Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:13:13.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An unusual Late Triassic nuculid bivalve with divaricate shell ornamentation, and the evolutionary history of oblique ribs in Triassic bivalves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Michael Hautmann ,
Babak Aghababalou  and
Leo Krystyn
Michael Hautmann
Affiliation:
1Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Karl Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland,
Babak Aghababalou
Affiliation:
2Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran,
Leo Krystyn
Affiliation:
3Department for Paleontology, Vienna University, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new nuculid bivalve Trigonucula (Gonionucula) aciloides new subgenus and species from the upper Triassic Nayband Formation of Central Iran is described. Gonionucula differs from Trigonucula s.s. by the presence of oblique ribs, which either deviate from a concentric pattern at the anterior shell part, or, as in the newly described type species, consist of a complex pattern of chevron-like ribs on the central part of the flank, plus an additional set of opisthocline to more or less acline ribs on posterior part of the flank. The oblique ribs of Gonionucula probably aided energy-efficient burrowing, which was advantageous in competing for food resources with less efficiently burrowing detritus feeders. The number of burrowing bivalve species with oblique ribs generally rose towards the end of the Triassic, which probably reflects increasing competition at a time when most niches were re-occupied after the end-Permian mass extinction event. The fact that oblique ribs were rare in Paleozoic bivalves suggests that the level of competition was higher in post-Paleozoic biota, which is in accordance with a general increase in metabolic rates, predation pressure, and ecospace occupation in the course of the Mesozoic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 22 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. and Adams, A. 1858. The genera of recent Mollusca; arranged according to their organization. Volume 1, 484 p.; volume 2, 661 p.; volume 3, 136 pls. John van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1839. Mémoire sur les moules de mollusques vivans et fossiles, par Ls Agassiz. 1. ptie. Moules d'acéphales vivans. Petitpierre, Neuchâtel, 48 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1840-1845. Études critiques sur les mollusques fossiles. H. Wolprath, Neuchâtel, 287 p.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology, 19:372–397.Google Scholar
Bittner, A. 1895. Lamellibranchiaten der alpinen Trias. I. Theil: Revision der Lamellibranchiaten von Sct. Cassian. Abhandlungen der k. k. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 18:1–235.Google Scholar
Checa, A. 2002. Fabricational morphology of oblique ribs in bivalves. Journal of Morphology, 254:195–209.Google Scholar
Checa, A. and Jiménez-Jiménez, A. P. 2003. Evolutionary morphology of oblique ribs of bivalves. Palaeontology, 46:709–724.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, B. I. 1950. Semeistvo Grammysiidae iz verkhnepaleozoiskikh otlozhenii SSSR. Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Seriya Stratigrafii i Paleontologii, 1:3–91.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. On the hinge of pelecypods and its development, with an attempt toward a better subdivision of the groups. American Journal of Science, 38:445–462.Google Scholar
Dickins, J. M. 1957. Lower Permian pelecypods and gastropods from the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 41:1–56.Google Scholar
Fallahi, M. 1980. Stratigraphie und Fauna der Trias um Isfahan, Persien. Unpublished , Vienna University, 205 p.Google Scholar
Fallahi, M., Gruber, B., and Tichy, G. 1983. Gastropoden und Bivalven aus dem oberen Teil der Nayband-Formation (Obertrias) von Baqirabad (Isphahan, Iran), p. 57–82. In Zapfe, H. (ed.), Neue Beiträge zur Biostratigraphie der Tethys-Trias. Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommission 5. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Fleming, C. A. 1987. New Zealand Mesozoic bivalves of the superfamily Trigoniacea. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 53:1–104.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. O. 1945. A new genus Glyptoleda and a revision of the genus Nuculana from the Permian of Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 21:293–312.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. O. 1946. New Lamellibranchia from the Upper Permian of Western Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 21:395–405.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Hautmann, M., Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Seyed-Emami, K. 2005. The Upper Triassic Nayband and Darkuh formations of east-central Iran: Stratigraphy, facies patterns and biota of extensional basins on an accreted terrane. Beringeria, 35:53–133.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A. 1837. Petrefacta Germaniae. Part 2 (3). Arnz, Düsseldorf, p. 141–224.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1824. Shells. Supplement to appendix, Perry's voyage for the discovery of the north-west passage in the years 1819-1820, Appendix 10, Zoology, p. 240–246.Google Scholar
Zong-hai, Gou. 1993. Bivalve Fauna of Upper Triassic in Maantang Area, Jiangyou, Sichuan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 32:13–30. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Fuxiang, Guo. 1985. Fossil bivalves of Yunnan. Yunnan Science and Technology Publishing House, Kunming, 319 p. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Harper, E. M. 2006. Dissecting post-Palaeozoic arms race. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 232:322–343.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2001. Die Muschelfauna der Nayband-Formation (Obertrias, Nor-Rhät) des östlichen Zentraliran. Beringeria, 29:1–181.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2003. Notes on Gruenewaldia Wöhrmann, 1889 (Bivalvia, Trigoniida). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 2003:145–152.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2004. Early Mesozoic evolution of alivincular bivalve ligaments and its implications for the timing of the “Mesozoic marine revolution”. Lethaia, 37:165–172.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2006. Shell morphology and phylogenetic origin of oysters. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 240:668–671.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2007. Steuerungsfaktoren globaler Biodiversifizierungsmuster am Beispiel frühmesozoischer Muscheln. Beringeria, 37:61–74.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. and Golej, M. 2004. Terquemia (Dentiterquemia) eudesdeslongchampsi new subgenus and species, an interesting cementing bivalve from the Lower Jurassic of the western Carpathians (Slovakia). Journal of Paleontology, 78:1086–1090.Google Scholar
Healey, M. 1908. The fauna of the Napeng-beds or the Rhaetic beds of upper Burma. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, 2:1–88.Google Scholar
Holdhaus, K. 1913. Fauna of the Spiti Shales (Lamellibranchiata and Gastropoda). Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, 15:397–456.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, K. 1949. Trigonucula (nov.) and other taxodont pelecypods from the Upper Triassic of the Sakawa Basin in Shikoku, Japan. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, Transactions, 21:267–272.Google Scholar
Kluwer, H. M., Tirrul, R., Chance, P. N., Johnes, G. W., and Meixner, H. M. 1983. Explanatory text of the Nayband Quadrangle Map 1:250,000. Geological Quadrangle Report J8, Geological Survey of Iran, Tehran, 143 p.Google Scholar
Korobov, I. A. 1954. Sprvochnik i metodicheskoe rukovodstro po tretichum Mollyuskam Plastinchatozhabernye. Nauchno-tecnoi Isledov, Leningradskoi Otdelenie, 444 p.Google Scholar
Krumbeck, L. 1913. Obere Trias von Buru und Misol. Palaeontographica, Supplement 4:1–161.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. (1943) [1948]. La fauna cassina di Cortina d'Ampezzo. Parte I, Introduzione geologica e lamellibranchi. Memorie Ist. Geologia Università di Padova, 15:1–78. [Reprints distributed 1943, journal published 1948].Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I (tenth edition). Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
McGowan, A. J., Smith, A. B., and Taylor, P. D. 2009. Faunal diversity, heterogeneity and body size in the Early Triassic: testing post-extinction paradigms in the Virgin Limestone of Utah, USA. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 56:859–872.Google Scholar
McRoberts, C. A. 1997. Late Triassic (Norian-Rhaetian) bivalves from the Antimonio Formation, northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 14:167–177.Google Scholar
McRoberts, C. A. 2001. Triassic bivalves and the initial marine Mesozoic revolution: A role for predators? Geology, 29:359–362.Google Scholar
Münster, G. Grafzu. 1841. Beiträge zur Petrefacten-Kunde. IV. Beschreibung und Abbildung der in den Kalkmergelschichten von St. Cassian gefundenen Versteinerungen. Buchner'sche Buchhandlung, Bayreuth, 152 p.Google Scholar
Patte, E. 1926. Etudes Paléontologiques relatives à la Géologie de l'Est du Tonkin (Paléozoique et Trias). Bulletin du Service Géologique de l'Indochine, 15:1–241.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1972. Divaricate patterns in pelecypod shells. Lethaia, 5:325–343.Google Scholar
Seyed-Emami, K. 2003. Triassic in Iran. Facies, 48:91–106.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1969. Bivalve mollusk burrowing aided by discordant shell ornamentation. Science, 166:634–635.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir, 125:1–296.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. Why clams have the shape they have: an experimental analysis of borrowing. Paleobiology, 1:48–58.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1977a. Coadaptation in the Trigonoidae, a remarkable family of burrowing bivalves. Palaeontology, 20:869–899.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1977b. Trends, rates, and patterns of evolution in the Bivalvia, p. 209–250. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Patterns of evolution as illustrated by the fossil record. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1929. Geologie von Peru. Carl Winter, Heidelberg, 448 p.Google Scholar
Stur, D. 1851. Die liasischen Kalksteingebilde von Hirtenberg und Enzersfeld. Jahrbuch der k. k. geologischen Reichsanstalt, 2:19–27.Google Scholar
Tamura, M. and McRoberts, C. 1993. A new species of Myophorigonia from the Upper Triassic Martin Bridge Formation, Wallowa Mountains, Oregon, U.S.A. with reference on the Minetrigoniidae of the Circum-Pacific. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University, Natural Science, 42:29–34.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology, 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 527 p.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species: Selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25:219–236.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2008. Escalation and its role in Jurassic biotic history. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 263:3–8.Google Scholar
Khuc, Vu. 1991. Paleontological atlas of Vietnam. Volume 3. Mollusca. Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi, 207 p.Google Scholar
Vu, K. and Huyen, D. T. 1984. Some new bivalve genera and subgenera from Triassic sediments of North Vietnam. Cac khoa hoc ve Trai dat, 6:1–23.Google Scholar
Walker, S. E. and Brett, C. E. 2002. Post-Paleozoic patterns in marine predation: Was there a Mesozoic and Cenozoic marine predatory revolution? Paleontological Society Papers, 8:119–193.Google Scholar
Wen, S., Lan, X., Chen, J., Zang, Z., Chen, C., and Gu, Z. 1976. Fossil Lamellibranchia from the Mount Qomolangma region. The Xizang scientific expedition, Scientific reports on the expedition to the Qomolangma region (1966-1968), Palaeontology (Fascicule III). Chinese Academy of Science, Science Press, Beijing, 152 p. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Zahedi, M. 1973. Étude géologique de la région de Soh (W de l'Iran Central). Report of the Geological Survey of Iran, 27:1–197.Google Scholar
Zapfe, H. 1967. Beiträge zur Paläontologie nordalpiner Riffe. Die Fauna der Zlambach-Mergel der Fischwiese bei Aussee, Steiermark. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, 71:413–480.Google Scholar