Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:32:59.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological variations of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to changes in ecological parameters: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

E. Boltovskoy ,
D. B. Scott  and
F. S. Medioli
E. Boltovskoy
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “B. Rivadavia’ and CONICET, Avenida Angel Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina
D. B. Scott
Affiliation:
Centre for Marine Geology, Department of Geology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada
F. S. Medioli
Affiliation:
Centre for Marine Geology, Department of Geology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some of the relatively recent literature correlating morphological variation in benthic foraminifera with environmental parameters such as temperature, salinity, carbonate solubility, depth, nutrition, substrate, dissolved oxygen, illumination, pollution, water motion, trace elements, and rapid environmental fluctuation is reviewed. It appears some variables (most notably depth) are recorded more frequently, which may affect some conclusions. Although each variable is treated separately, it appears that almost no variables act independently on test morphologies. In reviewing the literature, it becomes clear that there are many individual trends, especially with shell ornamentation, but few broad ones, and that it is almost impossible, with exception of some of the larger reef-dwelling, symbiont-bearing foraminifera, to predict how any species will react to various parameters. The broad trends concern thinning or thickening of carbonate tests with changing carbonate availability, temperature, and salinity. It appears that many observations of morphological changes within species may not be recorded in the literature, perhaps because authors did not recognize the importance of small details that would be of importance at a later time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , March 1991 , pp. 175 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R., and Roda, R. S. 1977. Benthonic foraminifera from La Have estuary. Maritime Sediments, 13:67–72.Google Scholar
Arnold, Z. M. 1954. Culture methods in the study of living foraminifera. Journal of Paleontology, 20:404–416.Google Scholar
Arnold, Z. M. 1967. Biological observations on the foraminifer Calcituba polymorpha Roboz. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 110:28–304.Google Scholar
Ayala-Castañares, A., and Segura, L. R. 1968. Ecología y distribuciòn de los foraminíferos recientes de la Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, México, Méx. Universidad Nacional Autònoma de México, Instituto de Geologia, Boletín, 87:1–89.Google Scholar
Bandy, O. L. 1960. General correlation of foraminiferal structure with environment. International Geological Congress, 21st Ses., Copenhagen, 22:7–19.Google Scholar
Bandy, O. L. 1963. Larger living foraminifera of the continental borderland of southern California. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 14:121–126.Google Scholar
Barbieri, F., and Medioli, F. 1969. Distribution of foraminifera on the Scotian Shelf (Canada). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia, 75:849–879.Google Scholar
Bartenstein, H. 1938. Foraminiferen der meerischen und brackischen Bezirke des Jade-Gebietes. Senckenbergiana, 20:386–412.Google Scholar
Basov, I. A. 1979. Ecology of benthic foraminifera in the upwelling zone near south-west Africa. Voprosy Mikropaleontologii, 22:135–146[in Russian].Google Scholar
Bernhard, J. M. 1986. Characteristic assemblages and morphologies of benthic foraminifera from anoxic organic-rich deposits: Jurassic through Holocene. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 16:207–215.Google Scholar
Bettenstaedt, F. 1962. Evolutionsvorgänge bei fossilen foraminiferen. Mitteilungen aus dem Geolischen Staatsinstitut im Hamburg, 31:385–460.Google Scholar
Bik, A. 1964. An aberrant Nonionid from the Miocene of the Mayence basin. Notizblatt des Hessischen für Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden, 92:68–74.Google Scholar
