Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:58:57.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calicovatellus petrodytes, a new genus and species of primitive vatelline diving beetle (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae: Vatellini) from the Miocene Barstow Formation, southern California, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Kelly B. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Comstock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA,
Sara H. Lubkin
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Snee Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA,

Extract

Relatively few fossil dytiscids have been described. This is unfortunate since fossils can provide useful phylogenetic and evolutionary information including unique character combinations not present in extant taxa and minimum ages for divergences. However, even when fossils are found, important characters are often not visible since they may be poorly preserved or obscured. The fossil insects present in calcareous nodules from the Miocene Barstow Formation of the Calico Mountains in Southern California are exceptionally well preserved (Palmer, 1957). The original organisms are replaced by silica or other minerals and when the nodules are dissolved in formic acid, the three-dimensional fossil can be retrieved from the resulting residue. These nodules have yielded a wide variety of fossils, including larvae of the dytiscid species Schistomerus californense Palmer, 1957 and numerous other terrestrial and fresh-water arthropods (Palmer, 1957). The purposes of this paper are to describe a new dytiscid genus and species from an exceptionally well-preserved specimen from the Barstow Formation and to present a hypothesis of the phylogenetic placement of the new taxon.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Degens, E. T., Pierce, W. D., and Chillingar, G. V. 1962. Origin of the petroleum-bearing freshwater concretions of Miocene age. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 46:15221525.Google Scholar
Elias, S. A. 1994. Quarternary Insects and their Environments. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 284 p.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1837. Die Kafer der Mark Brandenburg. F. H. Morin, Berlin, 384 p.Google Scholar
Glazner, A. F., Walker, J., Fletcher, D., Bartley, J. M., Schermer, J. M., Martin, E. R., Boettcher, M. W., Boettcher, S., Miller, J. S., Linn, J. K., and Fillmore, R. P. 1994. Reconstruction of the Mojave Block, p. 273330. In Geological Society of America, Cordilleran Section, Annual Meeting, Guidebook. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. E. 1986. Miocene invertebrates from the Calico Mountains, San Bernadino County, California. Quarterly of the San Bernadino County Museum Association, 33:142.Google Scholar
Larson, D. J. 1996. Color patterns of dytiscine water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Dytiscinae) of arroyos, billabongs and wadis. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 50:231235.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1817. The zoological miscellany; being descriptions of new or interesting animals, illustrated with coloured figures, engraved from orignal drawings, by R. P. Nodder. R. A. Taylor, London, 151 p.Google Scholar
Lindsay, E. H. 1972. Small mammal fossils from the Barstow Formation, California. California University Publications in the Geological Sciences, 93:104.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Sysema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, sononymis, locis ed. 10, 823 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubkin, S. H. 1999. Paleoclimate reconstruction using fossil insects and other invertebrates from the middle Miocene Barstow Formation of the Mojave Desert, California. Unpublished senior thesis, University of California, 40 p.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R. B. 1966. Amateur investigations of Miocene arthropods from the Mojave Desert, California. The Microscope and Crystal Front, 15:96105.Google Scholar
Moore, R. (ed.). 1969. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4. The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 651 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 1957. Miocene arthropods from the Mojave Desert, California. U.S. Geological Survey Paper, 249-G:237280Google Scholar
Park, L. 1995. Geochemical and paleoenvironmental analysis of lacustrine arthropod-bearing concretions of the Barstow Formation, Southern California. Palaios, 10:4447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennak, R. W. 1989. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca (third edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, 656 p.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1947. The Search for Fossil Insects. Los Angeles County Museum Quarterly, 6:1317.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1959. Fossil arthropods of California, 22: A progress report on the nodule studies. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 58:7278.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1960a. Fossil arthropods of California, 23: Silicified insects in Miocene nodules from the Calico Mountains. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 59:4049.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1960b. Silicified Turbellaria from Calico Mountains nodules. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 59:138143.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1962. The significance of the petroliferous nodules of our desert mountains. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 61:714.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1963. Fossil arthropods of California, 25: Silicified leafhoppers from California mountain nodules. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 62:6982.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1964. Three new types of invertebrates extracted from Miocene petroliferous nodules. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 63:8185.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1965. Fossil arthropods of California, 26: Three new fossil insect sites in California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 64:157162.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1966. Fossil Arthropods of California, 29: Silicified miocene pupae of Ceratopogonid flies. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 65:8198.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D., and Gibron, J. 1962. Fossil arthropods of California, 24: Some unusual fossil arthropods from the Calico Mountain nodules. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 61:143151.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G. 1887. Bestimmungs: Tabellen der Dytiscidae und Gyrinidae des europaischen Faunengebietes. Verh Naturforsch Vereins Brunn, 25:3136.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1882. On aquatic carnivorous Coleoptera or Dytiscidae. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, 2:1791003.Google Scholar
Spangler, P. J. 1963. A description of the larva of Macrovatellus mexicanus Sharp (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 17:97100.Google Scholar
Spangler, P. J. 1966. A new species of Derovatellus from Guatemala and a description of its larva (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 20:1118.Google Scholar
Ward, J. V. 1992. Aquatic Insect Ecology, 1: Biology and Habitat. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 437 p.Google Scholar
Woodburne, M., Tedford, R., and Swisher, C. 1990. Lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and geochronology of the Barstow Formation, Mojave Desert, Southern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 102:459477.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. N. 1960. The colors of desert water beetles—environmental effect or protective coloration? Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 53:422425.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. 1919. Die Schwimmkäfer des Deutschen Entomologischen Museums in Berlin-Dahlem. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 83:68249.Google Scholar