Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:50:06.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fossil Decapod Crustaceans from the Jagüel and Roca Formations (Maastrichtian–Danian) of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Rodney M. Feldmann ,
Silvio Casadío ,
Luis Chirino-Gálvez  and
María Aguirre-Urreta
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
Silvio Casadío
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, 6300 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
Luis Chirino-Gálvez
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
María Aguirre-Urreta
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ten species of macruran, anomuran, and brachyuran decapod crustaceans, arrayed in eight families, were collected from seven localities in the Jagüel and Roca Formations, west-central Argentina. All of the decapods were collected from the Maastrichtian Jaqüel Formation and a part of the Roca Formation dated as Maastrichtian–Danian. All but one of the taxa, Xanthilites gerthi Glaessner, represent first occurrences in the unit and six had not been described previously from Argentina. Six taxa, Thaumastoplax rocaensis n. sp., Proterocarcinus lophos n. gen. and sp., Lobonotus lobulata n. sp., Glyphithyreus wichmanni n. sp., and Costacopluma australis n. sp. are new. Comparison of the fauna with Cretaceous and Paleogene faunas in Chile, Antarctica, and New Zealand indicates that the Argentinian fauna was strongly influenced by dispersal from lower latitude, Atlantic and Tethyan sources in marked contrast to the high latitude, Pacific affinities of the other faunas. There is no evidence that the Argentinian brachyuran fauna was seriously affected by the K–T extinction event. Seven of the genera from the Roca Formation are known from Cretaceous and Paleogene rocks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue S43: The Paleontological Society Memoir 43: Fossil Decapod Crustaceans from the Jaguel and Roca Formations (Maastrichtian-Danian) of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina , September 1995 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Paleontological Society, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, L. G., and Felgenhauer, B. 1982. Decapoda, p. 296–326. In Parker, S. P. (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Volume 2. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1,232 p.Google Scholar
Aguirre-Urreta, M. B. 1983. Crustáceos decápodes barremianos de la región del Tuai-Tuai, provincia de Santa Cruz. Ameghiniana, 19(3–4):303–317.Google Scholar
Aguirre-Urreta, M. B. 1985. Ancylocerátidos (Ammonoidea) Aptianos de la Cordillera Patagónica Austral, Provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba, 56:135–235.Google Scholar
Aguirre-Urreta, M. B. 1989. The Cretaceous decapod Crustacea of Argentina and the Antarctic Peninsula. Palaeontology, 32:499–552.Google Scholar
Aguirre-Urreta, M. B., and Ramos, V. 1981. Crustáceos decápodos del Cretácico inferior de la Cuenca Austral, provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina, p. 599–623. In Volkheimer, W. and Musacchio, E. (eds.), Cuencas Sedimentarias del Jurásico y Cretácico de América del Sur, II. Comité Argentino del Jurásico y Cretácico, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Barrio, C. A. 1991. Controles en la sedimentación de cuencas foreland. El ejemplo del Grupo Malargüe (Campaniano–Paleoceno) en la Cuenca Neuquina, Argentina. VI Congreso Geológico Chileno, Resumenes expandidos: 597–601.Google Scholar
Bell, T. 1857. A monograph of the fossil malacostracous Crustacea of Great Britain. Pt. I, Crustacea of the London Clay. Palaeontographical Society, London, 44 p.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1964. Micropaleontologia del Paleoceno de General Roca (Prov. de Rio Negro). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Nueva Serie 4, Paleontologia 23:125–184.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1969. Estratigrafia del límite Cretácico–Terciario en Patagonia septentrional. Revista Asociacion geologicos argentina, 24:41–54.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1975. Bioestratigrafia del Paleogeno en La Republica Argentina. Revista Española Micropaleontologia, VIII(3):429–450.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1979. Estratigrafia y micropaleontología de la Formation San Julián en su área tipo, provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 14:233–293.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1930. Vergleichende stammesgeschichte. Grundlangen, Methoden, Probleme unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der höheren Krebse. VIII, [317]–586. Forstschritte der Geologie und Paläontologie. b. VIII, Hft. 26. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1939. Neue Decapoden-Krebse aus dem ungarischen Tertiär. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 21(2):135–160, pl. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, J. 1911. Callianassa Burckhardti n. sp. nebst einer Zusammenstellung der fossilen Arten der Gattung Callianassa . Zeitschrift der Deutsche geologisches Gesellschaft, 63:37–41.Google Scholar
Burkenroad, M.D. 1963. The evolution of the Eucarida (Crustacea, Eumalacostraca), in relation to the fossil record. Tulane Studies in Geology, 2:3–16.Google Scholar
Casadío, S. 1990. Estratigrafia secuencial del limite Cretácico–Tertiario en el occidente de La Pampa. Tercera Reunión Argentina de Secimentología, Actas:87–93.Google Scholar
Böhm, J. 1994. Estratigrafia y paleontología del intervalo Maastrichtiano–Daniano en el occidente de la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, 420 p.Google Scholar
Casadío, S., and Concheyro, A. 1992. Facies y ambientes de sedimentación en el limite Cretácico–Tertiario de La Pampa, Argentina. VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Geologia, Actas 4:30–34.Google Scholar
Chirino-Gálvez, L. A. 1993. Cenozoic crabs from Chile. Unpublished Master's thesis, Kent State University, Kent, 280 p.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., and Morris, S. F. 1975. A new crab, Costacopluma concava, from the upper Cretaceous of Nigeria. Palaeontology, 18:823–829.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., and Morris, S. F. 1978. New lower Tertiary crabs from Pakistan. Palaeontology, 21:957–981.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., and Rasmussen, H. W. 1992. Upper Cretaceous–Lower Tertiary decapod crustaceans from west Greenland. Gr⊘nlands Geologiske Unders⊘gelse, Bulletin, 162:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1851. On the classification of the Cancroidea. Silliman's American Journal of Science and Arts, series 2, 12:121–131.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Macrura. Conspectus Crustaceorum. Conspectus of the Crustacea of the Exploring Expedition under Capt C. Wilkes, U.S.N. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 6:10–28.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1986. Paleobiogeography of two decapod crustacean taxa in the Southern Hemisphere: global conclusions with sparse data, p. 5–20. In Gore, R. H. and Heck, K. L. (eds.), Crustacean Biogeography. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1991. Decapod Crustacea from the Tapui Glauconitic Sandstone (Bortonian: middle Eocene) in the Waitaki valley, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 34:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Chirino-Gálvez, L. 1994. Paleobiogeography of Cretaceous and Paleogene decapods from the high southern latitudes (abstract). 7th Congreso Geológico Chileno 1994, Universidad de Concepcion, Actas, II:1671–1673.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Duncan, P. W. 1992. Eocene decapod crustaceans from Snowdrift Quarry, South Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 35:455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Keyes, I. W. 1992. Systematic and stratigraphic review with catalogue and locality index of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic decapod Crustacea of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 73 p.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Neto, R. Martins 1995. Costacopluma nordestina n. sp. (Decapoda Retroplumidae) from the Maria Farinha Formation (Paleocene) of Brazil. Journal of Paleontology, 69:610–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and McLay, C. L. 1993. Geological history of brachyuran decapods from New Zealand. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 13:443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Wilson, M. 1988. Eocene decapod crustaceans from Antarctica, p. 465–488. In Feldmann, R.M. and Woodburne, M.O. (eds.), Geology and Paleontology of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Geological Society of America, Memoir 169.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Tshudy, D., and Thomson, M. R. A. 1993. Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula. Paleontological Society Memoir, 28:1–41.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Tucker, A. B., and Berglund, R. E. 1991. Paleobathymetry of decapod Crustaceans. National Geographic Research and Exploration, 7:352–363.Google Scholar
Ferrari, L. 1981. Aportes para el Conocimiento de la Familia Callianassidae (Decapoda, Macrura) en el Oceano Atlántico Sudoccidental. Physis (Buenos Aires), Section A, 39(97):11–21.Google Scholar
Förster, R. 1970. Neue Dekapoden-Reste aus der Oberkreide von Mocambique, Norddeutschland und den bayerischen Alpen. Palaeontologisches Zeitschrift, 44(3–4):134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. 1894. A new bassalian type of crabs. American Naturalist, 28:1043–1045.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1929. Crustacea Decapoda, p. 1–464. In Pompeckj, J. F. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia, Part 41. W. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1930. Neue Krebse aus der Kreide. Jahrbuch der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin, 51:1–7.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1947. Decapod Crustacea (Callianassidae) from the Eocene of Victoria. Royal Society of Victoria, Proceedings, 59:1–7.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Decapoda, p. R400–R651. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Part R4(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Gomez–Alba, J. 1989. Decàpodes fòssils d'Espanya (Decapoda, Cretaci–Plistocè) conservat al Museu de Geologia de Barcelona. Impremta Municipal, Barcelona, 46 p.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1977. Propositions pour une nouvelle classification des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. Compte Rendu Académie des Science de Paris, serie D, 285:1049–1052.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L. B. 1967. A survey of the genus Ctenocheles (Crustacea: Decapoda: Callianassidae), with a discussion of its zoogeography and its occurrence in the Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin of Marine Science, 17:376–385.Google Scholar
Imaizumi, R. 1957. An interesting crustacean remain, Ctenocheles sujakui n. sp., from the Paleogene of Kyushu, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 32:299–304.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. J. F. 1972. Australian fossil decapod Crustacea: faunal and environmental changes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Adelaide, 392 p.Google Scholar
Kishinouye, K. 1926. Two rare and remarkable forms of macrurous Crustacea from Japan. Japanese Journal of Zoology, 11:63–70.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802–1803. Histoire naturelle, général et particulière, des crustacés et des insectes, Volume 3. F. Dufart, Paris, 468 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1831. Cours d'Entomologie, ou de l'histoire naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides, des Myriapodes et des Insectes, etc. Annales I. Atlas, Roret, Paris, 26 p.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1814. Crustaceology. Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7:383–437.Google Scholar
Leanza, H. A., and Hugo, C. A. 1985. Los biohermas ostreros de la Formation Roca (Paleoceno) en el sudoeste de la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 21(2–4):143–149.Google Scholar
Legarreta, L., Kokogiân, D. A., and Boggetti, D. A. 1989. Depositional sequences of the Malargüe Basin, Argentina. Cretaceous Research, 10:337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeuff, P. Le, and Intes, A. 1974. Les Thalassinidea (Crustacea, Decapoda) du Golfe de Guinée. Systématique–Écologie. Cahiers ORSTOM, série Océanographie, 12:17–69.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., and Felder, D. L. 1991. Revision of the American Callianassidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 104:764–792.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., and Holthuis, L. B. 1981. West African brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 306:1–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British Fossil Crustacea, with Notices of the new Forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 2th series, 4(21):161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLay, C. L. 1988. Brachyura and Crab-like Anomura of New Zealand. University of Auckland, Leigh Laboratory Bulletin, No. 22, 463 p.Google Scholar
Macleay, W. S. 1838. Illustrations of the Annulosa of South Africa. On the brachyurous decapod Crustacea brought from the Cape by Dr. Smith, p. 53–71. In Smith, A. (ed.), Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa, Invertebrate, Smith, Elder, and Company, London.Google Scholar
Mertin, H. 1941. Decapod Krebs aus dem Subhercynen und Braunschweger Emscher und Untersenon, sowie Bermerkungen uber einige verwandte Formen in der Oberkreide. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 10:150–264.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1881. On a collection of Crustacea made by Baron Hermann Maltzam (sic) at Gorée Island, Senegambia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 8:204–220, 258–281, 364–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1886. Report of the Brachyura collected by the H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76, p. 1–362. In Thomson, C. W. and Murray, J. (eds.), Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873–76. Zoology, Johnson Reprints, New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. Milne 1864. Monographic des décapodes macrures fossiles cancériens. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, série 5(1):31–88.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. Milne 1832. Recherches sur l'organisation et la classification naturelle des Crustacés Décapodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Zoologie et Biologie Animale, 25:298–332.Google Scholar
