Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:50:06.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper Missourian–Lower Wolfcampian (Upper Kasimovian–Lower Asselian) conodont biostratigraphy of the midcontinent, U.S.A.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Scott M. Ritter
Scott M. Ritter*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Upper Missourian to lower Wolfcampian sequence (middle Kansas City through lower Council Grove Groups) of the Midcontinent U.S.A. (Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Missouri) is divided into seven biostratigraphic zones defined chiefly upon first occurrences of Streptognathodus species. In ascending order, these are the: 1) Streptognathodus gracilis Zone; 2) Streptognathodus firmus Zone; 3) Streptognathodus pawhuskaensis deflectus Zone; 4) Streptognathodus virgilicus Zone; 5) Streptognathodus brownvillensis Zone; 6) Streptognathodus wabaunsensis s.l. Zone; and 7) Streptognathodus aff. barskovi Zone. The diagnostic Permian genus Sweetognathus first appears in the lower part of the S. aff. S. barskovi Zone. These zones coincide generally with Upper Carboniferous–Lower Permian conodont zones of Russia. Streptognathodus virgilicus, a new species common in the upper Shawnee and Wabaunsee Groups, is described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1139 - 1154
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baars, D. L., Maples, C. G., Ritter, S. M., and Ross, C. A. 1992. Redefinition of the Pennsylvanian–Permian boundary in Kansas, Midcontinent U.S.A. International Geology Review, 34:1021–1025.Google Scholar
Baesemann, J. F. 1973. Missourian (Upper Pennsylvanian) conodonts of northeastern Kansas. Journal of Paleontology, 47:689–710.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., and Boardman, D. R. Jr. 1989. Stratigraphic distribution of morphotypes of Idiognathodus and Streptognathodus in Missourian–lower Virgilian strata, north-central Texas, p. 167–188. In Boardman, D. R. Jr., Barrick, J. E., Cocke, J., and Nestell, M. K. (eds.), Middle and Late Pennsylvanian chronostratigraphic boundaries in north-central Texas: glacial-eustatic events, biostratigraphy, and paleoecology. Texas Tech University Studies in Geology, 2.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S. 1984. A zonal scale for the Upper Carboniferous Series and the Permian Asselian Stage based on conodonts and problems of its improvement, p. 102–107. In Menner, V. V. and Gregoreva, A. D. (eds.), The Upper Carboniferous of the U.S.S.R. Transactions of the Academy of Science, U.S.S.R. Transactions, 13.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Alekseev, A. S., Kononova, L. I., and Migdisova, A. V. 1987, Atlas of Upper Devonian and Carboniferous conodonts. Moscow University Press, 141 p.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R. Jr., Barrick, J. E., Nestell, M., and Peppers, R. A. 1990. Middle–Upper Pennsylvanian chronostratigraphic boundary in the Midcontinent region of North America, p. 319–337. In Brenckle, P. L. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Intercontinental Correlation and division of the Carboniferous System. Courier Furschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 130.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V. V., and Chuvashov, B. I. 1991. Conodont zones in the Lower Permian, p. A21. In Program and Abstracts: International Congress on the Permian System of the World.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V. V., and Reshetkova, N. P. 1987. Biostratigraphy and conodonts of the Carboniferous and Permian boundary beds of the western slope of the southern and central Urals. Uralian Science Center, Academy of Science, U.S.S.R., p. 1–50.Google Scholar
Chuvashov, B. I. 1990. The Carboniferous–Permian boundary in the U.S.S.R., p. 43–59. In Wardlaw, B. R. (ed.), Working Group on the Carboniferous Permian boundary: Proceedings at the 28th International Geological Congress. United States Geological Survey Open File Report 90-233.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L., Carr, T. R., Behnken, F. H., Wardlaw, B. R., and Collinson, J. W. 1979. Permian conodont biostratigraphy in the Great Basin. In Sandberg, C. A., and Clark, D. L. (eds.), Conodont biostratigraphy of the Great Basin and Rocky Mountains: Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 26:143–149.Google Scholar
Davydov, V. I., Glenister, B. F., Spinosa, C., Ritter, S. M., Chernykh, V. V., Wardlaw, B. R., and Snyder, W. S. 1995. Proposal of Aidaralash as GSSP for the base of the Permian System. Permophiles, 26:1–9.Google Scholar
Ellison, S. E. Jr. 1941. Revision of Pennsylvania conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 15:107–143.Google Scholar
