Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T05:20:13.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cuticular microstructure of some Silurian homalonotid trilobites from Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

John E. Dalingwater ,
Derek J. Siveter  and
Harry Mutvei
John E. Dalingwater
Affiliation:
50 Westgate, Hale, Cheshire WA15 9AZ, U.K.
Derek J. Siveter
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, U.K.
Harry Mutvei
Affiliation:
Sektionen för Paleozoologi, Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, S-10005 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Etched slices of the cuticle of the Silurian trilobite Homalonotus rhinotropis Angelin, 1854, from two localities in Skåne, southern Sweden, have been examined with the scanning electron microscope. The two major subdivisions of the cuticle are a “prismatic” (originally laminated) outer layer, about 20-30 μm thick, and a principal layer, 200-300 μm thick, which may be foliated or roughly laminated. The original finely-laminated aspect of the outer layer may sometimes be seen as a continuous layer, but is more frequently detected as “shaped inclusions” set in a prismatic background. These “shaped inclusions” are considered to have been produced by accumulation of minerals around the apices of 3-6 μm perpendicular canals early in calcification and preferentially preserved because of subtle differences from the products of later stages of the process. It is possible that calcification started before ecdysis. The difficulties involved in ascertaining the original structure of the principal layer are outlined, and possible reasons for differences in its preservation from the outer layer are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 73 , Issue 2: Papers from the Second International Trilobite Conference, August 1997 , March 1999 , pp. 256 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dalingwater, J. E., and Mutvei, H. 1990. Arthropod exoskeletons, p. 83–96. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, Volume I. Van Nostrand Rheinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Dalingwater, J. E., Hutchinson, S. J., Mutvei, H., and Siveter, D. J. 1991. Cuticular ultrastucture of the trilobite Ellipsocephalus polytomus from the Middle Cambrian of Öland, Sweden. Palaeontology, 34:205–217.Google Scholar
Dalingwater, J. E., Hutchinson, S. J., Mutvei, H., and Siveter, D. J. 1993a. Cuticular ultrastructure of some Silurian calymenid trilobites from the Welsh Borderland and Gotland. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 229:37–49, 10 pl.Google Scholar
Dalingwater, J. E., Hutchinson, S. J., Mutvei, H., and Siveter, D. J. 1993b. Trilobite cuticle calcification, p. 13–20. In Kobayashi, I., Mutvei, H., and Sahni, A. (eds.), Structure, Formation and Evolution of Fossil Hard Tissues. Tokai University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Dalingwater, J. E., Hutchinson, S. J., Mutvei, H., and Siveter, D. J. 1996. Mineralization of some homalonotid trilobite cuticles. Bulletin de l'Institut océanographique, Monaco, nombre spécial, 14, 4:343–351.Google Scholar
Digby, P. S. B. 1967. Calcification and its mechanism in the shore crab, Carcinus maenus (L.). Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London, 178:129–146.Google Scholar
McAllister, J. E., and Brand, U. 1989. Primary and diagenetic microstructures in trilobites. Lethaia, 22:101–111.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H. 1974. SEM studies on arthropod exoskeletons, Pt. 1, Decapod crustaceans, Homarus gammarus L. and Carcinus maenas (L.). Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, Ne. Series, 4:73–80.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H. 1977. SEM studies on arthropod exoskeletons, Pt. 2, Horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus (L.) in comparison with extinct eurypterids and Recent scorpions. Zoologic. Scripta, 6:203–213.Google Scholar
Teigler, D. J., and Towe, K. M. 1975. Microstructure and composition of the trilobite exoskeleton. Fossils and Strata, 4:137–149, 9 pl.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1993. Morphology, anatomy and habits of the Silurian homalonotid trilobite Trimerus. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 15:69–83.Google Scholar