Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:53:06.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dizygocrinus: Mississippian camerate crinoid (Echinodermata) from the midcontinental United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

William I. Ausich  and
Thomas W. Kammer
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mississippian crinoid genus Dizygocrinus is revised, and the phylogeny is inferred. Eleven species are recognized, including D. biturbinatus (Hall), D. indianaensis (Lyon and Casseday), D. caroli (Hall), D. whitei (Wachsmuth and Springer), D. originarius (Wachsmuth and Springer), D. montgomeryensis (Worthen), D. gorbyi (Miller), D. venustus (Miller), D. peculiaris (Miller and Gurley), D. mutabilis (Wachsmuth and Springer), and D. cantonensis (Wachsmuth and Springer). Nomenclatoral revisions include recognition of D. gorbyi and D. peculiaris as valid species and designation of the following as junior synonyms: D. calvus, D. crawfordsvillensis, D. intermedius, D. mediocris, and D. somersetensis. Dizygocrinus is now recognized from both the late Osagean and Meramecian on both the eastern and western margins of the Illinois Basin.

Dizygocrinus is first recognized virtually simultaneously on both the eastern and western margins of the Illinois Basin. Migration proceeded in both directions, but was most common later in the history of the genus. The principal radiation on the western basin margin was among species with generally smooth aboral cup plates, whereas on the eastern margin sculptured species account for the principal species radiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , July 1992 , pp. 637 - 658
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I., and Kammer, T. W. 1990. Systematics and phylogeny of the late Osagean and Meramecian crinoids Platycrinites and Eucladocrinus from the Mississippian stratotype region. Journal of Paleontology, 64:759–778.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Kammer, T. W. 1991. Systematic revisions to Aorocrinus, Dorycrinus, Macrocrinus, Paradichocrinus, Strotocrinus, and Uperocrinus: Mississippian camerate crinoids from the stratotype region (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 65:936–944.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Lane, N. G. 1985. Crinoid assemblages and geographic endemism in the Lower Mississippian (Carboniferous) of the United States Continental Interior, p. 216–224. In Dutro, J. T. Jr., and Pferfferkorn, H. W. (eds.), Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, Volume 5, Paleontology/Paleoecology/Paleogeography.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beede, J. W. 1906. Fauna of the Salem Limestone of Indiana, Echinodermata. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources for 1905, 1906, 30th Annual Report, 1243–1270.Google Scholar
Conkin, J. E., and Conkin, B. M. 1976. Guide to the rocks and fossils of Jefferson County, Kentucky, southern Indiana, and adjacent areas, second and revised edition. University of Louisville Publication, 239 p.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. R. 1989. Echinoderms of the Somerset Shale Member, Salem Limestone (Mississippian), in Indiana and Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 63:900–912.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Report on the Geological Survey of Iowa, embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856, 1857. Geological Survey of Iowa 1(1 and 2), 724 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1860. Contributions to the palaeontology of Iowa: being descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils. Iowa Geological Survey, 1(2) supplement, 94 p.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., Brenckle, P. L., Carter, J. L., and Ausich, W. I. 1990. Redefinition of the Osagean-Meramecian boundary in the Mississippian stratotype region. Palaios, 5:414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1894. Paleontology of Missouri, Part 1. Missouri Geological Survey, 4:143–225.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de, and Le Hon, H. S. 1854. Recherches sur les crinoïdes du terrain carbonifè de la Belgique. Academie Royal Belgique Mémoire 28(3), 217 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1958. The monobathrid camerate crinoid family: Batocrinidae. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 259 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1963a. Meristic variation in the dorsal cup of monobathrid camerate crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 37:917–930.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1963b. Two new Mississippian camerate (Batocrinidae) crinoid genera. Journal of Paleontology, 37:691–702.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (upper Osagian: Indiana). University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 99, 141 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1978. Family Batocrinidae, p. T466–T471. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R. 1948. Osage-Meramec contact. Journal of Geology, 56:288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, S. S., and Casseday, S. A. 1860. Description of nine new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana and Kentucky. American Journal of Science and Arts 79 (2nd ser., Vol. 29):68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of new Crinoidea, etc., from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 1865:155–166.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-Shaped Animals, with Observations on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites. Bryan and Company, Bristol, England, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, Ohio, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891. Paleontology. Advance Sheets from the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 17, 103 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892a. Paleontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 17:611–705.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892b. Paleontology. Advance Sheets from the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 18. W. B. Burford, Indianapolis, Indiana, 53 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1894. Paleontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report, 18:257–356.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1897. Second appendix to North American Geology and Palaeontology. (Privately published) Cincinnati, Ohio, p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890a. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Carboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History 13:3–59.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890b. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the coal measures and subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri and Iowa. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural History Annual Report, 16:327–373.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895a. Description of new species of Palaeozoic Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 6, 62 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895b. New and interesting species of Palaeozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 7, 89 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896. New species of crinoids from Illinois and other states. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 9, 66 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 167 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea, p. 137–209. In Shimer, H. W. and Shrock, R. R. (eds.), Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S., and Rexroad, C. B. 1975. Stratigraphy and conodont paleontology of the Sanders Group (Mississippian) in Indiana and adjacent Kentucky. Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin, 51, 36 p.Google Scholar
Priest, A. 1972. Some variations in crinoids. Earth Science, 25:85–88.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B., and Lane, N. G. 1984. Spickert Knob Formation (new), Borden Group, in Indiana. Indiana Geological Survey Occasional Paper 43, 4 p.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R., and Hare, S. J. 1891. Description of some new species of crinoids and blastoids from the Subcarboniferous rocks of Pike and Marion Counties, Missouri, and Scott County, Virginia. Kansas City Scientist, 5:113–118.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1989. PAUP, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L., and Olsen, G. J. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction, p. 411–501. In Hillis, D. M. and Moritz, C. (eds.), Molecular Systematics, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978a. Camerata, p. T408–T519. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978b. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J. F. 1964. Crawfordsville Crinoids, p. 34–136. In Van Sant, J. F. and Lane, N. G., Crawfordsville (Indiana) Crinoid Studies. University of Kansas Paleontological Contribution, Echinodermata Article 7.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1881. Revision of the Palaeocrinidae, Pt. 2, Family Sphaeroidocrinidae with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings:175–411(1–237).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 3, sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of generic descriptions. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Proceedings:64–226(140–302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoirs 20, 21, 897 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1942–1968. Geological Society of America Memoir 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1977. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1969–1973. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 8, 235 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1986. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1974–1980. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 16, 405 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1988. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1981–1985. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 18, 236 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 153, 653 p.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troost's unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 64, 115 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1882. Descriptions of fifty-four new species of crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous limestones and Coal Measures of Illinois and Iowa. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 1 (Article 1):3–38.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1883. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 7:269–322.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1884. Description of two new species of Crustacea, fifty-one species of Mollusca, and three species of crinoids, from the Carboniferous formation of Illinois and adjacent states, Illinois State Museum Bulletin 2, 27 p.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1890. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 8:69–154.Google Scholar