Gunnell, F. H. 1931. Conodonts from the Fort Scott Limestone of Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 26:244–252.Google Scholar
Gunnell, F. H. 1933. Conodonts and fish remains from the Cherokee, Kansas City, and Wabaunsee Groups in Missouri and Kansas. Journal of Paleontology, 7:261–297.Google Scholar
Harris, R. W., and Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science, 25(147):193–204.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1977. Origin of phosphatic black shale facies in Pennsylvanian cyclothems of Midcontinent North America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 61:1045–1068.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1983. Diagenetic model for carbonate rocks in Midcontinent Pennsylvanian eustatic cyclothems. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 53:733–759.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1985. Current view of Midcontinent Pennsylvanian cyclothems, p. 1–22. In Watney, W. L., Kaesler, R. L., and Newell, K. D. (eds.), Recent interpretations of Late Paleozoic cyclothems. Proceedings of the third annual meeting and field conference, Mid-Continent Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H., and Baesemann, J. F. 1975. Environmental interpretation of conodont distribution in Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) megacyclothems in eastern Kansas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 59:486–509.Google Scholar
Kozur, H., and Mostler, H. 1976. Neue Conodonten aus dem Jungpalaozoikum und der Trias. Geologisches-Palaontologisches Mitteilungen Innsbruck, 6:1–33.Google Scholar
Kozitskaya, R. I., Kosenko, Z. A., Lipnygov, O. N., and Nemirovska, T. I. 1978. Conodonts from the Carboniferous of the Donets Basin. Isvestya Nauka Dumka, Kiev, 136 p.Google Scholar
Lane, R. H., Merrill, G. K., Straka, J. J. Jr., and Webster, G. D. 1970. North American Pennsylvanian conodont biostratigraphy. In Sweet, W. C., and Bergstrom, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on conodont biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memoir 127:395–414.Google Scholar
Merriam, D. F. 1989. The Wauneta Limestone, a new member of the Howard Limestone (Wabaunsee Group, Upper Pennsylvanian) in eastern Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 91(1-2):107–112.Google Scholar
Merriam, D. F. 1990. Shanghai Creek Shale Member of the Howard Limestone (Wabaunsee Group, Upper Pennsylvanian) in Easter Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 93 (l-2):60.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. 1973. Pennsylvanian nonplatform conodont genera, I: Spathognathodus . Journal of Paleontology, 47:289–314.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1932. A reclassification of the Pennsylvanian System in the northern Midcontinent region. Kansas Geological Society Guidebook: Sixth Annual Field Conference, p. 79–98.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, B. 1975. Conodonts from the uppermost Wabaunsee Group (Pennsylvanian) and the Admire and Council Grove Groups (Permian) in Kansas. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 9:95–115.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T. 1963. Conodonts from the topmost Tensleep Sandstone of the eastern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 37:401–408.Google Scholar
Ritter, S. M. 1986. Taxonomic revision and phylogeny of post-Early Permian crisis bisselli-whitei Zone conodonts with comments on Late Paleozoic diversity. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 20:139–165.Google Scholar
Ritter, S. M. 1994. New species and subspecies of Streptognathodus (Conodonta) from the Virgilian (Late Carboniferous) of Kansas. Journal of Paleontology, 69:870–877.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1978. Fusulinacean biostratigraphy near the Carboniferous-Permian boundary in North America, p. 535–542. In Neuvieme Congres International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie de Carbonifere, Volume 2, Biostratigraphy. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Stauffer, C. R., and Plummer, H. J. 1932. Texas Pennsylvanian conodonts and their stratigraphic relations. University of Texas Bulletin, 3201:13–50.Google Scholar
Von Bitter, P. H. 1972. Environmental control of conodont distribution in the Shawnee Group (Upper Pennsylvanian) of eastern Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contribution, Article 59, 105 p.Google Scholar
Von Bitter, P. H., and Merrill, G. K. 1990. Effects of variation on the speciation and phylogeny of Diplognathodus . Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 118:105–129.Google Scholar
Zeller, D. E., Jewett, J. M., Bayne, C. K., Goebel, E. D., O'Connor, H. G., and Swineford, A. 1968. The stratigraphic succession of Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin 189, 81 p.Google Scholar