Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:38:15.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molluscan biostratigraphy of the lower River Bend Formation at the Martin Marietta Quarry, New Bern, North Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Thomas J. Rossbach  and
Joseph G. Carter
Thomas J. Rossbach
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599
Joseph G. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lower River Bend Formation at the Martin Marietta New Bern quarry in Craven County, North Carolina, contains a diverse and abundant moldic molluscan fauna. This fauna, reconstructed by latex casts, suggests a Vicksburgian or a post-Vicksburgian, pre-Chickasawhayan age for the New Bern exposure. Forty-one molluscan species and subspecies are presently identified from the lower River Bend Formation, 11 of which are new: Turritella caelatura alani, Turritella neusensis, Galeodaria britti, Phalium newbernensis, Cymatium planinodum, Oocorys vadosus, Ecphora wheeleri, Lyria concinna, Scaphella saintjeani, Turricula (Orthosurcula) aequa, and Lucina (Stewartia) micraulax. This fauna is virtually identical at the generic level and similar at the species level to the Vicksburgian faunas of the Gulf Coastal Plain. About 37 percent of the New Bern species also occur in the Vicksburgian of Mississippi, although many of these species reach considerably larger sizes at New Bern. Apparent evolutionary transitions between previously known Vicksburgian and Chickasawhayan mollusks suggest a time of deposition intermediate between these two Oligocene stages.

Moderately high molluscan diversity, the abundance of characteristically warm-water genera, and associated carbonate-rich sediments suggest that the lower River Bend Formation represents a subtropical, open-marine, predominantly carbonate environment immediately seaward of a nearshore lagoonal or barrier island complex.

The lower River Bend Formation at New Bern differs faunally, climatically, and sedimentologically from the upper River Bend Formation in quarry exposures near Belgrade, North Carolina. The upper River Bend Formation contains a lower diversity molluscan fauna with marked dominance diversity and few warm-water taxa. It represents a slightly cooler nearshore, open-marine environment in a transitional siliciclastic-carbonate sedimentary regime. The considerable taxonomic and sedimentologic differences between the lower and upper parts of the River Bend Formation corroborate microfossil evidence suggesting that they represent temporally distinct depositional cycles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 80 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Paleontology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R. T. (ed.). 1968. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, Volume 2. The Department of Mollusks, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 202 p.Google Scholar
Abbott, R. T. (ed.). 1974. American Seashells, 2nd edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 663 p.Google Scholar
Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1853–1858. The Genera of Recent Mollusca: Arranged According to Their Organization, 3 Volumes. John von Voorst, London, 1145 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1837. German edition of: J. de C. Sowerby, Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, Volume 1.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1885. Notes on the Tertiary of Alabama and Mississippi, with descriptions of new species. Cincinnati Society of Natural History, Journal, 8:145–155.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1886. Preliminary report upon the Tertiary fossils of Alabama and Mississippi. Geological Survey of Alabama, Bulletin, 1:15–60.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1894. New Tertiary fossils from Red Bluff, Mississippi. The Nautilus, 7:97–99.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1903. New species of Tertiary fossils from Alabama, Mississippi and Florida. The Nautilus, 16:97–101.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1923. New molluskan names. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 36:199.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1929. Marine Miocene and related deposits of north Colombia. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series, 18:73–213.Google Scholar
Báldi, T. 1973. Mollusc Fauna of the Hungarian Upper Oligocene (Egerian). Studies in Stratigraphy, Palaeoecology, Palaeogeography and Systematics. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 511 p.Google Scholar
Basterot, B. de. 1825. Description géologique du Bassin tertiaire du Sud-Ouest de la France. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 2:1–100 [not seen].Google Scholar
Baum, G. R. 1977. Stratigraphic framework of the middle Eocene to lower Miocene formations of North Carolina. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 139 p.Google Scholar
Baum, G. R. 1981. Lithostratigraphy, depositional environments and tectonic framework of the Eocene New Bern Formation and Oligocene Trent Formation, North Carolina. Southeastern Geology, 22:177–191.Google Scholar
Baum, G. R., Harris, W. B., and Zullo, V. A. 1978. Stratigraphic revision of the exposed middle Eocene to lower Miocene formations in North Carolina. Southeastern Geology, 20:1–19.Google Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1944. Beiträge zur Stammesgeschichte der Muscheln. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, nos. 1–2:133–145 [not seen].Google Scholar
Beyrich, E. 1853–1856. Die Conchylien des norddeutschen Tertiärgebirges. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 5:273–358, 1853; 6:408–500, 726–781, 1854; 8:21–88, 553–588, 1856 [not seen].Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. de. 1824. Mollusques, p. 1–392. In Levrault, F. G. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, Volume 32. Strasbourg and Paris, 567 p.Google Scholar
Blow, W. H. 1969. Late middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy, p. 199–422. In Brönnimann, P. and Renz, H. H. (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils. Geneva, 1967, Volume 1, 422 p.Google Scholar
Born, I. 1778. Index Rerum Naturalium Musei Caesarei Vindobonensis. Pars Ima Testacea. Verzeichniss der Natürlichen Seltenheiten des K. K. Naturalien Kabinets zu Wien. 1. th: Schalthiere. Vindobonae, ex Officina Krausiana, 458 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Born, I. 1780. Testacea Musei Caesarei Vindobonensis, folio. Vindobonae. Vienna, 442 p.Google Scholar
