Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:51:56.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two new species of the Cambrian genus Mickwitzia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Mark A. S. McMenamin
Mark A. S. McMenamin*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075-1484
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mickwitziids are a unique group of brachiopods, known exclusively from the Lower Cambrian. Herein are described the new species Mickwitzia lochmana and M. multipunctata; both species are from southwestern North America. Mickwitzia muralensis Walcott, 1913, the largest mickwitziid, is reported here for the first time from the United States. This paper also discusses the distribution of mickwitziids, their shell structure, and the possible functions of mickwitziid punctae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , March 1992 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balińsky, A. 1988. Shell morphology and structure in Lingulipora Girty. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 33:123–133.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1981. Lower Cambrian shelly faunas and biostratigraphy in Scandinavia, p. 22–25. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short Papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 81-743.Google Scholar
Bergström, J., and Ahlberg, P. 1981. Uppermost Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 103:193–214.Google Scholar
Bergström, J., and Gee, D. G. 1985. The Cambrian in Scandinavia, p. 247–271. In Gee, D. G. and Sturt, B. A. (eds.), The Caledonide Orogen–Scandinavia and Related Areas. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Bornemann, J. G. 1891. Die Versteinevungen des cambrischen Schichtensystems der Insel Sardinien, Abtheilung 2. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae Natureae Curiosorum, Bandes 56, No. 3, p. 438–468.Google Scholar
Brunton, H. 1966. Predation and shell damage in a Viséan brachiopod fauna. Palaeontology, 9:355–359.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Menge, Chen. 1990. Tommotiids from the Lower Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 64:169–184.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., Arellano, A. R. V., Johnson, J. H., Okulitch, V. J., Stoyanow, A., and Lochman, C. 1952. Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology near Caborca, northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 119:1–184.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., Arellano, A. R. V., Johnson, J. H., Okulitch, V. J., Stoyanow, A., and Lochman, C. 1956. Geología y palentología del la región de Caborca, norponiente de Sonora. Congreso Geológico Internacional XX Sesión, México 1956, 1:1–260.Google Scholar
Curry, G. B. 1983a. Microborings in Recent brachiopods and the functions of caeca. Lethaia, 16:119–127.Google Scholar
Curry, G. B. 1983b. Brachiopod caeca—a respiratory role? Lethaia, 16:311–312.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1975. Broad correlations of some Lower and Middle Cambrian strata in the North American Cordillera. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 75-1, A:533–540.Google Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu. 1969. Bezzamkovye brakhiopody kembriiskikh i ordovikskikh otlozhenii severo-zapada Russkoi Platformy. Ministerstvo Geologii RSFSR, Severo-Zapadnoe Territorial'noe Geologicheskoe Upravlenie, Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaemym Severo-Zapada RSFSR, Izdatel'stvo “Nedra,” Leningradskoe otdelenie, 6:1–173.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1892. Natural History of New York. Paleontology. Vol. 8. An Introduction to the Study of the Genera of Palæozoic Brachiopoda. Pt. I. Charles Van Benthuysen and Sons, Albany, New York, 367 p.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1979. Morphological strategies of sessile organisms, p. 499–555. In Larwood, G. and Rosen, B. R. (eds.), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Academic Press Inc., London.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 1990. Predation by Early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms—evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone. Lethaia, 23:29–42.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Nowlan, G. S., and Fletcher, T. P. 1980. A microfauna associated with Early Cambrian trilobites of the Callavia Zone, northern Antigonish Highlands, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 17:400–418.Google Scholar
Lehtovaara, J. J., and Tynni, R. 1983. Fossiliferous boulders of Lower Cambrian phosphoritic sandstone in southwestern Finland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland, 55:85–99.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1869. On some fossils found in the Eophyton sandstone at Lugnås in Sweden. Geological Magazine, 6:393–406. [Translated from Linnarsson, J. G. O., 1869, Om några försteningar från Vestergötlands sandstenslager. Öfversigt af Konglig Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, 26(3):337–357.]Google Scholar
Matthews, S. C., and Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1975. Small shelly fossils of late Precambrian and Early Cambrian age: a review of recent work. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 131:289–304.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1984. Paleontology and stratigraphy of Lower Cambrian and Upper Proterozoic sediments, Caborca Region, Northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 218 p.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1986. The Garden of Ediacara. Palaios, 1:178–182.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1987a. Lower Cambrian trilobites, zonation and correlation of the Puerto Blanco Formation, Sonora, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 61:738–749.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1987b. The emergence of animals. Scientific American, 256:94–102.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1988a. Lower Cambrian mickwitziid brachiopods, p. 13. In Landing, E. (ed.), The Canadian Paleontology and Biostratigraphy Seminar—Proceedings of Meeting. New York State Museum Bulletin 463.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1988b. Paleoecological feedback and the Vendian–Cambrian transition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3:205–208.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S., and McMenamin, D. L. S. 1990. The Emergence of Animals: The Cambrian Breakthrough. Columbia University Press, New York, 217 p.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S., Pittenger, S. L., Carson, M. R., and Larrabee, E. M. In press. Upper Precambrian–Cambrian faunal sequence, Sonora, Mexico plus Lower Cambrian fossils from New Jersey, United States. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Paleontology and Stratigraphy in Honor of Donald W. Fisher, Festschrift. New York State Museum Bulletin 481.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H., and Sundberg, F. A. 1984. Boring Late Cambrian organisms. Lethaia, 17:185–190.Google Scholar
Moczydłowska, M., and Vidal, G. 1988. How old is the Tommotian? Geology, 16:166–168.Google Scholar
Mount, J. D. 1976. Early Cambrian faunas from eastern San Bernardino County, California. Bulletin of the Southern California Paleontological Society, 8:173–182.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S., Narbonne, G. M., and Fritz, W. H. 1985. Small shelly fossils and trace fossils near the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Lethaia, 18:233–256.Google Scholar
Onken, B. R., and Signor, P. W. 1988. Lower Cambrian stratigraphic paleontology of the southwestern Great Basin (White-Inyo Mountains of eastern California and Esmeralda County, Nevada). Bulletin of the Southern California Paleontological Society, 20:131–150.Google Scholar
Owen, G., and Williams, A. 1969. The caecum of articulate Brachiopoda. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B172:187–201.Google Scholar
Popov, L. E., and Ushatinskaya, G. T. 1986. O vtorichnykh izmeneniyakh mikrostruktury fosfatno-kal'tievykh rakovin bezzamkovyk brakiopod. Izvestiya, Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologicheskaya, 10:135–137.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J. 1965. Inarticulata, p. H260–H296. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda 1. Geological Survey of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J. 1977. Early Cambrian brachiopods from the southwestern Great Basin of California and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 51:68–85.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. M., and Carlson, S. J. 1983. Westgardia gigantea, a new Lower Cambrian fossil from eastern California. Journal of Paleontology, 57:1317–1320.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1965. Sensory spines in the Jurassic brachiopod Acanthothiris . Palaeontology, 8:604–617.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1888. Über eine neuentdeckte untercambrische Fauna in Estland. Mémoires de l'academie imperial des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg, Série 7, 36:1–27.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., Mount, J. F., and Onken, B. R. 1987. A pre-trilobite shelly fauna from the White-Inyo region of eastern California and western Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 61:425–438.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. H., McMenamin, M. A. S., and Morales, J. M.-Ramirez. 1984. Upper Proterozoic and Cambrian rocks in the Caborca Region, Sonora, Mexico—physical stratigraphy, biostratigraphy, paleocurrent studies, and regional relations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1309:1–36.Google Scholar
Stolzenburg, W. 1990. When life got hard. Science News, 138:120–123.Google Scholar
Tynni, R. 1982. New results of studies on the fossils in the Lower Cambrian sediment deposit of the Söderfjärden Basin. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland, 54:57–68.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Classification and terminology of the Cambrian Brachiopoda. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 53:139–165.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. U.S. Geological Survey, Monographs, 51(1):1–872 and 51(2):1–363.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1913. New Lower Cambrian subfauna. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57:309–316.Google Scholar
Wiman, C. 1902. 2. Studien über das Nordbaltische Silurgebiet. I. Olenellussandstein, Obolussandstein und Ceratopygeschiefer. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Upsala, 6(1):12–76.Google Scholar