Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:57:38.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first Middle Ordovician and Gondwanan record of the cincinnaticrinid crinoid Ohiocrinus byeongseoni n. sp. from South Korea: biostratigraphy, paleobiogeography, and taphonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2022

Hyeonmin Park ,
Seung-Bae Lee Open the ORCID record for Seung-Bae Lee [Opens in a new window] ,
Jusun Woo  and
Dong-Chan Lee Open the ORCID record for Dong-Chan Lee [Opens in a new window]
Hyeonmin Park
Affiliation:
Chungbuk National University, Department of Earth Sciences Education, Cheongju 28644, South Korea
Seung-Bae Lee
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Geological Museum, Daejeon 34132, South Korea
Jusun Woo
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul 08826, South Korea
Dong-Chan Lee*
Affiliation:
Chungbuk National University, Department of Earth Sciences Education, Cheongju 28644, South Korea
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ohiocrinus byeongseoni n. sp. from the Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) Jigunsan Formation of South Korea in the Sino-Korean (North China) block is the oldest species of Ohiocrinus of the Cincinnaticrinidae and the first record outside Laurentia. O. byeongseoni is characterized by a loosely clockwise-coiled anal sac, isotomous branching throughout arms, long, slender xenomorphic column, and small lichenocrinid-type holdfast. The new species occurs in association with a deep-water siliciclastic environment, unlike the Laurentian species with a shallow-water carbonate environment. The monospecific crinoid assemblage is interpreted as parautochthonous, considering that the crinoids were reworked by relatively weak down-current probably caused by storm but preserved within the environment where they lived. The occurrence of O. byeongseoni presents a considerable spatiotemporal gap and ecologic disparity in evolution of Ohiocrinus and the Cincinnaticrinidae.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/240417a4-8d33-4f45-aedb-afcc07f1ecbb

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 939 - 949
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albanesi, G.L., and Ortega, G., 2016, Conodont and graptolite biostratigraphy of the Ordovician System of Argentina: Stratigraphy & Timescales, v. 1, p. 61–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1998, Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea: The University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, v. 9, https://doi.org/10.17161/PCNS.1808.3772Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Bolton, T.E., and Cumming, L.M., 1998, Whiterockian (Ordovician) crinoid fauna from the Table Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 35, p. 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Hess, H., 1999, Taphonomy, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J., eds., Fossil Crinoids: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wright, D.F., Cole, S.R., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 2020, Homology of posterior interray plates in crinoids: a review and new perspectives from phylogenetics, the fossil record and development: Palaeontology, v. 63, p. 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T.K., Gahn, F.J., Hess, H., and Messing, C.G., 2008, Taphonomy as an indicator of behavior among fossil crinoids, in Ausich, W.I., and Webster, G.D., eds., Echinoderm Paleobiology: Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 7–20Google Scholar
Bergström, S.M., 1971, Conodont biostratigraphy of the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Europe and eastern North America: Geological Society of America Memoir, v. 127, p. 83–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S.M., and Ferretti, A., 2017, Conodonts in Ordovician biostratigraphy: Lethaia, v. 50, p. 424–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S.M., Xu, C., Schmitz, B., Young, S., Jia-Yu, R., and Saltzman, M.R., 2009, First documentation of the Ordovician Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in Asia: chemostratigraphy of the Pagoda and Yanwashan formation in southeastern China: Geological Magazine, v. 146, p. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C.E., Moffat, H.A., and Taylor, W.L., 1997, Echinoderm taphonomy, taphofacies, and Lagerstätten: Paleontological Society Papers, v. 3, p. 147–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J.C., 1992, Hybocrinid and disparid crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of Northern Iowa and Southern Minnesota: Journal of Paleontology, v. 66, p. 973–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J.C., 2005, The paleobiology and ontogeny of Cincinnaticrinus varibrachialus Warn and Strimple, 1977 from the Middle Ordovician (Shermanian) Walcott-Rust Quarry of New York: Journal of Paleontology, v. 79, p. 152–174.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J.C., 2010, Camerate and cladid crinoids from the Upper Ordovician (Katian, Shermanian) Walcott-Rust quarry of New York: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 626–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J.C., 2013, Paleoecology of echinoderm assemblages from the Upper Ordovician (Katian) Dunleith Formation of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota: Journal of Paleontology, v. 87, p. 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byun, U.H., Lee, H.S., and Kwon, Y.K., 2018, Sequence stratigraphy in the Middle Ordovician shale successions, mid-east Korea: stratigraphic variations and preservation potential of organic matter within a sequence stratigraphic framework: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 152, p. 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S.H., Lee, B.-S., Lee, D.-J., and Choh, S.-J., 2021, The Ordovician succession of the Taebaek Group (Korea) revisited: old conodont data, new perspectives, and implications: Geosciences Journal, v. 25, p. 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., 2019, Evolution of the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea: I, early Paleozoic sedimentation in an epeiric sea and break-up of the Sino-Korean craton from Gondwana: Island Arc, v. 28, e12275, https://doi.org/10.1111/iar.12275Google Scholar
