Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:45:42.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biochronological significance of Amynodontidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from the Paleogene of Kazakhstan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Spencer G. Lucas  and
Robert J. Emry
Spencer G. Lucas
Affiliation:
New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road N. W., Albuquerque 87104
Robert J. Emry
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five taxa of amynodontid rhinoceroses have been named from Kazakhstan. We consider only two of these valid, and recognize three amynodontid taxa from Paleogene deposits in Kazakhstan: Cadurcodon ardynensis (=Cadurcodon zaisanensis; =Amynodon tuskabakensis) from the upper Eocene (Ergilian)-lower Oligocene (Shandgolian) of the Zaysan basin, Zaisanamynodon borisovi, from the Ergilian of the Zaysan basin and Cadurcodon kazakademius, from Shandgolian strata in the vicinity of the Chelkar-Teniz lake basin. Gigantamynodon akespensis, from the upper Oligocene north of the Aral Sea is a rhinocerotid, not an amynodontid. Close similarity of the amynodontids of Kazakhstan to those of Mongolia and China supports direct correlation of Ergilian and Shandgolian strata across Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , July 1996 , pp. 691 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhmetiev, M. A., and Sychevskaya, E. K. 1994. Oligocene-Miocene boundary in Kazakhstan: Field Excursion Guidebook. Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 88 p.Google Scholar
Akhmetiev, M. A., Borisov, B. A., Erofeev, V. S., and Tseshovsky, Y. G. 1986. The Kiin-Kerish section (USSR, south-eastern Kazakhstan, the Lake Zaisan basin); pp. 141–145. In Pomerol, C. and Premoli-Silva, I. (eds.), Terminal Eocene Events. Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayshashov, B. U. 1993. Pervaya nakhodka bolotnovo nosoroga (Amynodontidae) v Akespe (Kazakhstan). Selevinia, 1:74–75. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Belyaeva, E. I. 1962. Bolotnyy nozorog Cadurcodon zaisanensis sp. nov. Paleontologickesky Zhurnal, 4:116–123. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Belyaeva, E. I. 1970. O nakhodke aminodonta v oligotsene Kazakhstana. Paleontologichesky Zhurnal, 1970:155–156. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Belyaeva, E. I. 1971. Novye dannye po aminodontam SSSR. Akademiya Nauk SSSR Trudy Paleontologicheskiy Institut, 130:39–61. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Biryukov, M. D. 1961. Bolotniy nosorog (Amynodontidae) iz srednovo Oligotsena Turgayskovo progiba. Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoiy SSR Institut Zoologii Materialy po istorii Fauny i Flory Kazakhstana, 3:20–29. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Biryukov, M. D. 1963. Noviy vid aminodonta (Amynodontidae) iz Paleogena Kazakhstana. Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoiy SSR Institut Zoologii Materialy po istorii Fauny i Flory Kazakhstana, 4:34–41. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Borisov, B. A. 1963. Stratigrafiya verkhnevo mela i paleogene-neogena Zaysanskoy vpadiny. Trudy VSEGEI i Gosudarstveny Geologicheskiy Komineta novye seriy, 94:11–75. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Brunet, M. 1979. Les grands mammifères chefs de file de l'immigration Oligocène et le problème de la limte Éocène-Oligocène en Europe. Éditions de la Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris, 281 p.Google Scholar
Dashzeveg, D. 1993. Asynchronism of the main mammalian faunal events near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Tertiary Research, 14:141–149.Google Scholar
Ducrocq, S. 1993. Mammals and stratigraphy in Asia: is the Eocene-Oligocene boundary at the right place? Compte Rendus Academie de Science Paris Serie II, 316:419–426.Google Scholar
Emry, R. J., Tjutkova, L. A., Wang, B., Lucas, S. G., and Bayshashov, B. U. 1995. The Ergilian-Shandgolian (Eocene-Oligocene) transition in the Zaysan basin of Kazakhstan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 15(3):27A.Google Scholar
Gromova, V. 1954. Boltany nosorogi (Amynodontidae) Mongolii. Akademiya Nauk SSSR Trudy Paleontologicheskiy Institut, 55:85–189. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Kordikova, E. G. 1994. Oligocene vertebrate assemblages in central Kazakhstan: faunas, biogeography and paleoecology. Historical Biology, 8:191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, S. G., Emry, R. J., and Bayshashov, B. U., In press. Zaisanamynodon, a late Eocene amynodontid (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Kazakhstan and China. Tertiary Research.Google Scholar
Orlov, Yu. A. 1939. Mestonakhozhdeniye tretichnykh mlekopita-yushchikh v Aralskovo Morya. Priroda, 5:91–94. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1924. Cadurcotherium ardynense, Oligocene, Mongolia. American Museum Novitates, 147:1–4.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1929. The titanotheres of ancient Wyoming, Dakota, and Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 55, 953 p. (2 volumes).Google Scholar
Pilgrim, G. E. 1912. The vertebrate fauna of the Gaj Series in the Bugti Hills and the Punjab. Paleontologia Indica new series, 4(2):1–83.Google Scholar
Premoli-Silva, I., and Jenkins, D. G. 1993. Decision on the Eocene-Oligocene boundary stratotype. Episodes, 16:379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Swisher, C. C. III. 1992. Magnetostratigraphy and geochronology of the terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene transition in North America, p. 46–73. In Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A. (eds.), Eocene-Oligocene climatic and biotic evolution. Princeton University Press, p. 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raza, S. M., and Meyer, G. E. 1984. Early Miocene geology and paleontology of the Bugti Hills, Pakistan. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Pakistan, 11:43–63.Google Scholar
Roman, F., and Joleaud, L. 1908. Le Cadurcotherium de l'Isle-sur-Sorgues (Vaucluse) et revision du genre Cadurcotherium. Archives du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon, 10:1–52.Google Scholar
Russell, D. E., and Zhai, R. 1987. The Paleogene of Asia: mammals and stratigraphy. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 52:1–488.Google Scholar
Wall, W. P. 1982. Evolution and biogeography of the Amynodontidae (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotoidea). Third North American Paleontological Convention Proceedings, 2:563–567.Google Scholar
Wall, W. P. 1989. The phylogenetic history and adaptive radiation of the Amynodontidae, p. 341–354. In Prothero, D. R. and Schoch, R. M. (eds.), The evolution of perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wang, B. 1992. The Chinese Oligocene: a preliminary review of mammalian localities and local faunas, p. 529–547. In Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A. (eds.), Eocene-Oligocene climatic and biotic evolution. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. 1961. Some Oligocene mammals from Chuching, Yunnan. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 4:315–329. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Xu, Y. 1966. Amynodonts of Inner Mongolia. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 10:123–190. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar