Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:53:11.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chaoborus Lichtenstein (Diptera: Chaoboridae) pupae from the middle Eocene of Mississippi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

John E. Johnston  and
Art Borkent
John E. Johnston
Affiliation:
680 Manor Ridge Drive, Mableton, Georgia 30126 U.S.A.
Art Borkent
Affiliation:
1171 Mallory Road, R1-S20-C43, Enderby, British Columbia V0E 1V0 Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pupae of the nonbiting midge Chaoborus are reported from the middle Eocene (Claibornian) Tallahatta Formation in Benton County, Mississippi. These pupae are placed within the genus Chaoborus because the shape of the respiratory organs, length of the abdomen, and shape of the anal paddles closely resemble other species of this extant genus. This occurrence represents the oldest record of Chaoborus pupae and the first record of fossil Chaoborus from North America. The flora and fauna found associated with the fossil pupae along with the known habitats of extant Chaoborus pupae indicate a lentic environment. This interpretation corresponds to the depositional environment of similar Eocene-aged clay deposits in western Tennessee.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , May 1998 , pp. 491 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borkent, A. 1978. Upper Oligocene fossil pupae and larvae of Chaoborus tertiarus (Von Heyden) (Chaoboridae, Diptera) from West Germany. Quaestiones Entomologicae, 14:491–496.Google Scholar
Borkent, A. 1979. Systematics and bionomics of the species of the subgenus Schadonophasma Dyar and Shannon (Chaoborus, Chaoboridae, Diptera). Quaestiones Entomologicae, 15:122–255.Google Scholar
Borkent, A. 1981. The distribution and habitat preferences of the Chaoboridae (Culicomorpha; Diptera) of the Holarctic Region. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59:122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkent, A. 1993. A world catalogue of fossil and extant Corethrellidae and Chaoboridae (Diptera), with a listing of references to keys, bionomic information and descriptions of each known life stage. Entomologica Scandinavica, 24:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, M. T. 1992. Chaoborus and fish-mediated influences on Daphnia longispina population structure, dynamics and life history strategies. Oecologia, 89:69–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, F. M. 1992. Hexapoda, p. 406–407. In Kaesler, R. L., (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 4, Volume 4. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. 1992. A synopsis of the species of African Culicidae, other than Anopheles. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 3:1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Ende, C. N. and Dempsey, D. O. 1981. Apparent exclusion of the cladoceran Bosmina longisrostris by the invertebrate predator Chaoborus americanus. American Midland Naturalist, 105:240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenhuis, N. L. 1994. Catalogue of the Fossil Flies of the World (Insecta: Diptera). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. 600 p.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., and Duncan, P. M. 1986. Invertebrates, mainly insects, from the freshwater, Lower Cretaceous, Koonwarra Fossil Bed (Korumburra Group), South Gippsland, Victoria. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 3:111–205.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. E. 1993. Insects, spiders, and plants from the Tallahatta Formation (middle Eocene) in Benton County, Mississippi. Mississippi Geology, 14:71–82.Google Scholar
Kalugina, N. S., and Kovalev, V. G. 1985. Jurassic Diptera of Siberia. Akademia Nauk SSSR, Paleontological Institute, Moscow, 198 p. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, A. A. H. 1800. Beschreibung eines neu entdeckten Wasserinsekts. Archiv fur Zoologie und Zootomie, 1:168–175.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae (10th edition). In Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 824 p.Google Scholar
Potter, F. W. Jr., and Dilcher, D. L. 1980. Biostratigraphic analysis of Eocene clay deposits in Henry County, Tennessee, p. 211–225. In Dilcher, D. L. and Taylor, T. N. (eds.), Biostratigraphy of Fossil Plants: Successional and Paleoecological Analyses. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc., Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 1990. Interpreting the Stratigraphic Record. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. 410 p.Google Scholar
Spitze, K. 1992. Predator-mediated plasticity of prey life history and morphology: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. American Naturalist, 139:229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1985. Distribution of major vegetational types during the Tertiary, p. 357–375. In Broecker, W. S. and Sundquist, E. T. (eds.), The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO2: Natural Variations Archean to Present. American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph, 32.Google Scholar
Yan, N. D., Keller, W., Macisaac, H. J. and McEachern, L. J. 1991. Regulation of zooplankton community structure of an acidified lake by Chaoborus. Ecological Applications, 1:52–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed