Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:40:40.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cambrian series 3 agnostoid trilobites Ptychagnostus sinicus and Ptychagnostus atavus from the Machari Formation, Yeongwol Group, Taebaeksan Basin, Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2015

Paul S. Hong  and
Duck K. Choi
Paul S. Hong
Affiliation:
Geological Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 305-350, Korea 〈[email protected]〉
Duck K. Choi
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea 〈[email protected]〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the successive occurrence of Ptychagnostus sinicus Lu, 1957 and Ptychagnostus atavus (Tullberg, 1880) from the lower part of the Machari Formation, Yeongwol Group, Korea. Morphometric approaches of using the landmark and principal component analyses make it possible to differentiate P. sinicus from P. atavus with clarity: pygidia of P. sinicus have a relatively narrow M1, a transverse F2, and a weakly developed M2 tubercle, whereas those of P. atavus are characterized by a broadly arching M1, a chevron-shaped F2, and a prominent M2 tubercle. Recognition of P. atavus, for the first time in Korea, allows the determination of the base of the Drumian Stage in Korea and aids correlation with other parts of the world.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 377 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abràmoff, M.D., Magalhães, P.J., and Ram, S.J., 2004, Image processing with ImageJ: Biophotonics International, v. 11, p. 36–42.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P., Axheimer, N., and Robison, R.A., 2007, Taxonomy of Ptychagnostus atavus: a key trilobite in defining a global Cambrian stage boundary: Geobios, v. 40, p. 709–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelin, N.P., 1851, Palaeontologia Svecica, Pars I: Iconographia Crustaceorum Formationis Transitionis, Fascicule I. Lund, v. 24.Google Scholar
Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A., Rees, M.N., Peng, S.-C., and Saltzman, M.R., 2007, The global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP) of the Drumian Stage (Cambrian) in the Drum Mountains, Utah, USA: Episodes, v. 30, p. 85–95.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O.L., and Banchig, A.L., 2007, Cambrian trilobite biofacies in the Alojamiento Formation, Precordillera of San Juan and Mendoza, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 44, p. 91–107.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O.L., Banchig, A.L., Pratt, B.R., and Raviolo, M.M., 2008, Trilobite-based biostratigraphic model (biofacies and biozonation) for the Middle Cambrian carbonate platform of the Argentine Precordillera: Geologica Acta, v. 6, p. 115–129.Google Scholar
Brøgger, W.C., 1878, Om paradoxidesskifrene ved Krekling: Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne, v. 24, p. 18–88.Google Scholar
Choi, D.K., 1998, The Yongwol Group (Cambrian-Ordovician) redefined: a proposal for the stratigraphic nomenclature of the Choson Supergroup: Geoscience Journal, v. 2, p. 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., and Chough, S.K., 2005, The Cambrian-Ordovician stratigraphy of the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea: a review: Geosciences Journal, v. 9, p. 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., and Kim, E.-Y., 2006, Occurrence of Changshania (Trilobita, Cambrian) in the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea and its stratigraphic and paleogeographic significance: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 242, p. 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., Kim, E.-Y., and Lee, J.G., 2008, Upper Cambrian polymerid trilobites from the Machari Formation, Yongwol, Korea, Geobios, v. 41, p. 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., and Lee, J.G., 1995, Occurrence of Glyptagnostus stolidotus Öpik, 1961 (Trilobita, Late Cambrian) in the Machari Formation of Korea: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 590–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D.K., Lee, J.G., and Sheen, B.C., 2004, Upper Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from the Machari Formation: Yongwol, Korea: Geobios, v. 37, p. 159–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chough, S.K., Kwon, S.-T., Ree, J.-H, and Choi, D.K., 2000, Tectonic and sedimentary evolution of the Korean peninsula: a review and new view: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 52, p. 175–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergaliev, G.Kh., 1980, Middle and Upper Cambrian trilobites from Malyi Karatau: Nauka, Alma-Ata, v. 208.Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G.Kh., Zhemchuzhnikov, V.A., Ergaliev, F.G., Popov, L.E., Ghobadi Pour, M., and Bassett, M.G., 2008, Trilobite biostratigraphy and biodiversity patterns through the Middle-Upper Cambrian transition in the Kyrshabakty section, Malyi Karatau, southern Kazakhstan, in Rábano, I., Gozalo, R., and García-Bellido, D., eds., Advances in Trilobite Research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9:Madrid, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, p. 91–98.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T.P., 2006, Bedrock geology of the Cape St. Mary’s Peninsula, southwest Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, St. John’s, Report 06-02.Google Scholar
