Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:59:07.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Walter G. Joyce ,
James F. Parham  and
Jacques Armand Gauthier
Walter G. Joyce
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, ,
James F. Parham
Affiliation:
2Museum of Paleontology, University of California at Berkeley, 1101 VLSB, Berkeley 94720,
Jacques Armand Gauthier
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, ,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a rank-free phylogenetic nomenclature for 25 well-established ancient clades of living turtles. This is the first attempt to document fully the nomenclatural history of a clade with the intent of proposing a coherent nomenclatural system to replace the traditional rank-based nomenclature. Because of the imperative to retain connectivity to the literature for information retrieval, due consideration is given to balancing the desire to develop a consistent system against the desire to conserve traditional associations between names, taxa (i.e., clades), and characters. Novel issues and problems that emerged during this review include: the unclear name/clade association of traditional names; the creation of synonymy lists from which to choose a name; difficulties associated with selecting a single criterion for choosing among multiple ‘subjectively synonymous’ names; identifying authorship for a converted traditional name; and the potential loss of nomenclatural information due to ‘functional homonyms.’ This work may provide a useful road map to those intent on converting their traditional rank-based nomenclatures to explicitly phylogenetic nomenclatures under the precepts of the PhyloCode.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , September 2004 , pp. 989 - 1013
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1857. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America. Vol. 1, Pts. 1 & 2. Little, Brown, Boston, 452 p.Google Scholar
del Toro, M. Alvarez 1972. Los Reptiles de Chiapas (second edition). Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, 178 p.Google Scholar
Auffenberg, W. 1974. Checklist of fossil terrestrial tortoises (Testudinidae). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Sciences, 18:121–251.Google Scholar
Batsch, A. J. G. C. 1788. Versuch einer Anleitung, zur Kenntniß und Geschichte der Thiere und Mineralien. Akademische Buchhandlung, Jena, 528 p.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1887. Osteologische Notizen über Reptilien (Fortsetzung II). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 10:241–268.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1888a. Osteologische Notizen über Reptilien (Fortsetzung III). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 11:417–424.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1888b. Osteologische Notizen über Reptilien (Fortsetzung V). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 11:736–737.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1890. On the classification of the Testudinata. American Naturalist, 24:530–536.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1891. The very peculiar tortoise, Carettochelys Ramsay, from New Guinea. Science, 17:190.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1893. Notes on the classification of the Cryptodira. American Naturalist, 27:672–675.Google Scholar
Bell, T. 1825. A monograph of the tortoises having a moveable sternum with remarks on their arrangement and affinities. Zoological Journal, 2:299–310.Google Scholar
Bell, T. 1828. Characters of the order, families, and genera of the Testudinata. Zoological Journal, 3:513–516.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biological Review, 75:633–648.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., and Clark, J. M. 1988. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia, p. 295–338. In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Volume 1, Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Berry, J. F., Seidel, M. E., and Iverson, J. B. 1997. A new species of mud turtle (genus Kinosternon) from Jalisco and Colima, Mexico, with notes on its natural history. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2:329–337.Google Scholar
Bickham, J. W. 1981. Two-hundred-million-year-old chromosomes: deceleration of the rate of karyotypic evolution in turtles. Science, 212:1291–1293.Google Scholar
Bickham, J. W., Lamp, T., Minx, P., and Patton, J. C. 1996. Molecular systematics of the genus Clemmys and the intergeneric relationships of emydid turtles. Herpetologica, 52:89–97.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. de. 1816. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systé matique du régne animal. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique de Paris, 1816:113–124.Google Scholar
Boddaert, P. 1770. Over de Kraakbeenige Schildpad. Kornelis van Tongerlo, Amsterdam, 39 p.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1831a. Saggio di una distribuzione metodica degli animali vertebrati. Giornale Arcadico di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, 49:3–77.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1831b. Saggio d'una distribuzione metodica degli animali vertebrati a sangue freddo. Giornale Arcadico di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, 52:129–209.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1832. Saggio d'una Distribuzione Metodica degli Animali Vertebrati a Sangue Freddo. Antonio Boulzaler, Roma, 36 p.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1836a. Cheloniorum Tabula Analytica. N. p., Rome, 9 p.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1836b. Tavola analitica dei chelonii o testuggini. Giornale Arcadico di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, 69:54–64.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1850. Conspectus Systematum Herpetologiae et Amphibiologiae. EJ Brill, Lugduni Batavorum, 1 p.Google Scholar
Bonnaterre, P. J. 1789. Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature. Erpétologie. Panckoucke, Paris, 72 p.Google Scholar
Boulenger, G. A. 1887. On a new family of pleurodiran turtles. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 19:170–172.Google Scholar
Boulenger, G. A. 1888. On the characters of the chelonian families Pelomedusidae and Chelydidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1:346–347.Google Scholar
Boulenger, G. A. 1889. Catalogue of the Chelonians, Rhynchocephalians, and Crocodiles in the British Museum (Natural History). Taylor and Francis, London, 311 p.Google Scholar
Bour, R. 2000. Une nouvelle espèce de Pelusios du Gabon (Reptilia, Chelonii, Pelomedusidae). Manouria, 8:1–32.Google Scholar
Bour, R., and Dubois, A. 1985. Nomenclature ordinale et familiale des tortues (Reptilia). Studia Palaeocheloniologica, 1:77–86.Google Scholar
Bour, R., and Dubois, A. 1986. Nomenclature ordinale et familiale des tortues (Reptilia). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, 55:87–90.Google Scholar
Broadley, D. G. 1993. A review of the Southern African species of Kinixys Bell (Reptilia: Testudinidae). Annals of the Transvaal Museum, 36:41–52.Google Scholar
Broin, F. de. 1988. Les tortues et le Gondwana. Examen des rapports entre le fractionnement du Gondwana et la dispersion géographique des tortues pleurodires à partir du Crétacé. Studia Palaeocheloniologica, 2:103–142.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1800a. Essai d'une classification naturelle des reptiles, par le citoyen. Premiere Partie. Etablissement des ordres. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique de Paris, 2:81–82.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1800b. Essai d'une classification naturelle des reptiles, par le citoyen. Seconde Partie. Formation et disposition des genres. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique de Paris, 2:89–91.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1805. Essai d'une classification naturelle des reptiles. Mémoires présentés a l'Institut des Sciences, Lettres et Arts, par Divers Savans, et lus dans ses Assemblées, Sciences Mathématiques et Physiques, 1:587–637.Google Scholar
Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Systematic Biology, 43:124–130.Google Scholar
Bryant, H. N., and Cantino, P. D. 2002. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biological Reviews, 77:39–55.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1835. Grundriß der Naturgeschichte (second edition). G. Reimer, Berlin, 184 p.Google Scholar
Cann, J. 1998. Australian Freshwater Turtles. Beaumont Publishing, Singapore, 292 p.Google Scholar
Cantino, P. D., Bryant, H. N., de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M. J., Eriksson, T., Hillis, D. M., and Lee, M. S. Y. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology, 48:790–807.Google Scholar
Casper, G.-J., Reinders, G.-J., Leunissen, J. A. M., Wattel, J., and de Jong, W. W. 1996. Protein sequences indicate that turtles branches off from the Amniote tree after mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 42:580–586.Google Scholar
Chiappe, L. M. 1996. Late Cretaceous birds of southern South America: anatomy and systematics of Enantiornithes and Patagopteryx deferrariisi. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A Geologie und Paläontologie, 30:203–244.Google Scholar
Chkhikvadze, V. M. 1970. Classification of the subclass Testudinata. 16th Scientific Session of the Institute of Paleobiology devoted to the 50th celebration of Soviet Georgia and the Communistic Party of Georgia Abstract, 7–8. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Chkhikvadze, V. M. 1971. First find of a Tertiary turtle of the family Platysternidae. Paleontological Journal, 5:546–547.Google Scholar
Collins, J. T., and Taggart, T. W. 2002. Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles and Crocodilians (fifth edition). Publication of the Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas, 44 p.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1864. On the limits and relations of the Raniformes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1864:181–183.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1865. Third contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1865:185–198.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1868. On the origin of genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1868:242–300.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871a. [Letter to Professor Lesley giving an account of a journey in the valley of the Smoky Hill River, in Kansas]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 12:174–176.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871b. Synopsis of the extinct Batrachia, Reptilia and Aves of North America. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 14:1–252.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871c. On the homologies of some of the cranial bones of the Reptilia, and on the systematic arrangement of the class. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1:194–247.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1882. Contributions to the history of the Vertebrata of the lower Eocene of Wyoming and New Mexico, made during 1881. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 20:139–197.Google Scholar
Crumly, C. R. 1982. A cladistic analysis of Geochelone using cranial osteology. Journal of Herpetology, 16:215–234.Google Scholar
Crumly, C. R. 1985. A hypothesis for the relationships of land tortoise genera (Family Testudinidae). Studia Palaeocheloniologica, 1:115–124.Google Scholar
Crumly, C. R. 1994. Phylogenetic systematics of North American tortoises (genus Gopherus): evidence for their classification. Fish and Wildlife Research, 13:7–32.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. de. 1800. Leçons d'Anatomie Comparée, pt. 1. Baudouin, Paris, 521 p.Google Scholar
Danilov, I. G. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of platysternid turtles. Third Asian Herpetological Meetings Abstract, 14.Google Scholar
Danilov, I. G., and Sukhanov, V. B. 2001. New data on lindholmemydid turtle Lindholmemys from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 46:125–131.Google Scholar
David, P. 1994. Liste des reptiles actuels du monde. I. Chelonii. Dumérilia, 1:7–127.Google Scholar
DeBraga, M., and Rieppel, O. 1997. Reptile phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120:281–354.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Philosophy of Science, 55:238–259.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 1994. Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of “Mammalia.” Systematic Biology, 43:497–510.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation, p. 57–75. In Howard, D. J. and Berlocher, S. H. (eds.), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 1999. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category, p. 49–89. In Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Donoghue, M. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics, 4:317–338.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology, 39:307–322.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23:449–480.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9:27–31.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, P. E. P. 1939. The Tetrapod Reptiles of Ceylon, Volume 1, Testudinates and Crocodilians. Ceylon Journal of Science, Ceylon Government Press, Colombo, 412 p.Google Scholar
Dollo, M. L. 1884. Première note sur les chéloniens de Bernissart. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 3:63–84.Google Scholar
Dollo, M. L. 1886. Première note sur les chéloniens du Bruxelliens (Éocène moyen) de la Belgique. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 4:75–96.Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. 1806. Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux. H. L. Perronneau, Paris, 344 p.Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C., and Bibron, G. 1834. Erpétologie Générale ou Histoire Naturelle Complète des Reptiles. Vols. 1 & 2. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 447 + 680 p.Google Scholar
Dryden, L. S. 1988. Paraphyly of the Cryptodira and phylogenetic systematics of turtles. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 142 p.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. G., Cifelli, R. L., Hutchison, J. H., Kirkland, J. I., and Parrish, J. M. 1999a. Cretaceous vertebrate faunas from the Kaiparowits Plateau, south-central Utah, p. 345–353. In Gillette, D. D. (ed.), Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah Miscellaneous Publication, 99–1. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. G., Hutchison, J. H., Holroyd, P. A., Korth, W. W., and Goldstrand, P. M. 1999b. Vertebrates of the Turtle Basin Local Fauna, middle Eocene, Sevier Plateau, south-central Utah, p. 463–468. In Gillette, D. D. (ed.), Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah Miscellaneous Publication, 99–1. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ernst, C. H., and Barbour, R. W. 1989. Turtles of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 290 p.Google Scholar
Ernst, C. H., Lovich, J. E., and Barbour, R. W. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 578 p.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. R., and Parham, J. F. 2001. Molecular systematics of emydine turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 4:194–198.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. R., and Parham, J. F. 2002. A molecular phylogeny for emydine turtles: taxonomic revision and the evolution of shell kinesis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 22:388–398.Google Scholar
Fitzinger, L. 1826. Neue Classification der Reptilien nach ihren natürlichen Verwandtschaften. Verlag J. G. Heubner, Wien, 66 p.Google Scholar
Fitzinger, L. 1836. Entwurf einer systematischen Anordnung der Schildkröten. Annales des Wiener Museums der Naturgeschichte, 1:105–128.Google Scholar
Fitzinger, L. 1843. Systema Reptilium. Braumüller and Seidel, Vindobona, 106 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1822. The Philosophy of Zoology. Vol. 2. Archibald Constable, Edinburgh, 618 p.Google Scholar
Forskål, P. 1775. Descriptiones animalium avium, amphibiorum, piscium, insectorum, vermium; quae in itinere orientali observavit. Möllerus, Haunia, 164 p.Google Scholar
Fritz, U., Gaulke, M., and Lehr, E. 1997. Revision der südostasiatischen Dornschildkröten-Gattung Cyclemys Bell, 1834, mit Beschreibung einer neuen Art. Salamandra, 33:183–212.Google Scholar
Fuente, M. S. de la, and Iturralde-Vinent, M. 2001. A new pleurodiran turtle from the Jagua Formation (Oxfordian) of western Cuba. Journal of Paleontology, 75:860–869.Google Scholar
Fuente, M. S. de la, de Broin, F. De Lapparent, and de Bianco, T. Manera 2001. The oldest and first nearly complete skeleton of a chelid, of the Hydromedusa sub-group (Chelidae, Pleurodira), from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 172:237–244.Google Scholar
Fushitani, K., Higashiyama, K., Moriyama, E. N., Imai, K., and Hosokawa, K. 1996. The amino acid sequences of two αchains of hemoglobins from Komodo dragon Varanus komodoensis and phylogenetic relationships of amniotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13:1039–1043.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1975a. A phylogeny and classification of the higher categories of turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 155:389–436.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1975b. Phylogeny of the chelydrids turtles: a study of shared derived characters in the skull. Fieldiana Geology, 33:157–178.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1975c. A taxonomic revision of the Jurassic turtles Portlandemys and Plesiochelys. American Museum Novitates, Number 2574, 19 p.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1980. Phylogenetic relationships of the major groups of Amniotes, p. 593–610. In Panchen, A. L. (ed.), The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1984. Historical analysis of theories of chelonian relationship. Systematic Zoology, 33:283–301.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1991. The fossil turtles of Australia, p. 704–720. In Vickers-Rich, P., Monaghan, J. M., Baird, R. F., and Rich, T. H. (eds.), Vertebrate Palaeontology of Australia. Pioneer Design Studio, Lilydale.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1996. The postcranial morphology of Meiolania platyceps and a review of the Meiolaniidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 229:1–166.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., and Forster, C. A. 2003. Side-necked turtle lower jaws (Podocnemididae, Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation of Madagascar. American Museum Novitates, Number 3397, 13 p.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., and Kitching, J. W. 1995. The morphology and relationships of Australochelys, an Early Jurassic turtle from South Africa. American Museum Novitates, Number 3130, 29 p.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., and McKenna, M. C. 1979. A Late Permian captorhinid from Rhodesia. American Museum Novitates, Number 2688, 15 p.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., and Meylan, P. A. 1988. A phylogeny of turtles, p. 157–219. In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1, Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Campos, D. de A., and Hirayama, R. 2001. Cearachelys, a new side-necked turtle (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil. American Museum Novitates, Number 3319, 20 p.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Meylan, P. A., and Wyss, A. R. 1991. A computer assisted analysis of the relationships of the higher categories of turtles. Cladistics, 7:313–335.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Hutchison, J. H., Jenkins, F. A., and Meeker, L. J. 1987. Modern turtle origins: the oldest known cryptodire. Science, 237:289–291.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Kool, L., Brinkman, D. B., Rich, T. H., and Vickers-Rich, P. 1998. Otwayemys, a new cryptodiran turtle from the Early Cretaceous of Australia. American Museum Novitates, Number 3233, 28 p.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. 1993. Haematothermia: warm-blooded amniotes. Cladistics, 9:369–395.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. D., Russell, A. P., and Brinkman, D. B. 1995. Systematics and taxonomy of soft-shelled turtles (Family Trionychidae) from the Judith River Group (mid-Campanian) of North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 32:631–643.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. 1984. A cladistic analysis of the higher systematic categories of the Diapsida. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 564 p.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. 1994. The diversification of the amniotes, p. 129–159. In Prothero, D. and Schoch, R. M. (eds.), Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution: Short Courses in Paleontology. The Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J., and de Queiroz, K. 2001. Feathered dinosaurs, flying dinosaurs, crown dinosaurs, and the name “Aves,” p. 7–41. In Gauthier, J. and Gall, L. F. (eds.), New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J., Estes, R., and de Queiroz, K. 1988a. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha, p. 15–98. In Estes, R. and Pregill, G. (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G., and Rowe, T. 1988b. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics, 4:105–209.Google Scholar
Geoffroy-St.-Hilaire, M. 1809a. Sur les tortues molles, nouveau genre sous le nom de Trionyx, et sur la formation des carapaces. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, 14:1–20.Google Scholar
Geoffroy-St.-Hilaire, M. 1809b. Mémoire sur les tortues molles. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique de Paris, 1809:363–367.Google Scholar
Georges, A., Adams, M., and McCord, W. 2002. Electrophoretic delineation of species boundaries within the genus Chelodina (Testudines: Chelidae) of Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 134:401–421.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. G. 1847. Die Vögel und Amphibien der Vorwelt mit steter Berücksichtigung der lebenden Vögel und Amphibien. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 217 p.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1889. A remarkable tortoise, p. 509–511. In Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, for the Year Ending June 30th, 1887, Pt. 1. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1789. In Linnaeus, C., Systema Naturae, Volume 1 (thirteenth edition). N. p., Lipsia, 1309 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1825. A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy, 10:193–217.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1831. Synopsis Reptilium, Pt. 1, Cataphracta. Tortoises, Crocodiles, Enaliosaurians. Treuttel, Wurtz, London, 85 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. Description of a new genus of Emydae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:55–56.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1855. Catalogue of Shield Reptiles in the Collection of the British Museum, Pt. 1, Testudinata (Tortoises). Taylor and Francis, London, 79 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1864. Description of a new species of Staurotypus (S. salvinii) from Guatemala. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1864:127–128.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1869. Notes on the families and genera of tortoises (Testudinata), and on the characters afforded by the study of their skulls. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1869:165–223.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1870. Supplement to the catalogue of shield reptiles in the collection of the British Museum, pt. 1, Testudinata (tortoises). Taylor and Francis, London, 120 p.Google Scholar
Günther, A. 1888. Tortoise, p. 455–457. In Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 23 (ninth edition). Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Volume 2. Verlag Georg Reimer, Berlin, 462 p.Google Scholar
Haiduk, M. W., and Bickham, J. W. 1982. Chromosomal homologies and evolution of testudinoid turtles with emphasis on the systematic placement of Platysternon. Copeia, 1982:60–66.Google Scholar
Haworth, A. H. 1825. A binary arrangement of the class Amphibia. Philosophical Magazine and Journal, 65:372–373.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1892. The batrachians and reptiles of the State of Indiana. Annual Report of the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources, 17:409–602.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1908. The fossil Turtles of North America. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C., 568 p.Google Scholar
Hedges, S. B. 1994. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 91:2621–2624.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main, 436 p. (Not cited anymore)Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. 1985. Cladistic analysis of batagurine turtles. Studia Palaeocheloniologica, 1:140–157.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. 1994. Phylogenetic systematics of chelonioid sea turtles. Island Arc, 3:270–284.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. 1998. Oldest known sea turtle. Nature, 392:705–708.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. 2000. Fossil turtles from the Kuwajima Formation (Tetori Group; Early Cretaceous) of Kaseki-kabe, Shiramine-mura, Ishikawa Prefecture, Central Japan, p. 75–92. In Matsuoka, H. (ed.), Fossils of the Kawajima “Kaseki-kabe” (Fossil-Bluff). Scientific Report on a Neocomian (Early Cretaceous) Fossil Assemblage from the Kuwajima Formation, Tetori Group, Shiramine, Ishikawa Japan. Shiramine Village Board of Education, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., and Chitoku, T. 1996. Family Dermochelyidae (super-family Chelonioidea) from the Upper Cretaceous of North Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, 184:597–622.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., and Hikida, Y. 1998. Mesodermochelys (Testudines, Chelonioidea, Dermochelyidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Nakagawa-cho, Hokkaido, North Japan. Bulletin of the Nakagawa Museum of Natural History, 1:69–76.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., Brinkman, D. B., and Danilov, I. G. 2000. Distribution and biogeography of non-marine Cretaceous turtles. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 7:181–198.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. K. 1890. Schildkröten, p. 1–442. In Bronn, H. G. (ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs. Vol. 6, Pt. 3. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Holbrook, J. E. 1842. North American Herpetology. Vols. 1 & 2. J. Dobson, Philadelphia, 152–142 p.Google Scholar
Holtz, T. R. Jr. 1996. Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Paleontology, 70:536–538.Google Scholar
Huene, F. R. von. 1956. Paläontologie und Phylogenie der niederen Tetrapoden. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 716 p.Google Scholar
Hummel, K. 1929. Die fossilen Weichschildkröten (Trionychia). Geologische und Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, 16:359–487.Google Scholar
Hunt, T. J. 1958. The ordinal name for tortoises, terrapins, and turtles. Herpetologica, 14:148–150.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. 1980. Turtle stratigraphy of the Willwood Formation, Wyoming: preliminary results. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology, 24:115–118.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. 1991. Early Kinosterninae (Reptilia: Testudines) and their phylogenetic significance. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11:145–167.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. 1996. Testudines. p. 337–353. In Prothero, D. R. and Emry, R. J. (eds.), The Terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene Transition in North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H., and Bramble, D. M. 1981. Homology of the plastral scales of the Kinosternidae and related turtles. Herpetologica, 37:73–85.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H., Eaton, J. G., Holroyd, P. A., and Goodwin, M. B. 1998. Larger vertebrates of the Kaiparowits Formation (Campanian) in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and adjacent areas, p. 391–398. In Hill, L. M. and Koselak, J. J. (eds.), Learning from the Land. Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Science Symposium Proceedings. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1999 (fourth edition). International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 p.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. B. 1992. A Revised Checklist with Distribution Maps of the Turtles of the World. Privately printed, Richmond, Virginia, 363 p.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. B., and Mittermeier, R. A. 1980. Dermatemydidae, river turtles. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles, 237:1–4.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. B., Spinks, P. Q., Shaffer, H. B., McCord, W. P., and Das, I. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among the Asian tortoises of the genus Indotestudo (Reptilia: Testudines: Testudinidae). Hamadryad, 26:272–275.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1979. The origin of chordates—a methodological essay, p. 443–477. In House, M. R. (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G., and Gauthier, J. A. 2004. Palaeoecology of Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle origins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 271:1–5.Google Scholar
King, W., and Burke, R. L. 1989. Crocodilian, Tuatara, and Turtle Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Association of Systematics, Washington D.C., 732 p.Google Scholar
Klein, I. T. 1751. Quadrupedum Dispositio Brevisque Historia Naturalis. Ionas Schmidt, Lipsia, 127 p.Google Scholar
Klein, I. T. 1760. Klassification und kurze Geschichte der Vierfüßigen Thiere (translation by Behn, F. D.). Jonas Schmidt, Lübeck, 381 p.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1961. Die Familien der rezenten und fossilen Amphibien und Reptilien. Verlagshaus Meisenbach, Bamberg, 79 p.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1964. Fossilium Catalogus, Volume 1, Animalia, Pt. 107, Testudines. Ysel Press, Gravenhage, 299 p.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1967. Amphibien und Reptilien. Katalog der Subfamilien und höheren Taxa mit Nachweis des ersten Auftretens. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, 124 p.Google Scholar
Kumazawa, Y., and Nishida, M. 1999. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of the green turtle and blue-tailed mole skink: statistical evidence for archosaurian affinity of turtles. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16:784–792.Google Scholar
de Broin, F. Lapparent 2000a. African chelonians from the Jurassic to the present: phases of development and preliminary catalogue of the fossil record. Palaeontologia Africana, 36:43–82.Google Scholar
de Broin, F. Lapparent 2000b. The oldest pre-Podocnemidid turtle (Chelonii, Pleurodira), from the early Cretaceous, Ceará state, Brasil, and its environment. Treballs del Museu Geologica de Barcelona, 9:43–95.Google Scholar
de Broin, F. Lapparent, and de la Fuente, M. S. 2001. Oldest world Chelidae (Chelonii, Pleurodira), from the Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Earth and Planetary Sciences, 333:463–470.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1800. Histoire naturelle des salamandres de France. Villier, Paris, 58 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1825. Familles Naturelles de Règne Animal. Baillière Libraire, Paris, 570 p.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. 2002. Tetrapod phylogeny, amphibian origins, and the definition of the name Tetrapoda. Systematic Biology, 51:364–369.Google Scholar
Laurin, M., and Reisz, R. R. 1995. A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113:165–223.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y. 1995. Historical burden in systematics and the interrelationships of ‘parareptiles.’ Biological Reviews, 70:459–547.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y. 1996. Stability in meaning and content of taxon names: an evaluation of crown-clade definitions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 263:1103–1109.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y. 1997. Pareiasaur phylogeny and the origin of turtles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120:197–280.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y., and Spencer, P. S. 1997. Crown-clades, key characters and taxonomic stability: when is an amniote not an amniote? p. 61–84. In Sumida, S. S. and Martin, K. (eds.), Amniote Origins: Completing the Transition to Land. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Leidy, . 1870. [Proceedings of January 11, 1870]. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1870:3–5.Google Scholar
Leidy, . 1871. [Proceedings of November 8, 1870]. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1871:102–103.Google Scholar
Leunis, J. 1883. Synopsis der Thierkunde, Volume 1 (third edition). Hahn'sche Hofbuchhandlung, Hannover, 1083 p.Google Scholar
Lindholm, W. A. 1929. Revidiertes Verzeichnis der Gattungen der rezenten Schildkröten nebst Notizen zur Nomenklatur einiger Arten. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 81:275–272.Google Scholar
Link, H. F. 1807. Beschreibung der Naturalien-Sammlung der Universität zu Rostock, Volume 2. Adlers Erben, Rostock, 100 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, Volume 1 (tenth edition). Laurentius Salvius, Holmia, 824 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1766. Systema Naturae, Volume 1 (twelfth edition). Laurentius Salvius, Holmia, 532 p.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. 1887. Indian Tertiary and post-Tertiary vertebrates: eocene chelonia from the Salt Range. Palaeontologica Indica, 10:59–65.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. 1889. Catalogue of the Fossil Reptilia and Amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History), Pt. 3, Chelonia. Longmans, London, 239 p.Google Scholar
Lynch, S. C., and Parham, J. F. 2003. The first report of hard-shelled sea turtles (Cheloniidae sensu lato) from the Miocene of California, including a new species (Euclastes hutchisoni) with unusually plesiomorphic characters. PaleoBios, 23(3):21–35.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. J. C. 1849. System des Thier-Reiches oder Eintheilung der Thiere nach einem Pricipe entworfen. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande, 1849:169–210.Google Scholar
Mayr, E., and Bock, W. J. 2002. Classification and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 40:169–194.Google Scholar
McCord, W. P., and Thomson, S. A. 2002. A new species of Chelodina (Reptilia: Pleurodira: Chelidae). Journal of Herpetology, 36:255–267.Google Scholar
McCord, W. P., Iverson, J. B., Spinks, P. Q., and Shaffer, H. B. 2000. A new genus of geoemydid turtle from Asia. Hamadryad, 25:20–24.Google Scholar
McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus Clemmys and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquatic Testudinidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 143:239–279.Google Scholar
McJilton, W. T., and Reeder, T. W. 1999. Support for the diapsid relationship of turtles using molecular data from single copy nuclear genes. Joint Meeting of ASIH, AES, HL, SSAR, Pennsylvania State University Program and Abstracts, 163.Google Scholar
Merrem, B. 1820. Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Johann Christian Krieger, Marburg, 191 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, F. A. A. 1795. Synopsis Reptilium Novam Ipsorum Sistens Generum Methodum, nec non Gottingensium huius Ordinis Animalium Enumerationem. Vandenhoek et Ruprecht, Gottinga, 32 p.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A. 1987. The phylogenetic relationships of soft-shelled turtles (family Trionychidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 186:1–101.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A. 1988. Peltochelys Dollo and the relationships among the genera of the Carettochelyidae (Testudines: Reptilia). Herpetologica, 44:440–450.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A. 1996. Skeletal morphology and relationships of the Early Cretaceous side-necked turtle, Araripemys barretoi (Testudines: Pelomedusoides: Araripemydidae), from the Santana Formation of Brazil. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:20–33.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A., and Gaffney, E. S. 1989. The skeletal morphology of the Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle, Adocus, and the relationships of the Trionychoidea. American Museum Novitates, Number 2941, 60 p.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. A., Moody, T. J., Walker, C. A., and Chapman, S. D. 2000. Sandownia harrisi, a highly derived trionychoid turtle (Testudines: Cryptodira) from the Early Cretaceous of the Isle of Wight. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20:522–532.Google Scholar
Mlynarski, M. 1976. Testudines. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie, Number 7, 130 p.Google Scholar
Nessov, L. A. 1977. A new genus of pitted-shelled turtle from the Upper Cretaceous of Karakalpakia. Paleontological Journal, 11:96–107.Google Scholar
Nessov, L. A., and Chkhikvadze, V. M. 1987. New evidence on Paleocene turtle remains from south Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, 125:177–180.Google Scholar
Nopcsa, F. 1923. Die Familien der Reptilien. Fortschritte der Geologie und Palaeontologie, 2:1–210.Google Scholar
Nopcsa, F. 1928. The genera of reptiles. Palaeobiologica, 1:163–188.Google Scholar
Ogilby, J. D. 1907. Catalogue of the emydosaurian and testudinian reptilies of New Guinea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, 19:1–30.Google Scholar
Oppel, M. 1811. Die Ordnungen, Familien, und Gattungen der Reptilien als Prodrom einer Naturgeschichte derselben. Joseph Lindauer, München, 86 p.Google Scholar
Padian, K., Hutchinson, J. R., Holtz, T. R. 1999. Phylogenetic definitions and nomenclature of the major taxonomic categories of the carnivorous Dinosauria (Theropoda). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 19:69–80.Google Scholar
Palkovacs, E. P., Gerlach, J., and Caccone, A. 2002. The evolutionary origin of Indian Ocean tortoises (Dipsochelys). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24:216–227.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., and Fastovsky, D. E. 1997. The phylogeny of cheloniid sea turtles revisited. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2:548–554.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., and Feldman, C. R. 2002. Generic revisions of emydine turtles. Turtle and Tortoise Newsletter, 6:28–31.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., and Hutchison, J. H. 2003. A new eucryptodiran turtle from the Late Cretaceous of North America (Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23:783–798.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., and Stidham, T. A. 1999. Late Cretaceous sea turtles from the Chico Formation of California. Paleobios, 19:1–7.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., Simison, W. B., Kozak, K. H., Feldman, C. R., and Haitao, S. 2001. New Chinese turtles: endangered or invalid? Animal Conservation, 4:357–367.Google Scholar
Perälä, J. 2001. A new species of Testudo (Testudines: Testudinidae) from the Middle East, with implications for conservation. Journal of Herpetology, 35:567–582.Google Scholar
Peters, W. C. H. 1882. Naturwissenschaftliche Reise nach Mossambique, Zoologie, Volume 3, Amphibien. G. Reimer, Berlin, 191 p.Google Scholar
PhyloCode. 2003. A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature, Version 2a. http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/preface.html.Google Scholar
Platz, J. E., and Conlon, J. M. 1997. … and turn back again. Nature, 389:246.Google Scholar
Pollock, D. D., Eisen, J. A., Doggett, N. A., and Cummings, M. P. 2000. A case for evolutionary genomics and the comprehensive examination of sequence biodiversity. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17:1776–1788.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P. C. H. 1979. Encyclopedia of turtles. TFH Publications, Jersey City, 895 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1814. Prodrono di erpetologia siciliana. Specchio delle Scienze o Giornale Enciclopedico di Sicilia, 2:65–66.Google Scholar
Ramsay, E. P. 1887. On a new genus and species of freshwater tortoise from the Fly River, New Guinea. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, 1:158–162.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., and Laurin, M. 1991. Owenetta and the origin of turtles. Nature, 349:324–326.Google Scholar
Rieppel, O., and DeBraga, M. 1996. Turtles as diapsid reptiles. Nature, 384:453–455.Google Scholar
Rieppel, O., and Reisz, R. R. 1999. The origin and early evolution of turtles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30:1–22.Google Scholar
Ritgen, F. A. 1828. Versuch einer natürlichen Eintheilung der Amphibien. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 6:247–284.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1956. Osteology of the Reptiles. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 772 p.Google Scholar
Ross, W., and Macartney, J. 1802. Lectures on Comparative Anatomy, translated from the French of G. Cuvier, Volume 1. Oriental Press, London, 710 p.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization, p. 27–48. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Rougier, G. W., Fuente, M. S., and Arcucci, A. B. 1995. Late Triassic turtles from South America. Science, 268:855–858.Google Scholar
Rowe, T. 1988. Definition, diagnosis, and the origin of Mammalia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 8:241–264.Google Scholar
Rowe, T., and Gauthier, J. 1992. Ancestry, paleontology, and definition of the name Mammalia. Systematic Biology, 41:372–378.Google Scholar
Schander, C., and Thollesson, M. 1995. Phylogenetic taxonomy—some comments. Zoologica Scripta, 24:263–268.Google Scholar
Schlegel, H., and Müller, S. 1844. Over de Schildpadden van den Indischen Archipel. Beschrijving einer nieuwe soort van Sumatra, p. 29–36. In Temminck, C. J. (ed.), Verhandelingen over de natuurlijke geschiedenis der Nederlandsche overzeesche bezittingen, Pt. 3. S. and J. Luchtmans and van der Hoek, Leiden.Google Scholar
Schmid, K. 1819. Naturhistorische Beschreibung der Amphibien. Lithographische Kunst-Anstalt, München, 95 p.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. G. 1783. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte der Schildkröten, nebst einem systematischen Verzeichnisse der einzelnen Arten und zwey Kupfern. Johann Gotfried Müllersche Buchhandlung, Leipzig, 364 p.Google Scholar
Schweigger, A. F. 1812. Prodromus monographiae Cheloniorum, Pt. 1. Königsberger Archiv für Naturwissenschaft und Mathematik, 1812:271–458.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1880. Note on Psephophorus polygonus, v. Meyer, a new type of chelonians reptiles allied to the leathery turtle. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 36:406–413.Google Scholar
Seidel, M. E. 2002. Taxonomic observations on extant species and subspecies of slider turtles, genus Trachemys. Journal of Herpetology, 36:285–292.Google Scholar
Serb, J. M., Phillips, C. A., and Iverson, J. B. 2001. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Kinosternon flavescens based on complete mitochondrial control region sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 18:149–162.Google Scholar
Sereno, P. C. 1998. A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 210:41–83.Google Scholar
Sereno, P. C. 1999. Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: critique and rationale. Systematic Biology, 48:329–351.Google Scholar
Shaffer, H. B., Meylan, P., and McKnight, M. L. 1997. Test of turtle phylogeny: molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Systematic Biology, 46:235–268.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. 1794. Zoology of New Holland. Sowerby, London, 33 p.Google Scholar
Siebenrock, F. 1907. Die Schildkrötenfamilie Cinosternidae. Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, 116:527–599.Google Scholar
Siebenrock, F. 1909. Synopsis der rezenten Schildkröten. Zoologische Jahrbücher (supplement), 10:427–618.Google Scholar
Spinks, P. Q., Shaffer, H. B., McCord, W. P., and Iverson, J. B.In press. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the turtle family Geoemydidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.Google Scholar
Stejneger, L. 1907. Herpetology of Japan and adjacent territory. Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 58:1–577.Google Scholar
Strauch, A. 1862. Chelonologische Studien. Mémoires de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, 5(7):1–196.Google Scholar
Straugh, A. 1890. Bemerkungen über die Schildkrötensammlung im zoologischen Museum der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg. Mémoires de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, 38:1–127.Google Scholar
Stuart, B. L., and Parham, J. F. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the critically endangered Indochinese box turtle Cuora galbinifrons. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31(1):164–177.Google Scholar
Sukhanov, V. B. 2000. Mesozoic turtles of middle and central Asia, p. 309–367. In Benton, M. J., Shishkin, M. A., Unwin, D. M., and Kurochkin, E. N. (eds.), The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1839. On the natural history and classification of fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, p. 1–452. In Lardner, D. (ed.), Cabinet Cyclopaedia. Vol. 2. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Theobald, W. 1868. Catalogue of reptiles in the museum of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Journal of the Asiatic Society (extra number), 1868:8–88.Google Scholar
Troost, . 1835. In Harlan, R., Medical and physical researches. Lydia R. Bailey, Philadelphia, 653 p.Google Scholar
Vaillant, L. 1877. Remarques sur la classification et les affinités réciproques des Chéloniens. Bulletin de la Société Philomatique de Paris, 1:54–58.Google Scholar
Vaillant, L. 1894. Essai sur la classification générale des chéloniens. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 16:331–345.Google Scholar
Vandellius, D. 1761. Epistola de holothurio, et testudine coriacea ad celeberrimum Carolum Linnaeum equitem naturae curiosorum dioscoridem II. Conzatti, Patavius, 12 p.Google Scholar
van Dijk, P. P., Stuart, B. L., and Rhodin, A. G. J. 2000. Asian turtle trade. Proceedings of a workshop on conservation and trade of freshwater turtles and tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs, 2:1–264.Google Scholar
Wagler, J. 1828. Vorläufige Übersicht des Gerüstes, so wie Ankündigung seines Systema Amphibiorum. Isis von Oken, 21:859–861.Google Scholar
Wagler, J. 1830. Natürliches System der Amphibien mit vorangehender Classification der Säugethiere und Vögel. J. G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung, München, 354 p.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1917. A sketch classification of the pre-Jurassic tetrapod vertebrates. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1917:167–186.Google Scholar
Weems, R. E. 1974. Middle Miocene sea turtles (Syllomus, Procolpochelys, Psephophorus) from the Calvert Formation. Journal of Paleontology, 48:278–303.Google Scholar
Wermuth, H. 1953. Systematik der rezenten Krokodile. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Berlin, 29:429–514.Google Scholar
Whetstone, K. N. 1978a. Additional record of the fossil snapping turtle Macroclemys schmidti from the Marsland Formation (Miocene) of Nebraska with notes on interspecific skull variation within the genus Macroclemys. Copeia, 1:159–162.Google Scholar
Whetstone, K. N. 1978b. A new genus of cryptodiran turtles (Testudinoidea, Chelydridae) from the Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation of Montana. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 51:539–563.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, A. F. 1828. Beyträge zur Amphibienkunde. Isis von Oken, 21:364–383.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, A. F. A., and Ruthe, J. F. 1832. Handbuch der Zoologie. C. G. Lüderiß, Berlin, 621 p.Google Scholar
Williams, E. E. 1950. Variation and selection in the cervical central articulations of living turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 94:511–561.Google Scholar
Wood, R. C. 1985. Evolution of the pelomedusid turtles. Studia Palaeocheloniologica, 1:269–282.Google Scholar
Wood, R. C., Johnson-Gove, J., Gaffney, E. S., and Maley, K. F. 1996. Evolution and phylogeny of leatherback turtles (Dermochelyidae), with descriptions of new fossil taxa. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2:266–286.Google Scholar
Yasukawa, Y., Hirayama, R., and Hikida, T. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of geoemydine turtles (Reptilia: Bataguridae). Current Herpetology, 20:105–133.Google Scholar
Yasukawa, Y., Ota, H., and Hikida, T. 1992. Taxonomic re-evaluation of the two subspecies of Geoemyda spengleri (Gmelin, 1789) (Reptilia: Emydidae). Japanese Journal of Herpetology, 14:143–159.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1969. The turtle shell, p. 311–339. In Gans, C., Bellairs, A. d'A., and Parsons, T. S. (eds.), Biology of the Reptilia. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Turnbull, W. D. 1955. Procolpochelys grandaeva (Leidy), an early carettine sea turtle. Fieldiana Zoology, 37:345–382.Google Scholar
Zardoya, R., and Meyer, A. 2000. Mitochondrial evidence on the phylogenetic position of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Genetics, 155:765–775.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1889. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Section 1: Palaeozoologie, Volume 3, Vertebrata, Shipment 3: Reptilia. R. Oldenbourg. München, 900 p.Google Scholar
Zug, G. R., Vitt, L. J., and Caldwell, J. P. 2001. Herpetology (second edition). Academic Press, San Diego, California, 630 p.Google Scholar