Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T07:11:40.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conodonts of the Windsor Group (Lower Carboniferous), Magdalen Islands, Quebec, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Peter H. Von Bitter  and
Hilary A. Plint
Peter H. Von Bitter
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Palaeontology, Royal Ontario Museum, and Department of Geology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada
Hilary A. Plint
Affiliation:
Dome Petroleum Limited, P.O. Box 200, Calgary, Alberta T2P 2H8, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lower Carboniferous (Viséan-?early Namurian) conodonts, and some of their variably complete reconstructed apparatuses, are described from cyclic marine carbonates, associated with evaporites and mud rocks, of the Windsor Group, Magdalen Islands, Quebec, Canada. The conodont fauna includes Clydagnathus windsorensis, Cavusgnathus unicornis, Taphrognathus transatlanticus, Hindeodus cristula, Hindeodus? scitulus, Vogelgnathus campbelli, Ozarkodina laevipostica, Mestognathus bipluti, Mestognathus spp., Spathognathodus? n. sp. A, and Apatognathus spp.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 346 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. L. 1973. Phylogeny and homeomorphy of conodonts in the Lower Carboniferous. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 141:105–116.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L. and Davies, R. B. 1984. Problems of recognition and implications of Dinantian conodont biofacies in the British Isles, p. 195–228. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 196.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L. and Rhodes, F. H. T. 1969. A conodont assemblage from the Carboniferous of the Avon Gorge, Bristol. Palaeontology, 12:400–405.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1925. Classification and stratigraphic use of the conodonts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 36:218–220.Google Scholar
Bell, W. A. 1929. Horton-Windsor district, Nova Scotia. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir, 155:1–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W. A. 1948. Early Carboniferous strata of St. George's Bay area, Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 10:1–45.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe, und der Devon/Karbon-Grenze. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 19:1–64.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. and Mehl, M. G. 1941. Conodonts from the Keokuk Formation. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 35:179–188.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E., Clarkson, E. N. K. and Aldridge, R. J. 1983. The conodont animal. Lethaia, 16:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisebois, D. 1979. Stratigraphie du Permo-Carbonifère des Iles de la Madeleine. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal, Québec, 274 p.Google Scholar
Brisebois, D. 1981. Lithostratigraphie des strates permocarbonifères, de l'archipel des îles de la Madeleine. Ministère de l'énergie et des ressources, Direction de l'énergie, Québec, DPV-796:1–48.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L. 1972. Early Permian crisis and its bearing on Permo-Triassic conodont taxonomy. Geologica et Palaeontologica, SB 1:147–158.Google Scholar
Dubois, E. P. 1943. Evidence on the nature of conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 17:155–159.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, W. 1930. Conodonten aus dem Culm des Harzes. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 12:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fåhraeus, L. E. 1983. Phylum Conodonta Pander, 1856 and nomenclatural priority. Systematic Zoology, 32:455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globensky, Y. 1967. Middle and Upper Mississippian conodonts from the Windsor Group of the Atlantic Provinces of Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 41:432–448.Google Scholar
Harris, R. W. and Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science, 5th series, 25:193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1961. Some Namurian conodonts from North Staffordshire. Geological Magazine, 98:210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1900. In J. Smith, Conodonts from the Carboniferous limestone strata of the west of Scotland (with notes on the specimens and descriptions of six new species, by Geo. Jennings Hinde). Glasgow Natural History Society Transactions, 5:336–346.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. and Rexroad, C. B. 1982. An evaluation of statistical reconstructions of multielement conodont taxa from middle Chesterian rocks (Carboniferous) in southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 56:959–969.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. G. 1958. Mississippian stratigraphy and petroleum possibilities of central Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Bulletin of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 51:341–351.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. G. 1967. Some aspects of Carboniferous stratigraphy and depositional history in the Atlantic provinces. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 4:213–228.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. and Philip, G. M. 1971. Devonian conodont apparatuses and their vicarious skeletal elements. Lethaia, 4:429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozur, H. 1976. Paleoecology of the Triassic conodonts and its bearing on multielement taxonomy. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 15:313–324.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1968. Symmetry in conodont element-pairs. Journal of Paleontology, 42:1258–1263.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. and von Bitter, P. H. 1977. Apparatus of the Pennsylvanian conodont genus Neognathodus. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, 112:1–22.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1980. The multielement genus Apatognathus from the Late Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Alcheringa, 4:133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norby, R. D. 1976. Conodont apparatuses from Chesterian (Mississippian) strata of Montana and Illinois. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 295 p.Google Scholar
