Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:52:21.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ordovician (Whiterock) calymenid and encrinurid trilobites from the Precordillera of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Gregory D. Edgecombe ,
Brian D. E. Chatterton ,
Beatriz G. Waisfeld  and
Norberto E. Vaccari
Gregory D. Edgecombe
Affiliation:
Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney South, NSW 2000, Australia
Brian D. E. Chatterton
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
Beatriz G. Waisfeld
Affiliation:
CONICET, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida ángel Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Norberto E. Vaccari
Affiliation:
CONICET, Cátedra de Estratigrafía y Geología Histórica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Avenida Vélez Sársfield 299,C.C. 395, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phacopida from upper Whiterock (Lower Caradoc) horizons in the Las Aguaditas Formation of San Juan Province, Argentina, include the calymenid Platycalymene trapezoidalis (Baldis and Pöthe, 1995) and the encrinurids Frencrinuroides edseli new species, Lasaguaditas oweni new genus and species, and Walencrinuroides? new species A. Sulcocalymene Baldis and Pöthe, 1995, a purported subgenus of Flexicalymene, is a junior subjective synonym of Platycalymene Shirley, 1936. Platycalymene is now known from Avalonia, Baltica, Laurentia (Scotland), and the Precordillera. Emending the cladistic analysis of Ordovician Encrinurinae by Lespérance and Desbiens (1995), the monophyly and membership of Frencrinuroides and Walencrinuroides are ambiguous. Frencrinuroides edseli is closely related to species from eastern Laurentia. Lasaguaditas new genus is superficially cybelinid-like in some respects but shares several derived characters with the Encrinurinae. All three encrinurinid species in the Las Aguaditas Formation possess two instars in the protaspid period, a general pattern in Ordovician encrinurinid ontogeny.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , July 1998 , pp. 678 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica. I: Crustacea formationis transitionis. Fascicule, 2:21–92.Google Scholar
Astini, R. A. 1995. Sedimentología de la Formación Las Aguaditas (talud carbonático) y evolución de la cuenca precordillera durante el Ordovícico medio. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 50:143–164.Google Scholar
Astini, R. A., Benedetto, J. L., and Carrera, M. 1986. La fauna de trilobites de la Formación Las Plantas (Ordovícico Tardio), Precordillera de La Rioja, Argentina. Actas IV Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, 1:81–88.Google Scholar
Baldis, B. A., and Blasco, G. 1975. Trilobites ordovícicos de la comarca de Jáchal, Precordillera Argentina. I. Telephinidae. Ameghiniana, 11:71–87.Google Scholar
Baldis, B. A., and Pöthe de Baldis, E. D. 1995. Trilobites ordovícicos de la Formation Las Aguaditas (San Juan, Argentina) y consideraciones estratigráficas. Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba, 60:409–448.Google Scholar
Baldis, B. A., Shergold, J. H., and Peralta, S. H. 1995. New Llanvirnian trilobites and graptolites from the Las Aguaditas Formation, Argentine Precordillera. Actas VI Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, 31–38.Google Scholar
Brussa, E. D. 1994. Los graptofaunas del sector central de la Precordillera Occidental sanjuanina. , Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 323 p.Google Scholar
Brussa, E. D. 1996. Las graptofaunas ordovícicas de la Formación Las Aguaditas, Precordillera de San Juan. Parte I: Familias Thamnograptidae, Dichograptidae, Abrograptidae y Glossograptidae. Ameghiniana, 33:421–434.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic studies of Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica (A), 171:1–74.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1997. Ontogeny and relationships of the Ordovician odontopleurid trilobite Ceratocara, with new species from Argentina and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 71:108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., Waisfeld, B. G., and Vaccari, N. E. 1998. Ontogeny and systematics of Toernquistiidae (Trilobita, Proetida) from the Ordovician of the Argentine Precordillera. Journal of Paleontology, 72:273–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Ludvigsen, R. 1976. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites from the South Nahanni River area, District of Mackenzie, Canada. Palaeontographica (A), 154:1–106.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Siveter, D. J., Edgecombe, G. D., and Hunt, A. S. 1990. Larvae and relationships of the Calymenina (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 64:255–277.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1990. Systematics of Encrinuroides and Curriella (Trilobita), with a new Early Silurian encrinurine from the Mackenzie Mountains. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27:820–833.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1992. Early Silurian (Llandovery) encrinurine trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 66:52–74.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Chatterton, B. D. E., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1997. Ontogeny of the proetoid trilobite Stenoblepharum and relationships of a new species from the Upper Ordovician of Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 71:419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Speyer, S. E., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Protaspid larvae and phylogenetics of encrinurid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 62:779–799.Google Scholar
Evitt, W. R., and Tripp, R. P. 1977. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites from the families Encrinuridae and Staurocephalidae. Palaeontographica (A), 157:109–174.Google Scholar
Frederickson, E. A. 1964. Two Ordovician trilobites from southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 24:71–75.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., and Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician Trilobites of Argentina. Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Special Publication, 276 p.Google Scholar
Hicks, H. 1873. On the succession of the ancient rocks in the vicinity of St. David's Pembrokeshire, with special reference to those of Arenig and Llandeilo groups, and their fossil contents. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 31:167–195.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1969. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, Central Wales. Pt. I. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History): Geology, 18:42–103.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. K., and Tripp, R. P. 1991. The trilobite fauna of the Middle Ordovician Doularg Formation of the Girvan district, Scotland, and its palaeoenvironmental significance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:27–54.Google Scholar
Krueger, H.-H. 1971. Encrinuriden aus ordovizischen Geschieben (Teil I). Geologie, 20:1132–1169.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J., and Desbiens, S. 1995. Selected Ordovician trilobites from the Lake St. John District of Quebec and their bearing on systematics. Paleontological Society Memoir 42 (Journal of Paleontology, 69[4]Supplement), 19 p.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H. 1840. Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés, Comprenant l'Anatomie, la Physiologie et la Classification de ces Animaux, 3. Roret, Paris, 638 p.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1839. The Silurian System. John Murray, London, 786 p.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W. and Heath, R. A. 1989. A revision of the Upper Ordovician trilobite genus Erratencrinurus with a description of a new species from Hadeland. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 69:225–233.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1931. The Lower Palaeozoic trilobites of Girvan. Supplement No. 2. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 1–30.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian formations. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 1–80.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1865. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian formations. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 81–128.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. 1974. Simpson Group (Middle Ordovician) Trilobites of Oklahoma. Paleontological Society Memoir 6 (Journal of Paleontology, 48[5]Supplement), 54 p.Google Scholar
Shirley, J. 1936. Some British trilobites of the family Calymenidae. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 92:293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siveter, D. J. 1977. The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo Region, Norway, 27. Trilobites of the family Calymenidae. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 56:335–396.Google Scholar
Siveter, D. J. 1979. Metacalymene Kegel, 1927, a calymenid trilobite from the Kopanina Formation (Silurian) of Bohemia. Journal of Paleontology, 53:367–379.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a revised classification of trilobites. Geological Magazine, 2:487–496, 538-545.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1. Program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
Tremblay, J. V., and Westrop, S. R. 1991. Middle Ordovician (Whiterockian) trilobites from the Sunblood Formation, District of Mackenzie, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 65:801–824.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1967. Trilobites from the Upper Stinchar Limestone (Ordovician) of the Girvan District, Ayrshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 67:43–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1974. New encrinurid trilobites from the Galena Formation (Ordovician) of Wisconsin and Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 48:484–488.Google Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1882. Skånes graptoliter. I. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning (C), 50:1–44.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1877. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Chazy and Trenton limestones. Annual Report on the New York State Museum of Natural History by the Regents of the University of the State of New York, 31:68–71.Google Scholar