Choi, D.K., and Chough, S.K., 2005, The Cambrian–Ordovician stratigraphy of the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea: a review: Geosciences Journal, v. 9, p. 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., Kim, D.H., and Sohn, J.W., 2001, Ordovician trilobite faunas and depositional history of the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea: implications for palaeogeography: Alcheringa, v. 25, p. 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chough, S.K., 2013, Geology and Sedimentology of the Korean Peninsula: New York, Elsevier, 363 p.Google Scholar
Cocks, L.R.M., and Torsvik, T.H., 2021, Ordovician palaeogeography and climate change: Gondwana Research, v. 100, p. 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deline, B., Thompson, J.F., Smith, N.S., Zamora, S., Rahman, I.A., Sheffield, S.L., Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., and Sumrall, C.D., 2020, Evolution and development at the origin of a phylum: Current Biology, v. 30, p. 1672–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donovan, S.K., 1989, Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, part 2: Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, v. 142, p. 69–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1992, A new crinoid from the Ashgill Starfish Bed, Threave Glen: Scottish Journal of Geology, v. 28, p. 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S.K., and Clark, N.D.L., 2015, A collection of pelmatozoans (Echinodermata) from the Lady Burn Starfish Beds (Upper Ordovician, Katian), SW Scotland: Scottish Journal of Geology, v. 51, p. 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S.K., Miller, C.G., Sansom, I.J., Heward, A.P., and Schreurs, J., 2011, A Laurentian Iocrinus Hall (Crinoidea, Disparida) in the Dapingian or Darriwilian (Middle Ordovician, Arenig) of Oman: Palaeontology, v. 54, p. 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., 1866, Descriptions of some new species of Crinoidea and other fossils from the lower Silurian strata of the age of the Hudson-River Group and Trenton Limestone: Albany, State Cabinet Report, 17 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1872, Description of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils from strata of the age of the Hudson-River Group and Trenton Limestone: Annual Report on New York State Museum of Natural History, v. 24, p. 205–224.Google Scholar
Harrington, H.J., and Leanza, A.F., 1957, Ordovician trilobites of Argentina: Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Special Publication, v. 1, 276 p.Google Scholar
Havlíček, V., 1998, Ordovician, in Chlupáč, I., Havlíček, V., Kříž, J., Kuka, Z., and Štorch, P., eds., Palaeozoic of the Barrandian (Cambrian to Devonian): Prague, Czech Geological Survey, p. 39–79.Google Scholar
Hunda, B.R., Hughes, N.C., and Flessa, K.W., 2006, Trilobite taphonomy and temporal resolution in the Mt. Orab Shale bed (Upper Ordovician, Ohio, USA): Palaios, v. 21, p. 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1894, Über die Morphogenie und Phylogenic der Crinoiden: Sitzungsberichten der Gesilschaft Naturfoschender Freunde, Jahrgang, v. 4, p. 101–121.Google Scholar
Jennette, D.C., and Pryor, W.A., 1993, Cyclic alternation of proximal and distal storm facies: Kope and Fairview formations (Upper Ordovician), Ohio and Kentucky: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 63, p. 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, X., Zhou, H., and Wang, X., 2015, Ordovician (middle Darriwilian–earliest Sandbian) conodonts from the Wuhai area of Inner Mongolia, North China: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 768–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S.M., Fürsich, F.T., and Aigner, T., 1986, Conceptual framework for the analysis and classification of fossil concentrations: Palaios, v. 1, p. 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.Y., Kwon, J.Y., Kim, K.-S., and Cho, H.S., 2005, Graptolites from the Jigunsan Shale of Taebaeg Area, Korea: Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, v. 26, p. 137–148.Google Scholar
Klappa, C.F., Opalinski, P.R., and James, N.P., 1980, Middle Ordovician Table Head group of western Newfoundland: a revised stratigraphy: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 17, p. 1007–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1934, The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen, palaeontology, part I, Middle Ordovician faunas: Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, sec. II, v. 3, p. 329–519.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y.K., Chough, S.K., Choi, D.K., and Lee, D.J., 2006, Sequence stratigraphy of the Taebaek Group (Cambrian–Ordovician), mideast Korea: Sedimentary Geology, v. 192, p. 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.-S., and Seo, K.-S., 2004, Lower Paleozoic conodonts of Korea: Paleontological Society of Korea, Special Publication, v. 7, p. 189–215. [in Korean with English abstract]Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C., and Choi, D.K., 1992, Reappraisal of the Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Jigunsan Formation, Korea: Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, v. 28, p. 167–183.Google Scholar
