Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:47:46.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution and classification of the Productellidae (Productida), upper Paleozoic brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

C. H. C. Brunton  and
S. S. Lazarev
C. H. C. Brunton
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, U.K.
S. S. Lazarev
Affiliation:
The Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117647, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Lower Devonian the first productellids evolved from their chonetidine ancestors as the Productellinae. This subfamily was the stem group from which all the later Productidina evolved, yet three of its five subfamilies persisted to the end of the Permian. The main characters used in the new classification, here presented, for the Productellidae are described and reviewed, and the main changes seen during its evolution are discussed. Within this new classification five new genera are described: in the Overtoniinae are Barunkhuraya Lazarev from the latest Famennian, Onavia Lazarev from the Tournaisian, both from Mongolia, and Echinariella Lazarev (type species Krotovia jisuensiformis Sarycheva) from the late Permian of Transcaucasia; in the Marginiferinae there is Breileenia Brunton from the Visean of western Europe and in the Plicatiferinae is Maemia Lazarev from the mid and Upper Carboniferous on the coast of the Barents Sea. New species described in these genera are Barunkhuraya indrengynensis Lazarev, Onavia barunkhurensis Lazarev, Breileenia radiata Brunton, Maemia chaykensis Lazarev, and M. nana Lazarev.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , May 1997 , pp. 381 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramov, B. S. 1970. Biostratigrafiia kamennougol'nykh otlozhenii Sette-Dabana (Iuzhnoe Verkhoian'e). [Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous Deposits of Sette-Daban (Southern Verkhoyan)]. Nauka, Moscow, 178 p.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1966. Silicified productids from the Visean of County Fermanagh. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 12:175–243.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1985. Growth and shell shape in productacean brachiopods. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 38:273–281.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C., Lazarev, S. S., and Grant, R. E. 1995. A review and new classification of the brachiopod order Productida. Palaeontology, 38:915–937.Google Scholar
Carter, J. L. 1987. Lower Carboniferous Brachiopods from the Banff Formation of Western Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin (Ottawa), 378:1–183.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. T. 1925. On the age of the Taiyuan Series of north China. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China, 4:221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. T. 1927. Productidae of China, Part 1, Producti. Palaeontologia Sinica, Geological Survey of China, 5:1–244.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1861. A monograph of the British fossil Brachiopoda; The fossil Brachiopoda, Carboniferous, Palaeontographical Society, Monograph, 2:81–210.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, V. Ya., Lazarev, S. S., and Solov'eva, M. N. 1977. Carboniferous deposits of Cape Chaika (Yugorskii Peninsular), p. 5–7. In Sarycheva, T. G., (ed.), Brachiopods of the Upper Palaeozoic of Siberia and the arctic. Transactions of the Palaeontological Institute, 162.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O., and Condra, G. E. 1932. Brachiopoda of the Pennsylvanian System in Nebraska. Nebraska Geological Survey Bulletin (Lincoln), Ser. 2, 5:1–377.Google Scholar
Gizatulin, Z. Z. 1991. A new morphometric character for articulate brachiopods. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, Moscow, 3:57–64(in Russian).Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W.in Norin, E. 1922. The late Palaeozoic and early Mesozoic sediments of central Shansi. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China, 4:3–80.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum, 42nd ed. London, 370 p.Google Scholar
Jarosz, J. 1917. Fauna des Kohlenkalks in der Umgebung Von Krakau. Bulletin International de l'Academie des Sciences de Cracovie, Ser. B, 3:61–101.Google Scholar
Kalashnikov, N. V. 1980. Brakhiopody Verkhnego Paleozoia Evropeiskogo Severa SSSR. [Brachiopods of the Upper Paleozoic of the European North of the USSR]. Nauka, Leningrad, 136 p.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de. 1847. Monographie des genres Productus et Chonetes. Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, Mémoires (Bruxelles), Serie 1, 4:73–278.Google Scholar
Lazarev, S. S. 1987. Origin and systematic position of the main groups of the Productida (Brachiopoda). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 4:41–52[in Russian].Google Scholar
Lazarev, S. S. 1990. Evolution and systematics of the productids, Academia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskii Institut, 242, 174 p (in Russian).Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America Memoir 81, 447 p.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1965. Productidina, p. H439–H510. In Moore, R. C. (ed), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda, Volume 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Nalivkin, D. V. 1979. Brakhiopody turneiskogo iarusa Urala. [The Tournaisian Brachiopoda of the Urals]. Nauka, Leningrad, 248 p.Google Scholar
Norwood, J. G., and Pratten, H. 1855. Notice of Producti found in the Western States and Territories, with Descriptions of Twelve New Species. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Journal, Series 2, 3:5–22.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1836. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire; or a Description of the Strata and Organic Remains: Accompanied by a Geological Map, Sections, and Diagrams, and Figures of the Fossils. Part II–The Mountain Limestone District. John Murray, London, 253 p.Google Scholar
Sarytcheva, T. G. 1968. Brakhiopody verkhnego paleozoia vosto-chnogo Kazakhstana. [Early Paleozoic Brachiopods of Eastern Kazakhstan]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskii Institut, Trudy (Moscow), 121:1–212.Google Scholar
Sarytcheva, T. G., Licharew, B. K., and Sokolskaja, A. N. 1960. Otriad Productida, 221-238. In Orlov, Y. A. (ed.), Osnovy Paleontologii. Mshanki Brakhiopody. Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow.Google Scholar
Sarytcheva, T. G., and Sokolskaja, A. N. 1965. Otriad Productida, p. 209–232. In Ruzhentsev, V. E. and Sarytcheva, T. G., (eds.), Razvitie i Smena Morskikh Organizmov na Rubezhe Paleozoia i Mezozoia. [The Development and Change of Marine Organisms at the Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskii Institut, Trudy (Moscow), 108:209–232.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Rowell, A. J., Muir-Wood, H. M., Pitrat, C. W., Schmidt, H., Stehli, F. G., Ager, D. V., Wright, A. D., Elliott, G. F., Amsden, T. W., Rudwick, M. J. S., Hatai, K., Biernat, G., Mclaren, D. J., Boucot, A. J., Johnson, J. G., Stanton, R. D., Grant, R. E., and Pope, H. M. 1965. In Moore, R. C. (ed), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda, Volume 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 521 p.Google Scholar