Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:42:17.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The problem of vast numbers of cladodont shark denticles in the Pennsylvanian Excello Shale of Pike County, Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Rainer Zangerl
Rainer Zangerl*
Affiliation:
Curator Emeritus, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road and Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While studying X-ray films of new iniopterygians (Subterbranchialia, Chondrichthyes) in the Excello Shale from the Field Museum of Natural History's Bethel Quarry locality in southern Pike County, Indiana, a moderately dense spread of tiny cladodont shark denticles was noticed on the radiographs, confined to micro-horizons of shale about 7.5 mm thick, which also contained the iniopterygians.

These denticle spreads, which are entirely unrelated to the iniopterygians, but are seen on X-ray films of most of the chondrichthyan skeletons collected from a sheet of Excello Shale of about 500 m2 in extent, and mostly from two very fossiliferous levels, have an average density of about nine denticles per 1 cm2. Because the chondrichthyan skeletons were collected from all parts of the quarry, it is probable that the denticle spreads in several micro-horizons extended over the entire quarry area and perhaps beyond. The number of denticles in each of the micro-horizons in 500 m2 of shale thus amounts to about 4.6 million.

A discussion of the origin of these vast numbers of cladodont denticles, given a variety of taphonomic and depositional constraints, results in the conclusion that these large numbers of denticles could not have resulted from the two species of sharks, Denaea meccaensis and Stethacanthulus longipeniculus, that are members of the burial assemblage and bear dentition teeth indistinguishable from those in the areal spread. Evidence suggesting very rapid deposition of organic muds that produced the characteristic Mecca Quarry type carbonaceous, sheety shales rules out the possibility of accumulation of the denticle spreads over extended periods of time. Because sharks do not possess nearly enough dentition teeth to account for this occurrence, one must entertain the possibility that the denticles are not all dentition teeth, but perhaps for the most part mucous membrane (or even dermal) denticles, though none such are presently known to display cladodont design.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , May 1995 , pp. 556 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gross, W. 1973. Kleinschuppen, Flossenstacheln und Zähne von Fischen aus Europäischen und Nordamerikanischen Bonebeds des Devons. Palaeontographica, Abt. A, 142:51–155.Google Scholar
Hall, H. 1992. “Diver's Hot Spots” by Susan Milius. International Wildlife, 22(2):56–57.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Weldon, L. W., and Blackburn, R. D. 1969. Aquatic Weeds. Science, 166(3906):699–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, J. S. 1875. Description of fossil fishes. Geological Survey of Ohio, 2(2):1–64.Google Scholar
Peyer, B. 1968. Comparative Odontology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 347 p.Google Scholar
St. John, O., and Worthen, A. H. 1875. Description of fossil fishes. Geological Survey of Illinois, 6:245–488.Google Scholar
Williams, M. E. 1985. The “cladodont level” sharks of the Pennsylvanian black shales of central North America. Paleontographica, Abt. A, 190:83–158.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1966. A new shark of the family Edestidae, Ornithoprion hertwigi, from the Pennsylvanian Mecca and Logan Quarry shales of Indiana. Fieldiana: Geology, 16(1):1–43.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1981. Chondrichthyes I, Paleozoic Elasmobranchii, Volume 3A. In Schultze, H.-P. (ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 115 p.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1990. Two new stethacanthid sharks (Stethacanthidae, Symmoriida) from the Pennsylvanian of Indiana, U.S.A. Palaeontographica, Abt. A, 213:115–141.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. Fieldiana: Geology Memoirs, 4, 352 p.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Case, G. R. 1973. Iniopterygia, a new order of chondrichthyan fishes from the Pennsylvanian of North America. Fieldiana: Geology Memoirs, 6, 69 p.Google Scholar