Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:24:16.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advanced cladid crinoids from the middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: intermediate-grade calyces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Thomas W. Kammer  and
William I. Ausich
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6300, Morgantown 26506-6300
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species of the late Osagean and early Meramecian advanced cladid crinoid genera (suborder Poteriocrinina) Abrotocrinus, Aulocrinus, Cromyocrinus. Decadocrinus, Dinotocrinus, Holcocrinus, Hylodecrinus, Lanecrinus n. gen., Pachylocrinus, Parascytalocrinus n. gen., and Stinocrinus from Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, and Missouri are redescribed and redefined from study of type material and museum collections. Nomenclatural and systematic acts include the following: 1) Abrotocrinus cymosus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, is a valid species and not a synonym of A. coreyi (Meek and Worthen, 1869); 2) A. coreyi is a senior synonym of Poteriocrinus orestes Worthen, 1882; 3) Scaphiocrinus manus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, is assigned to Abrotocrinus; 4) Abrotocrinus granulatus n. sp. is described; 5) S. bellus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, is assigned to Aulocrinus and is a senior synonym of Aulocrinus agassizi Wachsmuth and Springer, 1897; 6) S. orbicularis Hall, 1861a, is assigned to Cromyocrinus; 7) P. latidactylus Worthen, 1882, is assigned to Dinotocrinus; 8) S. gibsoni White, 1878, is assigned to Hylodecrinus with P. nauvooensis Worthen, 1882, questionably placed in synonymy; 9) P. briareus Worthen, 1882, is assigned to Hylodecrinus and is a senior synonym of S. lacunosus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, S. boonvillensis Miller, 1891b, S. constrictus Miller, 1891a, and S. arrosus Miller and Gurley, 1893; 10) S. bonoensis Miller and Gurley, 1890a, is assigned to Hylodecrinus; 11) Hylodecrinus robustus n. sp. is described; 12) P. validus Worthen, 1882, is questionably assigned to Hylodecrinus; 13) Lanecrinus n. gen. is described and the following species are assigned to this new genus: S. halli Hall, 1861 a, S. depressus Meek and Worthen, 1870, P. milleri Wetherby, 1881, P. fountainensis Worthen, 1882, S. repertus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, and Ramulocrinus consectatus Strimple and Watkins, 1969; P. otterensis Worthen, 1882, is questionably assigned to Lanecrinus; 14) Lanecrinus depressus is the senior synonym of P. ulrichi Worthen in Miller, 1889, and S. maniformis Miller, 1892; 15) Lanecrinus repertus is the senior synonym of S. gorbyi Miller, 1891a; 16) P. asper Worthen, 1882, is assigned to Pachylocrinus and is a senior synonym of S. extensus Wachsmuth and Springer, 1886; 17) Parascytalocrinus n. gen. is described and the following species are assigned to this new genus: Poteriocrinus hamiltonensis Worthen, 1882, and Scytalocrinus validus Wachsmuth and Springer, 1897; 18) Poteriocrinites mcadamsi Meek and Worthen, 1873, is questionably placed in synonymy with Parascytalocrinus hamiltonensis; and 19) Poteriocrinus burketi Worthen, 1882, nomen dubium and Zeacrinus dubius Miller and Gurley, 1890a, are placed in Incertae Sedis.

