Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:04:04.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Albian ammonite faunas from Peru: The genus Neodeshayesites Casey, 1964

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Emmanuel Robert  and
Luc Georges Bulot
Emmanuel Robert
Affiliation:
46b Rue Jean de Pins, 31300 Toulouse, France,
Luc Georges Bulot
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6019, Centre de Sédimentologie-Paléontologie, Université de Provence, F-13331 Marseille cedex 04, France,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our understanding of the Cretaceous ammonite succession of Peru is mainly based on the reference work of Benavides Cáceres (1956) that updates the descriptive paleontological papers by Gabb (1877), Sommermeier (1910), and Knechtel et al. (1947), among others. New fossil collections made in the course 1995 and 1999 in northern and central Peru provide the basis for a revision of the Albian ammonite faunas of this country. In contrast to our predecessors, our collections are based on sections that have been sampled bed by bed.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , May 2005 , pp. 611 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthula, D. J. 1899. Über die Kreidefossilien des Kaukasus mit einem allegemeinen Ueberblick über die Entwicklung der Sedimentärbildungen des Kaukasus. Beiträge zur Paläontologie und Geologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 12:55–106.Google Scholar
Benavides Cáceres, V. F. 1956. The Cretaceous System in northern Peru. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History, 108(4):357–493.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, T. N., and Prozorovsky, V. A.. 1999. Substantiation of the Barremian/Aptian boundary. Scripta Geologica, Proceedings of the fourth international workshop of the Lower Cretaceous Cephalopod Team (IGCP-project 362), p. 45–81.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1954. New genera and subgenera of Lower Cretaceous ammonites. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 44:106–115.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1961. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontographical Society, Pt. 3:119–216.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1964. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontographical Society, Pt. 5:289–398.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1965. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontographical Society, Pt. 6:399–546.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1841. Description zoologique et géologique de tous les animaux molluques et rayonnés, fossiles de France. Tome premier. In Paléontologie française, p. 121–430. Terrains crétacés. Masson Eds, 1.Google Scholar
Etayo Serna, F. 1979. Zonation of the Cretaceous of central Colombia by ammonites. Publicaciones Geológicas Especiales del Ingeominas, 2:1–188.Google Scholar
Etayo Serna, F., and Carrillo Castillo, G.. 1996. Bioestratigrafía del Cretácico mediante Macrofósiles en la Sección El Ocal, Valle Superior del Magdalena, Colombia. Geología Colombiana, 20:81–92.Google Scholar
Fritel, P. 1906. Sur les variations morphologiques d'Acanthoceras milletianum, d'Orbigny sp. Le Naturaliste, Paris, 472:245–257.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1877. Description of a collection of fossils made by Dr. Antonio Raimondi in Peru. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2(8):263–336.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 673, 238 p.Google Scholar
Jaillard, E., Hérail, G., Monfret, T., Diaz-Martinez, E., Baby, P., Lavenu, A., and Dumont, J.-F.. 2000. Tectonic evolution of the Andes of Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and northernmost Chile. Tectonic Evolution of South America, 31 International Congress, Geology and Sustainable Development, p. 481–559.Google Scholar
Karsten, H. 1858. Über die geognostischen Verhältnisse des Westlichen Colombien des heutigen Republiken Neu Granada und Ecuador. Amtlicher Bericht der Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte, 32:80–117.Google Scholar
Kasansky, P. A. 1914. Opisanie kollektsii golovonogikh iz melovykh otlozhenii Dagestana. Izvestiia Tomskogo Teckhnologicheskoga Instituta, 32(4):1–127.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A.. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 17, 94 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Gale, A. S., Bown, P. R., Caron, M., Davey, R. J., Gröcke, D., and Wray, D. S.. 2000. Integrated stratigraphy across the Aptian–Albian boundary in the Marnes Bleues, at Col de Pré-Guittard, Arnayon (Drôme), and at Tartonne (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence), France: A candidate Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Boundary Point for the base of the Albian Stage. Cretaceous Research, 21:591–720.Google Scholar
Knechtel, M. M., Richards, E. F., and Rathbun, M. V.. 1947. Mesozoic fossils of the Peruvian Andes, Pt. III, Cephalopoda. John Hopkins University, Studies in Geology, 15, 150 p.Google Scholar
Marcou, J. 1875. Explication d'une seconde édition de la Carte Géologique de la Terre. Zurich, 222 p.Google Scholar
Mégard, F. 1978. Étude géologique des Andes du Pérou Central. Mémoire Orstom, 86, 310 p.Google Scholar
Renz, O. 1982. The Cretaceous Ammonites of Venezuela. Birkhaüser Verlag Eds, Basel, 132 p.Google Scholar
Riedel, L. 1937. Amonitas del Cretácico inferior de la Cordillera Oriental. Estudios geológicos y paleontólogicos sobre la Cordillera Oriental de Colombia, 2. Departamento Minas Petróleo, Ministerio Industria y Trabajo República Colombia, p. 7–80.Google Scholar
Robert, E. 2002. La transgression albienne dans le Bassin Andin (Pérou: Biostratigraphie, Paléontologie (Ammonites) et Stratigraphie séquentielle. Strata, 38, 380 p.Google Scholar
Robert, E., Bulot, L. G., Dhondt, A., Jaillard, E., Villagomez, R., Rivadeneira, M., and Paz, M.. 1998. La Transgresión del Cretáceo inferior en el margen andino (Perú y Ecuador): Datos preliminares. Boletin Sociedad Geológica del Perú, 88:73–86.Google Scholar
Scott, G. 1940. Cephalopods from the Cretaceous Trinity Group of the south-central United States. University of Texas Publication, 3945:969–1106.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H., Adkins, W. S., and Plummer, F. B.. 1954. The Mesozoic System in Texas. Geology of Texas: Stratigraphy. University of Texas Bulletin, 3232(1):239–518.Google Scholar
Sinzov, I. T. 1907. Untersuschungen einiger Ammonitiden aus dem Unteren Gault Mangyshlaks und des Kaukasus. Verhandlungen der russisch-kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft zu St. Peterburgs, 45:455–519.Google Scholar
Sommermeier, L. 1910. Die Fauna des Aptien und Albien im nördlichen Peru. Partie I. Cephalopoden. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläeontologie, Beilage-band, 30:313–382.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1923. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Gault. Palaeontographical Society, 1:1–72.Google Scholar
Stoyanow, A. 1949. Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy in southern Arizona. Geological Society of America Memoir, 38, 169 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1887. Contributions to the paleontology of Brazil, comprising descriptions of Cretaceous invertebrate fossils, mainly from the provinces of Sergipe, Pernambuco, Para and Bahia. Archivos do Museo Nacional, 278 p.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W., Calloman, J. H., and Howarth, M. K.. 1996. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. L. Mollusca 4 (revised), Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 362 p.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1974. Lower Albian and Aptian (Cretaceous) ammonites of Texas. Geoscience and Man, 8:175–228.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1884. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Band 1, Abt. 2, Lief 3, Cephalopoda. Oldenbourg, Munich und Leipzig, p. 329–522.Google Scholar