Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:15:47.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eocene Caribbean reef corals: a unique fauna from the Gatuncillo Formation of Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Ann F. Budd ,
Thomas A. Stemann  and
Robert H. Stewart
Ann F. Budd
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Thomas A. Stemann
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Robert H. Stewart
Affiliation:
2204 Tampa Downs Boulevard, Lutz, Florida 33549
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forty-three species of 25 genera are described in a collection of 170 large, massive reef corals from the upper Eocene Gatuncillo Formation near Lago Alahuela in central Panama. Comparisons with type material for other Eocene Caribbean reef corals suggest that 27 of these species are new. Twenty-four of these species are named herein. Like other Eocene Caribbean reef-coral faunas, the fauna is rich in Astrocoenia, Actinacis, and Astreopora; however, unlike other faunas, plocoid and meandroid members of the family Faviidae (e.g., Montastraea, Agathiphyllia, Goniastrea, and Colpophyllia) are abundant. Also present are the oldest known representatives of the genera Meandrina, Coscinaraea, Alveopora, Heliopora, and Pocillopora, as well as the only recorded occurrences of Coscinaraea and Cyathoseris from the Caribbean. Comparisons with Oligocene and Recent Caribbean reef-coral faunas suggest that the generic composition of Cenozoic Caribbean reefs became established during the Eocene. With exception of the family Mussidae, much of the post-Oligocene history of the Caribbean is one of extinction at the generic level (19 of the 28 Eocene genera became extinct) and proliferation of species within the surviving genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , July 1992 , pp. 570 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barta-Calmus, S. 1973. Revision de collections de Madreporaires provenant da Nummulitigre du sud-est de la France de l'Italie et de la Yougoslavie septentrionales. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Paris VI, France, 694 p.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. de. 1830. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles. Zoophytes, Vol. 60, Paris, p. 297–364.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C. 1895. On the structure and affinities of Heliopora caerulea, Pallas. With some observations on the structure of Xenia and Heteroxenia. Royal Society of London, Philosophical Transactions, 186:445–483.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C. 1900. Anthozoa, p. 1–84. In Lankester, E. R. (ed.), Treatise on Zoology, Part II.Google Scholar
d'Achiardi, A. 1875. Coralli eocenici del Friuli. Societa Toscana di Scienze Naturele, Pisa, Atti, Proc. Verb., 2:239–242.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1863. On the fossil corals of the West Indian Islands. Part 1. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 19:406–458.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1868. On the fossil corals (Madreporaria) of the West-Indian Islands. Part IV. Conclusion. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 24:9–33.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1873. On the older Tertiary formations of the West Indian Islands. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 29:548–565.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M., and Wall, G. P. 1865. A notice of the geology of Jamaica with special reference to the district of Clarendon; with descriptions of the Cretaceous, Eocene, and Miocene corals of the islands. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 21:1–14.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, G. G. 1834. Beiträge zur physiologischen Kenntniss der Corallenthiere im allgemeinen und besonders des Rothen Meeres. Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, Abhandlungen, 1832:250–380.Google Scholar
Foster, A. B. 1986. Neogene paleontology in the northern Dominican Republic. 2. The family Poritidae (Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Bulletins of American Paleontology, 90:47–123.Google Scholar
Frost, S. H. 1972. Evolution of Cenozoic Caribbean coral faunas. Caribbean Geological Conference Transactions, 6:461–464.Google Scholar
Frost, S. H. 1977. Cenozoic reef systems of Caribbean—prospects for paleoecologic synthesis, p. 93–110. In Frost, S. H., Weiss, M. P., and Saunders, J. B. (eds.), Reefs and Related Carbonates. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Studies in Geology No. 4.Google Scholar
Frost, S. H., and Langenheim, R. L. 1974. Cenozoic Reef Biofacies. Northern Illinois Press, Dekalb, Illinois, 388 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1842. Northern Zoological Gallery. Room II, III, Radiated animals, p. 128–135. In Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum, 44th edition, London.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. An outline of an arrangement of stony corals. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London, Series 1, 19:120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1900. The corals. Jurassic fauna of Cutch. Palaeontologica Indica, Series 9, 2:1–195.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. H. P. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von C. Darwin reformierte Descendez-Theorie, Berlin, 1,036 p.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, J. E. 1932. Geology of Eua, Tonga. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 96, 93 p.Google Scholar
Koby, F. 1890. Monographie des polypiers jurassiques de la Suisse. Société de la Paléontologie Suisse, Mémoires, 16:467–582.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1801. Systeme des animaux sans vertèbres. Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1816. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Paris, Vol. 2, 568 p.Google Scholar
Link, H. F. 1807. Beschreibung der Naturalien. Sammlungen der Universität Rostock, 3:161–165.Google Scholar
Matthai, G. 1914. A revision of the Recent colonial Astreidae possessing distinct corallites. Linnean Society of London, Transactions, Zoology, 17:1–140.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H., and Haime, J. 1848. Recherches sur les polypiers. Quatrième mémoire. Monographie des Astréides. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Paris, Series 3, 10:209–320.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H., and Haime, J. 1849. Mémoire sur les polypiers appartenant à la famille des Oculinides, au groupe intermédiaire des Pseudastréides et à la famille des Fongides (extrait). Academie de la Science, Paris, C. R., 29:67–73.Google Scholar
Moseley, H. N. 1876. On the structure and relations of the alcyonarian Heliopora caerulea, with some account of the anatomy of a species of Sarcophyton; notes on the structure of the species of the genera of Millepora, Pocillopora, and Stylaster; and remarks on the affinities of certain Palaeozoic corals. Royal Society of London, Philosophical Transactions, 166:91–129.Google Scholar
Oken, L. 1815. Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte. Jena, Theil 3, Zoologie, Abteilung I, Fleischlose Thiere, 850 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1849. Note sur les polypiers fossiles. Revue Magazine de la Zoologie, Paris, Series 2, 1:526–538.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1864. Die fossilen Foraminiferen, Anthozoen und Bryozoan von Oberburg in Steiermark. Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Denkschriften, 23, 38 p.Google Scholar
Rosen, B. R., and Turnsek, D. 1989. Extinction patterns and biogeography of scleractinian corals across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 8:355–370.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. 1899. Some Cretaceous and Eocene corals from Jamaica. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 34:227–256.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. 1900. The Eocene and lower Oligocene coral faunas of the United States, with description of a few doubtfully Cretaceous species. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 39, 263 p.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. 1919. Fossil corals from Central America, Cuba, and Porto Rico, with an account of the American Tertiary, Pleistocene, and Recent coral reefs. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 103:189–524.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. 1922. Corals from the Eocene deposits of Peru, p. 124–135. In Bosworth, T. O. (ed.), Geology of the Tertiary and Quarternary Periods in the North-west Part of Peru, with an Account of the Paleontology. Macmillan and Co. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. 1941. New corals: one Recent, Alaska; three Eocene, Alabama and Louisiana. Journal of Paleontology, 15:280–284.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W., and Wells, J. W. 1943. Revision of the suborders, families, and genera of the Scleractinia. Geological Society of America Special Paper 104, 363 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1865. Classification of polyps: (extract condensed from a synopsis of the polypi of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition under Captain Ringgold and Rodgers, U.S.N.). Essex Institute, Communications, 4(9):145–152.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1902. Notes on corals of the genus Acropora madrepora (Lam.) with new descriptions and figures of types, and of several new species. Connecticut Academy of Arts and Science, Transactions, 11:207–266.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1973. New and little-known corals from the Tampa Formation of Florida. Florida Bureau of Geology, Geological Bulletin, 56, 147 p.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1974. Late Cenozoic corals of south Florida. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 66:259–544.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1934a. Eocene corals from Cuba. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 20:147–158.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1934b. A new species of Madracis from Texas. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 20:161–164.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1934c. Some fossil corals from the West Indies. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 83:71–110.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1935. Corals from the Cretaceous and Eocene of Jamaica. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 10, 15:183–194.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1941. Cretaceous and Eocene corals from northwestern Peru. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 26:303–326.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1945. American old and middle Tertiary larger foraminifera and corals. Part II. West Indian Eocene and Miocene corals. Geological Society of America Memoir 9, 25 p.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1956. Scleractinia, p. F328–F444. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, F. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E. 1977. Eocene corals from Eua, Tonga. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 640G:1–13.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N. E., and Lang, J. C. 1973. Systematic list of Jamaican shallow-water Scleractinia. Bulletin of Marine Science, 23:55–58.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1957. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306A:1–145.Google Scholar