Perch-Nielsen, K. 1985. Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils, p. 427–554. In Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Quayle, W. J., and Collins, J. S. 1981. New Eocene crabs from the Hampshire basin. Palaeontology, 24:733–758.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou Tableau de l'Univers et des corps Organisés. Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. W. 1971. Echinoid and crustacean burrows and their diagenetic significance in the Maastrichtian–Danian of Stevns Klint, Denmark. Lethaia, 4:191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1919. Decapod crustaceans from the Panama Region. p. 123–184. In Vaughan, T. W. (ed.), Contributions to the Geology and Paleontology of the Canal Zone, Panama and Geologically Related Areas in Central America and the West Indies. Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum Bulletin, 103.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1926. The fossil stalk-eyed Crustacea of the Pacific slope of North America. Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum Bulletin, 138:1–155.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1930a. The cancroid crabs of America of the families Euryalidae, Portunidae, Atelecyclidae, Cancridae and Xanthidae. Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum Bulletin, 152:1–609.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1930b. Fossil decapod Crustaceans from Mexico. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 78(8):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain. Geological society of America, Special papers, 2:1–160.Google Scholar
Retamal, M. A. 1981. Catálogo ilustrado de los crustáceos Decápodos de Chile. Gayana, Zoología, Concepción, 44:1–110.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1859. Zur Kenntnis fossiler Krabben. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, Denkschrift, 17:1–90.Google Scholar
Secretan, S. 1964. Les crustacés décapodes du Jurassique Supérieur et du Crétacé de Madagascar. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Nouvelle Série, Série C, Sciences de la Terre, 14:1–223.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., Hurley, A. M., and Briden, J. C. 1981. Phanerozoic paleocontinental world maps. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–102 p.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1935. Middle Eocene and Oligocene decapod crustaceans from Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. American Midland Naturalist, 16:379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. J. 1979. Macrurous Decapoda from the Lower Cretaceous of south-eastern Alexander Island. British Antarctic Survey, Scientific Reports, 81:1–39.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D. M. 1993. Taxonomy and Evolution of the Clawed Lobster families Chilenophoberidae and Nephropidae. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, 472 p.Google Scholar
Uliana, M. A., and Dellapé, D. A. 1981. Estratigrafia y evolución palecambiental de la sucesión maestrichtiano–eoterciario del engolfamiento Neuquino (Patagonia septentrional). VII Congreso Geológico Argentino, San Luis, Actas, 3:673–711.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Feldmann, R. M. 1991. Fossil crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda) from the Maastrichtian Difunta Group, Northeastern Mexico. Annals of The Carnegie Museum, 60:163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Feldmann, R. M. 1992. Occurrence of Costacopluma (Decapoda: Brachyura: Retroplumidae) in the Maastrichtian of Southern Mexico, and its paleobiogeographic implications. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 61:133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat-Montoya, M. C. 1989. Una especie nueva de cangrejo del género Costacopluma (Crustacea: Dacapoda: Retroplumidae) del Maastrichtiano del estado de Nuevo Leon. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma, Instituto de Geología, Revista, 8(1):84–87.Google Scholar
Boada, L. Via 1969. Decápodos del Eoceno Español. Pirineos, Revista del Instituto de estudios pirenaicos, Jaca, 91–94:1–469.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1907. Erläuterungen zu R. Hauthals Geologische Skizze des Gebietes zwischen dem Lago Argentino und dem Seno de la Ultima Esperanza (Sudpatagonien). Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Freiburg im Breisgau, 15:75–96.Google Scholar
Windhausen, A. 1926. Las antiquas conexious de la Patagonie. Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Boletin 28:213–250.Google Scholar
Woods, H. 1922. Crustacea from the Eocene deposits of Peru, p. 114–118. In Bosworth, T.O. (ed.), Geology and Palaeontology of the North-West Peru. MacMillan and Company, Limited, London.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1982. Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary molluscan biogeography of the southern circum-Pacific. Journal of Paleontology, 56:84–102.Google Scholar