Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:34:18.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corals and a cephalopod from the Whirlpool Formation (latest Ordovician, Hirnantian), Hamilton, Ontario: biostratigraphic and biogeographic significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Robert J. Elias*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
Roger A. Hewitt
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, 12 Fairfield Road, Eastwood, Leigh-on-Sea, Essex SS9 5SB, England
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Solitary rugose corals assigned to Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. and an annulated orthoconic cephalopod identified as Gorbyoceras sp. occur in nearshore shallow-marine sandstone of the Whirlpool Formation in Hamilton, southern Ontario. They are the first macrofossils contributing to a modern understanding of the age and correlation of this stratigraphic unit. Streptelasma rutkae most closely resembles S. subregulare (Savage, 1913), which occurs widely in the Edgewood Province of the east-central United States, in strata considered latest Ordovician (Hirnantian). Gorbyoceras ranges into the latest Katian (latest Richmondian) in the Cincinnati Arch region. Thus, the occurrences of S. rutkae and Gorbyoceras sp. support other biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic data suggesting that the Whirlpool Formation is latest Ordovician, rather than earliest Silurian as traditionally thought. They also indicate paleogeographic connections between the area of Whirlpool deposition in Ontario and the Edgewood Province and Cincinnati Arch region in the east-central United States

UUID: http://zoobank.org/d1ded814-204d-4070-a469-52d3b6e259c7

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Non-technical Summary

The new coral species Streptelasma rutkae and a cephalopod belonging to the genus Gorbyoceras occur in nearshore shallow-marine sandstone of the Whirlpool Formation in Hamilton, southern Ontario. They are the first macrofossils contributing to a modern understanding of the geologic age and correlation of this formation. Streptelasma rutkae most closely resembles a species that occurs widely in the Edgewood Biogeographic Province of the east-central United States, in rocks dating to the latest part of the Ordovician Period. Gorbyoceras is present in Late Ordovician rocks in the Cincinnati Arch region. Thus, the occurrences of Streptelasma rutkae and Gorbyoceras support other fossil and chemical data suggesting that the age of the Whirlpool Formation is latest Ordovician, rather than earliest Silurian as traditionally thought. They also indicate paleogeographic connections between the area where the Whirlpool Formation was deposited in Ontario and the Edgewood Biogeographic Province and Cincinnati Arch region in the east-central United States.

Introduction

The Whirlpool Formation is a unit of sandstone exposed along the Niagara Escarpment from the vicinity of Medina in northwestern New York westward to Hamilton in southern Ontario and northward from there to the Collingwood area (Rutka et al., Reference Rutka, Cheel, Middleton, Salas and Cheel1991; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995) (Fig. 1.1). The lower part of the formation is interpreted as a terrestrial deposit, with the upper part representing nearshore shallow-marine deposition during a transgression. The Whirlpool is separated from underlying shale of the Queenston Formation by the regional Cherokee Unconformity and is overlain gradationally by shale of the Power Glen Formation in the southeast and dolostone of the Manitoulin Formation in the northwest. On Bruce Peninsula and Manitoulin Island, Ontario, where the Whirlpool Formation is absent, the Manitoulin Formation overlies the Cherokee Unconformity.

Figure 1. (1) Index map showing Hamilton, Ontario (white star), where studied corals and cephalopod were collected from Whirlpool Formation. Corals of Edgewood Province occur at stratigraphic sections in outcrop areas A–F; other corals mentioned in text occur on Anticosti Island, Québec (crosshatched area), at a locality in Grand Rapids Uplands, Manitoba (black star), and at St. Clair Spring section, Arkansas (open circle). AR = Arkansas; IA = Iowa; IL = Illinois; IN = Indiana; KY = Kentucky; MB = Manitoba; MI = Michigan; MO = Missouri; NY = New York; OH = Ohio; OK = Oklahoma; ON = Ontario; PA = Pennsylvania; QC = Québec. (2) Detail map showing Kenilworth Avenue locality where corals were collected in 1986. At that time, Escarpment Rail Trail was a Canadian National Railway line (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, fig. A1–3a; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, fig. 26). Whirlpool Formation is exposed below the former railway line (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, p. A1–11; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, p. 137). Locality is currently accessible by ascending stairs from Kimberly Drive; 30 steps below the top, there is access to a path leading northwest along the base of the stratigraphic section. (3) Detail map showing Jolley Cut locality (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, p. A1–9, fig. A1–3a; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, p. 140, fig. 26; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Cheel, Duke, Goodman, LoDuca, Middleton, Pratt, Rutka, Salas and Cheel1991, fig. 44). Cephalopod was collected by Grant (Reference Grant1892, Reference Grant1897a, Reference Grantb, Reference Grant1900) from a Jolley Cut quarry; in 1985, R.A.H. located the probable site (white star).

Traditionally, the Cherokee Unconformity was considered to mark the Ordovician–Silurian boundary (Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995). Although fossils representing various taxonomic groups were known from the Whirlpool Formation, they were thought to be biostratigraphically undiagnostic. Therefore, the Whirlpool was assigned an age on the basis of lateral correlation with strata of the Manitoulin Formation containing a fauna interpreted as earliest Silurian (Llandovery, Rhuddanian). More recently, the Hirnantian Isotopic Carbon Excursion (HICE) of latest Ordovician (Hirnantian) age has been identified in the upper Queenston, Whirlpool, and Manitoulin formations in southern Ontario, and brachiopods and conodonts in the Manitoulin have been reinterpreted as consistent with that age (Stott and Jin, Reference Stott and Jin2007; Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011). In northwestern New York, microfossils suggest that the Whirlpool and Power Glen formations are Late Ordovician (late Katian and/or Hirnantian) (Schröer et al., Reference Schröer, Vandenbroucke, Hints, Steeman, Verniers, Brett, Cramer and McLaughlin2016).

In this paper, we present the first modern, systematic study involving macrofossils from the Whirlpool Formation. They are solitary rugose corals assigned to Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. and an annulated orthoconic cephalopod identified as Gorbyoceras sp., from Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1.1, white star). The occurrences of these taxa support other biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic data suggesting that the Whirlpool Formation is latest Ordovician in age. They also point to paleogeographic connections with the Edgewood Province and Cincinnati Arch region in the east-central United States.

Geologic setting

Exposures of the Whirlpool Formation occur along the Niagara Escarpment in southern Ontario and northwestern New York, from the Collingwood area, to Hamilton, to the vicinity of Medina (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, fig. 1-1; Middleton et al., Reference Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, fig. 1; Rutka et al., Reference Rutka, Cheel, Middleton, Salas and Cheel1991, fig. 17; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995, fig. 1) (Fig. 1.1). Southwest of the escarpment, the Whirlpool is present in the subsurface of Ontario, New York, northwestern Pennsylvania, and eastern Ohio (Castle, Reference Castle1998; Johnson, Reference Johnson1998). The formation, rarely more than 9 m thick, is composed of very fine- to fine-grained subarkose to quartz arenite (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986; Rutka et al., Reference Rutka, Cheel, Middleton, Salas and Cheel1991). The lower part of the Whirlpool is considered to represent terrestrial deposition in a braided river system, with sediment derived from the Appalachian region to the east. The upper part of the formation is a nearshore shallow-marine deposit that formed during a transgression.

The Whirlpool Formation is overlain gradationally by shale of the Power Glen Formation in the southeast and dolostone of the Manitoulin Formation in the northwest (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986; Middleton et al., Reference Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987; Rutka et al., Reference Rutka, Cheel, Middleton, Salas and Cheel1991; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995). Northwest of Collingwood (Fig. 1.1), the Whirlpool pinches out beneath the Manitoulin Formation (Bergstrom et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011) or grades laterally into it (Farnam et al., Reference Farnam, Brett, Huff, Sturmer and Paton2019), so the Manitoulin unconformably overlies the Queenston Formation on Bruce Peninsula. The Manitoulin Formation extends to Manitoulin Island, where it unconformably overlies carbonates and shales of the Georgian Bay Formation.

Rutka (Reference Rutka1986, tables 5-1, 5-2, 5-3) tabulated the regional occurrence of various trace fossils, microfossils, and macrofossils found in her study of the Whirlpool Formation. Trace fossils appear only in the upper part of the formation, where they are common and diverse. Microfossils that occur in both the lower and upper parts of the Whirlpool include spore-like forms and tube-like fragments. In addition, acritarchs, chitinozoans, cuticle-like fragments, and scolecodonts are present in the upper part of the formation. In northwestern New York, Gray and Boucot (Reference Gray and Boucot1971) listed spore tetrads, acritarchs, and scolecodonts ~2.5–3.0 m above the base of the Whirlpool Formation. From the bottom of the upper part of the Whirlpool, Schröer et al. (Reference Schröer, Vandenbroucke, Hints, Steeman, Verniers, Brett, Cramer and McLaughlin2016) reported cryptospores, acritarchs, glomalean fungi, chitinozoans, cuticle fragments, and small carbonaceous mandibles of unknown affinity. Miller and Eames (Reference Miller and Eames1982) documented spore-like microfossils and acritarchs from the upper part of the Whirlpool.

Macrofossils occur in the upper part of the Whirlpool Formation but are sparse. They include corals, gastropods, bivalves, brachiopods (including linguloids), bryozoans, crinoids, ostracods, and trilobites (Foerste, Reference Foerste1923; Rutka, Reference Rutka1986; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Cheel, Duke, Goodman, LoDuca, Middleton, Pratt, Rutka, Salas and Cheel1991, Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995). Cephalopods are represented by a single specimen, which Hewitt (Reference Hewitt1986) assigned to Gorbyoceras Shimizu and Obata, Reference Shimizu and Obata1935. Rutka (Reference Rutka1986) noted that brachiopods and crinoids are most widely distributed, and corals are present only in the area where the Whirlpool Formation is overlain by the Manitoulin Formation.

Regarding corals, Spencer (Reference Spencer1883, p. 142) identified the solitary rugosan Zaphrentis bilateralis (Hall, Reference Hall1852) from the Medina “Gray Band,” now known as the Whirlpool Formation (Hewitt, Reference Hewitt1986, table 1). The assignment to that inadequately known species is doubtful. Bassler (Reference Bassler1950) placed it in Heliophrentis Grabau, Reference Grabau, Grabau and Sherzer1910 and indicated that the type material is from the Silurian Reynales Limestone in New York, which is substantially higher stratigraphically than the Whirlpool (Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995). Hill (Reference Hill and Teichert1981) questionably synonymized Heliophrentis with Zaphrenthis Rafinesque and Clifford, Reference Rafinesque and Clifford1820 (misspelled Zaphrentis by Milne-Edwards and Haime, Reference Milne-Edwards and Haime1850), a Devonian genus. Grant (Reference Grant1897b, p. 136) listed Favosites niagarensis “(or closely allied)” from the unit he termed Medina, now known as the Whirlpool Formation (Hewitt, Reference Hewitt1986, table 1). That identification requires verification. Type material of the tabulate coral F. niagarensis Hall, Reference Hall1852 is from the Silurian Lockport Dolomite in New York (see Bassler, Reference Bassler1950), which is much higher stratigraphically than the Whirlpool (Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995).

More recently, corals from the Whirlpool Formation have been identified as the phaceloid colonial rugosan Synaptophyllum sp. (Salas, Reference Salas1983) and the solitary rugosans Blothrophyllum sp. (Salas, Reference Salas1983; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Cheel, Duke, Goodman, LoDuca, Middleton, Pratt, Rutka, Salas and Cheel1991), ?Enterolasma sp., and Streptelasma sp. (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986). However, the first three identifications are doubtful. Synaptophyllum Simpson, Reference Simpson1900 and Blothrophyllum Billings, Reference Billings1859 as currently understood are Devonian in age (Pedder and Murphy, Reference Pedder and Murphy2003; Pedder, Reference Pedder2010). Enterolasma Simpson, Reference Simpson1900 is considered a synonym of Palaeocyathus Foerste, Reference Foerste1888, with assigned species ranging from the mid-Silurian (Wenlock) to Devonian (Weyer, Reference Weyer2007). Streptelasma Hall, Reference Hall1847 is a possibility; confirmed species recognized by McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013) range from S. corniculum Hall, Reference Hall1847 in the Late Ordovician (early Katian, Mohawkian, Chatfieldian) to S. sibiricum (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva and Nikiforova1955) of Latypov (Reference Latypov1982) in the early Silurian (middle late Llandovery).

Kenilworth Avenue locality

Corals of the Whirlpool Formation documented in the present study are from the Kenilworth Avenue locality in Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1.1, 1.2). This locality was described in detail by Rutka (Reference Rutka1986). The Whirlpool Formation is ~2.5 m thick (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, figs. 4-16, 4-17b, 4-19; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, figs. 27, 28). The lower part, overlying the Queenston Formation, is a low-angle cross-laminated sandstone (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, fig. 3-5). The upper part of the formation includes symmetrical ripple cross-laminated sandstone, trough and planar cross-laminated sandstone, interbedded sandstone and shale, and hummocky to bioturbated, amalgamated hummocky cross-stratified sandstone (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, figs. 3-10a, b, 4-17b, 4-18). The upper part of the Whirlpool Formation is overlain by the Manitoulin Formation. Rutka (Reference Rutka1986) considered the Whirlpool at this locality anomalous in being relatively thin, with a thin lower part. This was attributed to substantial reworking and/or scouring during the transgression in which the upper part of the formation was deposited.