Bogdanowich, A. K. 1952. Miliolidy i Peneroplidy, Iskopaemye foraminifery SSSR [Miliolidae, Peneroplidae, fossil foraminifera of the USSR]. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Neftyanogo Nauchno-issledovatel'skogo Geologorazvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI), new series, 64:1–138[in Russian].Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1954. Foraminíferos de la bahía San Blas. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Revista de Geología, 3:247–300.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1956. Applications of chemical ecology in the study of foraminifera. Micropaleontology, 2:321–325.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1957a. Las anormalidades en los caparazones de foraminíferos y el “Indice de Regeneramiento.” Ameghiniana, 1(1/2):80–84.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1957b. Los foraminíferos del estuario del Río de la Plata y su zona de influencia. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Instituto Nacional de Investigaciòn de las Ciencias Naturales, Revista de Geología, 6:1–76.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1958. The foraminifera fauna of the Rio de la Plata and its relation to the Caribbean area. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 9:17–21.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1963. Foraminíferos y sus relaciones con el medio. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Instituto Nacional de Investigaciòn de las Ciencias Naturales, Revista de Hidrobiología, 1(2):21–109.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E. 1972. Nota sobre los valores mínimos de oxigenaciòn que pueden soportar los foraminíferos bentònicos. Sociedad de Biología de Concepcion, Boletín, 44:135–144.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., and Boltovskoy, A. 1968. Foraminíferos y tecamebas de la parte inferior del Río Quequén Grande (sistemática, distribución, ecología). Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Revista de Hidrobiología, 2(4):127–164.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., and Giussani de Kahn, G. 1980. Nonion(?) pseudotysburyense n. sp., primer foraminífero calcáreo multilocular hallado en aguas de río. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Revista, Ecología, 2:111–115.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., and Lena, H. 1971. The foraminifera (except family Allogromiidae) which dwell in fresh water. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 1:71–76.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., and Wright, R. 1976. Recent Foraminifera. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, 515 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. S. 1955. Preliminary laboratory experiments on ecology of foraminiferal populations. Micropaleontology, 1:351–358.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. S. 1961. Laboratory experiments on the ecology of foraminifera. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 12:67–106.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1975. Morphology and habitat of living benthonic foraminiferids from Caribbean carbonate environment. Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 7:567–569.Google Scholar
Bugrova, E. M. 1975. Morfologicheskij oblik rakovin foraminifer kak pokasatel' uslovij ihk obitanij [The morphology of foraminiferal tests as indicator of their environment]. In Furssenko, A. V. (ed.), Obraz zhisni i zakonomernosti rasselenija sovremennoj i iskopaemoj mikrofauny [Mode of Life and Mechanisms of Settling of Recent and Fossil Microfaunae]. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, Akademija Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 333, 439 p.Google Scholar
Burgess, M. V., and Schnitker, D. 1990. Morphometry of Bulimina aculeata d'Orbigny and Bulimina marginata d'Orbigny. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 20:37–49.Google Scholar
Caralp, M. H. 1989. Size and morphology of the benthic foraminifer Melonis barleeanum: relationships with marine organic matter. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 19:235–245.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. 1856. Researches in the foraminifera. Royal Society of London, Philosophical Transactions, 146:547–569.Google Scholar
Closs, D., and Madeira, M. L. 1968. Seasonal variations of brackish foraminifera in the Patos Lagoon, southern Brazil. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Geologia, Publicaçao especial No. 15:1–51.Google Scholar
Collins, L. S. 1989. Relationship of environmental gradients to morphologic variation within Bulimina aculeata and Bulimina marginata, Gulf of Maine area. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 19:222–234.Google Scholar
Colom, G. 1970. Estudio de los foraminíferos de muestras de fondo de la costa de Barcelona. Investigación Pesquera, 34:355–384.Google Scholar
Corliss, B. H. 1979a. Size variation in the deep-sea benthonic foraminifer Globocassidulina subglobosa (Brady) in the southeast Indian Ocean. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 9:5–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corliss, B. H. 1979b. Recent deep-sea benthonic foraminiferal distribution in the southeast Indian Ocean: inferred bottom water routes and ecological implications. Marine Geology, 31(1/2):115–138.Google Scholar
Didkovsky, V. Ja. 1959. Vikopnih peneroplidi pivdenno-zakhidnoy chastini Radyans'kogo Soyuzu [Fossil Peneroplidae of the southwest part of the Soviet Union]. Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoy SSR, Seriya Stratigrafiy ta Paleonteontologiy, 28:1–70[in Ukranian].Google Scholar
Douglas, R. G. 1979. Benthic foraminiferal ecology and paleoecology: a review of concepts and methods. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course, 6:21–53.Google Scholar
Drooger, C. W. 1983. Environmental gradients and evolutionary events in some larger foraminifera, p. 255–271. In Meulenkamp, J. E. (ed.), Reconstruction of Marine Paleoenvironments. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, 30.Google Scholar
Eicher, D. L. 1960. Stratigraphy and micropaleontology of the Thermopolis Shale. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 15:1–126.Google Scholar
Ellison, R. L., Broome, R., and Ogilvie, R. 1986. Foraminiferal response to trace metal contamination in the Patapsco River and Baltimore Harbour, Maryland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 17:419–423.Google Scholar
Emery, K. O., and Hulseman, J. 1961. The relationship of sediments, life and water in marine basins. Deep-Sea Research, 8:165–180.Google Scholar
Fermont, W. J. J. 1977. Depth-gradient in internal parameters of Heterostegina in the Gulf of Elat, p. 149–163. In Drooger, C. W. (ed.), Depth-relations of Recent Larger Foraminifera in the Gulf of Aqaba-Elat. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, 15.Google Scholar
Fermont, W. J. J., Kreulen, R., and Van der Zwaan, G. J. 1983. Morphology and stable isotopes as indicators of productivity and feeding patterns in Recent Operculina ammonoides (Gronovius). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 13:122–128.Google Scholar
Forti, I. R. S., and Röttger, E. 1967. Further observations on the seasonal variations of mixohaline foraminifers from the Patos Lagoon, southern Brazil. Archivio di Oceanografia e Limnologia, 15:55–61.Google Scholar
Furssenko, A. V. 1959. Foraminifera. Obshchaja chast', p. 115–168. In Orlov, Ju. A. (ed.), Osnovy Paleontologii [Foraminifera. General Part. In Orlov, Ju. A. (ed.), Principles of Paleontology]. Akademija Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Furssenko, A. V. 1978. Vvedenie v izuchenie foraminifer [An Introduction to the Study of Foraminifera]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Akademija Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 391, 241p., Novosibirsk [in Russian].Google Scholar
Gary, A. C., Healy-Williams, N., and Ehrlich, R. 1989. Watermass relationships and morphologic variability in the benthic foraminifer Bolivina albatrossi Cushman, northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 19:210–221.Google Scholar
Greiner, G. O. C. 1974. Environmental factors controlling distributions of Recent foraminifera. Brevoria, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 420:1–35.Google Scholar
Grünig, A. 1984. Phenotypic variation in Spiroplectammina, Uvigerina and Bolivina, p. 249–255. In Oertli, H. J. (ed.), Benthos '83, 2nd International Symposium on Benthic Foraminifera. Elf Aquitaine, Esso REP and Total CFP, Pau and Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Haake, F. W. 1977. Living benthic foraminifera in the Adriatic Sea: influence of water depth and sediment. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 7:62–75.Google Scholar
Hada, Y. 1957. Biology of arenaceous foraminifera. Journal of Science of the Suzugamine Women's College, Hiroshima, Japan 3(B):31–50.Google Scholar
Haig, D. W. 1988. Miliolid foraminifera from inner neritic sand and mud facies of the Papuan Lagoon, New Guinea. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 18:203–236.Google Scholar
Hallock, P. 1979. Trends in test shape with depth in large, symbiont-bearing foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 9:61–69.Google Scholar
Hallock, P. 1981. Light dependence in Amphistegina. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 11:40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallock, P. 1984. Distribution of selected species of living algal symbiont-bearing foraminifera on two Pacific coral reefs. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 14:250–261.Google Scholar
Hallock, P. 1985. Why are larger foraminifera large? Paleobiology, 11:195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallock, P. 1988a. Interoceanic differences in foraminifera with symbiotic algae: a result of nutrient supplies? Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium, Australia, 1988, 3:251–255.Google Scholar
Hallock, P. 1988b. Diversification in algal symbiont-bearing foraminifera: a response to oligotrophy. Revue de Paléobiologie, Special Volume 2 (Benthos '86):789–797.Google Scholar
Hallock, P., Forward, L. B., and Hansen, H. J. 1986 Influence of environment on the test shape of Amphistegina. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 16:224–231.Google Scholar
Hallock, P., and Glenn, E. C. 1986. Larger foraminifera: a tool for paleoenvironmental analysis of Cenozoic carbonate depositional facies. Palaios, 1:55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallock, P., and Hansen, H. J. 1979. Depth adaptation in Amphistegina: change in lamellar thickness. Bulletin of Geological Society of Denmark, 27:99–104.Google Scholar
Hallock, P., and Larsen, A. R. 1979. Coiling direction in Amphistegina. Marine Micropaleontology, 4:33–44.Google Scholar
Harman, R. A. 1964. Distribution of foraminifera in the Santa Barbara Basin, California. Micropaleontology, 10:81–96.Google Scholar
Haynes, J. R. 1981. Foraminifera. McMillan, Hong Kong, 443 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, R. H., and Wakefield, J. S. 1967. Clone culture studies of a new rosaliniid foraminifer from Plymouth, England and Wellington, New Zealand. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K., 47:121–128.Google Scholar
Hendrix, W. E. 1958. Foraminiferal shell form, a key to sedimentary environment. Journal of Paleontology, 32:649–659.Google Scholar
Herb, R., and Hekel, H. 1973. Biostratigraphy, variability and facies relations of some upper Eocene Nummulites from northern Italy. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 66:419–445.Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E., and Earland, A. 1910. On the Recent and fossil foraminifera of the shore-sands of Selsey Bill, Sussex: Part VI. A contribution towards the aetiology of Massilina secans (d'Orbigny sp.). Journal of the Royal Microscopic Society, London, 1910:693–695.Google Scholar
Hofker, J. 1968. Studies on foraminifera. Part 1 —General problems. Overdruk Publication van het Natuurhistoire Genootschap in Limburg, 18:1–135.Google Scholar
Hofker, J. 1971. The foraminifera of Piscadera Bay, Curaçao. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands, 35:1–57.Google Scholar
Ingle, J. C. 1980. Cenozoic paleobathymetry and depositional history of selected sequences within the southern California continental borderland. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 19:163–195.Google Scholar
Ivert, H. 1980. Relationship between stratigraphical variation in the morphology of Gabonella elongata and geochemical composition of the host sediment. Cretaceous Research, 1:223–233.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. A., Gradstein, F. M., Berggren, W. A., Geroch, S., and Beckmann, J. P. 1988. Flysch-type agglutinated foraminiferal assemblages from Trinidad: taxonomy, stratigraphy and paleobathymetry. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 41:155–227.Google Scholar
Kitazato, H. 1984. Microhabitats of benthic foraminifera and their application to fossil assemblages, p. 339–344. In Oertli, H. J. (ed.), Benthos '83, 2nd International Symposium on Benthic Foraminifera. Elf Aquitaine, Esso REP and Total CFP, Pau and Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Kuile, B., and Erez, J. 1984. In situ growth rate experiments on the symbiont-bearing foraminifer Amphistegina lobifera and Amphisorus hemprichii. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 14:262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurc, G. 1961. Foraminifères et ostracodes de l'étang de Thau: Revue des Travaux. Institut des Pêches Maritimes, 25:134–248.Google Scholar
Lalicker, C. G. 1948. Dwarfed protozoan faunas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 18:51–55.Google Scholar
Lamb, J. L., and Miller, T. H. 1984. Stratigraphic significance of uvigerinid foraminifers in the western hemisphere. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, Article 66:1–32.Google Scholar
Larsen, A. R. 1976. Studies of Recent Amphistegina, taxonomy and some ecological aspects. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, 25:1–26.Google Scholar
Larsen, A. R., and Drooger, C. W. 1977. Relative thickness of the test in the Amphistegina species of the Gulf of Elat. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, 15:225–239.Google Scholar
Le Calvez, J., and Le Calvez, Y. 1951. Contribution á l'étude des foraminifères des eaux saumatres. 1. Etange de Canet et des Salses. Vie et Milieu, 2:237–254.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., and Hallock, P. 1987. Algal symbiosis as a driving force in the evolution of larger foraminifera, p. 330–347. In Lee, J. J. and Fredrick, J. (eds.), Endocytobiology III. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 503.Google Scholar
Lewis, K. B., and Jenkins, C. 1969. Geographical variations of Nonionella flemingi. Micropaleontology, 15:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, L. 1965. Sedimentary environment and foraminiferal parameters: Nantucket Bay, Massachusetts. Limnology and Oceanography, 10:392–402.Google Scholar
Lipina, O. A. 1961. Zavisimost' foraminifer ot fathij v otlozhenijakh Famenskogo jarusa verkhnego devona i turnejskogo jarusa karbona zapadnogo sklona Urala [Dependence of foraminifera on facies deposits of Famen Stage of upper Devonian and Turnej Stage of Carboniferous of the western slope of the Ural Mountains]. Voprosy Mikropaleontologii, 5:147–161[in Russian].Google Scholar
Longinelli, A., and Tongiori, E. 1960. Frequenza degli individui destrorsi in diverse popolazioni di Rotalia beccarii Linné. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 1:5–16.Google Scholar
Lutze, G. F. 1964. Statistical investigations on the variability of Bolivina argentea Cushman. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 15:105–115.Google Scholar
Malmgren, B. A. 1984. Analysis of the environmental influence on the morphology of Ammonia beccarii (Linné) in southern European salinas. Geobios, 17:737–746.Google Scholar
McCrone, A. W., and Schafer, C. T. 1966. Geochemical and sedimentary environments of foraminifera in the Hudson estuary, New York. Micropaleontology, 12:505–509.Google Scholar
Medioli, F. S., and Scott, D. B. 1978. Emendation of the genus Discanomalina Asano and its implications on the taxonomy of some of the attached foraminiferal forms. Micropaleontology, 24:291–302.Google Scholar
Mikhalevich, V. I. 1976. New data on the foraminifera of the groundwater of Middle Asia. International Journal of Speleology, 8:167–175.Google Scholar
Miklukho-Maklaj, K. V., and Kashik, D. S. 1975. Svijź izmenchivosti Kazanskikh Pseudonodosarij izmenenijami uslovij sedimentathii [The relationship between variation of Kazanian Pseudonodosaria and conditions of sedimentation]. Voprosy Mikropaleontologii, 18:162–166[in Russian].Google Scholar
Miller, A. A. L., Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1982. Elphidium excavatum (Terquem): ecophenotypic versus subspecific variation. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 12:116–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. N. 1953. Ecological study of the foraminifera of Mason Inlet, North Carolina. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 4:41–63.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1955. Deposits of foraminiferal tests in the Tokyo Bay, Japan. University of Kyoto, College of Science, Memoires, B, 22:213–222.Google Scholar
Mullins, H. T., Thomson, J. B., McDougall, K., and Vercoutere, T. L. 1985. Oxygen-minimum zone edge effects: evidence from the central California coastal upwelling system. Geology, 13:491–494.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1963. Ecological experiments on foraminifera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K., 43:621–642.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1968. Living foraminifera of lagoons and estuaries. Micropaleontology, 14:435–455.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1973. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids. Crane, Russak and Co., New York, 274 p.Google Scholar
Myers, E. H. 1942a. A quantitative study of the productivity of the foraminifera in the sea. American Philosophical Society, Proceedings, 85:325–342.Google Scholar
Myers, E. H. 1942b. Ecologic relationship of some recent and fossil foraminifera. National Research Council, Division of Geology and Geography, Annual Report, 1942:31–36.Google Scholar
Myers, E. H. 1943. Life activities of foraminifera in relation to marine ecology. American Philosophical Society, Proceedings, 66:439–458.Google Scholar
Nagy, J., and Alve, E. 1987. Temporal changes in foraminiferal faunas and impact of pollution in Sandebukta, Oslo Fjord. Marine Micropaleontology, 12:109–128.Google Scholar
Parisi, E. 1983. Distribuzione dei foraminiferi bentonici in una carota della Dorsale Mediterranean (Pleistocene medio e superiore). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 88:641–677.Google Scholar
Pflum, C. E., and Frerichs, W. E. 1976. Gulf of Mexico deep-water foraminifers. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 14:1–108.Google Scholar
Phleger, F. B, and Hamilton, W. A. 1946. Foraminifera of two submarine cores from the North Atlantic Basin. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 57:951–966.Google Scholar
Poag, C. W. 1978. Paired foraminiferal ecophenotypes in Gulf Coast estuaries: ecological and paleoecological implications. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Transactions, 28:395–421.Google Scholar
Poag, C. W. 1981. Ecologic Atlas of Benthic Foraminifera of the Gulf of Mexico. Marine Science International, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 174 p.Google Scholar
Poag, C. W. 1982. Environmental implications of test-to-substrate attachment among some modern sublittoral foraminifera. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 93:252–268.Google Scholar
Poag, C. W., and Tresslar, R. C. 1981. Living foraminifers of West Flower Garden Bank, northernmost coral reef in the Gulf of Mexico. Micropaleontology, 27:31–70.Google Scholar
Pokorny, V. 1958. Grundzüge der Zoologischen Mikropaläontologie. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 429 p.Google Scholar
Pratje, O. 1931. Die Sedimente der Deutschen Bucht. Eine regional statistische Untersuchung. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen Abteilung für Helgoland, 18(2):1–126.Google Scholar
Pujos-Lamy, A. 1973. Bolivina subaenariensis Cushman, indicateur d'un milieu confiné dans le Golfe de Cap-Breton. Academie des Sciences, Paris, Comptes Rendus, 277(D):2655–2658.Google Scholar
Quinterno, P. J., and Gardner, J. V. 1987. Benthic foraminifers on the continental shelf and upper slope, Russian River area, Northern California. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17:132–152.Google Scholar
Rao, K. K., and Rao, T. C. S. 1979. Studies on pollution ecology of foraminifera of the Trivandrum Coast. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 9:31–35.Google Scholar
Reiss, Z., and Hottinger, L. 1984. The Gulf of Aqaba, Ecological Micropaleontology. Ecological Studies 50, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 354 p.Google Scholar
Resig, J. M. 1963. Size relationships of Eggerella advena to sediment and depth of substratum, p. 121–126. In Clements, T., Stevenson, R. E., and Halmos, D. M. (eds.), Essays in Marine Geology in Honor of K. O. Emery. University of Southern California Press.Google Scholar
Revelle, R. 1934. Physico-chemical factors affecting the solubility of calcium carbonate in seawater. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 4:103–110.Google Scholar
Rhumbler, L. 1911. Die Foraminiferen (Thalamophoren) der Plankton Expedition, Pt. 1, Die allgemeinen Organizationsverhältnisse der Foraminiferen. Lipsius & Tischer, Kiel und Leipzig, 331 p.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. L. 1988. Environmental significance of morphologic variability in open-ocean versus ocean-margin assemblages of Orbulina universa. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 18:326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset-Moulinier, M. 1986. Les populations de foraminifères benthiques de La Manche. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 27:387–440.Google Scholar
Röttger, R. 1972. Analyse von Wachstumskurven von Heterostegina depressa (Foraminifera: Nummulitidae). Marine Biology, 17:228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röttger, R., and Berger, W. H. 1972. Benthic foraminifera: morphology and growth in clone cultures of Heterostegina depressa. Marine Biology, 15:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röttger, R., and Hallock, P. 1982. Shape trends in Heterostegina depressa (Protozoa, Foraminiferida). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 12:197–204.Google Scholar
Said, R. 1950. The distribution of foraminifera in the Northern Red Sea. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 1:9–29.Google Scholar
Said, R. 1953. Foraminifera of Great Pond, East Falmouth, Massachusetts. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 4:7–14.Google Scholar
Schafer, C. T. 1970. Studies of benthonic foraminifera in the Restigouche Estuary. 1. Faunal distribution patterns near pollution sources. Maritime Sediments, 6:121–134.Google Scholar
Schafer, C. T. 1973. Distribution of foraminifera near pollution sources in Chaleur Bay. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2:219–233.Google Scholar
Schnitker, D. 1974. Ecophenotypic variation in Ammonia beccarii (Linné). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 4:216–223.Google Scholar
Schröder, C. J. 1986. Deep-water arenaceous foraminifera in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Technical Report of Hydrography and Ocean Sciences, 190 p. (Ph.D. thesis at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia).Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1980a. Quantitative studies of marsh foraminiferal distributions in Nova Scotia: implications for sea level studies. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 17, 58 p.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1980b. Living vs total foraminiferal populations: their relative usefulness in paleoecology. Journal of Paleontology, 54:814–831.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Schafer, C. T. 1977. Temporal changes in foraminiferal distributions in Miramichi River estuary, New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 14:1566–1587.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., Mudie, P. J., and Bradshaw, J. S. 1976. Benthic foraminifera of three southern California lagoons: ecology and Recent stratigraphy. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 6:59–75.Google Scholar
Seiglie, G. A. 1964. Significación de los foraminíferos anormales de la laguna Unare. Lagena, 1:6.Google Scholar
Seiglie, G. A. 1971. A preliminary note on the relationship between foraminifers and pollution in two Puerto Rican bays. Caribbean Journal of Science, 11(1–2):93–98.Google Scholar
Seiglie, G. A. 1975. Foraminifera of Guayanilla Bay and their use as environmental indicators. Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 7:453–487.Google Scholar
Seiglie, G. A. 1976. Significance of proloculus size in the foraminifer Fursenkoina punctata (d'Orbigny). Micropaleontology, 22:485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiglie, G. A., and Bermúdez, P. J. 1963. Distribución de los foraminíferos del Golfo de Cariaco. Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidad de Oriente, Boletin, 2:5–87.Google Scholar
Sellier de Civrieux, J. M. 1973. Foraminíferos indicadores de comunidades bentónicas recientes en Venezuela (Parte 1: Plataforma marina interior). Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidad de Oriente, Boletin, 12:79–93.Google Scholar
Setty, M. G. A. P. 1976. The relative sensitivity of benthonic foraminifera in the polluted marine environment of Cola Bay, Goa. Indian Colloquium of Micropaleontology and Stratigraphy, Proceedings, 6:225–234.Google Scholar
Setty, M. G. A. P. 1982a. Pollution affects monitoring with foraminifera as indices in the Thana Creek, Bombay area. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 18:205–209.Google Scholar
Setty, M. G. A. P. 1982b. Recent marine microfauna from the continental margin west coast of India. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 41:674–679.Google Scholar
Setty, M. G. A. P., and Nigam, R. 1980. Foraminifera as indicators of pollution in the marine environment of the west coast of India. 26th International Geological Congress, Paris, Sect. 6:113.Google Scholar
Setty, M. G. A. P., and Nigam, R. 1984. Foraminiferal assemblages and organic carbon relationship in benthic marine ecosystems of western Indian continental shelf. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 11:225–232.Google Scholar
Severin, K. P. 1983. Test morphology of benthic foraminifera as a discriminator of biofacies. Marine Micropaleontology, 8:65–76.Google Scholar
Showers, W. J. 1980. Biometry of the foraminifer Rosalina globularis (d'Orbigny) in Antarctic environment. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 10:61–74.Google Scholar
Slama, D. 1954. Arenaceous tests in foraminifera: an experiment. The Micropaleontologist, 8:33–34.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. 1963. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the family Bolivinidae. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 429-A:A1–A39.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. 1964. Ecology of benthonic species. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 429-B:1–55.Google Scholar
Steinker, D. C. 1980. Morphologic, physiologic, and reproductive adaptations among foraminifera for life in the rocky internal zone. Micron, 11:17–18.Google Scholar
Sztrakos, K. 1983. Le genre Uvigerina (foraminifères) dans le Paleogène de la Hongrie. Revue de Micropaléontologie, 26:132–142.Google Scholar
Tappan, H. 1951. Foraminifera from the Arctic Slope of Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 236A:1–20.Google Scholar
Tappan, H. 1976. Systematics and the species concept in benthonic foraminiferal taxonomy. Maritime Sediments, Special Publication 1:301–313.Google Scholar
Theyer, F. 1966. Variationsstatistische Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung der Gattung Buccella Andersen im südlichen Teil Südamerikas (Protozoa, Foraminifera). Zoologische Jahrbücher; Abteilung für Systematik; Geographie und Biologie, 8:203–222.Google Scholar
Theyer, F. 1971. Size-depth variation in Cyclammina cancellata Brady, Peru–Chile Trench area. Antarctic Research, Ser. 15:309–318.Google Scholar
Veillon, M., and Vigneaux, M. 1960. Rapport entre la morphologie générale des Nummulites et des lithofacies. Comptes Rendus des Séances, Société Géologique de France, 9:243–244.Google Scholar
Vénec-Peyré, M. Th. 1981. Les foraminifères et la pollution: étude de la microfaune de la Cale du Dourduff (Embochure dala Rivière de Morlaix). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 22:25–33.Google Scholar
Vénec-Peyré, M. Th. 1983. Etude de la croissance et variabilité chez un foraminifère benthique littoral, Ammonia beccarii (Linné), en Mediterranée Occidentale. Cahiers de Micropaléontologie, 2:5–31.Google Scholar
Vénec-Peyré, M. Th. 1984. Les foraminifères et le milieu: étude de trois écosystèmes, p. 573–581. In Oertli, H. J. (ed.), Benthos '83, 2nd International Symposium on Benthic Foraminifera. Elf Aquitaine, Esso REP and Total CFP, Pau and Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Walton, W. R., and Sloan, B. J. 1990. The genus Ammonia Brünnich, 1772: its geographic distribution and morphologic variability. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 20:128–156.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Min, Q., and Bian, Y. 1985. On marine continental transitional faunas in Cenozoic deposits of East China, p. 15–33. In Wang, P. (ed.), Marine Micropaleontology of China. China Ocean Press, Beijing; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. G. 1961. Foraminiferal ecology around the Orange County, California, ocean sewer outfall. Micropaleontology, 7:199–206.Google Scholar
Wetmore, K. L. 1987. Correlations between test strength, morphology and habitat in some benthic foraminifera from the coast of Washington. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. C. 1968. Miliolidae (foraminíferos) recientes del estuario del Río Quequén Grande (Prov. de Buenos Aires). Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Revista de Hidrobiología, 2:225–256.Google Scholar
Yeruku Naidu, T., Chandrasekhara Rao, D., and Subba Rao, M. 1985. Foraminifera as pollution indicators in the Visakhapatnam Harbour Complex, east coast of India. Proceedings of the XI Indian Colloquium of Micropaleontology and Stratigraphy, Pt. 1: Microfauna (Samanta, Bimal K., ed.): Geological, Mineralogical and Metallurgical Society of India, Bulletin, 52:88–96.Google Scholar