Norby, R. D. and Rexroad, C. B. 1985. Vogelgnathus, a new Mississippian conodont genus. Indiana Geological Survey Occasional Paper, 50:1–14.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H. 1856. Monographic der fossilen Fische des silurischen Systems der russischbaltischen Gouvernements. Akademie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersburg, 91 p.Google Scholar
Plint, H. A. and von Bitter, P. H. 1986. Windsor Group (Lower Carboniferous) conodont biostratigraphy and palaeoecology, Magdalen Islands, Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23:439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. 1957. Conodonts from the Chester Series in the type area of southwestern Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey Report of Investigations, 199:1–43.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. 1981. Conodonts from the Vienna Limestone Member of the Branchville Formation (Chesterian) in southern Indiana. Indiana Geological Survey Occasional Paper, 34:1–16.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Burton, R. C. 1961. Conodonts from the Kinkaid Formation (Chester) in Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 35:1143–1158.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Collinson, C. 1961. Preliminary range chart of conodonts from the Chester Series (Mississippian) in the Illinois basin. Illinois State Geological Survey Circular, 319:3–11.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Collinson, C. 1963. Conodonts from the St. Louis Formation (Valmeyeran Series) of Illinois, Indiana, and Missouri. Illinois Geological Survey Circular, 355:1–28.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Furnish, W. M. 1964. Conodonts from the Pella Formation (Mississippian), south-central Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 38:667–676.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Thompson, T. L. 1979. A spathognathodont lineage of Mississippian conodonts. Lethaia, 12:235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T. 1952. A classification of Pennsylvanian conodont assemblages. Journal of Paleontology, 26:886–901.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T., Austin, R. L. and Druce, E. C. 1969. British Avonian (Carboniferous) conodont faunas, and their value in local and intercontinental correlation. Bulletin British Museum (Natural History) Geological Supplement, 5:1–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. A. (ed.). 1981. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part W, Miscellanea, supplement 2, Conodonta. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence, 202 p.Google Scholar
Sanschagrin, R. 1964. Magdalen Islands. Quebec Department of Natural Resources, Geological Report, 106:1–56.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. E. 1967. The significance of algal stromatolites to paleoenvironmental and chronostratigraphic interpretations of the Windsorian Stage (Mississippian), Maritime Provinces. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 4:229–243.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1934. The zoological relationships of the conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 8:448–455.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1942. Conodont assemblages from the Heath Formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 16:293–300.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1973. New Conodontochordata from the Bear Gulch Limestone (Namurian, Montana). Publications of the Museum, Michigan State University Paleontological series, 1(2):81–100.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1976. Skeletal anatomy of the late Paleozoic and Early Triassic conodont genus Hindeodus Rexroad and Furnish, 1964. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 8(4):512–513.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H. 1972. Environmental control of conodont distribution in the Shawnee Group (Upper Pennsylvanian) of eastern Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 59:1–105.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H. 1976. Paleoecology and distribution of Windsor Group (Viséan-?early Namurian) conodonts, Port Hood Island, Nova Scotia, Canada. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 15:225–241.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H. and Austin, R. L. 1984. The Dinantian Taphrognathus transatlanticus conodont range zone of Great Britain and Atlantic Canada. Palaeontology, 27:95–111.Google Scholar
von Bitter, P. H. and Plint-Geberl, H. A. 1982. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Codroy Group (Lower Carboniferous), southwestern Newfoundland, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19:193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bitter, P. H., Sandberg, C. A. and Orchard, M. 1986. Phylogeny, speciation, and palaeoecology of the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) conodont genus Mestognathus. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, 143:1–115.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. and Miller, A. K. 1949. Conodonts from the Late Mississippian Pella beds of south-central Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 23:617–622.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1977. Catalogue of conodonts, Vol. 3. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Suttgart. 574 p.Google Scholar