Guo, H.-J., Zan, S.-Q., and Luo, K.-L., 1996, Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobites of Eastern Liaoning: Jilin, Jilin University Press, v. 184.Google Scholar
Hong, P.S., Lee, J.G., and Choi, D.K., 2003a, Trilobites from the Lejopyge armata zone (upper Middle Cambrian) of the Machari Formation, Yongwol Group, Korea: Journal of Paleontology, v. 77, p. 895–907.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, P.S., Lee, J.G., and Choi, D.K., 2003b, The Late Cambrian trilobite Irvingella from the Machari Formation, Korea: evolution and correlation: Special Papers in Palaeontology, v. 70, p. 175–196.Google Scholar
Howell, B.F., 1935, Some new Brunswick Cambrian agnostians: Bulletin of the Wagner Free Institute of Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 10, p. 13–16.Google Scholar
Høyberget, M., and Bruton, D.L., 2008, Middle Cambrian trilobites of the suborders Agnostina and Eodiscina from the Oslo Region, Norway: Palaeontographica Abteilung A, v. 286, p. 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1993, Opinion 1701; Ptychagnostus Jaekel, 1909 and Glyptagnostus Whitehouse, 1936 (Trilobita): accepted usage conserved: Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, v. 50, p. 63–64.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1909, Über die Agnostiden: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 61, p. 380–401.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1935, The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen, Palaeontology, Part III, Cambrian faunas of South Chosen with a special study on the Cambrian genera and families: Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, v. 4, p. 49–344.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1939, On the agnostids (part I): Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, v. 5, p. 69–198.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1962, The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Korea, Part IX, Paleontology VIII, the Machari fauna: Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section II, v. 14, p. 1–152.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1966, The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Korea, Part X, stratigraphy of the chosen group in Korea and South Manchuria and its relation to the Cambro-Ordovician formations of other areas, section A, the Chosen Group of South Korea: Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section II, v. 16, p. 1–84.Google Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 1988, Revision of some Australian Ptychagnostinae (Agnostida, Cambrian): Alcheringa, v. 12, p. 169–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, J.R., 2008, Species relationships in the Ptychagnostidae (Cambrian, Agnostina), in Rábano, I., Gozalo, R., and García-Bellido, D., eds., Advances in Trilobite Research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9: Madrid, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, p. 211–218.Google Scholar
Lee, J.G., and Choi, D.K., 1994, Glyptagnostus and associated trilobites from the Machari Formation, Yeongweol, Korea: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 10, p. 117–136.Google Scholar
Lee, J.G., and Choi, D.K., 1995, Late Cambrian trilobites from the Machari Formation–Machari area, Korea: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 11, p. 1–46.Google Scholar
Lee, J.G., and Choi, D.K., 1996, Trilobites from the Pseudoyuepingia asaphoides Zone (Late Cambrian) of the Machari Formation near Gamaesil village, Yeongweol, Korea: Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, v. 12, p. 145–167.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J.G.O., 1869, Om Vestergötlands Cambriska och Siluriska aflagringar: Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 8, no. 2, p. 1–89.Google Scholar
Lisogor, K.A., Rozov, S.N., and Rozova, A.V., 1988, Correlation of Middle Cambrian deposits of the Lesser Karatau and Siberian platform according to trilobites, in Zhuravleva, I.T., and Repina, L.N., eds., Cambrian of Siberia and Middle Asia. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Siberian Branch: Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Transactions v. 720, p. 54–82.Google Scholar
Lu, Y.-H., 1957, Trilobita, in Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, ed., Index Fossils of China, Invertebrata, III: Beijing, Geological Publishing House, v. 320, p. 249–294.Google Scholar
Lu, Y.-H., Chang, W.-T., Chu, Z.-L., Chien, Y.-Y., and Hsiang, L.-W., 1965, Trilobites of China: Beijing, Science Press, v. 766.Google Scholar
Luo, K.-L., 1999, The boundary of the Zhangxia and Gushan stages with to the boundary of the Middle and Upper Cambrian of North China: Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, v. 27, p. 93–105.Google Scholar
Nan, R.-S., 1980, Trilobita, in Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China (1). Palaeozoic: Beijing, Geological Publishing House, v. 686, p. 484–519.Google Scholar
Öpik, A.A., 1979, Middle Cambrian agnostids: systematics and biostratigraphy: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin, v. 172, p. 1–188.Google Scholar
Özdikmen, H., 2009, Nomenclatural changes for twenty trilobites genera: Munis Entomology and Zoology, v. 4, p. 155–171.Google Scholar
Palmer, A.R., 1954, An appraisal of the Great Basin Middle Cambrian trilobites described before 1900: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 264, p. 55–85.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-C., and Robison, R.A., 2000, Agnostid biostratigraphy across the Middle-Upper Cambrian boundary in Hunan, China: Paleontological Society Memoir, v. 53, p. 1–104.Google Scholar
Qiu, H.-A., Lu, Y.-H., Zhu, Z.-L., Bi, D.-C., Lin, T.-R., Zhang, Q.-Z., Qian, Y.-Y., Ju, T.-Y., Han, N.-R., and Wei, X.-Z., 1983, Trilobita, in Palaeontological Atlas of East China (1): Beijing, Geological Publishing House, v. 657, p. 28–254.Google Scholar
Robison, R.A., 1982, Some Middle Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from western North America. Journal of Paleontology, v. 56, p. 132–160.Google Scholar
Robison, R.A., 1984, Cambrian Agnostida of North America and Greenland Part I, Ptychagnostidae: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper, v. 109, p. 1–59.Google Scholar
Robison, R.A., 1994, Agnostoid trilobites from the Henson Gletcher and Kap Stanton formations (Middle Cambrian), North Greenland: Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Bulletin, v. 169, p. 25–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, A.J., Robison, R.A., and Strickland, D.K., 1982, Aspects of Cambrian agnostoid phylogeny and chronocorrelation: Journal of Paleontology, v. 56, p. 161–182.Google Scholar
Salter, J.W., 1864, A Monograph of British Trilobites, Part 1: London, Palaeontographical Society, 1862.Google Scholar
Sheets, H.D., 2012, IMP 7.14, Department of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York: http://www.canisius.edu/~sheets/imp714.htm (accessed August 2015).Google Scholar
Sun, X.-W., 1989, Cambrian agnostids from the North China platform: Palaeontologia Cathayana, v. 4, p. 53–129.Google Scholar
Tullberg, S.A., 1880, Om Agnostus-arterna i de Kambriska aflagringame vid Andrarum: Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning (series C), v. 42, p. 1–37.Google Scholar
Walch, J.E.I., 1771, Die Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen zur Erläuterung der Knorrischen: Nürnberg, Sammlung von Merkwürdigkeiten dur Natur.Google Scholar
Webster, M., and Sheets, H.D., 2010, A practical introduction to landmark-based geometric morphometrics, in Alroy, J., and Hunt, G., eds., Quantitative Methods in Paleobiology: Paleontological Society Papers, v. 16, p. 163–188.Google Scholar
Weidner, T., and Nielsen, A.T., 2009, The Middle Cambrian Paradoxides paradoxissimus Superzone on Öland, Sweden: GFF, v. 131, p. 253–268.Google Scholar
Weidner, T., and Nielsen, A.T., 2014, A highly diverse trilobite fauna with Avalonian affinities from the Middle Cambrian Acidusus atavus Zone (Drumian Stage) of Bornholm, Denmark: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 12, p. 23–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergård, A.H., 1936, Paradoxides oelandicus beds of Öland: with the account of a diamond boring through the Cambrian at Mossberga, Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, series C, no. 394: Årsbok v. 30, p. 1–66.Google Scholar
Westergård, A.H., 1946, Agnostidea of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden, Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, series C, no. 477: Årsbok v. 40, p. 1–140.Google Scholar
Westrop, S., Ludvigsen, R., and Kindle, C.H., 1996, Marjuman (Cambrian) agnostoid trilobites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland: Journal of Paleontology, v. 70, p. 804–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H.B., and Kelly, S.R.A., 1997, Morphological terms applied to Trilobita, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part O, Trilobita (Revised): Boulder, Colorado, Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. 313–329.Google Scholar
Yang, J.-L., 1982, Notes on the Middle Cambrian trilobite faunas from Duibian of Jiangshan, Zhejiang: Geological Review, v. 28, p. 299–307.Google Scholar
Yosimura, I., 1940, Geology of the Neietsu district, Kogendo, Tyosen: Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, v. 47, p. 112–122.Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-L., Li, Y., Mu, X.-N., Lin, J.-P., and Zhu, X.-J., 2012, Trilobite fauna of the Changhia Formation (Cambrian Series 3) from Shandong and adjacent area, North China: Palaeontologia Sinica, v. 197, p. 1–758.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D., and Fink, W.L., 2004, Geometric Mophometrics for Biologists: A Primer: San Diego, Academic Press, p. 443.Google Scholar