Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:24:44.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age of the hexactinellid beds of the Roberts Mountains Formation, Snake Mountains, Nevada, and additions to the Silurian sponge fauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby  and
Brian J. Maher
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, and
Brian J. Maher
Affiliation:
ASARCO Inc., 510 East Plumb Lane, Reno, Nevada 89502
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The graptolite, Bohemicograptus bohemicus tenuis (Bouček, 1936), was collected with additional hexactinellid sponges from the Roberts Mountains Formation in the Snake Mountains of Elko County, Nevada, and dates the sponge beds as Ludlovian. To the modest fauna of hexactinellid sponges described by Rigby et al. (1991), can be added the new sponge genera and species Divaricospongia dilata and Fistellaspongia inclinata. The new species, Gabelia intermedia, is intermediate in size between the moderately fine-textured Gabelia pedunculus Rigby and Murphy, 1983, and the large Gabelia giganta Rigby et al. 1991. Additional specimens of Gabelia pedunculus were collected in association with well-preserved specimens of Gabelia fasiculata Rigby et al. 1991, which show additional skeletal and canal details. Associated coarse root tufts and patches of protosponge skeletal mesh were also discovered as part of the new collections and are described here, although not generically nor specifically identifiable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1020 - 1029
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beecher, C. E. 1889. Brachiospongiidae; a memoir on a group of Silurian sponges. Memoir of Yale Peabody Museum, 2(1):28.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1936. Graptolitova fauna ceskeho spodniho ludlowu. Rozpravy II, Tridy Ceskoslovenska Akademie, 46:1–26.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas Region. The siliceous sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 120, article 1, 160 p.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1983. Fossil Hexactinellida, p. 101–115. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs, Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology, 7.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1898. A memoir on the Paleozoic reticulate sponges constituting the Family Dictyospongidae. Memoir New York State Museum, 2, 350 p. (also printed as 1898, New York Geological Survey, 15th Annual Report, 3:743-984).Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1887-1893. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. London, Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London, 1887, Part 1:1-92; 1888, Part 2:93-188; 1893, Part 3:189–254.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H., and Palmer, D. C. 1974. Bohemicograptus, the youngest graptoloid known from the British Silurian sequence, p. 215–236. In Rickards, R. B., Jackson, D. E., and Hughes, C. P. (eds.), Graptolite studies in honour of O. M. B. Bulman. Palaeontological Association, Special Paper 13.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1894. Paleospongiologie. Palaeontographica, 41:233–346.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1958. A monograph of the Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London, Part I:i–xlvi.Google Scholar
Reimann, I. G. 1945. New Middle Devonian octactinellids. Paleontological Contributions, Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences Bulletin, 19(2):16–21.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1966. Protospongia hicksi Hinde from the Middle Cambrian of western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 40:549–554.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1970. Two new Upper Devonian hexactinellid sponges from Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 44:7–16.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1974. Vaurealispongia and Twenhofelella, two new brachiospongioid hexactinellid sponges from the Ordovician and Silurian of Anticosti Island, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 11:1324–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1978. Porifera of the Middle Cambrian Wheeler Shale, from the Wheeler Amphitheater, House Range, in western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 52:705–716.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1983. Sponges of the Middle Cambrian Marjum Limestone from the House Range and Drum Mountains of western Millard County, Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 57:240–270.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Maher, B., and Browne, Q. 1991. New hexactinellids from the Siluro-Devonian of the Snake Mountains, Elko County, Nevada, and a new locality for Gabelia . Journal of Paleontology, 65:709–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Murphy, M. 1983. Gabelia, a new late Devonian lyssakid protosponge from the Roberts Mountains, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 57:797–803.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Schumacher, D., and Meader, S. J. 1979. The genus Ensiferites, a Devonian astraeosponge of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 53:475–493.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. On some new fossils from the Lingula-flags of Wales. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 20:233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Wilhelm Englemann, Leipzig, p. i–iv, 1-88.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. The Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology, 21:1–514.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67(6):261–364.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1877. Studien über fossile Spongien, 1. Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse, 13:1–63.Google Scholar