Rutka (Reference Rutka1986, tables 5-1, 5-2, 5-3) listed various trace fossils, microfossils, and macrofossils from the upper part of the Whirlpool Formation at the Kenilworth Avenue locality. The microfossils include spore-like forms, acritarchs, and tube-like fragments. Macrofossils include solitary rugose corals (identified as Streptelasma sp.) and unidentifiable brachiopods, crinoids, and bivalves. In the present study, corals from the Kenilworth Avenue locality are assigned to Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Streptelasma rutkae n. sp., transverse thin sections (1–4, 7, 8, 10–13; oriented with apical direction of corallum into the page and cardinal septum in six o'clock position) and longitudinal thin sections (5, 6, 9; oriented in cardinal-counter plane with cardinal fossula on left side and apical direction of corallum toward bottom of the page). (1) GSC 143183. (2–6) Holotype GSC 143181. (7) GSC 143188. (8) Paratype GSC 143182. (9) GSC 143186. (10, 11) GSC 143189. (12, 13) GSC 143187. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 1.2 m above base of Whirlpool Formation; Kenilworth Avenue locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Jolley Cut locality

The cephalopod documented in the present study is from the Jolley Cut locality in Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1.1, 1.3). The entire Jolley Cut locality was described in detail by Rutka (Reference Rutka1986). Exposures occur over a lateral distance of 260 m (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, figs. 4-14, 4-15; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, figs. 29, 30; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Cheel, Duke, Goodman, LoDuca, Middleton, Pratt, Rutka, Salas and Cheel1991, figs. 45, 46). The Whirlpool Formation has a maximum thickness of 4.3 m, including the lower and upper parts of the formation. The Whirlpool is underlain by the Queenston Formation and overlain by the Manitoulin Formation.

Rutka (Reference Rutka1986, tables 5-1, 5-2, 5-3) listed various trace fossils, microfossils, and macrofossils from the upper part of the Whirlpool Formation at the Jolley Cut locality. The microfossils include spore-like forms, acritarchs, chitinozoans, tube- and cuticle-like fragments, and scolecodonts. Macrofossils include solitary rugose corals, brachiopods, and gastropods. A single cephalopod was collected from a quarry at the Jolley Cut by Grant (Reference Grant1892, Reference Grant1897a, Reference Grantb, Reference Grant1900), who identified the specimen as Orthoceras Bruguière, Reference Bruguière1789. It was reassigned to Gorbyoceras by Hewitt (Reference Hewitt1986) and is described as Gorbyoceras sp. in the present study (Fig. 3). The occurrence of this cephalopod in the upper part of the Whirlpool Formation indicates normal marine, certainly not brackish, conditions during the transgression above the terrestrial lower part of the formation.

Figure 3. Gorbyoceras sp., cast on underside of sandstone bed, ventral view with anterior direction toward top of page; RM 1108. A, anterior end of annulated shell on lateral side of specimen; B, parallel grooves and ridges of uncertain origin; C, siphuncle; D, annulations of shell appear to wedge into each other along hyponomic sinus; E, horizontal Planolites trace; F, traces of vertical burrows; G, septa weathered out as grooves; H, horizontal Planolites traces; I, posterior end of shell is missing. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 0.15 m above base of upper part of Whirlpool Formation; Jolley Cut locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Materials and methods

Corals

On 23 and 28 March 1986, R.A.H. collected silicified solitary rugose corals from the Whirlpool Formation at the Kenilworth Avenue locality in Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1.1, 1.2; 43°13′47.5″N, 79°48′55.4″W). The corals were obtained from a 15-mm-thick yellowish silicified sandstone bed 1.2 m above the base of the formation. That bed, which also yielded scolecodonts, was situated 0.3 m above a shale parting marking the likely change from terrestrial to marine deposition. The collecting site was 32 m southeast of the northwestern end of the 112-m-long exposure (see Rutka, Reference Rutka1986, fig. 4-19; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, fig. 28). On 11 June 2022, R.J.E. verified that the exposure is still accessible, although largely overgrown. The 1986 collection yielded 14 coral specimens that are sufficiently well preserved for systematic study. From those specimens, 25 transverse and 10 longitudinal thin sections were prepared.

In addition to qualitative information, the following biometric data were obtained from transverse thin sections where possible: corallum diameter and radius, number of major septa, thickness of major septa (based on a typical septum on counter side of corallum, measured halfway between corallum periphery and axial end of septum), length of major septa (based on a typical septum, measured from corallum periphery to axial end of septum), thickness of cardinal septum (measured halfway between corallum periphery and axial end of septum), length of cardinal septum (measured from corallum periphery to axial end of septum), width of cardinal fossula (distance from median line of septum on one side of fossula to median line of septum on other side of fossula, measured midway between peripheral and axial ends of fossula), length of minor septa (based on a typical septum, measured from corallum periphery to axial end of septum), and thickness of stereozone (measured midway between a typical major septum and adjacent minor septum).

In addition to qualitative information, the following biometric data were obtained from longitudinal thin sections where possible: thickness of tabulae (based on a typical tabula), spacing of tabulae in axial region (tabulae counted over a measured distance along corallum axis, then calculated as number per centimeter), and spacing of tabulae in septal region (tabulae counted over a measured distance along midline of septal region, then calculated as number per centimeter).

Cephalopod

The only cephalopod known from the Whirlpool Formation was collected by Grant (Reference Grant1892, Reference Grant1897a, Reference Grantb, Reference Grant1900) at a Jolley Cut quarry in Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1.1, 1.3). On 2–4 March 1985, R.A.H. compared the lithology of the specimen with the still existing exposures and located the most closely matching occurrence (43°14′43.0″N, 79°51′35.4″W). The rock is weathered to the right color of pale yellow and composed of silica-cemented quartz grains (diameter 0.1–0.2 mm) with a green mineral and black phosphatic spots (diameter 0.3 mm). At the base of the bed are load structures (width 50 mm) and sinuous horizontal traces (width 2 mm) identified as Planolites Nicholson, Reference Nicholson1873. This corresponds to the base of a low-angle cross-laminated interval at Section D of Rutka (Reference Rutka1986, fig. 4-14; Brusse et al., Reference Brusse, Duke, Fawcett, Middleton, Rutka, Salas and Duke1987, fig. 29; Brett et al., Reference Brett, Cheel, Duke, Goodman, LoDuca, Middleton, Pratt, Rutka, Salas and Cheel1991, fig. 46). The underlying 15-cm-thick sandstone layer has an irregular upper surface with shale patches and a smooth basal surface at the contact between the lower (terrestrial) and upper (marine) parts of the Whirlpool Formation.

The cephalopod is preserved on the underside of a 30-mm-thick, fine-grained, laminated sandstone bed as a cast with films of black phosphatic material (Fig. 3). It is envisioned that the ventral side of the annulated shell, with part of the wall broken away anteriorly, was imprinted in an area of mud on the seafloor. Elsewhere, traces of the Planolites producer were recorded in the mud. When a layer of fine-grained sand was deposited on top, load structures were produced, the traces were infilled (Fig. 3, arrows E, H), and infilling of the cephalopod imprint resulted in a three-dimensional cast. Several septa are weathered out as grooves in the sandstone (Fig. 3, arrow G) where the external wall was broken away anteriorly, revealing the interior of the shell. Therefore, the absence of septal sutures on the annulated part of the specimen, which are commonly superimposed on surfaces of annulated orthocones, is attributed to the sandstone and some phosphatic films replicating the exterior of a shell wall having no apparent preserved thickness. In the anterior portion of the shell, where the wall on the ventral side was broken away, the sandstone matrix has traces of vertical burrows (Fig. 3, arrow F); several horizontal parallel grooves and ridges with a width of 5 mm are of uncertain origin (Fig. 3, arrow B). Laterally, annulations of the shell wall extend to the anterior end of the specimen (Fig. 3, arrow A). The posterior end of the shell is missing (Fig. 3, arrow I).

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

Specimens referred to in Systematic paleontology are reposited in American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), New York, New York; Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), Ottawa, Ontario; National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Washington, D.C.; Redpath Museum (RM), McGill University, Montréal, Québec; and University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology (UMMP), Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Systematic paleontology

Phylum Cnidaria Hatschek, Reference Hatschek1888
Class Anthozoa Ehrenberg, Reference Ehrenberg1834
Subclass Rugosa Milne-Edwards and Haime, Reference Milne-Edwards and Haime1850
Order Stauriida Verrill, Reference Verrill1865
Suborder Streptelasmatina Wedekind, Reference Wedekind1927
Family Streptelasmatidae Nicholson in Nicholson and Lydekker, Reference Nicholson and Lydekker1889
Subfamily Streptelasmatinae Nicholson in Nicholson and Lydekker, Reference Nicholson and Lydekker1889
Genus Streptelasma Hall, Reference Hall1847

Type species

Streptelasma corniculum Hall, Reference Hall1847 (p. 69 as Streptoplasma corniculum, but generic name was corrected to Streptelasma on page facing p. 338; pl. 25, figs. 1a–d; fig. 1e was mentioned on p. 69 but not included in pl. 25), by subsequent designation (Roemer, Reference Roemer1861, p. 19); lectotype selected by Neuman (Reference Neuman1969, p. 10), original number AMNH 645/1(a), current number AMNH 29548; from lower part of Trenton Limestone (Upper Ordovician, lower Katian; Mohawkian, Chatfieldian), Middleville, New York, USA.

Remarks

The suprageneric classification below phylum level follows Hill (Reference Hill and Teichert1981). Many morphologically simple Ordovician and Silurian streptelasmatid species and genera are poorly understood because their ontogeny and/or variability are insufficiently known. As new data and interpretations have emerged, numerous synonyms or possible synonyms have been suggested, as in the case of Streptelasma (e.g., Neuman, Reference Neuman1969; McLean, Reference McLean1974; Elias, Reference Elias1982; McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; McLean and Copper, Reference McLean and Copper2013). Comparison with type species is an essential consideration in making generic assignments. Knowledge of the type species of Streptelasma is currently based only on the lectotype and a few additional specimens identified as S. corniculum from the Trenton Group of New York. They are documented in the following.

The lectotype of S. corniculum from Middleville was described and illustrated by Neuman (Reference Neuman1969, p. 10, 11, figs. 4–6) and McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013, p. 20, 21, pl. 1, figs. 1, 2, 6, 11). Transverse sections show only one side of the corallum, which was cut longitudinally in the cardinal-counter plane. The major septa are moderately dilated and meet in small groups at the corallum axis in the early ontogenetic stage. They become thinner, shorter, and slightly wavy by the late stage (corallum diameter 17 mm), a short distance below the base of the calice, where their length is ~0.6 of the corallum radius and the axial region is open. Minor septa are generally confined to the narrow stereozone, extending a short distance beyond it in the late stage. Although the cardinal septum was removed by longitudinal cutting of the specimen, sediment beside its presumed location in the late stage suggests that tabulae were depressed in a fossula. In longitudinal section, tabulae are thin and widely spaced. They are convex upward in the septal region, with some slightly upturned where they join the stereozone, and slightly depressed in the axial region.

McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013, p. 21, pl. 1, figs. 3–5, 7) also described and illustrated paralectotype AMNH 29551 from Middleville, which they considered conspecific with the lectotype. Moderately dilated major septa extending to the axis and the presence of a cardinal fossula are confirmed in transverse sections representing the intermediate stage. Features in a longitudinal section of the late stage are like those of the lectotype. Cox (Reference Cox1937, pl. 1, fig. 1) published a camera lucida drawing of the longitudinal section of USNM 322D, identified as S. corniculum from Middleville. Depression of tabulae in the axial region is less apparent than in the lectotype and paralectotype, but this section may be off-center or oblique.

McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013, p. 21, pl. 1, figs. 8–10, 12) documented two relatively small paralectotypes, AMNH 29547 and AMNH 29549 from Watertown, which they suggested may represent juvenile forms of S. corniculum. The major septa are moderately dilated and extend to the axis in the early ontogenetic stage. Stumm (Reference Stumm1963, pl. 1, figs. 4–6) illustrated transverse sections of UMMP IP 44327, identified as S. corniculum from near Watertown. However, the magnification and resolution of his figures are insufficient to verify certain details. Therefore, new photographs are presented here. In the early stage (Fig. 4.1), moderately to strongly dilated major septa extend to the axis. In the intermediate stage (Fig. 4.2), major septa meet in small groups at or near the axis. The long cardinal septum is thinner than other major septa, and it occurs in a prominent, straight-sided fossula that is sediment-filled, indicating depression of tabulae. In the late stage, the corallum diameter is 16 mm at the base of the calice (Fig. 4.3). The major septa are thin, slightly wavy, and shorter, reaching to ~0.8 of the corallum radius, with a few septal lobes extending into the axial region. The cardinal septum is distinctly shorter than other major septa. Minor septa extend a short distance beyond the stereozone.

Figure 4. (1–3) Streptelasma corniculum Hall, Reference Hall1847 of Stumm (Reference Stumm1963), relatively thick transverse thin sections mounted in Canada Balsam (oriented with cardinal septum in six o'clock position). UMMP IP 44327; photographs taken by J.E. Bauer; images provided by the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 and published with permission here. Upper Ordovician, lower Katian (Mohawkian, Chatfieldian); Trenton Group (lower Cobourg); cut on Watertown–Syracuse Highway, ~9.7 km from Watertown (just within Watertown quadrangle), New York; collected by G.W. Sinclair. (4) Streptelasma subregulare (Savage, Reference Savage1913), transverse thin section (oriented with apical direction of corallum into the page and cardinal septum in six o'clock position). USNM 423141. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; Kissenger Limestone Member, Bryant Knob Formation; cut on west side of State Route 79 just west of Kissenger Hill, Missouri (stratigraphic interval 3 at section 18 of McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Fig. 1.1, area D).

Stumm (Reference Stumm1963) figured two specimens identified as S. corniculum from Martinsburg. Corallum UMMP IP 45676 is considered to represent the intermediate stage of development. The external view (Stumm, Reference Stumm1963, pl. 1, fig. 1; diameter at calice rim 16 mm) shows that major septa extend to near the axis at the base of the calice, with the cardinal septum being the longest. In a longitudinal section of UMMP IP 44328 (Stumm, Reference Stumm1963, pl. 1, fig. 7), tabulae are widely spaced and arched upward in the septal region. The nature of tabulae in the axial region is unclear.

There are several complicating factors in understanding S. corniculum and its variability, given the limitations of available data. The eight coralla documented in the preceding are from three geographic locations in New York, spanning a distance of ~50 km from Middleville to Watertown, with Martinsburg in between. Specimens may have been obtained from different stratigraphic positions within the Trenton Group. Lectotype AMNH 29548, selected from the collection on which Hall (Reference Hall1847) based the species, is from the lower part of the Trenton Limestone according to its original label (Neuman, Reference Neuman1969). However, it is uncertain how that relates to stratigraphic units within the Trenton Group as currently recognized (Cornell et al., Reference Cornell, Andrews, Agle, Thomas and Valentino2005). The three specimens illustrated by Stumm (Reference Stumm1963; UMMP IP 44327, 44328, 44376) were reportedly from the lower Cobourg. The term Cobourg was formerly used for the upper Trenton; the lower Cobourg is now known as the Rust Formation of the Trenton Group (Cornell et al., Reference Cornell, Andrews, Agle, Thomas and Valentino2005). Of the eight coralla documented in the preceding, only two provide information on the late ontogenetic stage. The length of major septa is ~0.6 of the corallum radius in lectotype AMNH 29548 and ~0.8 in UMMP IP 44327.

McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013, p. 21, 27) distinguished Streptelasma, which they characterized as having “significantly shortened” major septa in the late ontogenetic stage, from Helicelasma Neuman, Reference Neuman1969 with “consistently longer” major septa. However, such a distinction seems arbitrary without quantification of a clear separation. The type species of Helicelasma is H. simplex Neuman, Reference Neuman1969 from the Dalmanitina Beds in Östergötland, Sweden. Those strata are now named the Loka Formation, which is Late Ordovician (Hirnantian) in age (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhan and Percival2019). The holotype of H. simplex is known only in longitudinal section (Neuman, Reference Neuman1969, figs. 23b, 26). A transverse section (diameter ~5 mm) from just below the calice of a small, preadult specimen shows that major septa nearly reach the corallum axis (Neuman, Reference Neuman1969, fig. 25c). In a larger, presumably mature individual, a transverse section (diameter ~8.5 mm) below the base of the calice has major septa that extend to ~0.8 of the corallum radius (Neuman, Reference Neuman1969, fig. 24e). The holotype of a large species, H. mutabile McLean and Copper, Reference McLean and Copper2013, is from early Silurian (Llandovery, Telychian) strata in the Jupiter River Formation on Anticosti Island, Québec (Fig. 1.1, crosshatched area). In a transverse section (diameter ~36 mm) of the late stage below the calice, the length of major septa is ~0.7–0.8 of the corallum radius (McLean and Copper, Reference McLean and Copper2013, pl. 4, fig. 6).

For comparison, Streptelasma subregulare (Savage, Reference Savage1913) is an extraordinarily variable species that occurs in Hirnantian strata of the Edgewood Province in the east-central United States (Fig. 1.1). In the holotype, the length of major septa is ~0.4–0.6 of the corallum radius at a diameter of ~30 mm (Elias, Reference Elias1982, pl. 4, fig. 7s). An extensive dataset including many specimens of S. subregulare shows a continuous range from major septa shorter than 0.4 of the corallum radius to major septa that extend to the corallum axis, even in the late stage of relatively large specimens at diameters of ≥25 mm (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 14). Figure 4.4 shows a transverse section (diameter 25 mm) with major septa extending to ~0.8 of the corallum radius in the late stage a short distance below the calice. Detailed analysis of S. subregulare indicates a general relation between septal length and a paleoenvironmental gradient (Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Ezaki, Mori, Sugiyama and Sorauf2001, fig. 3). Major septa tended to be short in restricted, low-energy, high-turbidity conditions and progressively longer in more open, higher-energy, lower-turbidity conditions.

The preceding comparisons suggest that Streptelasma and Helicelasma cannot be clearly distinguished on the basis of major septal length in the late ontogenetic stage. Helicelasma is probably a junior synonym of Streptelasma.

Streptelasma rutkae new species
Figure 2

Types

Holotype GSC 143181 (Fig. 2.22.6), paratype GSC 143182 (Fig. 2.8). Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 1.2 m above base of Whirlpool Formation; Kenilworth Avenue locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Diagnosis

Corallum trochoid, length and diameter up to ~40 mm and ~35 mm, respectively. Major septa moderately dilated and long in early ontogenetic stage, becoming thin and shorter during ontogeny, with length ~0.7–0.8 of corallum radius and a few septal lobes in axial region in late stage. Cardinal septum and fossula conspicuous in all ontogenetic stages. Stereozone thin; minor septa become relatively long during ontogeny. Tabulae convex upward in septal region, strongly depressed in cardinal fossula, slightly depressed and more closely spaced in axial region.

Occurrence

Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; Whirlpool Formation; Hamilton, Ontario.

Description

Corallum trochoid, straight to very slightly curved with convex cardinal side; estimated maximum length ~40 mm based on longest nearly complete specimen (holotype GSC 143181), estimated maximum diameter ~35 mm based on broadest nearly complete specimen (GSC 143186); exterior with septal grooves and interseptal ridges. All specimens silicified; original microstructure of wall, septa, and tabulae obliterated.

Relation between number of major septa and corallum diameter shown in Figure 5. During early ontogenetic stage (Fig. 2.1, 2.2, 2.10), major septa moderately dilated, extend nearly to corallum axis where they meet in small groups. During intermediate stage (Fig. 2.3, 2.7, 2.12), major septa become less dilated, slightly shorter, may become slightly wavy, form slight counterclockwise whorl in a few cases, meet in small groups from which a few septal lobes may extend. During late stage (Fig. 2.4, 2.8, 2.11, 2.13), major septa undilated and thin, shorter, slightly wavy; some ends meet; a few septal lobes extend axially. Relation between thickness of major septa and corallum diameter shown in Figure 6. Relation between length of major septa (as a fraction of corallum radius) and corallum diameter shown in Figure 7.

Figure 5. Relation between number of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with numbers beside circles indicating frequencies greater than one and solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Shaded area shows range for S. subregulare from Edgewood Province, excluding a few anomalous values; dotted line used to compare data from different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 13).

Figure 6. Relation between thickness of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Dotted line used for comparison with S. subregulare at different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 15).

Figure 7. Relation between length of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation. Length of a typical septum was divided by corallum radius, yielding a value ≤1.0. Data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Asterisk is mean value (0.86) and dashed line is standard deviation (0.07) for transverse sections at corallum diameters of 5–15 mm (average 11.2 mm; based on 12 sections from 10 coralla). Shaded area shows range of typical data for S. subregulare from Edgewood Province; values as low as 0.2 occur in the province (see McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 14, lower graph). For S. subregulare from stratigraphic intervals 3 and 4 at section 18, most values plot in the shaded and unshaded areas above dotted line (see McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 14, upper graph).

Cardinal septum and fossula conspicuous in all ontogenetic stages (Fig. 2.12.4, 2.7, 2.8, 2.102.13). Compared with typical major septa, cardinal septum usually thinner (as observed in 50% of 10 transverse sections), less commonly same thickness (30%), least commonly thicker (20%). Cardinal septum usually longer than typical major septa (as observed in 75% of 16 transverse sections) or less commonly same length (25%), may extend to corallum axis, may have axial lobe. Shape of cardinal fossula variable among coralla and usually among ontogenetic stages within coralla. Shapes correspond to four of five numbered categories defined by McAuley and Elias (Reference McAuley and Elias1990, p. 37): usually biconvex with maximum width midway between peripheral and axial ends (category 4; as observed in 50% of 14 transverse sections), less commonly hourglass-shaped with constriction midway between peripheral and axial ends (category 5; 29%), uncommonly with width constant from peripheral end to axial end (category 2; 14%), rarely with width decreasing from peripheral end to axial end (category 1; 7%). Relation between width of cardinal fossula and corallum diameter shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Relation between width of cardinal fossula and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Dotted line used for comparison with S. subregulare at different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 16).

Minor septa extend beyond stereozone, increase in length during ontogeny (Fig. 2.12.4, 2.7, 2.8, 2.102.13), average length 0.21 of corallum radius (range 0.12–0.36 based on 16 transverse sections), in some cases longest adjacent to counter septum, rarely slightly contraclined. Stereozone thin, average thickness 0.11 of corallum radius (range 0.05–0.20 based on 18 transverse sections).

Tabulae mostly incomplete (Fig. 2.5, 2.6, 2.9), convex upward in septal region, may be slightly upturned at stereozone, strongly depressed in cardinal fossula, slightly depressed in axial region, thin (thickness of typical tabula 0.10 mm in five longitudinal sections), spacing greater in septal region (average 15 tabulae per centimeter based on five longitudinal sections) than in axial region (average 22 tabulae per centimeter based on two longitudinal sections).

Etymology

The species is named for Margaret A. Rutka, in recognition of her research on the Whirlpool Formation.

Materials

In addition to the types: GSC 143183 (Fig. 2.1), GSC 143184, GSC 143185, GSC 143186 (Fig. 2.9), GSC 143187 (Fig. 2.12, 2.13), GSC 143188 (Fig. 2.7), GSC 143189 (Fig. 2.10, 2.11), GSC 143190–143194. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 1.2 m above base of Whirlpool Formation; Kenilworth Avenue locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Remarks

Coralla from the Whirlpool Formation will be compared with Streptelasma corniculum to verify the generic assignment, with S. subregulare to demonstrate that they represent a new species and with S. affine (Billings, Reference Billings1865) to show their difference from another species that occurs in North American Hirnantian strata.

Comparison with S. corniculum.—The morphology of S. corniculum, the type species of Streptelasma, was described in Remarks under the genus. Characters of the Whirlpool coralla that resemble those of S. corniculum include moderately dilated major septa that meet in small groups axially in the early ontogenetic stage; major septa that become thinner, shorter, and slightly wavy by the late stage; a conspicuous cardinal septum and fossula in which tabulae are depressed; a narrow stereozone; and thin, relatively widely spaced tabulae that are slightly depressed in the axial region and convex upward in the septal region, with some slightly upturned at the stereozone.

In S. corniculum, the late ontogenetic stage is known in the lectotype, where the length of major septa is ~0.6 of the corallum radius, and in another specimen, where the length is ~0.8 (Fig. 4.3). Major septa in the Whirlpool coralla extend to ~0.7–0.8 of the corallum radius in the late stage (Fig. 7). Lengths of major septa in a large collection of S. subregulare (see Fig. 7) range from much shorter than in S. corniculum to longer than in the Whirlpool coralla, indicating that a wide range of septal lengths can be accommodated within the genus. In the late ontogenetic stage, the axial region is open in the lectotype of S. corniculum; a few septal lobes extend into the axial region in another corallum (Fig. 4.3). In S. subregulare, a few septal lobes occur in some coralla (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Fig. 4.4). The axial region in S. affine varies from open to having septal lobes (Elias, Reference Elias1982, pl. 5, figs. 13, 18). A few septal lobes are present in the Whirlpool coralla. All things considered, the Whirlpool coralla are assigned to the genus Streptelasma.

Comparison with S. subregulare.—Coralla from the Whirlpool Formation are most closely comparable to S. subregulare, which is the most abundant and widespread coral in the Hirnantian-age Edgewood Province of the east-central United States (Elias and Young, Reference Elias and Young1998; Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Lee, Bae, Harper and Servais2013a). For information on stratigraphic sections and collecting intervals in outcrop areas of the Edgewood Province, see McAuley and Elias (Reference McAuley and Elias1990) and Elias (Reference Elias, Chaplin and Barrick1992); the outcrop areas are shown in Figure 1.1. Streptelasma subregulare is an extraordinarily variable species. Modern descriptions and photographs have been provided by Elias (Reference Elias1982, p. 57, 58, pl. 4, figs. 7–22; Reference Elias, Young, Webby and Laurie1992, pl. 1, figs. 1–9), McAuley and Elias (Reference McAuley and Elias1990, p. 34–42, pl. 1, figs. 1–19, pl. 2, figs. 1–12, pl. 3, figs. 1–18, pl. 4, figs. 1–13, pl. 5, figs. 1–10), and Elias and Young (Reference Elias, Young, Webby and Laurie1992, fig. 3g–i); see also Figure 4.4.

Corallum shape and size are far more variable in S. subregulare than in the Whirlpool materials. In addition to trochoid coralla that are straight to very slightly curved, as in the Whirlpool Formation, S. subregulare also includes ceratoid to rarely subcylindrical forms and moderately to in some cases greatly curved shapes (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, table 4). Coralla of S. subregulare attain a greater maximum size (length 102 mm, diameter 44 mm) than those in the Whirlpool Formation (length ~40 mm, diameter ~35 mm).

The relation between number of major septa and corallum diameter for the Whirlpool coralla is typical of S. subregulare at most stratigraphic sections in the Edgewood Province (Fig. 5). However, compared with the Whirlpool coralla, the proportion of data points that plot above an arbitrary dotted line (see Fig. 5) is much greater for S. subregulare at stratigraphic sections 20 and 31 (in outcrop area C), and the proportion of data points that plot below the dotted line is much greater for S. subregulare at section 21 (in area A) and section 19 (in area C) (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 13, table 5).

Data points for the thickness of major septa in the Whirlpool coralla plot below the dotted line in Figure 6 but are within the overall range for S. subregulare (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 15). Similarly, data for S. subregulare plot predominantly below the dotted line at sections 19, 20, and 31 (in area C) and section 32 (in area F); however, data plot predominantly above the dotted line at sections 14 and 18 (in area D) (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 15, table 5). Data points for the length of major septa in the Whirlpool coralla plot mostly within the typical range for S. subregulare, but values for the Whirlpool coralla are ~0.7 or higher (Fig. 7); values for S. subregulare are commonly as low as 0.5 and the range extends down to 0.2 (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 14, lower graph). Furthermore, unlike the Whirlpool coralla, data for S. subregulare in stratigraphic intervals 3 and 4 at section 18 (in area D) plot mostly above the dotted line that is shown in Figure 7 (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 14, upper graph). In the late ontogenetic stage, septal lobes are present in the axial region of Whirlpool coralla, whereas the axial region is usually open in S. subregulare.