Lee, K., and Lee, H.-Y., 1990, Conodont biostratigraphy of the upper Choseon Supergroup in Jangseong–Dongjeom area, Gangweon-do: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 6, p. 188–210.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.N., and Lee, H.-Y., 1986, Conodont biostratigraphy of the Jigunsan Shale and Duwibong Limestone in the Nokjeon–Sangdong area, Yeongweol-gun, Kangweondo, Korea: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 2, p. 114–136.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, B., Sumrall, C.D., Shroat-Lewis, R.A., Reich, M., Webster, G.D., Hunter, A.W., Nardin, E., Rozhnov, S.V., Guensburg, T.E., Touzeau, A., Noailles, F., and Sprinkle, J., 2013, Palaeobiogeography of Ordovician echinoderms, in Harper, D.A.T., and Servais, T., eds., Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeobiogeography: London, Geological Society Memoir No. 38, p. 173–198.Google Scholar
Lin, J-P., Ausich, W.I., Balinski, A., Bergström, S.M., and Sun, Y, 2018, The oldest iocrinid crinoids from the Early/Middle Ordovician of China: possible paleogeographic implications: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 151, p. 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D.L., Miller, A.I., Holland, S.M., and Dattilo, B.F., 2002, Crinoid distribution and feeding morphology through a depositional sequence: Kope and Fairview formations, Upper Ordovician, Cincinnati Arch region: Journal of Paleontology, v. 76, p. 725–732.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-shaped Animals, with Observation on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites: Bristol, Bryan and Company, 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 46, 167 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, H., Hibino, T., Oji, T., Hara, Y., and Amemiya, S., 2003, Larval stages of a living sea lily (stalked crinoid echinoderm): Nature, v. 421, p. 158–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyle, L.J., and Barnes, C.R., 2003, Conodonts from a platform-to-basin transect, Lower Ordovician to lower Silurian, northeastern British Columbia, Canada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 77, p. 146–171.Google Scholar
Servais, T., Danelian, T., Harper, D.A.T., and Munnecke, A., 2014, Possible oceanic circulation patterns, surface water currents and upwelling zones in the Early Palaeozoic: GFF, v. 136, p. 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, S.E., 1987, Comparative taphonomy and palaeoecology of trilobite Lagerstätten: Alcheringa, v. 11, p. 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, S.E., and Brett, C.E., 1986, Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies: Palaios, v. 1, p. 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouge, S.S., 1984, Conodonts of the Middle Ordovician Table Head Formation, western Newfoundland: Fossils and Strata, v. 16, 145 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Volume 1: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1925, New classification of the “Heterocrinidae”: Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir, v. 138, p. 82–101.Google Scholar
Waagen, W., and Jahn, J., 1899, Famille des Crinoides, in Barrande, J., ed., Systeme Silurien de centre de La Bohême, Volume VII, Classe des Echinodermes, part 2. Prague, Rivnác, p. 1–216.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1885, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, part 3, section 1, discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 37, p. 225–364.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, part 3, section 2, discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 38, p. 64–226.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Zhen, Y.Y., Bergström, S.M., Zhang, Y., and Wu, R., 2018, Ordovician conodont biozonation and biostratigraphy of North China: Australasian Palaeontological Memoirs, v. 51, p. 65–79.Google Scholar
Warn, J., and Strimple, H.L., 1977, The disparid inadunate superfamilies Homocrinacea and Cincinnaticrinacea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), Ordovician–Silurian, North America: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 72, 138 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1974, Crinoid pluricolumnal noditaxis patterns: Journal of Paleontology, v. 48, p. 1283–1288.Google Scholar
Woo, J., and Chough, S.K., 2007, Depositional processes and sequence stratigraphy of the Jigunsan Formation (Middle Ordovician), Taebaeksan Basin, mideast Korea: implications for basin geometry and sequence development: Geosciences Journal, v. 11, p. 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Peter, M.E., and Rhenberg, E.C., 2017, Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun, C.-S., 2011, Ordovician cephalopods from the Jigunsan Formation, Taebaek-Yeongwol, Korea: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 27, p. 149–259.Google Scholar
Zamora, S., Rahman, I.A., and Ausich, W.I., 2015, Palaeogeographic implications of a new iocrinid crinoid (Disparida) from the Ordovician (Darriwillian) of Morocco: PeerJ, v. 3, e1450, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y., Zhan, R., Zhen, Y., Wang, Z., Yuan, W., Fang, X., Ma, X., and Zhang, J., 2019, Ordovician integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China: Science China, Earth Sciences, v. 62, p. 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Zhang, S., Zhu, M., Ding, J., Li, H., Yang, T., and Wu, H., 2021, Paleomagnetic insights into the Cambrian biogeographic conundrum: did the North China craton link Laurentia and East Gondwana?: Geology, v. 49, p. 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhen, Y.Y., 2021, Middle Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy of Australasia: Journal of Earth Science, v. 32, p. 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar