Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:13:00.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

North American biogeography and taxonomy of Cryptolithus (Trilobita, Ordovician)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Frederick C. Shaw  and
Pierre J. Lespérance
Frederick C. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, Lehman College of The City, University of New York, Bronx, 10468
Pierre J. Lespérance
Affiliation:
Département de géologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal H3C 3J7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Museum and field restudy of Cryptolithus from all known geographic and stratigraphic occurrences in eastern North America shows that the principal variable character in this genus is the number of fringe pit arcs. Because this character varies within populations and even single individuals, it cannot be used to distinguish the earlier, typologically defined species of the genus. Instead, a neotype is designated here for the type species, Cryptolithus tessellatus Green, 1832, and morph designations are used for all pit arc variants. Over the time span considered, the species increased the number of pit arcs, but the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms responsible cannot be identified with certainty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , July 1994 , pp. 808 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1854. Paleontologica Scandinavica. Academiae Regiae Scientarium Suecanae, Pars 11:21–92.Google Scholar
Arens, N. C., and Cuffey, R. J. 1989. Bryozoan fauna of the Coburn and Salona Limestones (Middle Ordovician) of central Pennsylvania. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science, 63:113–121.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., and Speyer, S. E. 1987. Enrolled trilobites from the Alden Pyrite Bed, Ledyard Shale (Middle Devonian) of western New York. Journal of Paleontology, 61:539–548.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R., Norford, B. S., and Skevington, D. 1981. The Ordovician System in Canada. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 8, 27 p.Google Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1895. Structure and appendages of Trinucleus. American Journal of Science (3), 49:307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belt, E. S., Riva, J., and Bussieres, L. 1979. Revision and correlation of late Middle Ordovician stratigraphy northeast of Québec City. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 16:1467–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, J. 1971. Appendage morphology of the trilobite Cryptolithus and its implications. Lethaia, 5:85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M. 1971. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Europe and eastern North America, p. 83–157. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America, Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M., and Mitchell, C. E. 1986. The graptolite correlation of the North American Upper Ordovician standard. Lethaia, 19:247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M., and Mitchell, C. E. 1990. Trans-Pacific graptolite faunal relations: the biostratigraphic position of the base of the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in the standard Australian graptolite zone succession. Journal of Paleontology, 64:992–997.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M., and Mitchell, C. E. In press. Regional relationships between late and Middle and early Late Ordovician standard successions in New York–Quebec and the Cincinnati region in Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Paleontology and Stratigraphy in Honor of D. W. Fisher. New York State Museum Bulletin, 481.Google Scholar
Bertrand, R., and Lespérance, P. 1971. Biométrie de deux ‘espèces’ de Cryptolithus (Trilobita) (Caradocien du Québec et du Vermont), p. 27–41. In Colloque Ordovicien–Silurien. Bureau de Researches Géologiques et Minières Mémoire 73.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. 1970. Late Ordovician benthic marine communities in north-central New York. New York State Museum, Bulletin 414, 34 p.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Speyer, S. E. 1990. Taphofacies, p. 258–263. In Briggs, D. E. G. and Crowther, P. R. (eds.), Paleobiology—A Synthesis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Breztnski, D. K. 1986. An opportunistic Upper Ordovician trilobite assemblage from Missouri. Lethaia, 19:315–325.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1975. The functional morphology of Cryptolithus , p. 65–86. In Martinsson, A. (ed.), Evolution and morphology of the Trilobita, Trilobitoidea and Merostomata. Fossils and Strata 4, Universitetsforlaget Oslo.Google Scholar
Čech, S. 1975. Cranidial reticulation and functional morphology of the cephalic fringe in Trinucleidae. Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického, 50:173–177.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic studies of Middle Ordovician trilobites from Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica, Abt. A, Band 171, 74 p.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1973. Beecher's trilobite bed revisited: ecology of an Ordovician deepwater fauna. Postilla, 160, 25 p.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L., Chandlee, G. O., Rabe, B. D., and Cohen, J. A. 1982. Clinal variation, episodic evolution, and possible parapatric speciation: the trilobite Flexicalymene senaria along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 15:325–341.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L., Molenock, J., and Rabe, B. D. 1980. Evolution in a cline: the trilobite Triarthrus along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 13:47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressman, E. R. 1973. Lithostratigraphy and depositional environments of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovician) of central Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 768:61 p.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1968. Geological itineraries in south Shropshire. Geologist's Association Guides, 27, 48 p.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution, 25:156–167.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1977. Trilobites and evolutionary patterns, p. 305–332. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. L. 1977. Correlation of the Hadrynian, Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in New York State. New York State Museum Map and Chart Series, 25, 75 p.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1924. Upper Ordovician faunas of Ontario and Québec. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 138:1–255.Google Scholar
Grant, P.R., and Grant, B. M. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science, 256:193–197.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1832a. Synopsis of the trilobites of North America. Monthly American Journal of Geology and Natural History, 1(12):558–560.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1832b. Monograph of the Trilobites of North America. J. Brano, Philadelphia, 93 p.Google Scholar
Hawle, I., and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der bohmischen Trilobiten. Prague, 176 p.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1970. Statistical analysis and presentation of trinucleid (Trilobita) fringe data. Palaeontology, 13:1–9.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P., Ingham, J. K., and Addison, R. 1975. The morphology, classification and evolution of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 272:537–607.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. C. 1991. Morphological plasticity and genetic flexibility in a Cambrian trilobite. Geology, 19:865–960.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, J. K. 1970. Upper Ordovician trilobites of the Cautley-Dent districts of Westmorland and Yorkshire, Pt. 1, Palaeontographical Society Monographs, Publication 526, 58 p.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1978. Trilobite respiration and genal caeca. Alcheringa, 2:251–260.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 1990. Predation by early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms—evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone. Lethaia, 23:29–42.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1968. Ordovician formations in northwestern New York. Le Naturaliste Canadien, 95:1373–1378.Google Scholar
Lehman, D., and Pope, J. K. 1990. Upper Ordovician tempestites from Swatara Gap, Pennsylvania: depositional processes affecting the sediments and paleoecology of the fossil faunas. Palaios, 4:553–564.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Churkin, M. 1966. Upper Ordovician trilobites from northern Yukon. Palaeontology, 9:39–47.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J. 1988. Trilobites, p. 359–376. In Cocks, L. R. H. and Rickards, R. B. (eds.), A global analysis of the Ordovician-Silurian boundary. Bulletin of the British Museum Natural History (Geology), 43.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J. 1990. Cluster analysis of previously described communities from the Ludlow of the Welsh Borderland. Palaeontology, 33:209–244.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J., and Bertrand, R. 1976. Population systematics of the Middle and Upper Ordovician trilobite Cryptolithus from the St. Lawrence lowlands and adjacent areas of Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 50:598–613.Google Scholar
Levtnton, J. 1988. Genetics, Paleontology and Macroevolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 637 p.Google Scholar
Levi-Setti, R. 1975. Trilobites: A Photographic Atlas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 213 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. 1978. Middle Ordovician trilobite biofacies, southern Mackenzie Mountains. Geological Association Canada, Special Paper 18:1–37.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. 1979. Fossils of Ontario, Pt 1, The trilobites. Royal Ontario Museum Miscellaneous Publications, 96 p.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1952. Contribution to the stratigraphy and fauna of the uppermost part of the Králův Dvůr Shales. Sbornik Ustredniho ustavu geologickeho, 19:449–455.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1976. The sensory fields and life mode of Phacops rana (Green, 1832) (Trilobita). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 69:337–367.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. E., and Bergström, S. M. 1991. New graptolite and lithostratigraphic evidence from the Cincinnati region, U.S.A., for definition and correlation of the base of the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician). Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 90-9:59–77.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. G. 1970. Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area. Palaeontographica Americana, 6(41):281–444.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W. 1980a. A new species of Cryptolithus (Trilobita) from the Late Ordovician of Norway. Journal of Paleontology, 54:144–149.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W. 1980b. The trilobite Tretaspis from the upper Ordovician of the Oslo Region. Palaeontology, 23:715–747.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W., and Ingham, J. K. 1988. The stratigraphical distribution and taxonomy of the trilobite Onnia in the type Onnian Stage of the uppermost Caradoc. Palaeontology, 31:829–855.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1920. The appendages, anatomy and relationships of trilobites. Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, Memoir 7, 169 p.Google Scholar
Riva, J. 1974. A revision of some Ordovician graptolites of eastern North America. Palaeontology, 17:1–40.Google Scholar
Roberts, T. G., (ed.) 1981. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting Fieldtrip Guidebooks (Cincinnati, 1981). Vol. 1. Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, 258 p. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J., Nolan, T. B., and Harris, A. G. 1980. The Upper Ordovician and Silurian Hanson Creek Formation of central Nevada. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1126-C:1–22.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. et al. 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 12, 73 p.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1925. The Utica and Lorraine Formations of New York, Pt. 1, Stratigraphy. New York State Museum Bulletin 258, 175 p.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1926. The Utica and Lorraine Formations of New York, Pt. 2, Systematic paleontology. New York State Museum Bulletin 272, 227 p.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. (1991). Viola Group (Ordovician, Oklahoma) cryptolithinid trilobites: biogeography and taxonomy. Journal of Paleontology, 65:919–935.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C., and Fortey, R. A. 1977. Middle Ordovician facies and trilobite faunas in North America. Geological Magazine, 114:409–430.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P. R. 1988. Trilobite size-frequency distributions, recognition of instars, and phyletic size changes. Lethaia, 21:293–306.Google Scholar
Stephens, G. C., and Wright, T. O. 1981. Stratigraphy of the Martinsburg Formation, west of Harrisburg in the Great Valley of Pennsylvania. American Journal of Science, 281:1009–1020.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1984. Graphic correlation of upper Middle and Upper Ordovician rocks, North American Midcontinent Province, U.S.A., p. 23–25. In Bruton, D. (ed.), Aspects of the Ordovician System. Paleontological Contributions, University of Oslo, 295.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. Mohawkian and Cincinnatian chronostratigraphy, p. 84–90. In Landing, E. (ed.), The Canadian Paleontology and Stratigraphy Seminar. New York State Museum Bulletin 462.Google Scholar
Temple, J. T. 1980. A numerical taxonomic study of species of Trinucleidae (Trilobita) from the British Isles. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 71:213–233.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. R. 1963. Lithostratigraphy of the Middle Ordovician Salona and Coburn Formations in central Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Geological Survey Bulletin, G-38, 154 p.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1986. Fossil communities of the upper Trenton Group (Ordovician) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 60:805–824.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1878. Description of some new species of fossils from the Cincinnati group. Cincinnati Society of Natural History Journal, 1:92–100.Google Scholar
Walker, L. G. 1967. Stratigraphy of the Ordovician Martinsburg Formation in southwestern Virginia. Unpubl. , , Cambridge, Massachusetts, 201 p.Google Scholar
Walker, L. G. 1971. Biostratigraphy of the Ordovician Martinsburg Formation in southwestern Virginia. Geological Society of America, Abstracts, 3(5):355.Google Scholar
Walters, M., Lespérance, P. J., and Hubert, C. 1982. The biostratigraphy of the Nicolet River Formation in Québec and intra-North American correlations in Middle and Upper Ordovician strata. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19:571–588.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1941. The Trinucleidae—with special reference to North American genera and species. Journal of Palentology, 15:21–41.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1959. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites: Remopleurididae, Trinucleidae, Raphiophoridae, Endymioniidae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 121(8):371–496.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1968. Cryptolithus (Trilobita): specific characters and occurrence in Ordovician of eastern North America. Journal of Paleontology, 42:702–714.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., and Almond, J. E. 1987. Appendages and habits of the Upper Ordovician trilobite Triarthrus eatoni. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 317:1–46.Google Scholar
Wilde, P. 1991. Oceanography in the Ordovician, p. 283–298. In Barnes, C. R. and Williams, S. H. (eds.), Advances in Ordovician Geology. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 90-9.Google Scholar