Regarding the length of major septa at corallum diameters of 5–15 mm, the Whirlpool coralla have a higher mean value (Fig. 7, asterisk) than all but two occurrences of S. subregulare (Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Ezaki, Mori, Sugiyama and Sorauf2001, fig. 3); mean values for S. subregulare are slightly higher at section 15 and in the combined stratigraphic intervals 3 and 4 at section 18 (in area D). Compared with the Whirlpool coralla, mean values for S. subregulare are significantly lower at section 19 (in area C) and section 34 (in area E) (Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Ezaki, Mori, Sugiyama and Sorauf2001, fig. 3). The standard deviation of the mean value for the Whirlpool coralla (Fig. 7, dashed line) is considerably smaller than that for occurrences of S. subregulare (Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Ezaki, Mori, Sugiyama and Sorauf2001, fig. 3).

The cardinal septum is conspicuous in all ontogenetic stages of the Whirlpool coralla, usually being thinner and longer than typical major septa. In S. subregulare, however, the cardinal septum is most commonly inconspicuous, being the same length and thickness as other typical major septa, but the range of variability is high (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, table 6). The cardinal septum in S. subregulare is predominantly thinner and longer than typical major septa only at section 31 (in area C) (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, table 6). Regarding shape of the cardinal fossula, category 4 is predominant in the Whirlpool coralla, followed by category 5; category 3 (width increasing from peripheral end to axial end) is absent. In S. subregulare, category 4 is predominant at sections 19, 20, and 31 (in area C), but category 2 ranks second and category 3 occurs at those sections (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, table 7). Data points for width of the cardinal fossula in Whirlpool coralla (Fig. 8) plot within the typical range for S. subregulare (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 16). However, data for S. subregulare at section 18 (in area D) and section 19 (in area C) differ in plotting predominantly above the dotted line shown in Figure 8 (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 16, table 5).

In ontogenetic stages where major septa are thin, minor septa are relatively long in the Whirlpool coralla (Fig. 2.4, 2.8, 2.11, 2.13). They are seldom as long in S. subregulare (Elias, Reference Elias1982, pl. 4, figs. 17, 22; McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, pl. 1, figs. 3, 12, 16, 19, pl. 2, figs. 2, 3, pl. 5, fig. 10; Fig. 4.4). In Whirlpool coralla, as in S. subregulare, minor septa are in some cases longest adjacent to the counter septum. Width of the stereozone in Whirlpool coralla (0.05–0.20 of corallum radius) is similar to that in S. subregulare (0.05–0.15; McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, p. 38).

The close spacing of tabulae in the axial region of Whirlpool coralla (average 22 tabulae per centimeter) is comparable to some specimens of S. subregulare at section 17 (in area D) (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, fig. 17). However, tabulae in the septal region are closely spaced in those specimens of S. subregulare (e.g., McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990, pl. 3, fig. 6), whereas they are relatively widely spaced in Whirlpool coralla (Fig. 2.5, 2.6, 2.9).

In summary, the tremendous overall range of variability in S. subregulare encompasses morphologic characters of the Whirlpool coralla; however, the particular combination of features in the Whirlpool coralla makes them distinct. Although a few characters of the Whirlpool coralla are notably consistent with coralla of S. subregulare at several stratigraphic sections, other characters of S. subregulare at those sections are different. The combination of features that distinguish the Whirlpool coralla as a group includes major septa that become thin during ontogeny; the length of major septa that decreases during ontogeny to ~0.7–0.8 of the corallum radius, with a few septal lobes present in the axial region; the conspicuous cardinal septum and fossula in all ontogenetic stages; minor septa that become relatively long during ontogeny; and tabulae that are closely spaced in the axial region. It is concluded that the Whirlpool coralla represent a new species, S. rutkae, which shows relatively little intraspecific variability.

Comparison with S. affine.—Streptelasma affine is known from the Upper Ordovician (upper Katian–Hirnantian; Richmondian–Gamachian) on Anticosti Island, Québec (Bolton, Reference Bolton and Lespérance1981, pl. 3, figs. 3–8; Elias, Reference Elias1982, p. 59, 60, pl. 5, figs. 4–18) (Fig. 1.1, crosshatched area). It is an exceptionally large species (maximum length 170 mm, diameter 55 mm), far larger than S. rutkae (maximum length ~40 mm, diameter ~35 mm). Coralla of S. affine are initially ceratoid to trochoid and slightly to moderately curved, becoming subcylindrical and usually straight in later stages; coralla of S. rutkae are trochoid and straight to very slightly curved. Like S. rutkae, the major septa in S. affine become thin and slightly wavy and withdraw from the axis during ontogeny. However, in some cases they extend to <0.5 of the corallum radius, which is considerably less than the minimum value of ~0.7 in S. rutkae. In S. affine, there is variation from coralla with an open axial region to those with septal lobes; all coralla of S. rutkae have a few septal lobes in the axial region. The cardinal septum is generally indistinct in S. affine, whereas S. rutkae has a conspicuous cardinal septum in a pronounced fossula with depressed tabulae. The stereozone is usually thicker in S. affine than in S. rutkae. Streptelasma affine and S. rutkae are easily distinguishable from one another on the basis of the combinations of features exhibited by coralla.

Phylum Mollusca Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758
Class Cephalopoda Cuvier, Reference Cuvier1797
Subclass Orthoceratoidea Kuhn, Reference Kuhn1940
Order Orthocerida Kuhn, Reference Kuhn1940
Family Pseudorthoceratidae Flower and Caster, Reference Flower and Caster1935
Genus Gorbyoceras Shimizu and Obata, Reference Shimizu and Obata1935

Type species

Orthoceras gorbyi Miller, Reference Miller1894 (p. 322, pl. 10, fig. 2), by original designation (Shimizu and Obata, Reference Shimizu and Obata1935, p. 4); holotype USNM 64337 (Flower, Reference Flower1946, p. 148; Frey, Reference Frey1995, p. 64); from Saluda Formation (Upper Ordovician, upper Katian; Cincinnatian, Richmondian), Indiana, USA.

Remarks

The type species, Gorbyoceras gorbyi, was described by Miller (Reference Miller1894) from two fragmentary casts showing highly oblique, low annulations and no axial lirae. Flower (Reference Flower1946, p. 145–149, pl. 2, figs. 1, 9, 10, pl. 4, figs. 3, 6, 7) and Frey (Reference Frey1995, p. 63, 64, pl. 12, figs. 12, 13) also studied other specimens from the Saluda Formation in Indiana and Ohio and the basal Whitewater Formation (Upper Ordovician, upper Katian; Cincinnatian, Richmondian) in Ohio.

Gorbyoceras sp.
Figure 3

Reference Grant1892

Orthoceras; Grant, p. 149.

Reference Grant1897a

Orthoceras; Grant, p. 28.

Reference Grant1897b

Orthoceras species; Grant, p. 136.

Reference Grant1900

Orthoceras; Grant, p. 83.

Reference Hewitt1986

Gorbyoceras; Hewitt, fig. 2.

Occurrence

Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; Whirlpool Formation; Hamilton, Ontario.

Description

Annulated orthocone with slightly exogastric curvature of chord height around 3 mm in ventral 90 mm exposed length. At posterior end of specimen, crest of annulation has diameter ~13.2 mm (measured laterally and dorsoventrally) and height 0.6 mm, and wavelength of annulations is 3.6 mm. At a distance 124 mm and 30 annulations anteriorly, crest of annulation has diameter 27.4 mm (measured laterally) and height ~1.0 mm, and wavelength of annulations is 4.5 mm. Annulations appear to wedge into each other (Fig. 3, arrow D), bending into a ventral hyponomic sinus. At diameter ~20 mm, external surface has faint axial striae spaced 3 mm apart. Exposed interior of shell shows septa with radius of curvature 14 mm (Fig. 3, arrow G). Siphuncle in subcentral position laterally and dorsoventrally (Fig. 3, arrow C), extends 15 mm anteriorly beyond last unbroken septum, visible diameter 2 mm with transverse ridges spaced at intervals of 5 mm. These ridges appear to be cyrtochoanitic necks of septa that were broken off.

Material

Specimen RM 1108. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; 0.15 m above base of upper part of Whirlpool Formation; Jolley Cut locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Remarks

The suprageneric classification follows Frey (Reference Frey1995). Two named species of annulated orthocones have been based on fragments from units formerly interpreted as basal Silurian in eastern North America (see “Cephalopod data” in the section “Age of Whirlpool Formation and associated strata”), as follows.

Spyroceras microtextile Foerste, Reference Foerste1923 is from the Centerville Member of the Whippoorwill Formation in Ohio. Judging from the description and photographs (Foerste, Reference Foerste1923, p. 87, pl. 15, fig. 2a–c), the shell is “very slowly enlarging” to a diameter of only 9 mm, with five transverse annulations in 9 mm and with fine longitudinal striae that are more conspicuous than the fine transverse ones. Flower (Reference Flower1946) noted that generic reassignments are necessary for annulated Ordovician species placed by earlier workers in the Devonian genus Spyroceras Hyatt, Reference Hyatt1884. Likely possibilities are Gorbyoceras and Anaspyroceras Shimizu and Obata, Reference Shimizu and Obata1935, in which he placed some of those species. However, internal structures in many of the other species (including S. microtextile) are insufficiently known for assignment to a particular genus.

Dawsonoceras tenuilineatum Savage, Reference Savage1913, from the Wilhelmi Formation in northeastern Illinois, was documented by Savage (Reference Savage1913, p. 119, pl. 7, fig. 22). The illustrated portion of the specimen was said to be from about half the greatest diameter. At a diameter of 25 mm, there are five transverse annulations in ~25 mm, showing no hint of expansion. Longitudinal ornaments look less conspicuous than the transverse ones between the annulation crests on the photograph. Flower (Reference Flower1962) accepted the generic name Dawsonoceras Hyatt, Reference Hyatt1884 for this species, which he cited as the only known local species of that genus of early Silurian age. Like the mid-Silurian (Wenlock) type species D. annulatum (Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1818) specified by Hyatt (Reference Hyatt1884), and the specimen from the Jolley Cut (above the crinoidal lithology in the Gasport Formation) on which his generic concept was based, D. tenuilineatum as well as S. microtextile differ from the Whirlpool specimen in giving no hint at a large apical angle and axial curvature. Three Dawsonoceras specimens were seen by R.A.H. (3 March 1989) on a 12 m2 bedding plane in the Goat Island Formation, which served as the basement floor of a house built on top of the Niagara Escarpment at 21 East 9th Street in Hamilton. The shells were remarkably straight and slowly enlarging up to the body chamber (30 to 70 mm diameter in a length of 670 mm, 20 to 50 mm in 470 mm, and ? to 50 mm in 350 mm). The transverse annulations disappeared at the body chamber.

In the specimen from the Whirlpool Formation, the visible diameter of the longitudinal ridge with transverse ridges (Fig. 3, arrow C) is too small to be the whole siphuncle, which in both Dawsonoceras and Gorbyoceras is ~20% of the diameter of the chambers around them. In Dawsonoceras and other orthocones with short septal necks (orthochoanitic), siphuncles are preserved as segmented cylindrical fillings of their lumen. The deep and transverse grooves of such siphuncles are not seen on the convex and probably partly buried surface of the siphuncle in the Whirlpool specimen. In contrast with Dawsonoceras, septal necks in Gorbyoceras are longer and curved into swollen siphuncle connecting rings (cyrtochoanitic), with posterior endosiphuncular deposits (Frey, Reference Frey1995, pl. 12, fig. 6). It is therefore possible that the transverse ridges in the Whirlpool specimen represent gradual expansions defined by long septal necks from less obvious thin septal contraction grooves, and that the connecting rings were not yet reinforced by endosiphuncular or cameral deposits in the broken anterior chambers. According to Frey (Reference Frey1995), endosiphuncular deposits are seen only to a shell diameter of 15 mm in G. hammelli (Foerste, Reference Foerste1910).

Although the Whirlpool specimen lacks the more highly oblique annulations illustrated from various Gorbyoceras species in the Richmondian of the Cincinnati Arch region (Flower, Reference Flower1946; Frey, Reference Frey1995), it is assigned to that genus because there is curvature of the shell axis, while the septa within the annulations appear more concave and closely spaced than those of the sectioned Anaspyroceras specimen of Richmondian age from Manitoulin Island, illustrated by Copper (Reference Copper1978, pl. 5, fig. 3). Having examined the photograph of the Whirlpool specimen, R.C. Frey (R.C. Frey, personal communication to R.A.H., 1986) stated: “Anaspyroceras typically has subtubular and suborthochoanitic necks. Gorbyoceras, as you pointed out, has more expanded segments and cyrtochoanitic necks. The impression of the siphuncle in your specimen does suggest it is Gorbyoceras.”

The cephalopod from the Whirlpool Formation differs in ornament from the type species of Gorbyoceras, G. gorbyi. A better match among other Cincinnatian species assigned to this genus (Flower, Reference Flower1946; Frey, Reference Frey1995) is G. duncani Flower, Reference Flower1946, from the lower and upper Whitewater Formation and Saluda Formation in Ohio and Indiana (Flower, Reference Flower1946, p. 156, 157, pl. 1, figs. 1, 6, pl. 4, fig. 12; Sweet, Reference Sweet and Moore1964, fig. 185.4). The latter species has transverse annulations and axial lirae and is a similar size and shape to the Whirlpool specimen. However, given the state of preservation of the cephalopod from the Whirlpool Formation and the lack of additional material, it is identified as Gorbyoceras sp. rather than assigned to a new species or a previously named species based on better-preserved Richmondian material from the Cincinnati Arch region, for which internal structures are known.