Cromyocrinus orbicularis is the oldest species of its genus extending the range of the genus downward from the Upper to the Lower Mississippian.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 614 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1983. Component concept for the study of paleocommunities with an example from the Early Carboniferous of southern Indiana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 44:251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Lane, N. G. 1980. Platform communities and rocks of the Borden siltstone delta (Mississippian) along the south shore of Monroe Reservoir, Monroe County, Indiana, p. 36–67. In Shaver, R. H. (ed.), Field Trips 1980 from the Indiana University Campus, Bloomington. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Lane, N. G. 1982. Crinoids from the Edwardsville Formation (Lower Mississippian) of southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1343–1361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Lane, N. G. 1985. Crinoid assemblages and geographic endemism in the Lower Mississippian (Carboniferous) of the United States Continental Interior, p. 216–224. In Dutro, J. T. Jr., and Pfefferkorn, H. W. (eds.), Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, Volume 5, Paleontology/Paleoecology/Paleogeography.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1890. British fossil crinoids. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London, Series 6, Volume 5, p. 373–388, 485–486.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatazoa. British Association for the Advancement of Science, Report, 1898:916–923.Google Scholar
Burdick, D. W., and Strimple, H. L. 1982. Genevievian and Chesterian crinoids of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama, Bulletin 121, 277 p.Google Scholar
Chesnut, D. R. Jr., and Ettensohn, F. R. 1988. Hombergian (Chesterian) echinoderm paleontology and paleocecology, south-central Kentucky. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 95(330), 102 p.Google Scholar
Frest, T. J., and Strimple, H. L. 1977. The taxonomic status of Poteriocrinus (Scaphiocrinus) mcadamsi Meek and Worthen, 1873. Journal of Paleontology, 51:860–864.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Report on the Geological Survey of Iowa embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856, 1857. Geological Survey of Iowa, Volume 1, Pts. 1 and 2, 724 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861a. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils, from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Iowa Geological Survey Report of Investigations, Preliminary Notice, Albany, New York, 19 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861b. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 7:261–328.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1872. Photographic plates and explanations of plates. Albany, New York. [Plates are labeled as “New York State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 1” but A. S. Horowitz suggested that these were probably published privately by Hall.] Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 3:1–128.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1984. Crinoids from the New Providence Shale Member of the Borden Formation (Mississippian) in Kentucky and Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 58:115–130.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1987. Aerosol suspension feeding and current velocities: distributional controls for late Osagean crinoids. Paleobiology, 13:379–395.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1992. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: primitive-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 66:461–480.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., Brenckle, P. L., Carter, J. L., and Ausich, W. I. 1990. Redefinition of the Osagean–Meramecian boundary in the Mississippian stratotype region. Palaios, 5:414–431.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1938. Five new genera of Carboniferous Crinoidea Inadunata. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 28:158–172.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1939. Two new genera of Carboniferous inadunate crinoids. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 29:469–473.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1940. Seven new genera of Carboniferous Crinoidea Inadunata. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 30:321–334.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1941a. Four new genera of Mississippian Crinoidea Inadunata. Journal of Paleontology, 15:82–88.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1941b. Dinotocrinus, a new fossil inadunate crinoid genus. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 89:513–518.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1942. Sarocrinus, a new crinoid genus from the Lower Mississippian. Journal of Paleontology, 16:382–386.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1945. Holcocrinus, a new inadunate crinoid genus from the Lower Mississippian. American Journal of Science, 243:517–521.Google Scholar
de Koninck, L. G. 1854. Notice sur un nouveau genre de crinoïdes du terrain carbonifère de l'Angleterre. Académie Royale de Belgique, Class des Sciences, Mémoires 3, supplement, 28:209–217.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de., and Le Hon, H. S. 1854. Recherches sur les crinoïdes du terrain carbonifé de la Belgique. Académie Royale de Belgique, Class des Sciences, Volume 28, Mémoires 3, 217 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1972. Synecology of Middle Mississippian (Carboniferous) crinoid communities in Indiana. 24th International Geological Congress, Comptes Rendues Section, 7:89–94.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleonotology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagian: Indiana). University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 99:1–147.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., Parks, J. M., and Spreng, A. C. 1952. Mississippian crinoid fauna from the Banff Formation, Sunwapta Pass, Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 26:544–575.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Severson, J. L. 1953. New crinoid fauna, Mississippian, Lodgepole Formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 27:505–536.Google Scholar
Lyon, S. S. 1869. Remarks on thirteen new species of Crinoidea from the Paleozoic rocks of Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, and a description of certain peculiarities in the structure of the columns of Dolatocrinus, and their attachment to the body of the animal. American Philosophical Soceity, Transactions, 13:443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1860. Description of new species of Crinoidea and Echinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois, and other western states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, Series 2, 4:379–397.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from the western states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, 22:137–172.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1870. Description of new species and genera of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1870:22–56.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1873. Descriptions of invertebrates from Carboniferous system. Illinois Geological Survey, 5:321–619.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea of Lily-Shaped Animals, with Observation on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites. Bryan and Company, Bristol, England, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, Ohio, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891a. Paleontology. Advance Sheets from the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 17, 103 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1981b. A description of some Lower Carboniferous crinoids from Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey Bulletin 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892. Palaeontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report, 17:611–705.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1894. Palaeontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report, 18:257–333.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890a. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Private publication, 59 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890b. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural History Annual Report, 16:327–373.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1892. North American Geology and Paleontology, First Appendix, p. 665–718, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1893. Description of some new species of invertebrates from the Palaeozoic rocks of Illinois and adjacent states. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 3, 81 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. New genera and species of Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 5, 53 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896a. Description of new and remarkable fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 8, 65 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896b. New species of crinoids from Illinois and other states. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 9, 66 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896c. New species of Echinodermata and a new crustacean from the Palaeozoic rocks. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 10, 91 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of American Special Paper 46, 167 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea, p. 137–209. In Shimer, H. W. and Shrock, R. R. (eds.), Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Strimple, H. L. 1973. Lower Pennsylvanian (Morrowan) crinoids from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 60, Echinodermata, Article 12, 84 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., Strimple, H. L., and Lane, N. G. 1978. Suborder Poteriocrinina, p. T630–T756. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1979. Carboniferous, p. A254–A290. In Robison, R. A. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. A, Introduction. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
SAS User's Guide. 1985. Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 956 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1985. Echinodermata, Chapter 7, p. 153–181. In Murray, J. W. (ed.), Atlas of Invertebrate Macrofossils. John Wiley & Sons, New York and the Palaeontological Association.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1900. On the presence of pores in the ventral sac in fistulate crinoids. American Geologist, 26:133–151.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911. Some new American fossil crinoids. Harvard College, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir, 25:117–161.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. Unusual forms of fossil crinoids. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 67:1–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1961. Late Desmoinesian crinoid faunule from Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 93, 189 p.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1978. Evolutionary trends among Poteriocrinina, p. T298–T301. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., and Watkins, W. T. 1969. Carboniferous crinoids of Texas with stratigraphic implications. Palaeontographica Americana, 6:141–275.Google Scholar
Trautschold, H. 1867. Einige Crinoiden und andere Tierreste des jüngeren Bergkalks im Gouvernement Moskau. Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, Bulletin, Volume 40, Pt. 2, no. 3, 49 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe des Crinoïdes, p. 658–773. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, Volume 3. Masson and Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J. F. 1964. Crawfordsville crinoids, p. 34–136. In Van Sant, J. F. and Lane, N. G., Crawfordsville Crinoid Studies. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Article 7.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1880. Revision of the Palaeocrinidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1879:226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinidae, Pt. 3, sec. 2, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1885:64–226 (140-302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1890. New species of crinoids and blastoids from the Kinderhook group of the Lower Carboniferous rocks at Le Grand, Iowa; and a new genus from the Niagara group of western Tennessee. Illinois Geological Survey, 8(2), Palaeontology of Illinois, section 2:155–208.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir 21–22, 897 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1942–1968. Geological Society of America Memoir 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1977. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1969–1973. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 8, 235 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1981. New crinoids from the Naco Formation (Middle Pennsylvanian) of Arizona and a revision of the family Cromyocrinidae. Journal of Paleontology, 55:1176–1199.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1986. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1974–1980. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 16, 405 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1988. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1981–1985. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 18, 236 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 153, 653 p.Google Scholar
Wetherby, A. G. 1881. Descriptions of crinoids from the Upper Subcarboniferous of Pulaski County, Kentucky. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 3:324–330.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1878. Descriptions of new species of invertebrate fossils from the Carboniferous and Upper Silurian rocks of Illinois and Indiana. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, 30:29–37.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1880. Fossils of the Indiana rocks. Indiana Department of Statistics and Geology, Annual Report, 2:471–522.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1883. Contributions to invertebrate paleontology no. 8: fossils from the Carboniferous rocks of the interior states. U.S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, Annual Report 12, Pt. 1:155–171.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1881. Description of a new species of crinoid from the Burlington Limestone, at Burlington, Iowa. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 1:7–9.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1882. Descriptions of fifty-four new species of crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous limestones and Coal Measures of Illinois and Iowa. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 1 (Article 1):3–38.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1883. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 7:269–322.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1890. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 8:69–154.Google Scholar
Yandell, L. P., and Shumard, B. F. 1847. Contributions to the Geology of Kentucky. Prentice and Weissinger, Louisville, Kentucky, 36 p.Google Scholar
Von Zittel, K. A. 1913. Text-book of Paleontology: Adapted from the German and translated and edited by Eastman, C. R. Second ed., Macmillan and Company, London, 839 p.Google Scholar