Bosch, M. van den, Cadee, M. C., and Janssen, A. W. 1975. Lithostratigraphical and biostratigraphical subdivision of Tertiary deposits (Oligocene–Pliocene) in the Winterswijk–Almeno region (eastern part of the Netherlands). Scripta Geologica, 29:1–167.Google Scholar
Brander, G. 1766. Fossilia Hantoniensia Collecta et in Musaeo Britannica Deposita. London, 43 p.Google Scholar
Brann, D. C., and Kent, L. S. 1960. Catalogue of the type and figured specimens in the Paleontological Research Institution. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 40:1–995.Google Scholar
Bretsky, S. S. 1976. Evolution and classification of the Lucinidae (Mollusca; Bivalvia). Palaeontographica Americana, 8:219–337.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1823. Mémoire sur les terrains de sédiment supérieurs calcaréo-trappéens du Vicentin, et sur quelques terrains d'Italie, d'Allemange, etc., qui peuvent se rapporter a la même époque. Levrault, Paris, 86 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Brown, A. P., and Pilsbry, H. A. 1913. Fauna of the Gatun Formation, Isthmus of Panama—II. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 64:500–519.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1789–1827. Encyclopédie Méthodique. Paris, Panckoucke, and Paris, Agasse. 1789–1792, Histoire naturelle des vers, Volume 1, 758 p. 1791–1827, Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois regnes de la nature. Vers, coquilles, mollusques et polypiers, 180 p., 480 pls. [issued in full, with additions by Bory de Saint-Vincent and by Lamarck, in 1827].Google Scholar
Carter, J. G., Gallagher, P. E., Enos Valone, R., and Rossbach, T. J. 1988. Fossil Collecting in North Carolina. [North Carolina] Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of Land Resources, Geological Survey Section, Bulletin 89, 89 p.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G., and Rossbach, T. J. 1989. Summary of lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy for the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. Biostratigraphy Newsletter No. 3, 1 sheet.Google Scholar
Casey, T. L. 1903. Notes on the Conrad collection of Vicksburg fossils, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 55:261–283.Google Scholar
Casey, T. L. 1904. Notes on the Pleurotomidae with descriptions of some new genera and species. Transactions, Academy of Science of St. Louis, 14:123–170.Google Scholar
Clench, W. J., and Aguayo, C. G. 1939. Notes and descriptions of new deep-water Mollusca obtained by the Harvard-Havana Expedition off the coast of Cuba, II. Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural, 13:189–329.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1833a. Fossil Shells of the Tertiary Formations of North America, 1:29–38. Sold by Judah Dobson; W. P. Gibbons, Printer, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1833b. Fossil Shells of the Tertiary Formations of North America, 1:39–47. Sold by Judah Dobson; W. P. Gibbons, Printer, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1833c. On some new fossil and Recent shells of the United States. American Journal of Science, 1st series, 23:339–346.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1834. Descriptions of new Tertiary fossils from the southern states. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7:130–157.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1835. Eocene fossils of Claiborne, with observations on this formation in the United States, and a geological map of Alabama. Fossil Shells of the Tertiary Formations, Volume 1, no. 3, p. 29–56 [republished by Harris, 1893; plates 19 and 20 published by Harris were not published by Conrad].Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1841. Descriptions of twenty-six new species of fossil shells, from Maryland, etc. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1st series, 1:28–33.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1843. Descriptions of a new genus, and twenty-nine new Miocene, and one Eocene fossil shells of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1:305–311.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1844. Descriptions of nineteen species of Tertiary fossils of Virginia and North Carolina. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1:323–329.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1845. Descriptions of eight new fossil shells of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2:173–175.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1848a. Observations on the Eocene formation, and descriptions of one hundred and five new fossils of that period, from the vicinity of Vicksburg, Mississippi; with an appendix. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 3:280–299.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1848b. Observations on the Eocene formation, and descriptions of one hundred and five new fossils of that period, from the vicinity of Vicksburg, Mississippi; with an appendix. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2nd series, 1:111–134.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1849. Descriptions of new fossil and Recent shells of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2nd series. 1:207–209.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1854a. Rectification of the generic names of Tertiary fossil shells. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7:29–31.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1854b. Fossil Testacea of the Tertiary Green-sand Marl-bed of Jackson, Miss., p. 289. In Wailes, B. L. C., Report on the Agriculture and Geology of Mississippi. E. Barksdale, State Printer, 371 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2nd series, 4:275–298.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1865a. Catalogue of the Eocene and Oligocene Testacea of the United States. American Journal of Conchology, 1:1–35, two unnumbered pages of corrections following p. 190.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1865b. Descriptions of new Eocene shells of the United States. American Journal of Conchology, 1:142–149.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1865c. Descriptions of new Eocene shells, and references with figures to published species. American Journal of Conchology, 1:210–212.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1866. Check list of the invertebrate fossils of North America. Eocene and Oligocene. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 7:1–41.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1867a. Synopsis of the genera Sycotypus Browne, and Busycon Bolten. American Journal of Conchology, 3:182–185.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1867b. Descriptions of new Miocene shells. American Journal of Conchology, 3:186–187.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1922. The Byram calcareous marl of Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 129:79–85.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1923. The correlation of the Vicksburg Group. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 133:1–9.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928].Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928]. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928]. 1935. Notes on the Vicksburg Group. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 19:1162–1172.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928]. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928]. 1928. [1929]. New Vicksburg (Oligocene) mollusks from Mexico. U.S. Natural History Museum, Proceedings, 73:1–11 [issued as a separate on 24 April, 1928]. 1943. Geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 941, 121 p.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W., and MacNeil, F. S. 1952. Tertiary stratigraphy of South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 243-B:19–29.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1889. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocene des environs de Paris. Annales de la Société Royale Zoologique et Malacologique de Belgique, 24:3–381.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1895–1925. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Paris (published by author). Part 1 (1895), 159 p.; Part 2 (1896), 179 p.; Part 3 (1899), 201 p.; Part 4 (1901), 293 p.; Part 5 (1903), 215 p.; Part 6 (1904), 151 p.; Part 7 (1906), 261 p.; Part 8 (1909), 248 p.; Part 9 (1912), 215 p.; Part 10 (1916), 292 p; Part 11 (1918), 388 p; Part 12 (1921), 349 p.; Part 13 (1925), 345 p.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau Elementaire de l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. Privately published, Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
da Costa, E. M. 1776. Elements of Conchology; or an Introduction to the Knowledge of Shells. Benjamin White, London, 318 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. On the hinge of pelecypods and its development, with an attempt toward a better subdivision of the group. American Journal of Science, 3rd series, 38:445–462.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1890–1903. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida with especial reference to the Miocene Silex-beds of Tampa and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchie River. Wagner Free Institute of Science, Transactions, 3, p. 1–200 (1890); p. 201–474 (1892); p. 475–570 (1895); p. 571–948 (1898); p. 949–1218 (1900), p. 1219–1654 (1903).Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1894. Notes on the Miocene and Pliocene of Gay Head, Martha's Vineyard, Mass., and on the “land phosphate” of the Ashley River District, South Carolina. American Journal of Science, 3rd series, 148:296–301.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1915. A monograph of the molluscan fauna of the Orthaulax pugnax zone of the Oligocene of Tampa, Florida. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 90, 173 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1916 [1917]. A contribution to the invertebrate fauna of the Oligocene beds of Flint River, Georgia. U.S. National Museum, Proceedings, 5:487–524 [published 21 December 1916].Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1860–1866. Description des Animaux sans Vertèbres Découverts dans le Bassin de Paris pour Servir de Supplément à la Description des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris Comprenant une Revue Générale de Toute les Espéces Actuellement Connues. J. B. Ballière et Fils, Paris, Volume 1, 912 p.; Volume 2, 968 p.; Volume 3, 668 p.Google Scholar
Dillwyn, L. W. 1817. A Descriptive Catalogue of Recent Shells, Arranged According to the Linnaean Method; with particular attention to the synonymy. 2 volumes. Printed for John and Arthur Arch, London, 1,092 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1977. Mollusca of the Moodys Branch Formation, Mississippi. Mississippi Geological, Economic and Topographical Survey, Bulletin 120, 212 p.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1980. The invertebrate macropaleontology of the Clarke County, Mississippi, area. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology, Bulletin 122, 387 p.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1982a. Lesueur's Walnut Hills fossil shells. Mississippi Geology, 2:7–13.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1982b. Lower Oligocene Bivalvia of the Vicksburg Group in Mississippi. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology, Bulletin 123, 261 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1842. Paléontologique Française. Description zoologique et géologique des tout animaux mollusques et rayonnés de France. Animaux invertbrés. Terrains Crétaces, Volume 2, 456 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1844. Paléontologie Française Terrains Crétaces, Volume 3, Mollusques. G. Masson, Paris, 807 p.Google Scholar
Férussac, A. E. 1820–1822. Tableaux Systématique des Animaux Mollusques Classés en Familles Naturalles, dans lesquels on à Établi la Concordance de tout les Systèmes; Suivis d'un Prodome Générale pour tout les Mollusques Terrestres ou Fluviatiles, Vivants ou Fossiles. J. B. Baillière, Paris, 110 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1883. Manual de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologie Conchyliologique. Paris, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1884. Diagnoses d'espèces nouvelles de Mollusques recueillis dans le cours de l'Expédition scientifique du Talisman (1833). Journal de Conchyliologie, 31:391–394.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1807. Muséum-Démidoff. Mis en Ordre Systématique et Descrit par G. Fischer, Volume 3, Végetaux et Animaux. Imprimerie de l'Université Impériale, Moscou, 330 p.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1835. Lettre à M. le Baron de Férussac sur quelques generes de coquilles du Muséum Démidoff et en particulier sur quelques fossiles de la Crimée. Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou Bulletin, 8:117–119.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1822. The Philosophy of Zoology, or a General View of the Structure, Functions, and Classifications of Animals. Volume 1, 432 p., Volume 2, 618 p. Printed for Archibald Constable and Co., Edinburgh, and Hurst, Robinson and Co., London [not seen].Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1828. A History of British Animals, Exhibiting the Descriptive Characters and Systematical Arrangement of the Genera and Species of Quadrupeds, Birds, Reptiles, Fishes, Mollusca and Radiata of the United Kingdom; Including the Indigenous, Extirpated, and Extinct Kinds, Together with Periodical and Occasional Visitants. Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh, 565 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. R. 1987. Planktonic foraminifera from the Oligocene and early Miocene of Jones and Onslow Counties, North Carolina. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:83.Google Scholar
Forbes, E., and Hanley, S. 1848–1853. A History of British Mollusca, and their Shells. Volume 1, 77 p. (1848), Volume 2, 557 p. (1849–1850), Volume 3, 616 p. (1850–1851), Volume 4, 301 p. (1852–1853), London.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1873. On the topography and geology of Santo Domingo. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 15:49–259.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1926. The molluscan fauna of the Alum Bluff Group of Florida, Part I, Prionodesmacea and Anomalodesmacea. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 142-A:1–79.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1937. The molluscan fauna of the Alum Bluff Group of Florida, Part VI, Pteropoda, Opisthobranchia, and Ctenobranchia (in part). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 142-F:251–435.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1939. Notes on fossils from the Eocene of the Gulf Province. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 193-B:17–44.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1944a. [1943]. Mollusca from the Miocene and lower Pliocene of Virginia and North Carolina, Part 1, Pelecypoda. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 199-A:1–178 [issued 28 January, 1944].Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1944b. The molluscan fauna of the Alum Bluff Group of Florida, Part VII, Stenoglossa (in part). U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 142-G:437–491.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1945. Mollusca of the Tertiary formations of northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Memoir 11, 332 p.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 1947. The molluscan fauna of the Alum Bluff Group of Florida. Part VIII. Ctenobranchia (remainder), Aspidobranchia, and Scaphopoda. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 142-H:493–656.Google Scholar
Glawe, L. N. 1974. Upper Eocene and Oligocene Pectinidae of Georgia and their stratigraphic significance. Geological Survey of Georgia, Information Circular No. 46, 27 p.Google Scholar
Glenn, L. C. 1904. Systematic paleontology, Miocene, Pelecypoda, p. 274–401. In Clark, W. B., Shattuck, G. B., and Dall, W. H., The Miocene Deposits of Maryland. Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Geological Survey, Miocene, 543 p.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Caroli a Linné Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae. Edition 13, tome 1, pars 6 (Vermes), 3021–3910. Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Görges, J. 1952. Neue invertebrata aus dem Norddeutschen Oberoligocän. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 26:1–9.Google Scholar
Grateloup, J. P. S. 1847. Conchyliologie fossile des terrains tertiares du Bassin de l'Adour (environs de Dax). Tome I, Univalves. Atlas. Lafargue, Bordeaux, 48 pls. with explanations, p. 1–12 (index).Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1821. A natural arangement of Mollusca, according to their internal structure. London Medical Repository, 15:229–239.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1834. Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum, 28th ed. British Museum, London, 240 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings, Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1853. On the divisions of ctenobrancheous gasteropodous Mollusca into larger groups and families. Proceedings, Zoological Society of London, 21:32–44.Google Scholar
Gregorio, A. de. 1890. Monographie de la Faune Eocénique de L'Alabama et surtout de celle de Claiborne de l'Etage Parisien. Librairie Internationale L. Pedone Lauriel de Charles Clausen, Palmere, 316 p.Google Scholar
Griffin, W. T. 1982. Petrology of the Tertiary Carbonates Exposed at Belgrade, Onslow County, North Carolina. Unpubl. Masters thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 146 p.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1866. On the relations of the Tertiary formations of the West Indies. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 22:570–590.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1876. On the Miocene fossils of Haiti. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 32:516–532.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1910. On a collection of fossils from Springvale near Couva, Trinidad. Agricultural Society of Trinidad and Tobago, Society Paper 440:1–15.Google Scholar
Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J., and Vail, P. R. 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science, 235:1136–1167.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1893. The Tertiary geology of Calvert Cliffs, Maryland. American Journal of Science, 3rd series, 45:21–31.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1897. New and interesting Eocene Mollusca from the Gulf States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1896:470–482.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1899. The Lignitic Stage, Part II, Scaphopoda, Gastropoda, Pteropoda and Cephalopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 3:1–128.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1919. A few mid-upper Eocene fossils from the Carolinas and Texas. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 8:13–18.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D., and Palmer, K. V., 1947. The Mollusca of the Jackson Eocene of the Mississippi Embayment (Sabine River to the Alabama River). Second Section, Including Part II, Univalves and Index. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 30:207–546.Google Scholar
Harry, H. W., and Dockery, D. T. III. 1983. Notes on the Lower Oligocene oysters of Mississippi. Mississippi Geology, 4:7–14.Google Scholar
Hazel, J. E., Bybell, L. M., Christopher, R. A., Fredericksen, N. O., May, F. E., McLean, D. M., et al. 1977. Biostratigraphy of the deep corehole (Clubhouse Crossroads corehole 1) near Charleston, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1028-F:71–89.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. D. (ed.). 1976. International Stratigraphic Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 200 p.Google Scholar
Heilprin, A. 1886 [1887]. Explorations on the west coast of Florida and in the Okeechobee wilderness with special reference to the geology and zoology of the Floridian Peninsula. Wagner Free Institute of Science, Transactions, 1:1–134. [See Petit and Wilson, 1986, for publication date.] Google Scholar
Hoerle, S. E., and Vokes, E. H. 1978. A review of the volutid genera Lyria and Falsilyria (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Tertiary of the western Atlantic. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 14:105–130.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. M. 1942. Type fossil Cypraeidae of North America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 27:91–123.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. 1978. Die Mollusken des Oberoligozäns (Chattium) im Nordsee-Becken, 1. Scaphopoda, Archaeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 109:137–227.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. 1979. Die Mollusken des Oberoligozäns (Chattium) im Nordsee-Becken, 2. Neogastropoda, Euthyneura, Cephalopoda. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 109:277–376.Google Scholar
Jones, C. C. 1984. Ventricolaria judithae n. sp. (Bivalvia, Veneridae) from the Oligocene of North Carolina, with comments on ecology. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 136:152–164.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1954. Ventricolaria and Similivenus insolida, new names in the pelecypod family Veneridae. Journal of Paleontology, 28:217–218.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971. Sea Shells of Tropical West America, Second Edition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1064 p.Google Scholar
Kellum, L. B. 1925. The age of the Trent Marl in North Carolina. Journal of Geology, 33:183–187.Google Scholar
Kellum, L. B. 1926. Paleontology and stratigraphy of the Castle Hayne and Trent marls in North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 143, 56 p.Google Scholar
Koenen, A. von. 1865. Die Fauna der unteroligocänen Tertiärschichten von Helmstädt bei Braunschweig. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 17:459–534.Google Scholar
Koenen, A. von. 1889. Das Norddeutsche Unter-Oligocän und seine Mollusken-Fauna. Lieferung I: Strombidae–Muricidae–Buccinidae. Der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin, p. 1–280.Google Scholar
Koenen, A. von. 1890. Das Norddeutsche Unter-Oligocän und seine Mollusken-Fauna. Lieferung II: Conidae–Volutidae–Cypraeidae. Der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin, p. 281–574.Google Scholar
Koenen, A. von. 1892. Das Norddeutsche Unter-Oligocän und seine Mollusken-Fauna. Lieferung IV: Rissoidae–Littorinidae–Turbinidae–Haliotidae–Fissurellidae–Calyptraeidae–Patellidae. Der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin, p. 818–1004.Google Scholar
Korobkov, I. A. 1955 [1954]. Spravochnik i metodicheskoe rukovdstvo po tretichnym molljuskam Plastinichatozhabernye. Gosudarstvennii Nauchno-tekhnicheskii Issledovanie Nefti. Gorno-to-plivnoi literatury, Leningradskoi Otdelenie, 444 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, Mémoires, 1:63–91.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1802–1809. Mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris comprenant la détermination des espèces qui appartiennent aux animaux marins sans vertèbres, et dont la plupart sont figurés dans la collection des vélins du Muséum. Annales du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. [See Palmer, 1977, for dates of publication of parts.] Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1815–1822. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres … Précédée d'une Introduction offrant la Détermination des Caractères Essentiels de l'Animal sa Distinction du Végétal et des autres Corps Naturels, enfin l'Exposition des Principes Fundamentaux de la Zoologie. Verdière, Paris, 7 vols.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1825. Families naturelles du règne animal exposées succinctement et dans un ordre analytique, avec l'indication de leurs generes. J. B. Baillière, Paris, 570 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Lea, I. 1833. Tertiary formation of Alabama, p. 9–208. In Lea, I., Contributions to Geology. Carey, Lea and Blanchard, Philadelphia, 227 p.Google Scholar
Lesueur, C. A. 1829. [see Dockery, , 1982a.]Google Scholar
Link, H. F. 1807–1808. Beschreibung der Naturalien-Sammlung der Universität zu Rostock. Part 2, p. 82–100; Part 3, p. 101–160; Part 4, p. 6–23; Part 6 (1808), p. 33–37. Rostock, Germany.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae. Edito Decima, Reformata. Volume 1, Regnum Animale. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
MacNeil, F. S., and Dockery, D. T. III. 1984. Lower Oligocene Gastropoda, Scaphopoda, and Cephalopoda of the Vicksburg Group in Mississippi. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology Bulletin 124, 415 p.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. C. 1934. A new species of Pecten from the Oligocene near Duncan Church, Washington County, Florida. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 24:331–333.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. C. 1937. Mollusks of the Tampa and Suwannee limestones of Florida. State of Florida Department of Conservation Geological Bulletin No. 15, 334 p.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. C. 1938. Oligocene faunas from the lower and upper beds on the A. L. Parrish farm, Washington County, Florida. Washington Academy of Science, Journal, 28:93–107.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. C. 1940. Mollusks of the Chickasawhay Marl. Journal of Paleontology, 14:171–226.Google Scholar
Martin, G. C. 1904. Gastropoda, p. 131–270. In Clark, W. B., Shattuck, G. B., and Dall, W. H. (eds.), Maryland Geological Survey, Miocene, 543 p.Google Scholar
Maury, C. J. 1909. A new connecting link in the genesis of Fulgur . American Journal of Science, 4th series, 27:335.Google Scholar
Maury, C. J. 1925 [1924]. Fosseis Terciarios do Brasil com Decripção de Novas Formas Cretaceas. Servico Geologico E. Mineralogico do Brasil, Monographia N. IV, 665 p. [cover page date 1925, title page date 1924].Google Scholar
Meyer, O. 1885. The genealogy and the age in the species of the southern old-Tertiary, Part I. American Journal of Science, 3rd series, 29:457–468.Google Scholar
Meyer, O. 1886. Part II, Contributions to the Eocene paleontology of Alabama and Mississippi, p. 63–85. In Smith, E. A., Geologic Survey of Alabama, Bulletin No. 1, 85 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, O. 1887. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Fauna des Alttertiärs von Mississippi und Alabama. Bericht über die Senckenbergische naturforschende Gesellschaft in Frankfurt am Main, 1886, 22 p.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L. 1910. Erosion intervals in the Tertiary of North Carolina and Virginia. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 20:673–678.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L. 1912. The Tertiary formations, p. 171–258. In Clark, W. B., Miller, B. L., Stephenson, L. W., Johnson, B. L., and Parker, H. N., The Coastal Plain of North Carolina. North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey, 3.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. 1848. Note sur la classification naturelle des mollusques gastéropodes. Annalen des Sciences Naturelles Zoologique, Series 3, 9:102–112.Google Scholar
Möller, H. P. C. 1842. Index molluscorum Groenlandiae. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, 4:76–97.Google Scholar
Monterosato, T. A. di. 1890. Conchiglie delle profundità del mare di Palermo. Naturalista Siciliano, Palermo, 9:140–151, 157–166, 181–191.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. de. 1808–1810. Conchyliologie Systématique et Classification Méthodique des Coquilles; offrant leurs Figures, leur Arrangement Générique, leurs Descriptions Caractéristiques, leurs Noms; ainsi que leur Synonymie en Plusieurs Langues. Tome 1, Coquilles univalves, cloisonnées, 409 p.; tome 2, Coquilles univalves, non cloisonnées, 676 p. F. Schoell, Paris.Google Scholar
Moore, E. J. 1962. Conrad's Cenozoic fossil marine mollusk type specimens at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 114:23–120.Google Scholar
Mörch, O. A. L. 1852. Catalogus Conchyliorum quae Reliquit D. Alphonso d'Aguirra & Gadea, comes de Yoldi, Regis Daniae Cubiculariorum Princeps, Ordinis Dannebrogici in Prima Classe & Ordinis Caroli Tertii Eques, Fasciculus Primus, Cephalophora. L. Klein, Hafniae, 1:1–170.Google Scholar
Mörch, O. A. L. 1860–1861. Beiträge zur Molluskenfauna Central-Amerika's (Fortsetzung). Malakozoologische Blätter, 6:102–126; 7:66–106, 193–213.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1833. Supplement to the “Synopsis of the organic remains of the ferruginous sand formation of the United States,” contained in Vols. XVII and XVIII of this Journal. American Journal of Science, 1st series, 23:288–294.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Appendix. Catalogue of the fossil shells of the Tertiary formation of the United States. Philadelphia, 88 p.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. 1776. Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus, seu Animalum Daniae et Norvegiae Indigenarum Characteres, Nomina et Synonyma Imprimis Popularum. Hafniae, 282 p.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1884. Zur Morphologie des Bivalvenschlosses. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 88:385–418.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates 2206, 25 p.Google Scholar
Newton, R. B. 1922. Eocene Mollusca from Nigeria. Geological Survey of Nigeria Bulletin, 3:1–114.Google Scholar
North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. 1983. North American Stratigraphic Code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67:841–875.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1922. The Miocene of northern Costa Rica. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 9:1–288.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1944. Contributions to the paleontology of northern Peru, part VII. The Cretaceous of the Paita Region. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 28:159–305.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A., and Harbison, A. 1953. Pliocene Mollusca of Southern Florida with Special Reference to Those from North Saint Petersburg. Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia Monographs, No. 8, 457 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. P. 1974. A supraspecific classification of the scaphopod Mollusca. Veliger, 17:115–123.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and dibranchiate Cephalopoda of the southern United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 7:1–731.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1947. Part II. Univalves, p. 209–546. In The Mollusca of the Jackson Eocene of the Mississippi Embayment (Sabine River to the Alabama River), Second Section, Part II, Univalves and index. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 30:209–563.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1977. The Unpublished Vélins of Lamarck (1802–1809), Illustrations of the Fossils of the Paris Basin Eocene. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York, 67 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1966. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States, Part II. Gastropoda (excluding Pteropoda, Part I). Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48:471–1057.Google Scholar
Petit, R. E. 1967. Notes on Cancellariidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Tulane Studies in Geology, 5:217–219.Google Scholar
Petit, R. E. 1970. Notes on Cancellariidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) II. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 8:83–88.Google Scholar
Petit, R. E., and Wilson, D. 1986. Publication dates of Heilprin's Explorations on the West Coast of Florida. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 19:95–96.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1988. New species of Ecphora and ecphorine thaidids from the Miocene of Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, U.S.A. Bulletin of Paleomalacology, 1:1–16.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1846. Verzeichniss der in der Gegend von Magdeburg aufgefundenen Tertiärversteinerungen. Palaeontographica, 1:42–90.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1853. Handbuch der Conchyliologie und Malacozoologie. Eduard Anton, Halle, 547 p.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1922. Revision of W. M. Gabb's Tertiary Mollusca of Santo Domingo. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 73:305–428.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., and Olsson, A. A. 1954. Systems of the Volutidae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 35:271–307.Google Scholar
Porter, H. J. 1974. The North Carolina Marine and Estuarine Mollusca—an Atlas of Occurrence. The University of North Carolina Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, North Carolina, 351 p.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1928. The Recent and Tertiary cassids of New Zealand and a study of hybridization. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 59:629–642.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1942. The New Zealand Recent and fossil Mollusca of the family Turridae with general notes on turrid nomenclature and systematics. Bulletin Auckland Institute and Museum, 2:1–188.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature; ou, Tableau de l'Univers et des Corps Organisés. Palermo, 223 p.Google Scholar
Ravn, J. P. J. 1907. Molluskfaunaen I Jyllands Tertiaeraflejringer en Palaeontologisk-stratigrafisk undersogelse. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling, series 7, 3:1–180.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1943. Additions to the fauna of the Trent marl of North Carolina. Journal of Paleontology, 17:518–526.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1948. Tertiary invertebrate fossils from newly discovered localities in North and South Carolina. Notulae Naturae, No. 207:1–11.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1955. The Paleocene and Eocene of Georgia; Part 2: Upper Eocene. Georgia Mineral Newsletter, 8:151–156.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive Catalogus Cimeliorum e Tribus Regnis Naturae quae olim Collegerat Joa. Fried. Bolten, M.D.p.d., Pars Secunda. Typis. Johan. Christi. Trapii., Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1824. An account of some fossil shells of Maryland. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 4:124–155.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A. 1927. Revision der Cypraeacea. Archiv für Natur-geschichte, Vol. 91, abt. A, hft. 10, p. 1–165.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. 1984. Neogene stratigraphy and geologic history of the Apalachicola Embayment, Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 58, 146 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. F. 1817. Essai d'un Nouveau Système des Habitations des Vers Testacées. Schultz, Copenhagen, 287 p.Google Scholar
Siesser, W. G. 1983. Paleogene calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy: Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee. Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology Bulletin 125, 61 p.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 1907. A contribution to the morphology of Pyrula . Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 59:208–219.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. III. 1881. Description of eight new species of shells. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for 1881:635–638.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1812–1846. Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of Those Remains of Testaceous Animals of Shells, Which Have Been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth. London. [See Vol. 2, nos. 21–26 (1916), p. 29–116, Pls. 115–150.]Google Scholar
Spengel, J. W. 1881. Die Geruchsorgane und das Nervensystem der Mollusken. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 35:333–383.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1959. Cretaceous oysters of southwestern North America. El sistema Cretacico, un symposium sobre el Cretacico ene le hemisfero occidental y su correlation mundial. 20th International Geological Congress, Ciudad de México, 1956, El sistema Cretacico, 1:15–37.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1971. Oysters, p. 953–1224. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6, 3. The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1870–1871. Cretaceous Fauna of South India. Volume 3, The Pelecypoda, with a Review of all Known Genera of this Class, Fossil and Recent. Palaeontologica Indica, India Geological Survey Memoir, 537 p.Google Scholar
Strausz, L. 1966. Die Miozän-Mediterranen gastropoden Ungarns. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 693 p.Google Scholar
Suter, H. 1913–1915. Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca with an Atlas of Quarto Plates. Government Printer, Wellington, 1120 p.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1829–1833. Zoological Illustrations, or Original Figures and Descriptions of New, Rare, or Otherwise Interesting Animals, Selected Chiefly Principally from the Classes of Ornithology, Entomology, and Conchology, 2nd series. London [not seen].Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology, or Shells and Shellfish. Longman, London, 419 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Tembrock, M. L. 1965. Erläuterungen zur Gattung Streptochetus Cossmann (Gastropoda). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 46a:427–439.Google Scholar
Thayer, P. A., and Textoris, D. A. 1972. Petrology and diagenesis of Tertiary aquifer carbonates, North Carolina. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Transactions, 22:257–266.Google Scholar
Thayer, P. A., and Textoris, D. A. 1977. Faunal and diagenetic controls of porosity and permeability in Tertiary aquifer carbonates, North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources, Division of Earth Resources, Geology and Mineral Resources Section, Special Publication 7:1–35.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoda der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II. Teil: Deutsche Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer “Valdivia” 1898–1899. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse, 17:35–382.Google Scholar
Toulmin, L. D. 1977. Stratigraphic distribution of Paleocene and Eocene fossils in the eastern Gulf Coast region. Geological Survey of Alabama, Monograph 13, 602 p.Google Scholar
Turco, K. P., Sekel, D. M., and Harris, W. B. 1979. Stratigraphic reconnaissance of calcareous nannofossils from the North Carolina Coastal Plain: II—Lower to mid-Cenozoic. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 11:216.Google Scholar
Veatch, O., and Stephenson, L. W. 1911. Preliminary report on the geology of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. Geological Survey of Georgia Bulletin 26, 466 p.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1963. Notes on Cenozoic Muricidae from the western Atlantic region, with descriptions of new taxa. Tulane Studies in Geology, 1:151–163.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1964. Supraspecific groups in the subfamilies Muricinae and Tritonaliinae (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Malacologia, 2:1–41.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1971. Catalogue of the genus Murex Linné (Mollusca: Gastropoda): Muricinae, Ocenebrinae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 61:1–141.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1974. A new species and subgenus of Australian Dermomurex (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Malacological Society of Australia Journal, 3:1–5.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1975a. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic region, Part VI—Aspella and Dermomurex . Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 11:121–162.Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1975b. Some new or otherwise interesting members of the Calyptraeidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 11:163–172.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1957. Miocene fossils of Maryland. Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources, Bulletin 20, 85 p.Google Scholar
Vyalov, O. S. 1936. Sur la classification des huîtres. Comptes rendus (Doklady) de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, new series, 4:17–20.Google Scholar
Ward, L. W. 1984. Stratigraphy of outcropping Tertiary beds along the Pamunkey River—central Virginia Coastal Plain, p. 11–77. In Ward, L. W. and Krafft, K. (eds.), Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Outcropping Tertiary Beds in the Pamunkey River Region, Central Virginia Coastal Plain. Guidebook for the 1984 Field Trip, Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association.Google Scholar
Ward, L. W., and Blackwelder, B. W. 1980. Stratigraphy of Eocene, Oligocene, and lower Miocene formations—Coastal Plain of the Carolinas, p. 190–208. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), Excursions in Southeastern Geology, Volume I. American Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Ward, L. W., Gohn, G. S., and Poore, R. Z. 1979. Stratigraphic revision of Eocene, Oligocene and lower Miocene Formations of South Carolina. Geologic Notes, 23:2–32.Google Scholar
Ward, L. W., Lawrence, D. R., and Blackwelder, B. W. 1978. Stratigraphic revision of the Middle Eocene, Oligocene, and Lower Miocene—Atlantic Coastal Plain of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1457-F, 23 p.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda. Volume 6, 7 parts. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1639 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1887. Contribuições á paleontologia do Brazil. Archivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 7:1–273.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1987a. A new pycnodont oyster from the Pungo River Formation, and an annotated list of the Cenozoic pycnodonts of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain, p. 13–20. In Ray, C. E. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina II. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 61.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1987b. Species of Ecphora, including the subgenus Stenomphalus, in the Pungo River Formation, p. 21–29. In Ray, C. E. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina II. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 61.Google Scholar
Wood, W. 1828. Index Testaceologicus; or a Catalogue of Shells, British and Foreign, Arranged According to the Linnean System, etc., Second [i.e., third] Edition. 212 p. Also: Supplement, etc. (references from Lamarck's “Animaux sans Vertèbres,” adapted to the figures in the … “Index,” etc.). 59 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1928. Miocene mollusks from Bowden, Jamaica; Part II, gastropods and discussion of results. Contributions to the Geology and Paleontology of the West Indies, Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 385, 564 p.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1959. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (Gastropods: Vermetidae to Thaididae). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 306-B:147–239.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1973. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (Additions to gastropods, scaphopods, pelecypods: Nuculidae to Malleidae). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 306-E:453–539.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. P. 1851. A Manual of the Mollusca: or a Rudimentary Treatise of Recent and Fossil Shells, Part 1. London, 158 p.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. 1932. English Eocene species of Sassia, with a note on the morphology of the Cymatiidae and the Bursidae. Proceedings, Malacological Society of London, 20:127–140.Google Scholar
Zarra, L. 1983. Biostratigraphy of planktonic foraminifera from Oligocene and lowermost Miocene rocks of the North Carolina Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 15:726.Google Scholar
Zarra, L. 1989. Sequence stratigraphy and foraminiferal biostratigraphy for selected wells in the Albemarle Embayment, North Carolina. North Carolina Geological Survey Open-file Report 89-5, 48 p.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A. 1984. New genera and species of balanoid barnacles from the Oligocene and Miocene of North Carolina. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1312–1338.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A., and Baum, G. R. 1979. Paleogene barnacles from the Coastal Plain of North Carolina (Cirripedia, Thoracica). Southeastern Geology, 20:229–246.Google Scholar