The wedging of annulations on the Whirlpool specimen (Fig. 3, arrow D) is comparable to that seen in the original figure of Spyroceras mcfarlani Foerste, Reference Foerste1932 from the Chatfieldian-age Perryville Member of the Lexington Limestone in Kentucky (Foerste, Reference Foerste1932, pl. 14, fig. 5), reillustrated as “Spyrocerasmcfarlani by Flower (Reference Flower1946, pl. 5, fig. 5). Foerste (Reference Foerste1932, p. 107, 108) did not comment on that structure before noting that annulations fade on one side in Gorbyoceras, something not seen as wedges on photographs of various Gorbyoceras species in Flower (Reference Flower1946) and Frey (Reference Frey1995). Significantly, the longitudinal lirae of the Kentucky specimen pass undeflected across the wedge-like annulations, indicating that the latter were not due to pathological damage during formation of the shell aperture or to deformation during fossilization.

Age of Whirlpool Formation and associated strata

Fossils in the Whirlpool Formation were once considered biostratigraphically undiagnostic (Brett et al., Reference Brett, Tepper, Goodman, LoDuca and Eckert1995). The formation was therefore assigned an age on the basis of lateral correlation with strata of the Manitoulin Formation, containing a fauna thought to be early Silurian (Llandovery, Rhuddanian). However, Hewitt (Reference Hewitt1986, fig. 2) identified a cephalopod from the Whirlpool Formation as “Richmondian Gorbyoceras,” thereby suggesting a Late Ordovician age for the formation. More recently, Stott and Jin (Reference Stott and Jin2007) pointed out that the brachiopod fauna in the Manitoulin Formation is very similar to that in the Mosalem Formation of eastern Iowa (Fig. 1.1, area F). A δ13C curve in the lower Mosalem had been interpreted as the HICE, indicating a latest Ordovician (Hirnantian) age (Kleffner et al., Reference Kleffner, Bergström, Schmitz, Ludvigson and Bunker2005; Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner and Schmitz2012). Stott and Jin (Reference Stott and Jin2007) also noted similarity of the Manitoulin brachiopod fauna with that in the Ellis Bay Formation on Anticosti Island, Québec (Fig. 1.1, crosshatched area), which also records the HICE (Mauviel and Desrochers, Reference Mauviel and Desrochers2016).

Sharma and Dix (Reference Sharma and Dix2004) reported elevated δ13C values in ooids near the top of the Queenston Formation in southern Ontario. Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011) identified the HICE in the upper Queenston Formation, Whirlpool Formation, and overlying Manitoulin Formation in the vicinity of Collingwood, Ontario (Fig. 1.1) and in the upper Queenston and Manitoulin on Bruce Peninsula, where the Whirlpool is absent. However, the HICE was not detected on Manitoulin Island, where the Queenston Formation is missing and the Georgian Bay Formation underlies the Manitoulin Formation. Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011) concluded that strata of the Manitoulin Formation on Manitoulin Island represent only the upper part of the formation. They considered available conodont data from the Manitoulin Formation consistent with a Hirnantian age. Diagnostic fossils have not been documented from the upper Queenston Formation, but macrofossils and conodonts in the middle Queenston suggest a Late Ordovician (late Katian; Richmondian) age (Liberty and Bolton, Reference Liberty and Bolton1971; Rudkin et al., Reference Rudkin, Stott, Tetreault and Rancourt1998; Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011). The upper (Kagawong) submember of the upper member, Georgian Bay Formation, is considered Late Ordovician (late Katian; Richmondian) on the basis of conodonts and macrofossils (Barnes and Bolton, Reference Barnes, Bolton, Cocks and Rickards1988; Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner, Schmitz and Cramer2011).

Farnam et al. (Reference Farnam, Brett, Huff, Sturmer and Paton2019) did not detect the HICE in the Manitoulin Formation near Hamilton, Ontario (Fig. 1, white star), where it overlies the Whirlpool Formation. In northwestern New York, data based on chitinozoans, cryptospores, acritarchs, and scolecodonts, as well as a prominent δ13C peak at the base of the Whirlpool Formation, suggest that the Whirlpool and overlying Power Glen Formation are Late Ordovician (late Katian and/or Hirnantian) in age (Schröer et al., Reference Schröer, Vandenbroucke, Hints, Steeman, Verniers, Brett, Cramer and McLaughlin2016).

The Whirlpool Formation has been traced in the subsurface from southern Ontario and northwestern New York to northwestern Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio (Castle, Reference Castle1998; Johnson, Reference Johnson1998). In southern Ohio, strata representing the Whirlpool Formation are thought to grade westward into the Centerville Member of the Whippoorwill Formation, with the overlying Belfast Member of the Whippoorwill corresponding at least in part to the Power Glen Formation in northwestern New York (Waid, Reference Waid2018). On the eastern side of the Cincinnati Arch region in Ohio and Kentucky, a small δ13C excursion that may represent the HICE has been detected in the Centerville (Farnam et al., Reference Farnam, Brett, Huff, Sturmer and Paton2019; Farnam and Brett, Reference Farnam and Brett2021), and conodonts in the Belfast could be Hirnantian in age (Waid, Reference Waid2018).

Coral data

Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from the Whirlpool Formation is considered most closely related to S. subregulare, which is the most abundant and widespread coral in the Edgewood Province of the east-central United States (Elias and Young, Reference Elias and Young1998; Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Lee, Bae, Harper and Servais2013a) (Fig. 1.1). The coral fauna in the Edgewood Province was initially thought to range from the latest Ordovician (Hirnantian; Gamachian) to earliest Silurian (Llandovery, Rhuddanian), based primarily on earlier interpretations of conodonts and brachiopods, as well as the corals themselves (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Webby and Laurie1992; Young and Elias, Reference Young and Elias1995). More recently, the HICE has been recognized in some units containing Edgewood corals including S. subregulare, as follows: the lower Mosalem Formation in eastern Iowa (Fig. 1.1, area F), Wilhelmi Formation in northeastern Illinois (Fig. 1.1, area E), and Leemon Formation in southeastern Missouri (Fig. 1.1, area C) (Kleffner et al., Reference Kleffner, Bergström, Schmitz, Ludvigson and Bunker2005; Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2006, Reference Bergström, Kleffner and Schmitz2012). Consequently, the coral fauna in the Edgewood Province is now regarded as only Hirnantian in age (Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Lee, Bae, Harper and Servais2013a). Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zhan and Percival2019) placed this fauna in their globally identifiable Transitional Benthic Fauna 3, probably limited to the late Hirnantian on the basis of biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic data.

Given the apparent close relationship of S. subregulare and S. rutkae, the occurrence of S. rutkae is consistent with the interpretation that the Whirlpool Formation is Hirnantian. Also noteworthy, McAuley and Elias (Reference McAuley and Elias1990) mentioned that some coralla of S. subregulare are similar to S. affine from the Vaureal and Ellis Bay formations on Anticosti Island, Québec (Fig. 1.1, crosshatched area). Those strata are Late Ordovician in age, ranging from late Katian to Hirnantian (Richmondian–Gamachian) (Mauviel and Desrochers, Reference Mauviel and Desrochers2016).

Corals have been reported from the Manitoulin Formation at some localities where it overlies the Whirlpool Formation (Rutka, Reference Rutka1986). For example, Williams (Reference Williams1919) listed Enterolasma cf. E. geometricum (Foerste, Reference Foerste1890) and Paleofavosites asper (d'Orbigny, Reference d'Orbigny1850) at Hamilton (Fig. 1.1, white star) and Enterolasma cf. E. geometricum and Streptelasma cf. S. hoskinsoni Foerste, Reference Foerste1890 at adjacent Stoney Creek, Ontario. He illustrated specimens of those three species from the Manitoulin Formation on Manitoulin Island (Fig. 1.1), but the identifications and implied ages are questionable.

Enterolasma cf. E. geometricum from the Manitoulin Formation is unidentifiable on the basis of the lateral view of a corallum and a view of its calice, showing a morphologically simple solitary rugosan (Williams, Reference Williams1919, pl. 5, figs. 4a, b). That species was originally described by Foerste (Reference Foerste1890) as Streptelasma calicula var. geometricus from the Brassfield Formation of Ohio, which is considered Llandovery (Rhuddanian–Aeronian) in age (Sullivan et al., Reference Sullivan, McLaughlin, Brett, Cramer, Kleffner, Thomka and Emsbo2016). Foerste (Reference Foerste1893) subsequently identified it as Streptelasma? geometricum. Later, Foerste (Reference Foerste and Jillson1931) listed the species as E. geometricum but refigured it as Zaphrentis (?) geometricum. Weyer (Reference Weyer2007) considered it a questionable species of Palaeocyathus.

Streptelasma cf. S. hoskinsoni from the Manitoulin Formation is unidentifiable on the basis of the lateral view of a solitary rugosan (Williams, Reference Williams1919, pl. 5, fig. 5). Streptelasma hoskinsoni was originally described by Foerste (Reference Foerste1890) from Ohio, probably from the Brassfield Formation (Laub, Reference Laub1979). It was assigned to Dinophyllum Lindström, Reference Lindström1882 by Laub (Reference Laub1979), but could belong to Helicelasma or Parastreptelasma Li and Gong, Reference Li, Gong, Wang and Wang1996 according to McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013). A silicified solitary rugosan from the Manitoulin Formation on Manitoulin Island was figured as Streptelasma sp. by Bolton (Reference Bolton1966, pl. 1, figs. 22, 27; Reference Bolton, Liberty and Shelden1968, fig. 12.2). The generic assignment cannot be confirmed on the basis of the lateral view of the corallum and a view of its calice, which shows a morphologically simple species with radially arranged septa and possibly a cardinal fossula (Bolton, Reference Bolton1966, pl. 1, fig. 22). The calice of a different specimen, also identified as Streptelasma sp., was illustrated by Bolton and Copeland (Reference Bolton, Copeland, Robertson and Card1972, pl. C, fig. 18). The corallum is morphologically simple, with major septa that join in small groups from which a few septal lobes may extend near the axis. Information on its ontogeny is required to confirm the generic assignment.

Regarding the tabulate coral Paleofavosites asper from the Manitoulin Formation, Williams (Reference Williams1919, pl. 6, figs. 1a, b) illustrated the exterior and longitudinal view of a broken corallum. The type area of that species is in the Welsh Borderland, where it occurs in the mid–late Silurian (Wenlock–Ludlow) (Powell and Scrutton, Reference Powell and Scrutton1978). The Manitoulin material illustrated by Williams (Reference Williams1919) was considered by Laub (Reference Laub1979) to be conspecific with specimens from the Brassfield Formation of Ohio, which he identified as P. prolificus (Billings, Reference Billings1865). Bolton (Reference Bolton1966, pl. 1, figs. 25, 26; Reference Bolton, Liberty and Shelden1968, fig. 12.20) and Bolton and Copeland (Reference Bolton, Copeland, Robertson and Card1972, pl. C, fig. 11) also illustrated coralla identified as P. asper from the Manitoulin Formation on Manitoulin Island and Bruce Peninsula (Fig. 1.1). Laub (Reference Laub1979) noted the similarity of those coralla and his Brassfield material identified as P. prolificus but was uncertain whether they are conspecific.

A coral that better contributes to an understanding of the age of the Manitoulin Formation is the tabulate Propora thebesensis paucivesiculosa (Bolton, Reference Bolton1957), which occurs on Bruce Peninsula and Manitoulin Island. Young and Elias (Reference Young and Elias1995) concluded that it is probably a geographic subspecies of P. thebesensis (Foerste, Reference Foerste1909). Propora thebesensis is widespread in the Hirnantian Edgewood Province and ranges into the upper Mosalem Formation in northwestern Illinois (Fig. 1.1, area F) (Elias and Young, Reference Elias, Young, Webby and Laurie1992; Young and Elias, Reference Young and Elias1995). The upper Mosalem may be Rhuddanian in age (Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner and Schmitz2012). Young and Elias (Reference Young and Elias1995) noted that P. thebesensis also occurs on Anticosti Island in the Ellis Bay and Becscie formations, which range in age from Hirnantian to Rhuddanian (Mauviel and Desrochers, Reference Mauviel and Desrochers2016). Thus, P. thebesensis paucivesiculosa is consistent with the interpretation that the Manitoulin Formation is latest Ordovician to possibly earliest Silurian.

On Manitoulin Island, corals occur in the upper (Kagawong) submember of the upper member, Georgian Bay Formation, which underlies the Manitoulin Formation. They include Streptelasma divaricans (Nicholson, Reference Nicholson1875) and representatives of the colonial rugosan genus Cyathophylloides Dybowski, Reference Dybowski1873 and the tabulate genera Calapoecia Billings, Reference Billings1865 and Nyctopora Nicholson, Reference Nicholson1879 (Elias, Reference Elias1982; Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Lee, Bae, Harper and Servais2013a). McLean and Copper (Reference McLean and Copper2013) placed S. divaricans in the poorly known genus Parastreptelasma on the basis of its long, thin major septa in the late ontogenetic stage. They noted that the type species of Parastreptelasma, P. raritabulatum Li and Gong, Reference Li, Gong, Wang and Wang1996, has long, slender major septa throughout ontogeny. However, S. divaricans is a highly variable species that includes some coralla with short major septa and an open axial region in the late stage and some with moderately dilated septa in the early stage (Elias, Reference Elias1982). Those characters are typical of Streptelasma (see Systematic paleontology). The coral fauna in the upper Georgian Bay Formation is characteristic of the Richmond Province in eastern North America, which is Late Ordovician (late Katian; Richmondian) in age (Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Lee, Bae, Harper and Servais2013a).

Within the Cincinnati Arch region, rugose corals are present in the basal bed of the Belfast Member, Whippoorwill Formation, in Kentucky (Brett and Ray, Reference Brett and Ray2005). Foerste (Reference Foerste1923, p. 74) reported Enterolasma caliculum (Hall, Reference Hall1852) from just below the “typical Belfast” in Ohio. That taxonomic identification is questionable as it has been applied to solitary rugosans from a wide range of Silurian strata in eastern North America (e.g., see Bassler, Reference Bassler1915). Nevertheless, it suggests a taxon that is different from the Richmondian species in the Cincinnati Arch region—S. divaricans and Grewingkia canadensis (Billings, Reference Billings1862)—with which Foerste was familiar (Elias, Reference Elias1982, Reference Elias1983).

Cephalopod data

The presence of the annulated orthoconic cephalopod Gorbyoceras sp. in the Whirlpool Formation supports other evidence indicating a latest Ordovician, rather than Silurian, age for the formation. Gorbyoceras has a lengthy range in the Late Ordovician of North America (Flower, Reference Flower1946; Frey, Reference Frey1995). The youngest Richmondian occurrences are in the Cincinnati Arch region, where G. hammelli and G. crossi Flower, Reference Flower1946 are present in the Hitz Member of the Saluda Formation in southeastern Indiana. The Hitz is latest Richmondian in age (Brett et al., Reference Brett, Aucoin, Dattilo, Freeman, Hartshorn, McLaughlin and Schwalbach2020).

Some annulated orthocones occur in strata that may be, or are, Hirnantian in age. Within the Cincinnati Arch region, Foerste (Reference Foerste1923) described Spyroceras microtextile from beneath the Brassfield limestone in southwestern Ohio, in strata he later provisionally termed “Centerville formation” (Foerste, Reference Foerste and Jillson1931, p. 185). That unit is now known as the Centerville Member of the Whippoorwill Formation (Waid, Reference Waid2018). Foerste (Reference Foerste1923) considered S. microtextile to have Ordovician affinity. Annulated cephalopods from the “typical massive Belfast bed” in southern Ohio were identified by Foerste (Reference Foerste1923, p. 74) as possibly Dawsonoceras. Those strata are now known as the Belfast Member of the Whippoorwill Formation (Waid, Reference Waid2018). The Whippoorwill may be Hirnantian in age (Waid, Reference Waid2018; Farnam et al., Reference Farnam, Brett, Huff, Sturmer and Paton2019; Farnam and Brett, Reference Farnam and Brett2021). Foerste (Reference Foerste and Twenhofel1928) described S. ferum (Billings, Reference Billings1866) and S. microcancellatum Foerste, Reference Foerste and Twenhofel1928 from the Ellis Bay Formation (Hirnantian; Mauviel and Desrochers, Reference Mauviel and Desrochers2016) on Anticosti Island (Fig. 1.1, crosshatched area). Flower (Reference Flower1946) suspected that S. ferum is very closely related to G. hammelli. The only cephalopod identified from Hirnantian strata in the area of the Edgewood Province is Dawsonoceras tenuilineatum Savage, Reference Savage1913. Savage (Reference Savage1913, p. 119) described it from the “Channahon limestone” in northeastern Illinois (Fig. 1.1, area E), now known as the Wilhelmi Formation (Willman, Reference Willman1973). Savage (Reference Savage1913, table on p. 24–25) also reported Dawsonoceras cf. D. tenuilineatum from the “Edgewood formation” near Edgewood, northeastern Missouri (Fig. 1.1, area D). It presumably occurs in the “Cyrene member” (Savage, Reference Savage1913, p. 22), now known as the Cyrene Formation (Thompson and Satterfield, Reference Thompson and Satterfield1975). Flower (Reference Flower1962) noted that D. tenuilineatum is inadequately known but nevertheless listed it with other described species of that genus.

Cephalopods have been identified from the Manitoulin Formation where it overlies the Georgian Bay Formation on Manitoulin Island, overlies the Queenston Formation on Bruce Peninsula, and overlies the Whirlpool Formation in southern Ontario (Williams, Reference Williams1919; Bolton, Reference Bolton1957). They have also been listed from the Power Glen Formation where it overlies the Whirlpool in southern Ontario (Bolton, Reference Bolton1957). These cephalopods are not annulated; they are unrelated to Gorbyoceras sp. from the Whirlpool Formation.

The youngest cephalopods in the Queenston Formation have been reported from a limestone interval (Prairie Point biostrome) in about the middle of the formation on Bruce Peninsula (Liberty and Bolton, Reference Liberty and Bolton1971). On Manitoulin Island, cephalopods occur in the upper (Kagawong) submember of the upper member of the Georgian Bay Formation (Foerste, Reference Foerste1924; Caley, Reference Caley1936). The cephalopod-bearing strata in both those units are considered Richmondian in age. None of the cephalopods are annulated; they bear no resemblance to Gorbyoceras sp. from the Whirlpool Formation. On Manitoulin Island, cephalopods also occur in the Richmondian-age lower (Meaford) submember of the upper member of the Georgian Bay Formation (Foerste, Reference Foerste1924; Caley, Reference Caley1936; Copper, Reference Copper1978). Among them are Gorbyoceras hammelli and Spyroceras parksi Foerste, Reference Foerste1924. The latter species, considered closely similar to G. crossi by Flower (Reference Flower1946), was placed in Anaspyroceras by Copper (Reference Copper1978).

Biogeographic implications

Corals

Streptelasma subregulare and Propora thebesensis in the Edgewood Province of the east-central United States (Fig. 1.1) most closely resemble S. rutkae n. sp. in the Whirlpool Formation and P. thebesensis paucivesiculosa in the Manitoulin Formation of southern Ontario, respectively. The species- and subspecies-level differences presumably resulted from genetic differentiation of populations and geographic speciation in the latest Ordovician (Hirnantian), given the following evidence that the epeiric sea extended between those areas. In northeastern Illinois (Fig. 1.1, area E), S. subregulare occurs in the Schweizer and overlying Birds members comprising the Wilhelmi Formation (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Elias, Reference Elias, Chaplin and Barrick1992). Propora thebesensis is also present in the Wilhelmi (Young and Elias, Reference Young and Elias1995). A δ13C excursion in the Wilhelmi Formation has been identified as the HICE (Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner and Schmitz2012). The Schweizer Member extends into the subsurface of northwestern Indiana as the lower unit of the Sexton Creek Limestone (Rexroad and Droste, Reference Rexroad and Droste1982). A small-amplitude δ13C excursion, thought to represent the upper part of the HICE, occurs in the lower Sexton Creek (Degraeuwe, Reference Degraeuwe2019). Associated chitinozoans indicate an age in the range of latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian (Degraeuwe, Reference Degraeuwe2019). In the subsurface of northeastern Indiana, the Sexton Creek Limestone grades into the Cataract Formation, with the Manitoulin Dolomite Member at its base (Rexroad and Droste, Reference Rexroad and Droste1982). The Manitoulin Dolomite continues in the subsurface of southern Michigan (Lilienthal, Reference Lilienthal1978) and northwestern Ohio (Larsen, Reference Larsen1998), to the Manitoulin and Whirlpool formations in southern Ontario (Johnson, Reference Johnson1998).

Corals were also able to spread elsewhere in the cratonic interior during the Hirnantian. In the Grand Rapids Uplands of Manitoba (Fig. 1.1, black star), a poorly preserved fauna occurs in the upper Stonewall Formation (Demski et al., Reference Demski, Wheadon, Stewart, Elias, Young, Nowlan and Dobrzanski2015). It includes the tabulates Propora cf. P. thebesensis (Elias et al., Reference Elias, Young, Stewart, Demski, Porter, Lukie, Nowlan and Dobrzanski2013b, fig. 39b, c), Paleofavosites sp., and Aulopora sp. and the solitary rugosans Streptelasma sp. and Rhegmaphyllum sp. Associated conodonts and a positive δ13C excursion in the upper Stonewall indicate a Hirnantian age (Demski et al., Reference Demski, Wheadon, Stewart, Elias, Young, Nowlan and Dobrzanski2015). The coral fauna in the upper Stonewall Formation is somewhat similar to that in the Edgewood Province, where P. thebesensis and representatives of Paleofavosites Twenhofel, Reference Twenhofel1914 and Streptelasma are widespread, although Aulopora Goldfuss, Reference Goldfuss1829 is rare (Elias and Young, Reference Elias and Young1998). In the geographic area of the Edgewood Province, Rhegmaphyllum sp. appears in strata immediately above those containing characteristic Edgewood corals (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Elias, Reference Elias, Chaplin and Barrick1992). It occurs in the upper Mosalem Formation (Fig. 1.1, area F), lower Elwood Formation (Fig. 1.1, area E), and lower Bowling Green Dolomite (Fig. 1.1, area D), which have been considered earliest Silurian (Rhuddanian) in age (Bergström et al., Reference Bergström, Kleffner and Schmitz2012). However, in northern Arkansas (Fig. 1.1, open circle), Rhegmaphyllum sp. is present in oolite of the lower Cason Formation (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990); associated brachiopods and conodonts indicate a Hirnantian age (Amsden, Reference Amsden, Amsden and Barrick1986; Barrick, Reference Barrick, Amsden and Barrick1986). In correlative shale of the lower Cason (Fig. 1.1, area B), Rhegmaphyllum sp. is absent from a coral fauna belonging to the Edgewood Province (McAuley and Elias, Reference McAuley and Elias1990; Young and Elias, Reference Young and Elias1995).

Beyond the paleocontinent Laurentia, corals resembling those of the Edgewood Province have been recognized in South China, Baltica, and Kolyma, forming a widespread “Edgewood coral fauna” that is probably limited in age to the late Hirnantian (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Zhan and Percival2019, p. 17).

Cephalopods

The annulated cephalopod Gorbyoceras sp. is considered to have arrived in the depositional area of the Whirlpool Formation in southern Ontario during a Hirnantian marine transgression. A likely source area was the Cincinnati Arch region, where G. hammelli and G. crossi are present in latest Richmondian strata in southeastern Indiana. Cephalopods also occur in the Centerville Member of the Whippoorwill Formation in southwestern Ohio (Foerste, Reference Foerste1923, Reference Foerste and Jillson1931), which may prove to be Hirnantian (Farnam et al., Reference Farnam, Brett, Huff, Sturmer and Paton2019; Farnam and Brett, Reference Farnam and Brett2021). One of them is an annulated species, Spyroceras microtextile, in need of modern study and generic reassignment. In the subsurface, the Centerville grades eastward into the Whirlpool Formation (Waid, Reference Waid2018). Thus, there was a pathway for cephalopods from the Cincinnati Arch region to the area of Whirlpool deposition in southern Ontario.

