Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:48:31.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Old World Tethyan occurrences of Lyrischapa (Gastropoda; Volutidae) and biogeographic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Charles R. Givens*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310

Abstract

Lyrischapa Aldrich (1911), originally described from the Eocene of North America, is represented in the Old World Tethyan paleobiotic province by three species that previously have been referred to other genera: L. haimei (d'Archiac), from the late Paleocene or early Eocene upper Ranikot Formation of Pakistan; L. sismondai (d'Archiac), from the upper Ranikot Formation and the late Paleocene Hangu Shales of Pakistan; and L. soudanense (Douvillé), from the late Paleocene Kalambaina Formation in the Republic of Niger. A fourth unnamed species of Lyrischapa may be represented by an internal mold from the middle Eocene Khirtar Formation of Pakistan. Lyrischapa probably originated within the ancient Tethys seaway between Eurasia and the Gondwana continents of Africa and southern India because its oldest known occurrence (late Paleocene) and closest relatives (Indovoluta Eames, 1952; Gosavia Stoliczka, 1865, 1868; possibly also Diconomorpha Wenz, 1943) are in that region. It has no apparent ancestor among described American Paleogene or Cretaceous Volutidae. Because its large protoconch suggests that it lacked a teleplanic larval stage, the trans-Atlantic migration of Lyrischapa to the New World probably resulted from chance dispersal, either by rafting of egg masses attached to floating plant debris or by drift of floating egg capsules.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbass, H. L. 1967. A monograph on the Egyptian Paleocene and Eocene gastropods. Geological Museum, Cairo, Monograph No. 4, 154 p.Google Scholar
Adegoke, O. S. 1972. Tethyan affinities of West African Paleogene Mollusca. International Geological Congress, 24th Session, Section 7, Paleontology:441449.Google Scholar
Adegoke, O. S. 1977. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Ewekoro Formation (Paleocene) of southwestern Nigeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 71(295):1379.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1911. New Eocene fossils from the southern Gulf States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 5(22):124.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1835. Fossil shells of the Tertiary formations of North America, illustrated by figures drawn on stone by T. A. Conrad. Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 2956. Privately published, Philadelphia. [Reprinted in 1893 by G. D. Harris, Washington; and in 1963 by the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York.]Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1896. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Vol. 2. Privately published, Paris, 179 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M., and Pissarro, G. 1909. The Mollusca of the Ranikot Series. Part 1. Cephalopoda and Gastropoda. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, Vol. 3, Memoir 1, 83 p.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1930. The fossil fauna of the Samana Range and some neighbouring areas. Part 8. The Mollusca of the Hangu Shales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, 15:129222.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau Elementaire d'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. Privately published, Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1890. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida. Wagner Free Institute of Science, Transactions, Vol. 3, Pt. 1, 200 p.Google Scholar
d'Archiac de Saint-Simon, E. J. A. 1850. Histoire des progrès de la Geologie, Vol. 3. Privately published, Paris.Google Scholar
d'Archiac de Saint-Simon, E. J. A., and Haime, J. 1853–1854. Description des animaux fossiles du Groupe Nummulitique de L'Inde. 2 vols. Privately published, Paris, 373 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1934. Tertiary Faunas. Volume I: The Composition of Tertiary Faunas. Thomas Murby and Co., London, 406 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1971. Tertiary Faunas. Volume I: The Composition of Teritary Faunas. Revised and updated by F. E. Eames. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, 571 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1920. L'Eocène au Soudan et au Sénégal. Bulletin du Comite d'études historiques et scientifiques de l'Afrique Occidentale francaise, p. 113170.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1929. Les couches à Cardita beaumonti dans le Sind. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, Vol. 10, Memoir 3:2773.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1952. A contribution to the study of the Eocene in western Pakistan and western India: C. The description of the Scaphopoda and Gastropoda from standard sections in the Rakhi Nala and Zinda Pir areas of the western Punjab and in the Kohat District. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 236(631):1168.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1956. Indovoluta, a new Eocene volutid genus. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 32:109110.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1967. Cretaceous and Tertiary surface currents of the oceans. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Reviews for 1967, 5:317341.Google Scholar
Furon, R. 1948. Paleontologie, p. 95114. In Furon, R. and Kouriatchy, N., La faune eocène du Togo. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, Mémoires, New Series, 27(4).Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A., and Bowles, E. O. 1934. Early Tertiary species of gastropods from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Washington Academy of Sciences Journal, 24:241248.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1979. The gastropod genus Volutocristata Gardner and Bowles (Eocene; California, Mexico): a synonym of Lyrischapa Aldrich (Eocene; Gulf Coast). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 15:117128.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyms and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129219.Google Scholar
Greigert, J., and Pougnet, R. 1967. Essai de description des formations géologiques de la République du Niger. Mémoires du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Miniéres, No. 48, 228 p.Google Scholar
Hanna, M. A. 1927. An Eocene invertebrate fauna from the La Jolla quandrangle, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 16:247398.Google Scholar
Haq, B. U. 1981. Paleogene paleoceanography: early Cenozoic oceans revisited. Oceanologica Acta, Proceedings 26th International Geological Congress, Geology of Oceans Symposium, Paris, 1980:7182.Google Scholar
Hassan, P. F. 1985. New observations on the biostratigraphy of the Saudi Arabian Umm er Radhuma Formation (Paleocene) and its correlation with neighboring regions. Micropaleontology, 31:335364.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Lutz, R. A. 1980. Molluscan larval shell morphology: ecological and paleontological applications, p. 323377. In Rhoads, D. C. and Lutz, R. A. (eds.), Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, Editio decima reformata, Regnum animale, Volume 1, Holmiae. 824 p.Google Scholar
Marche-Marchad, I. 1968. Remarques sur le dévelopement chez les Cymba (Prosobranches Volutidés) et l'hypothese de leur origine sudaméricaine. Bulletin de L'Institute Fondamental D'Afrique Noire, Serie A, Sciences Naturelles, 30:10281037.Google Scholar
Mayer-Eymar, K. 1895. Descriptions des coquilles fossiles de terrains tertiaires inferieurs. Journal de Conchyliologie, 43:4054.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda, and dibranchiate Cephalopoda of the southern United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 7(32), Pts. 1 and 2, 730 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. D., and Forsyth, D. 1972. Plate tectonics, paleomagnetism, and the opening of the Atlantic. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83:15791600.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., and Olsson, A. A. 1954. Systems of the Volutidae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 35(152):136.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature; ou, Tableau de l'Universe et des Corps Organisés. Privately published, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1966a. A note on Paleocene Nautiloids from Nigeria. Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources, 10:4755.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1966b. Studies on Nigerian Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary Ostracoda. Part 3: Stratigraphical, paleoecological, and biometrical conclusions. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, Vol. 14, 151 p.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G., and Palmer, K. V. W. 1953. Eocene mollusks from Citrus and Levy Counties, Florida. Florida Geological Survey, Geological Bulletin No. 35, 95 p.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. 1974 [1976]. Marine prosobranch gastropods: larval studies and systematics. Thalassia Jugoslavica, 10:213238.Google Scholar
Rovereto, G. 1899. Prima ricerche sinonimiche sui generi dei Gastropodi. Atti della Societa Ligustica di Scienze naturali e Geographiche, 10:101110.Google Scholar
Scheltema, R. S. 1968. Dispersal of larvae by equatorial ocean currents and its importance to the zoogeography of shoal-water tropical species. Nature, 217:11591162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R. S. 1971. The dispersal of larvae of shoal-water benthic invertebrate species over long distances by ocean currents, p. 728. In Crisp, D. J. (ed.), Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scheltema, R. S. 1977. Dispersal of marine invertebrate organisms: paleobiogeographic and biostratigraphic implications, p. 73108. In Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J. E. (eds.), Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Shuto, T. 1974. Larval ecology of prosobranch gastropods and its bearing on biogeography and paleontology. Lethaia, 7:239256.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1825. A catalogue of the shells contained in the Collection of the Late Earl of Tankerville, arranged according to the Lamarckian conchological System; together with an Appendix containing descriptions of many new species. Privately published, London, 92 p., plus appendix.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1987. Eocene molluscan paleontology of the Whitaker Peak area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum Contributions in Science, 388, 93 p.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1865. Eine revision der Gastropoden der Gosauschichten in den Ostalpen. Sitzungsberichte k. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Math.–nat. Cl., 52:104223.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1868. Cretaceous fauna of southern India. Volume 2. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, Series V, 498 p.Google Scholar
Thorson, G. 1961. Length of pelagic larval life in marine bottom invertebrates as related to larval transport by ocean currents, p. 455474. In Sears, M. (ed.), Oceanography. Publication 67. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Vredenburg, E. W. 1923. Indian Tertiary Gastropoda, IV. Olividae, Harpidae, Marginellidae, Volutidae and Mitridae, with comparative diagnoses of new species. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 54:243276.Google Scholar
Vredenburg, E. W. 1929. A supplement to the Mollusca of the Ranikot Series. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, Vol. 10, Memoir 4, 75 p.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. S., and du Pont, J. E. 1970. Living Volutes. A Monograph of the Recent Volutidae of the World. Delaware Museum of Natural History, Monograph Series No. 1, 395 p.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Palaozoologie, Band 6. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1639 p.Google Scholar
Zekeli, L. F. 1852. Die Gasteropoden des Gosaugebilde in den Nordostlichen Alpen. Abhandlugen geologische Reichsanstalt, 1(2):1124.Google Scholar