Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:59:08.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freshwater gastropods from Early Eocene Difunta Group, northeastern Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Francisco J. Vega  and
Maria del Carmen Perrilliat
Francisco J. Vega
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Maria del Carmen Perrilliat
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three new species of freshwater gastropods are described from the lower Eocene Adjuntas Formation. Five more species are reported from the same fauna. This is the first report of Tertiary freshwater Mollusca of the Campanian–lower Eocene Difunta Group. The three new species (Hemisinus (Longiverena) reticulosus, Hemisinus (Longiverena) adjuntaensis, and Melanatria ypresiana) belong to the family Thiaridae, which today is a worldwide distributed group of freshwater gastropods of medical importance. Paleoenvironmental interpretation for red, green, and yellow beds of Adjuntas Formation suggests delta-plain deposits. Gastropods here described lived in swamps and marshes of this portion of the ancestral Gulf of Mexico.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , July 1992 , pp. 603 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, T. H. 1895. New or little known Tertiary Mollusca from Alabama and Texas. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1(2):1–30.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1913. Algunas faunas del Cretácico Superior de Coahuila y regiones limítrofes. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Boletín 30:1–56.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1927. Cretaceous ammonites from Texas and northern Mexico. University of Texas Bulletin, 2748:143–312.Google Scholar
Bowdich, T. E. 1822. Elements of conchology, including the fossil genera and the animals. Pt. I. Univalves. 88 p. Pt. II. Bivalves and multivalves. Tubicolae. Paris and London, 46 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1868. Description of a new Unio and fossil Goniobasis. American Journal of Conchology, 4:280.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. L. 1798. Tableau elémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Baudoni, Paris, 247 p.Google Scholar
de Greve, L. 1938. Eine Molluskenfauna aus dem Neogen von Iquitos am Oberen Amazonas in Peru. Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen Paleontologischen Gesellschaft 61, 133 p.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1945. Mollusca of the Tertiary formations of northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Memoir 11, 332 p.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. 1933. Monographie de la Faune Malacologique du Bruxellien des environs de Bruxelles. Memoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 53, 215 p.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Caroli a Linné Systema Natures per regna tria naturae. Editio decima tertia. London, Vol. 1, Pt. 6, cl. 6, Vermes:3021–3910.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum. Ed. 42, London, 370 p.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L., and Dall, W. H. 1898. Descriptions of Tertiary fossils from the Antillean Region. Proceedings United States National Museum, 19(1110):303–331.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1845. Nature of the geological formations occupying the portion of Oregon and North California included in a geographical survey under the direction of Captain Fremont; and descriptions of organic remains collected by Captain J. C. Fremont in the geographical survey of Oregon and North California, p. 295–310. In Fremont, J. C., A report of the exploring expedition to the Rocky Mountains in the year 1842, and to Oregon and North California in the years 1843–44. U.S. 28th Congress 2d Session, Senate Executive Document 174.Google Scholar
Heilprin, A. 1879. On some new Eocene fossils from the Claiborne marine formation of Alabama. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia:211–216.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1937. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous beds along the eastern side of Laguna de Mayran, Coahuila, Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin 48:1785–1872.Google Scholar
La Rocque, A. 1960. Molluscan faunas of the Flagstaff Formation of central Utah. Geological Society of America Memoir 78, 100 p.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. A., and Palmer, K. V. W. 1941. The geology and paleontology of the Cuenca–Azogues–Biblian region, provinces of Canar and Azuay, Ecuador. Part I. Geology by R. A. Liddle. Part II. Palaeontology, 26(100):1–62.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima, reformata. Stockholm, Vol. 1, Regnum animale, 824 p.Google Scholar
MacNeil, F. S. 1964. Eocene Megafossils from Ishigaki-shima, Ryukyu-retto. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 339-B, 14 p.Google Scholar
Malek, E. A., and Cheng, T. C. 1974. Medical and Economic Malacology. Academic Press, New York, 398 p.Google Scholar
Maury, C. J. 1925. A further contribution to the paleontology of Trinidad (Miocene horizons). Bulletins of American Paleontology, 10(42):1–250.Google Scholar
McBride, E. F. 1974. Significance of color in red, green, purple, olive, brown and gray beds of Difunta Group, northeastern Mexico. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 44:760–773.Google Scholar
McBride, E. F., Weidie, A. E., Wolleben, J. A., and Laudon, R. C. 1974. Stratigraphy and structure of the Parras and La Popa basins, northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84:1603–1622.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1877. Paleontology. U.S. Geological Exploration of the Fortieth Parallel (King Survey), Report, 4(1):1–97.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. P. E. 1952. World relations of the melanians (an abstract). American Malacological Union News Bulletin and Annual Report, 1951:6–9.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. P. E. 1954. The relationships of Old and New World melanians. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 103(3325):357–394.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. 1776. Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus seu Animalium, Daniae et Norvegiae Indigenarum characteres, nomina et synonyma imprimis popularium. Copenhagen. Mollusca:221–282.Google Scholar
Nagao, T. 1928. Paleogene fossils of the island of Kyushu, Japan. Tohoku Imperial University, Science Reports, 2d series (Geology), 9(3):97–128; 12(1):1–140.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., and Olsson, A. A. 1935. Tertiary fresh-water mollusks of the Magdalena Embayment, Colombia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 87:7–39.Google Scholar
Scopoli, J. A. 1777. Introductio ad Historiam naturalem sistens genera Lapidum, Plantarum et Animalium, hactenus dectecta, caracteribus essentialibus donata, in tribus divisa, subinde ad leges naturae. Prague. Mollusca:386–400.Google Scholar
Spix, J. B. 1827. Aylacostoma, p.15. In Wagner, J. A., Testacea fluviatilia … Brasilian …. Munich ed.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology or Shells and Shellfish. London, 419 p.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II. Wissenschaftliche Evgebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsu-Expedition “Valdivia,” 17:35–382.Google Scholar
Vega, F., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989a. La presencia del Eoceno marino en la cuenca de La Popa (Grupo Difunta), Nuevo León; orogenia postypresiana. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Revista 8:67–70.Google Scholar
Vega, F., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989b. Una especie nueva de cangrejo del género Costacopluma (Crustacea: Decapoda: Retroplumidae) del Maastrichtiano del estado de Nuevo León. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Revista 8:84–87.Google Scholar
Vega, F., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989c. On a new species of Venericardia from the lower Eocene in northeastern Mexico (Difunta Group). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 22:101–106.Google Scholar
Vega, F., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1990. Moluscos del Maastrichtiano de la Sierra El Antrisco, Nuevo León. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Paleontología Mexicana, 55, 64 p.Google Scholar
Vega, F., Mitre-Salazar, L. M., and Martínez-Hernández, E. 1989. Contribución al conocimiento de la estratigrafía del Grupo Difunta (Cretácico Superior–Ter ciario) en el noreste de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Revista 8:179–187.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. A. 1827. Testacea fluviatilla … Brasilian …. Munich ed.Google Scholar
Wolleben, J. A. 1977. Paleontology of the Difunta Group (Upper Cretaceous–Tertiary) in northern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 51:373–398.Google Scholar
Wood, W. 1828. Supplement of the Index Testaceologicus; or a catalogue of shells, British and foreign. Illustrated with 480 figures. London, 59 p., index to plates 34 p.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1959. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (gastropods: Vermetidae to Thaididae). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 306B:147–239.Google Scholar