Acknowledgments

The specimen of Gorbyoceras collected by C.C. Grant was donated by him to the Redpath Museum of McGill University, where I. Birker kindly loaned it to R.A.H. and curated it upon return in March 1985. M.A. Rutka provided discussion at McMaster University at that time. Images of coral thin sections reposited in the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology were kindly provided to R.J.E. by J.E. Bauer. We thank R.A. McLean, G.-X. Wang, and an anonymous reviewer for providing helpful comments on the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Amsden, T.W., 1986, Part I—Paleoenvironment of the Keel–Edgewood oolitic province and the Hirnantian strata of Europe, USSR, and China, in Amsden, T.W., and Barrick, J.E., Late Ordovician–Early Silurian Strata in the Central United States and the Hirnantian Stage: Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 139, p. 155.Google Scholar
Barnes, C.R., and Bolton, T.E., 1988, The Ordovician–Silurian boundary on Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada, in Cocks, L.R.M., and Rickards, R.B., eds., A Global Analysis of the Ordovician–Silurian Boundary: British Museum (Natural History) Bulletin, Geology Series, v. 43, p. 247253.Google Scholar
Barrick, J.E., 1986, Part II—Conodont faunas of the Keel and Cason formations, in Amsden, T.W., and Barrick, J.E., Late Ordovician–Early Silurian Strata in the Central United States and the Hirnantian Stage: Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 139, p. 5795.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1915, Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils, v. 1: United States National Museum Bulletin 92, 718 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1950, Faunal lists and descriptions of Paleozoic corals: Geological Society of America Memoir 44, 315 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S.M., Saltzman, M.M., and Schmitz, B., 2006, First record of the Hirnantian (Upper Ordovician) δ13C excursion in the North American Midcontinent and its regional implications: Geological Magazine, v. 143, p. 657678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S.M., Kleffner, M., Schmitz, B., and Cramer, B.D., 2011, Revision of the position of the Ordovician–Silurian boundary in southern Ontario: regional chronostratigraphic implications of δ13C chemostratigraphy of the Manitoulin Formation and associated strata: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 48, p. 14471470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S.M., Kleffner, M., and Schmitz, B., 2012, Late Ordovician–early Silurian δ13C chemostratigraphy in the Upper Mississippi Valley: implications for chronostratigraphy and depositional interpretations: Royal Society of Edinburgh Earth and Environmental Science Transactions, v. 102, p. 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E., 1859, On the fossil corals of the Devonian rocks of Canada West: Canadian Journal of Industry, Science, and Art, new series, v. 4, p. 97140.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1862, New species of fossils from different parts of the lower, middle and upper Silurian rocks of Canada: Geological Survey of Canada, Palaeozoic Fossils, v. 1, pt. 4, p. 96–185 (p. 169185 published in 1865).Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1865, Notice of some new genera and species of Palaeozoic fossils: Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, new series, v. 2, p. 425432.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1866, Catalogues of the Silurian fossils of the island of Anticosti, with descriptions of some new genera and species: Geological Survey of Canada, 93 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, T.E., 1957, Silurian stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Niagara Escarpment in Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 289, 145 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, T.E., 1966, Illustrations of Canadian fossils: Silurian faunas of Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada Paper 66-5, 46 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, T.E., 1968, Silurian faunal assemblages, Manitoulin Island, Ontario, in Liberty, B.A., and Shelden, F.D., The Geology of Manitoulin Island: Michigan Basin Geological Society Annual Field Excursion, p. 3849.Google Scholar
Bolton, T.E., 1981, Late Ordovician and early Silurian Anthozoa of Anticosti Island, Québec, in Lespérance, P.J., ed., IUGS Subcommission on Silurian Stratigraphy, Ordovician–Silurian Boundary Working Group, Field Meeting, Anticosti-Gaspé, Québec, 1981, Volume II, Stratigraphy and Paleontology: Montréal, Département de géologie, Université de Montréal, p. 107135.Google Scholar
Bolton, T.E., and Copeland, M.J., 1972, Manitoulin Island region Ordovician and Silurian fossils, in Robertson, J.A., and Card, K.D., Geology and Scenery, North Shore of Lake Huron Region: Ontario Geological Survey Geological Guide Book 4, p. 5461.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Ray, D.C., 2005, Sequence and event stratigraphy of Silurian strata of the Cincinnati Arch Region: correlations with New York–Ontario successions: Royal Society of Victoria Proceedings, v. 117, p. 175198.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Cheel, R.J., Duke, W.L., Goodman, W.M., LoDuca, S.T., Middleton, G.V., Pratt, B.R., Rutka, M.A., and Salas, C.J., 1991, Part 6: Stop descriptions, in Cheel, R.J., ed., Sedimentology and Depositional Environments of Silurian Strata of the Niagara Escarpment, Ontario and New York: Geological Association of Canada, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Society of Economic Geologists, Joint Annual Meeting, Toronto ’91, Field Trip B4, Guidebook, p. 6493.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Tepper, D.H., Goodman, W.M., LoDuca, S.T., and Eckert, B.-Y., 1995, Revised stratigraphy and correlations of the Niagaran Provincial Series (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport groups) in the type area of western New York: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2086, p. 2734.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Aucoin, C.D., Dattilo, B.F., Freeman, R.L., Hartshorn, K.R., McLaughlin, P.I., and Schwalbach, C.E., 2020, Revised sequence stratigraphy of the upper Katian Stage (Cincinnatian) strata in the Cincinnati Arch reference area: geological and paleontological implications: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 540, n. 109483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruguière, J.G., 1789, Encyclopédie méthodique; Histoire naturelle des vers, v. 1: Paris, Panckoucke, 344 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusse, W.C., Duke, W.L., Fawcett, P.J., Middleton, G.V., Rutka, M.A., and Salas, C.J., 1987, Stop descriptions, in Duke, W.L., ed., Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Ichnology of the Lower Silurian Medina Formation in New York and Ontario: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Eastern Section, 1987 Annual Field Trip Guidebook, p. 96172.Google Scholar
Caley, J.F., 1936, Part II, The Ordovician of Manitoulin Island, Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 202, p. 2191.Google Scholar
Castle, J.W., 1998, Regional sedimentology and stratal surfaces of a lower Silurian clastic wedge in the Appalachian foreland basin: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 68, p. 12011211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copper, P., 1978, Paleoenvironments and paleocommunities in the Ordovician–Silurian sequence of Manitoulin Island: Michigan Basin Geological Society Special Papers 3, p. 4761.Google Scholar
Cornell, S., Andrews, J., Agle, P., and Thomas, D., 2005, Trip A-4 & B-1: Classic localities of the Black River and Trenton groups (Upper Ordovician) in the Black River Valley: revisited through traditional and sequence stratigraphy, in Valentino, D.W., ed., New York State Geological Association, 77th Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook: New York State Geological Association, p. 4574.Google Scholar
Cox, I., 1937, Arctic and some other species of Streptelasma: Geological Magazine, v. 74, p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1797, Tableau Elémentaire de l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux: Paris, Baudouin, 710 p.Google Scholar
Degraeuwe, W., 2019, A chitinozoan analysis of core IGS-527 to help refine the Upper Ordovician–lower Silurian biostratigraphy of the USA midcontinent [M.Sc. thesis]: Ghent, Ghent University, 101 p.Google Scholar
Demski, M.W., Wheadon, B.J., Stewart, L.A., Elias, R.J., Young, G.A., Nowlan, G.S., and Dobrzanski, E.P., 2015, Hirnantian strata identified in major intracratonic basins of central North America: implications for uppermost Ordovician stratigraphy: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 52, p. 6876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1850, Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques & rayonnés; premier volume: Paris, Victor Masson, 349 p.Google Scholar
Dybowski, W.N., 1873, Monographie der Zoantharia sclerodermata rugosa aus der Silurformation Estlands, Nord-Livlands und der Insel Gotland: Archiv für die Naturkunde Liv-, Ehst- und Kurlands, series 1, v. 5, no. 3, p. 257414.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1834, Beiträge zur physiologischen Kenntniss der Corallenthiere im allgemeinen, und besonders des rothen Meeres, nebst einem Versuche zur physiologischen Systematik derselben: Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse, Abhandlungen (1832), p. 225380.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., 1982, Latest Ordovician solitary rugose corals of eastern North America: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 81, no. 314, 116 p.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., 1983, Middle and Late Ordovician solitary rugose corals of the Cincinnati Arch region: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1066-N, 13 p.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., 1992, New information on latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian solitary rugose corals of the east-central United States, in Chaplin, J.R., and Barrick, J.E., eds., Special Papers in Paleontology and Stratigraphy: A Tribute to Thomas W. Amsden: Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 145, p. 113125.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., and Young, G.A., 1992, Biostratigraphy and biogeographic affinities of latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian corals in the east-central United States, in Webby, B.D., and Laurie, J.R., eds., Global Perspectives on Ordovician Geology: Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, p. 205214.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., and Young, G.A., 1998, Coral diversity, ecology, and provincial structure during a time of crisis: the latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian Edgewood Province in Laurentia: Palaios, v. 13, p. 98112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, R.J., and Young, G.A., 2001, Rugose coral morphology during a time of crisis: the latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian Edgewood Province in Laurentia, in Ezaki, Y., Mori, K., Sugiyama, T., and Sorauf, J.E., eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera, September 12–16, 1999, Sendai, Japan: Tohoku University Museum Bulletin 1, p. 3440.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., Young, G.A., Lee, D.-J., and Bae, B.-Y., 2013a, Coral biogeography in the Late Ordovician (Cincinnatian) of Laurentia, in Harper, D.A.T., and Servais, T., eds., Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography: London, Geological Society Memoir 38, p. 97115.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., Young, G.A., Stewart, L.A., Demski, M.W., Porter, M.J., Lukie, T.D., Nowlan, G.S., and Dobrzanski, E.P., 2013b, Ordovician–Silurian boundary interval in the Williston Basin outcrop belt of Manitoba: a record of global and regional environmental and biotic change: Geological Association of Canada–Mineralogical Association of Canada Joint Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook FT-C5, Manitoba Geological Survey Open File OF2013-1, 49 p.Google Scholar
Farnam, C., and Brett, C.E., 2021, Reexamining the Ordovician–Silurian boundary of eastern North America: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 53, no. 3, paper 9-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnam, C., Brett, C.E., Huff, W.D., Sturmer, D.M., and Paton, T., 2019, A chemostratigraphic analysis of the Ordovician and Silurian boundary in the Appalachian Basin: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 51, no. 5, paper 282-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, R.H., 1946, Ordovician cephalopods of the Cincinnati region, Part I: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 29, no. 116, 656 p.Google Scholar
Flower, R.H., 1962, Part II, Notes on the Michelinoceratida: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir 10, p. 2142.Google Scholar
Flower, R.H., and Caster, K.E., 1935, The stratigraphy and paleontology of northwestern Pennsylvania, Part II, Paleontology; Section A, The cephalopod fauna of the Conewango Series of the Upper Devonian in New York and Pennsylvania: Bulletins of America Paleontology, v. 22, no. 75, 75 p.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1888, Notes on Paleozoic fossils: Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin, v. 3, p. 117137.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1890, Notes on Clinton Group fossils, with special reference to collections from Indiana, Tennessee and Georgia: Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, v. 24, p. 263355.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1893, Fossils of the Clinton Group in Ohio and Indiana: Ohio Geological Survey Report, v. 7, p. 516601.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1909, Fossils from the Silurian formations of Tennessee, Indiana and Illinois: Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin, v. 14, p. 61116.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1910, Preliminary notes on Cincinnatian and Lexington fossils of Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee: Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin, v. 16, p. 1787.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1923, Notes on Medinan, Niagaran, and Chester fossils: Denison University Scientific Laboratories Journal, v. 20, p. 37120.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1924, Upper Ordovician faunas of Ontario and Quebec: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 138, 255 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1928, The cephalopod fauna of Anticosti, in Twenhofel, W.H., Geology of Anticosti Island: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 154, p. 257321.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1931, The Silurian fauna of Kentucky, in Jillson, W.R., ed., The Paleontology of Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, series 6, v. 36, p. 167213.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1932, Black River and other cephalopods from Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ontario, Part 1: Denison University Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, v. 27, p. 47147.Google Scholar
Frey, R.C., 1995, Middle and Upper Ordovician nautiloid cephalopods of the Cincinnati Arch region of Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1066-P, 126 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfuss, G.A., 1829, Petrefacta Germaniae, I: Düsseldorf, Arnz and Company, p. 77164.Google Scholar
Grabau, A.W., 1910, Description of Monroe fossils, in Grabau, A.W., and Sherzer, W.H., The Monroe Formation of Southern Michigan and Adjoining Regions: Michigan Geological and Biological Survey Publication 2, Geological Series 1, p. 87213.Google Scholar
Grant, C.C., 1892, Fragments of Palaeozoic sea-floors from Hamilton, Ont., and Anticosti: Hamilton Association Journal and Proceedings, v. 8, p. 149154.Google Scholar
Grant, C.C., 1897a, Local palaeontological notes in continuation: Hamilton Association Journal and Proceedings, v. 13, p. 2737.Google Scholar
Grant, C.C., 1897b, List of local fossils not previously reported in the journal of proceedings: Hamilton Association Journal and Proceedings, v. 13, p. 128136.Google Scholar
Grant, C.C., 1900, Fossiliferous localities near Hamilton, Ont.: Hamilton Scientific Association Journal and Proceedings, v. 16, p. 8388.Google Scholar
Gray, J., and Boucot, A.J., 1971, Early Silurian spore tetrads from New York: earliest New World evidence for vascular plants?: Science, v. 173, p. 918921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., 1847, Natural History of New York, Part 6. Palaeontology of New-York, Volume I: Albany, C. van Benthuysen, 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1852, Natural History of New York, Part 6. Palaeontology of New-York, Volume II: Albany, C. van Benthuysen, 362 p.Google Scholar
Hatschek, B., 1888, Lehrbuch der Zoologie, eine morphologische Übersicht des Thierreiches zur Einführung in das Studium dieser Wissenschaft: Jena, Gustav Fischer, 432 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, R.A., 1986, Paleontological work of Lt. Col. C.C. Grant on the Silurian rocks of the Niagara Escarpment at Hamilton, Ontario: Geoscience Canada, v. 13, p. 270276.Google Scholar
Hill, D., 1981, Rugosa and Tabulata, in Teichert, C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata, Volume 1, Supplement 1: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. F1F378.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A., 1884, Genera of fossil cephalopods: Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, v. 22, p. 273338.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.F., 1998, The sedimentology of the lower Silurian Whirlpool Sandstone, in subsurface Lake Erie, Ontario [M.Sc. thesis]: St. Catharines, Brock University, 186 p.Google Scholar
Kleffner, M.A., Bergström, S.M., and Schmitz, B., 2005, Revised chronostratigraphy of the Ordovician/Silurian boundary interval in eastern Iowa and northeastern Illinois based on δ13C chemostratigraphy, in Ludvigson, G.A., and Bunker, B.J., eds., Facets of the Ordovician Geology of the Upper Mississippi Valley Region: Iowa Geological Survey Guidebook Series 24, p. 4649.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O., 1940, Paläozoologie in Tabellen: Jena, Gustav Fischer, 50 p.Google Scholar
Larsen, G.E., 1998, Generalized correlation chart of bedrock units in Ohio: Ohio Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-2, 1 p.Google Scholar
Latypov, Yu.Ya., 1982, Odinochnye diafragmatofornye korally Severnoy Azii: Moscow, Nauka, 116 p.Google Scholar
Laub, R.S., 1979, The corals of the Brassfield Formation (mid-Llandovery; lower Silurian) in the Cincinnati Arch Region: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 75, no. 305, 457 p.Google Scholar
Li, Z., and Gong, S., 1996, Rugose coral faunas of the Late Ordovician Sanjushan Formation of western Zhejiang and eastern Jiangxi, in Wang, H., and Wang, X., eds., Centennial Memorial Volume of Prof. Sun Yunzhu: Palaeontology and Stratigraphy: Wuhan, China University of Geosciences Press, p. 4248.Google Scholar
Liberty, B.A., and Bolton, T.E., 1971, Paleozoic geology of the Bruce Peninsula area, Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 360, 163 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilienthal, R.T., 1978, Stratigraphic cross-sections of the Michigan Basin: Michigan Geological Survey Report of Investigation 19, 36 p.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., 1882, Silurische Korallen aus Nord-Russland und Sibirien: Bihang till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 6, p. 123.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima, Reformata: Holmiae, Laurentii Salvii, 824 p.Google Scholar
Mauviel, A., and Desrochers, A., 2016, A high-resolution, continuous δ13C record spanning the Ordovician–Silurian boundary on Anticosti Island, eastern Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 53, p. 795801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuley, R.J., and Elias, R.J., 1990, Latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian solitary rugose corals of the east-central United States: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 98, no. 333, 82 p.Google Scholar
McLean, R.A., 1974, The rugose coral genera Streptelasma Hall, Grewingkia Dybowski and Calostylis Lindström from the lower Silurian of New South Wales: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 99, p. 3653.Google Scholar
McLean, R.A., and Copper, P., 2013, Rugose corals from the early Silurian (late Rhuddanian–Telychian) post-extinction recovery interval on Anticosti Island, eastern Canada: Palaeontographica Canadiana 33, 263 p.Google Scholar
Middleton, G.V., Rutka, M.A., and Salas, C.J., 1987, Depositional environments in the Whirlpool Sandstone Member of the Medina Formation, in Duke, W.L., ed., Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Ichnology of the Lower Silurian Medina Formation in New York and Ontario: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Eastern Section, 1987 Annual Field Trip Guidebook, p. 3145.Google Scholar
Miller, M.A., and Eames, L.E., 1982, Palynomorphs from the Silurian Medina Group (lower Llandovery) of the Niagara Gorge, Lewiston, New York, U.S.A.: Palynology, v. 6, p. 221254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1894, Palaeontology: Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources, Eighteenth Annual Report (1893), p. 257357.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J., 1850, A Monograph of the British Fossil Corals, First Part; Introduction, Corals from the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations: London, Palaeontographical Society, 71 p.Google Scholar
Neuman, B., 1969, Upper Ordovician streptelasmatid corals from Scandinavia: University of Uppsala, Bulletin of the Geological Institutions, new series, v. 1, p. 173.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H.A., 1873, Contributions to the study of the errant annelides of the older Palaeozoic rocks: Royal Society of London Proceedings, v. 21, p. 288290.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H.A., 1875, Description of the corals of the Silurian and Devonian systems: Ohio Geological Survey Report, v. 2, part 2, p. 181242.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H.A., 1879, On the Structure and Affinities of the “Tabulate Corals” of the Palaeozoic Period: Edinburgh and London, William Blackwood and Sons, 342 p.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H.A., and Lydekker, R., 1889, A Manual of Palaeontology for the Use of Students (third edition): Edinburgh and London, William Blackwood and Sons, v. 1, p. 1885.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, T.V., 1955, Podklass Rugosa ili Tetracoralla—Chetyrekhluchevye korally, in Nikiforova, O.I., ed., Polevoy Atlas Ordovikskoy i Siluriyskoy Fauny Sibirskoy Platformy: Moscow, Gosgeoltekhizdat, p. 2124.Google Scholar
Pedder, A.E.H., 2010, Lower–Middle Devonian rugose coral faunas of Nevada: contribution to an understanding of the “barren” E Zone and Choteč Event in the Great Basin: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 85, p. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedder, A.E.H., and Murphy, M.A., 2003, The Papiliophyllidae (Lower Devonian Rugosa): their systematics and reinterpreted biostratigraphic value in Nevada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 77, p. 601624.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.H., and Scrutton, C.T., 1978, Variation in the Silurian tabulate coral Paleofavosites asper, and the status of Mesofavosites: Palaeontology, v. 21, p. 307319.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C.S., and Clifford, J.D., 1820, Prodrome d'une monographie des Turbinolies fossiles du Kentuky (dans l'Amériq. septentr.): Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques, v. 5, p. 231235.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., and Droste, J.B., 1982, Stratigraphy and conodont paleontology of the Sexton Creek Limestone and the Salamonie Dolomite (Silurian) in northwestern Indiana: Indiana Geological Survey Special Report 25, 29 p.Google Scholar
Roemer, C.F., 1861, Die fossile Fauna der silurischen Diluvial-Geschiebe von Sadewitz bei Oels in Nieder-Schlesien; Eine Palaeonlotogische Monografie: Breslau, R. Nischkowsky, 81 p.Google Scholar
Rudkin, D., Stott, C., Tetreault, D., and Rancourt, C., 1998, Ordovician and Silurian rocks and fossils of the southern Georgian Bay area, Ontario: Canadian Paleontology Conference (CPC-VIII Collingwood ’98), Field Trip Guidebook No. 7, 38 p.Google Scholar
Rutka, M.A., 1986, The sedimentology and petrography of the Whirlpool Sandstone (lower Silurian) in outcrop and the subsurface in southern Ontario and upper New York State [M.Sc. thesis]: Hamilton, McMaster University, 355 p.Google Scholar
Rutka, M.A., Cheel, R.J., Middleton, G.V., and Salas, C.J., 1991, Part 3: The lower Silurian Whirlpool Sandstone, in Cheel, R.J., ed., Sedimentology and Depositional Environments of Silurian Strata of the Niagara Escarpment, Ontario and New York: Geological Association of Canada, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Society of Economic Geologists, Joint Annual Meeting, Toronto ’91, Field Trip B4, Guidebook, p. 2734.Google Scholar
Salas, C.J., 1983, Sedimentology of the Whirlpool Formation (lower Silurian) in the Halton Hills area, Ontario [B.Sc. thesis]: Hamilton, McMaster University, 188 p.Google Scholar
Savage, T.E., 1913, Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Alexandrian Series in Illinois and Missouri, Part I: Illinois State Geological Survey Extract from Bulletin 23, 124 p.Google Scholar
Schröer, L., Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., Hints, O., Steeman, T., Verniers, J., Brett, C.E., Cramer, B.D., and McLaughlin, P.I., 2016, A Late Ordovician age for the Whirlpool and Power Glen formations, New York: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 53, p. 739747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., and Dix, G.R., 2004, Magnesian calcite and chamositic ooids forming shoals peripheral to Late Ordovician (Ashgill) muddy siliciclastic shores: southern Ontario: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 210, p. 347366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, S., and Obata, T, 1935, New genera of Gotlandian and Ordovician nautiloids: Shanghai Science Institute Journal, v. 2, p. 110.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.B., 1900, Preliminary descriptions of new genera of Paleozoic rugose corals: New York State Museum Bulletin 8, no. 39, p. 199222.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J., 1818, The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of those Remains of Testaceous Animals on Shells, which have been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth, Volume II: London, Arding and Merrett, 251 p.Google Scholar
Spencer, J.W., 1883, Palaeozoic geology of the region about the western end of Lake Ontario: Canadian Naturalist and Quarterly Journal of Science, new series, v. 10, p. 129171.Google Scholar
Stott, C.A., and Jin, J., 2007, Rhynchonelliformean brachiopods from the Manitoulin Formation of Ontario, Canada: potential implications for the position of the Ordovician–Silurian boundary in cratonic North America: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 46, supp., p. 449459.Google Scholar
Stumm, E.C., 1963, Ordovician streptelasmid rugose corals from Michigan: University of Michigan, Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, v. 18, p. 2331.Google Scholar
Sullivan, N.B., McLaughlin, P.I., Brett, C.E., Cramer, B.D., Kleffner, M.A., Thomka, J.R., and Emsbo, P., 2016, Sequence boundaries and chronostratigraphic gaps in the Llandovery of Ohio and Kentucky: the record of early Silurian paleoceanographic events in east-central North America: Geosphere, v. 12, p. 18131832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W.C., 1964, Nautiloidea—Orthocerida, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 3, Cephalopoda—General Features—Endoceratoidea—Actinoceratoidea—Nautiloidea—Bactritoidea: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. K216–K261.Google Scholar
Thompson, T.L., and Satterfield, I.R., 1975, Stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy of strata contiguous to the Ordovician–Silurian boundary in eastern Missouri, in Studies in Stratigraphy: Missouri Geological Survey Report of Investigations 57, Part 2, p. 61108.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W.H., 1914, The Anticosti Island faunas: Geological Survey of Canada Museum Bulletin 3, Geological Series 19, 39 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrill, A.E., 1865, Classification of polyps (extract condensed from a synopsis of the Polypi of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition, under captains Ringgold and Rodgers, U.S.N.): Essex Institute Proceedings, v. 4, p. 145152.Google Scholar
Waid, C.B.T., 2018, High-resolution subsurface correlation of Late Ordovician–Wenlock (Silurian) strata in southeastern Ohio: Ohio Geological Survey Geological Note 14, 29 p.Google Scholar
Wang, G., Zhan, R., and Percival, I.G., 2019, The end-Ordovician mass extinction: a single-pulse event?: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 192, p. 1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, R., 1927, Die Zoantharia Rugosa von Gotland (bes. Nordgotland); Nebst Bemerkungen zur Biostratigraphie des Gotlandium: Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Avhandlingar och uppsatser, series Ca, no. 19, 94 p.Google Scholar
Weyer, D., 2007, Revision of the supposed Triassic, in fact Silurian genus Triadophyllum Weissermel, 1925 (Anthozoa, Rugosa): Fossil Record, v. 10, p. 164178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.Y., 1919, The Silurian geology and faunas of Ontario Peninsula, and Manitoulin and adjacent islands: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 111, 195 p.Google Scholar
Willman, H.B., 1973, Rock stratigraphy of the Silurian System in northeastern and northwestern Illinois: Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 479, 55 p.Google Scholar
Young, G.A., and Elias, R.J., 1995, Latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian colonial corals of the east-central United States: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 108, no. 347, 148 p.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. (1) Index map showing Hamilton, Ontario (white star), where studied corals and cephalopod were collected from Whirlpool Formation. Corals of Edgewood Province occur at stratigraphic sections in outcrop areas A–F; other corals mentioned in text occur on Anticosti Island, Québec (crosshatched area), at a locality in Grand Rapids Uplands, Manitoba (black star), and at St. Clair Spring section, Arkansas (open circle). AR = Arkansas; IA = Iowa; IL = Illinois; IN = Indiana; KY = Kentucky; MB = Manitoba; MI = Michigan; MO = Missouri; NY = New York; OH = Ohio; OK = Oklahoma; ON = Ontario; PA = Pennsylvania; QC = Québec. (2) Detail map showing Kenilworth Avenue locality where corals were collected in 1986. At that time, Escarpment Rail Trail was a Canadian National Railway line (Rutka, 1986, fig. A1–3a; Brusse et al., 1987, fig. 26). Whirlpool Formation is exposed below the former railway line (Rutka, 1986, p. A1–11; Brusse et al., 1987, p. 137). Locality is currently accessible by ascending stairs from Kimberly Drive; 30 steps below the top, there is access to a path leading northwest along the base of the stratigraphic section. (3) Detail map showing Jolley Cut locality (Rutka, 1986, p. A1–9, fig. A1–3a; Brusse et al., 1987, p. 140, fig. 26; Brett et al., 1991, fig. 44). Cephalopod was collected by Grant (1892, 1897a, b, 1900) from a Jolley Cut quarry; in 1985, R.A.H. located the probable site (white star).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Streptelasma rutkae n. sp., transverse thin sections (1–4, 7, 8, 10–13; oriented with apical direction of corallum into the page and cardinal septum in six o'clock position) and longitudinal thin sections (5, 6, 9; oriented in cardinal-counter plane with cardinal fossula on left side and apical direction of corallum toward bottom of the page). (1) GSC 143183. (2–6) Holotype GSC 143181. (7) GSC 143188. (8) Paratype GSC 143182. (9) GSC 143186. (10, 11) GSC 143189. (12, 13) GSC 143187. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 1.2 m above base of Whirlpool Formation; Kenilworth Avenue locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Gorbyoceras sp., cast on underside of sandstone bed, ventral view with anterior direction toward top of page; RM 1108. A, anterior end of annulated shell on lateral side of specimen; B, parallel grooves and ridges of uncertain origin; C, siphuncle; D, annulations of shell appear to wedge into each other along hyponomic sinus; E, horizontal Planolites trace; F, traces of vertical burrows; G, septa weathered out as grooves; H, horizontal Planolites traces; I, posterior end of shell is missing. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; sandstone bed 0.15 m above base of upper part of Whirlpool Formation; Jolley Cut locality, Hamilton, Ontario.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (1–3) Streptelasma corniculum Hall, 1847 of Stumm (1963), relatively thick transverse thin sections mounted in Canada Balsam (oriented with cardinal septum in six o'clock position). UMMP IP 44327; photographs taken by J.E. Bauer; images provided by the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 and published with permission here. Upper Ordovician, lower Katian (Mohawkian, Chatfieldian); Trenton Group (lower Cobourg); cut on Watertown–Syracuse Highway, ~9.7 km from Watertown (just within Watertown quadrangle), New York; collected by G.W. Sinclair. (4) Streptelasma subregulare (Savage, 1913), transverse thin section (oriented with apical direction of corallum into the page and cardinal septum in six o'clock position). USNM 423141. Upper Ordovician, Hirnantian; Kissenger Limestone Member, Bryant Knob Formation; cut on west side of State Route 79 just west of Kissenger Hill, Missouri (stratigraphic interval 3 at section 18 of McAuley and Elias, 1990; Fig. 1.1, area D).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Relation between number of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with numbers beside circles indicating frequencies greater than one and solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Shaded area shows range for S. subregulare from Edgewood Province, excluding a few anomalous values; dotted line used to compare data from different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, 1990, fig. 13).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Relation between thickness of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Dotted line used for comparison with S. subregulare at different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, 1990, fig. 15).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Relation between length of major septa and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation. Length of a typical septum was divided by corallum radius, yielding a value ≤1.0. Data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Asterisk is mean value (0.86) and dashed line is standard deviation (0.07) for transverse sections at corallum diameters of 5–15 mm (average 11.2 mm; based on 12 sections from 10 coralla). Shaded area shows range of typical data for S. subregulare from Edgewood Province; values as low as 0.2 occur in the province (see McAuley and Elias, 1990, fig. 14, lower graph). For S. subregulare from stratigraphic intervals 3 and 4 at section 18, most values plot in the shaded and unshaded areas above dotted line (see McAuley and Elias, 1990, fig. 14, upper graph).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Relation between width of cardinal fossula and corallum diameter in Streptelasma rutkae n. sp. from Whirlpool Formation; data shown as filled circles, with solid lines connecting data from same specimens. Dotted line used for comparison with S. subregulare at different stratigraphic sections in Edgewood Province (see McAuley and Elias, 1990, fig. 16).