayerns Lethaea geognostica. Der Kressenberg und die südlich von ihm gelegenen Hochalpen geognostisch betrachtet in ihren Petrefacten + Atlas zu Südbayerns Lethaea geognostica, Einhundert Talfeln und 2 Karten. Verlag Von Leopold Voss, Leipzig, 472 p.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 2001. Phylogeny of decapods: moving towards a consensus. Hydrobiologia, 449:1–20.Google Scholar
Schubart, C. D., Neigle, J. E., and Felder, D. L. 2000. Use of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene for phylogenetic and population studies of Crustacea. Crustacean Issues, 121:817–830.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. 2000. Tertiary Xanthoidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) from the west coast of North America. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 20:715–742.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. 2003a. Utility of proxy characters for classification of fossils: an example from the fossil Xanthoidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Journal of Paleontology, 77:911–932.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. 2003b. Progress on the fossil Xanthoidea MacLeay, 1838 (Decapoda, Brachyura). Contributions to Zoology, 72(2–3):181–186.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 2000a. New species of calappid crabs from western North America and reconsideration of the Calappidae sensu lato. Journal of Palaeontology, 74:230–246.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 2000b. New fossil portunids from Washington, U.S.A., and Argentina and a reevaluation of generic and family relationships within the Portunoidea Rafinesque (Decapoda: Brachyura). Journal of Paleontology, 74:636–653.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 2001a. Differentiating fossil Hexapodidae Miers (Decapoda: Brachyura) from similar forms. Journal of Paleontology, 75:330–345.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 2001b. Combining paleontological and biological criteria within the Xanthoidea (Decapoda): toward a new view of decapod systematics, evolution, and paleobiogeography. Geological Society of America 2001 Annual Meeting Abstracts with Programs, 33(6):A–378.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Karasawa, H. 2004. Revision of Amydrocarcinus and Palaeograpsus (Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthoidea) with definition of three new genera. Paleontological Research, 8(1):71–86.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., Feldmann, R. M., and Gingerich, P. D. 2004. New decapods (Crustacea) from the Eocene of Pakistan and a revision of Lobonotus A. Milne Edwards, 1864. University of Michigan Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, 31(4):89–118.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., Feldmann, R. M., Gonzáles-Barba, G., and Vega, F. J. 2002. New crabs from the Eocene and Oligocene of Baja California Sur, Mexico and an assessment of the evolutionary and paleobiogeographic implications of Mexican fossil decapods. The Paleontological Society Memoir 76 (supplement to Journal of Paleontology, 76), 43 p.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., Feldmann, R. M., Tucker, A. B., and Berglund, R. E. 2000. Eocene decapod crustaceans from Pulali Point, Washington. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 69:23–67.Google Scholar
Segerberg, K. O. 1900. De anomura och brachyura dekapoderna inom Skandinaviens Yngre krita. Geologiska Föreningens Stockholm, Förhandlingar 22:347–394, pl. 9.Google Scholar
Serène, R. 1984. Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures de l'Océan Indien occidental et de la Mer Rouge. Xanthoidea: Xanthidea et Trapeziidae. Faunae Tropicale, 24:1–400, pls. 1–48.Google Scholar
Števčić, Z. 1991. Note on some rare and aberrant Australian crabs. Beagle, Records of the Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences, 8:121–134.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1858. Crustacea Ocypodoidea: Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum, quae in Expeditione ad Oceanum Pacificum Septentrionalem, a Republica Federata missa, Cadwaladaro Ringgold et Johanne Rodgers Ducibus, observavit et descripsit W. Stimpson, Pt. V. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 10:93–110.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1859. Notes on North American Crustacea, No. I. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, 7:49–93, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1860. Notes on North American Crustacea, in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. No. II. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, 7:176–246, pls. 2, 5.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V. 1925. Description de Brachyoures montiens du Cominges. Bulletin de la Societé Belgique de Geologie, 34:58–62.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., Cosma, T., Coutiño, M. A., Feldmann, R. M., Nyborg, T. G., Schweitzer, C. E., and Waugh, D. A. 2001. New middle Eocene decapods (Crustacea) from Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 75:929–946.Google Scholar
Via, L. 1959. Decápodos fósiles del Eocene español. Boletin Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 70:331–402.Google Scholar
Via, L. 1966. Pinnixa (Palaeopinnixa) mytilicola nuevo braquiuro fósil en el miocene marino des Valles (Barcelona). Acta Geologica Hispanica, 1:1–4.Google Scholar
von Meyer, H. 1863. Tertiaere Decapoden aus den Alpen, von Oeningen und dem Taunus. Palaeontographica (Stuttgart), 10:147–178, pls. 16–19.Google Scholar
von Sternberg, R., and Cumberlidge, N. 2001. Notes on the position of the true freshwater crabs within the brachyrynchan Eubrachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Hydrobiologia, 449:21–39.Google Scholar
Waugh, D. A., Feldmann, R. M., Crawford, R. S., Jakobsen, S. L., and Thomas, K. B. 2004. Epibiont preservational and observational bias in fossil marine decapods. Journal of Paleontology, 78(5):961–972.Google Scholar
Wetzer, R., Martin, J. W., and Trautwein, S. E. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships within the coral crab genus Carpilius (Brachyura, Xanthoidea, Carpiliidae) and of the Carpiliidae to other xanthoid crab families based on molecular sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 27:410–421.Google Scholar
White, A. 1852. Descriptions of some new species of Annulosa, p. 387–395. In MacGillivray, J. (ed.), Narrative of the Voyage of H. M. S. “Rattlesnake” During the Years 1846–1850. Vol. 2, appendix. Boone, London.Google Scholar
Withers, T. 1924. Some Cretaceous and Tertiary decapod crustaceans from Jamaica. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 9, 13:81–93, pls. II-IV.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1867. On a new genus of shore-crab, Goniocypoda Edwardsi, from the lower Eocene of Hampshire. Geological Magazine, 4:529–531.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W., and Collins, J. S. H. 1972. British Cretaceous Crabs. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London, 114 p.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, M. 1911. Some Tertiary fossils from the Miike Coalfield. Journal of the Collections of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, 27:1–16, 3 pls.Google Scholar