Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:59:54.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A sclerotized retiolitid, and its bearing on the origin and evolution of Silurian retiolitid graptolites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Alfred C. Lenz*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada

Abstract

The recovery of fully sclerotized specimens of the retiolitid Agastograptus robustus Obut and Zaslavskaya permits the recognition of the relationship between the sicula and thecae 11 and 12 for the first time, and demonstrates unequivocally that the ancora sleeve (the “clathria” of earlier literature) is not homologous with the outer wall of normal diplograptaceans, but is a structure unique to Silurian retiolitids. The study supports earlier proposals that Silurian retiolitids arose, cladogenetically, from Pattern I, ancorate diplograptaceans by distal extension of the ancora/corona, to form the ancora sleeve, but further suggests that the sclerotization of the original diplograptacean outer wall (corresponding to the inner wall of the retiolitid of this study) was suppressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, D. E. B. 1990. Retiolite nomenclature and relationships. Journal of the Geological Society, 147:717723.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B., and Kirk, N. H. 1978. Contrasting modes of construction of retiolite-type rhabdosomes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 23:427448.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B., and Kirk, N. H. 1984. Autoecology of Silurian graptolites. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 32:121139.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B., and Kirk, N. H. 1992. The ultrastructure, mode of construction and functioning of a number of Llandovery ancorate diplograptid and retiolitid graptolites. Modern Geology, 17, 270 p.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B., Kirk, N. H., Zhao, Y., and Loydell, D. 1988. Ultrastructural studies on graptolites using scanning electron microscope. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 27:527543.Google Scholar
Bouček, B., and Münch, A. 1943. Die Retiolitien des mitteleuropäischen Llandovery und unteren Wenlock. Mitteilungen der tschechischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 53, 41:153.Google Scholar
Bouček, B., and Münch, A. 1952. Retioliti středoevropského svrchního wenlocku a ludlowu. Sborník ústředního ústavu geologického, oddíl paleontologický, 19:7151.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1970. Graptolithina with sections on Enteropneusta and Pterobranchia. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. 5. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence, 163 p.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1873. On an improved classification of the Rhabdophora. Geological Magazine, 10:500504, 555–560.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1993a. Late Wenlock and Ludlow (Silurian) Plectograptinae (retiolitid graptolites), Cape Phillips Formation, Arctic Canada. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 104:152.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1993b. Late Wenlock–Ludlow (Silurian) graptolite extinction, evolution and biostratigraphy: perspectives from Arctic Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30:491498.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1994. Uppermost Wenlock and lower Ludlow plectograptine graptolites, Arctic Islands, Canada: new isolated material. Journal of Paleontology, 68:851860.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Melchin, M. J. 1987a. Silurian retiolitids from the Cape Phillips Formation, Arctic Islands, Canada. Journal of the Geological Society of Denmark, 35:161170.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Melchin, M. J. 1987b. Peridermal and interthecal tissue in Silurian retiolitid graptolites: with examples from Sweden and Arctic Canada. Lethaia, 20:353359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchin, M. J.In press. Morphology and phylogenetic classification of some Early Silurian diplograptid genera from Cornwallis Island, Arctic Canada. Palaeontology.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. E. 1987. Evolution and phylogenetic classification of the Diplograptacea. Palaeontology, 30:353405.Google Scholar
Obut, A. M., and Zaslavskaya, N. M. 1983. Semeystva retiolitid i ikh filogeneticheskie otnosheniya, p. 103113. In Dagys, A. S. and Dubatolov, V. N. (eds.), Morfologiya i sistematika bespozvonochnykh fanerozoa. Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Sibirskoe otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki. Izdatel'stvo “Nauk,” Moscow.Google Scholar
Obut, A. M., and Zaslavskaya, N. M. 1986. Families of the Retiolitida and their phylogenetic relations, p. 207219. In Hughes, C. P. and Rickards, R. B. (eds.), Palaeoecology and Biostratigraphy of Graptolites. Geological Society Special Publication No. 20.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B., and Koren, T. N. 1974. Virgellar meshworks and sicular spinosity in Llandovery graptoloids. Geological Magazine, 111:193204.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B., Hutt, J. E., and Berry, W. B. N. 1977. Evolution of the Silurian and Devonian graptoloids. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 28:1120.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. 1986. A critique of graptolite classification, and a revision of the suborders Diplograptina and Monograptina, p. 112. In Hughes, C. P. and Rickards, R. B. (eds.), Palaeoecology and Biostratigraphy of Graptolites. Geological Society Special Publication No. 20.Google Scholar