Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:55:53.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapesites, a new Upper Pennsylvanian (lower Virgilian) ammonoid from Kansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

David M. Work  and
Darwin R. Boardman
David M. Work
Affiliation:
Maine State Museum, 83 State House Station, Augusta 04333-0083
Darwin R. Boardman
Affiliation:
School of Geology, 105 Noble Research Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, the authors, along with colleagues, have documented the lower Virgilian ammonoid faunas of the Midcontinent and north-central Texas (Boardman et al., 1989, 1994a, 1994b; Work and Boardman, 1995, 1996). Generic diversity for this interval is the highest in any Upper Pennsylvanian succession: at least 18 genera (representing 15 families) have been recovered from the Colony Creek Shale in north-central Texas alone (Boardman et al., 1989). An additional, previously unrecognized ammonoid from the correlative Little Pawnee Shale in southeastern Kansas is described herein as Mapesites chautauquaensis new genus and species. It is a highly original taxon with no obvious close relatives.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 6 , November 2003 , pp. 1195 - 1197
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrick, J. E., and Heckel, P. H. 2000. A provisional conodont zonation for Late Pennsylvanian (late Late Carboniferous) strata in Midcontinent region of North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 18:15–22.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R., Mapes, R. H., and Work, D. M. 1989. Ammonoids from the Colony Creek Shale (Caddo Creek Formation, Canyon Group) with implications for correlation of the position of the Missourian-Virgilian boundary in north-central Texas, p. 201–220. In Boardman, D. R., Barrick, J. E., Cocke, J., and Nestell, M. K. (eds.), Middle and Late Pennsylvanian Chronostratigraphic Boundaries in North-Central Texas: Glacial-Eustatic Events, Biostratigraphy, and Paleoecology. Texas Tech University Studies in Geology, 2.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R., Work, D. M., and Mapes, R. H. 1994a. Revision of the family Shumarditidae Plummer & Scott, 1937, p. 48–56. In Boardman, D. R., Work, D. M., Mapes, R. H., and Barrick, J. E. (eds.), Biostratigraphy of Middle and Late Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian-Virgilian) Ammonoids. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 232.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R., Work, D. M., Mapes, R. H., and Barrick, J. E. 1994b. Biostratigraphy of Middle and Late Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian-Virgilian) ammonoids. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 232, 121 p.Google Scholar
Bogoslovskaya, M. F., Kusina, L. F., and Leonova, T. B. 1999. Classification and distribution of Late Paleozoic ammonoids, p. 89–124. In Rozanov, A. Yu. and Shevyrev, A. A. (eds.), Fossil Cephalopods: Recent Advances in Their Study. Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1919. The Permo-Carboniferous ammonoids of the Glass Mountains, West Texas, and their stratigraphical significance. University of Texas Bulletin, 1762, 241 p.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V. V., and Reshetkova, N. P. 1987. Biostratigraphy and conodonts of the Carboniferous-Permian boundary beds of the western slope of the southern and central Urals. Uralian Branch, USSR Academy of Sciences, Sverdlovsk, 53 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Harris, R. W., and Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science, 25:193–204.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H., Boardman, D. R., and Barrick, J. E. 1999. Stop C3: US-166 roadcut west of Peru, Kansas, p. 50–51. In Heckel, P. H. (ed.), Middle and Upper Pennsylvanian (Upper Carboniferous) Cyclothem Succession in Midcontinent Basin, U.S.A. Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report, 99–27.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1884. Genera of fossil cephalopods. Boston Society of Natural History, Proceedings, 22:253–338.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopods, p. 502–604. In Zittel-Eastman Textbook of Paleontology, I. MacMillan and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Downs, H. R. 1950. Ammonoids of the Pennsylvanian Finis Shale of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 24:185–218.Google Scholar
Plummer, F. B., and Scott, G. 1937. Upper Paleozoic ammonites in Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 3701, 516 p.Google Scholar
Ruzhencev, V. E. 1950. Upper Carboniferous ammonoids of the Urals. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Trudy, 33, 188 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Ruzhencev, V. E. 1960. Principles of systematics, classification, and phylogeny of the Paleozoic Ammonoidea. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Trudy, 83, 331 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. 1903. Carboniferous ammonoids of America. United States Geological Survey Monograph, 42, 211 p.Google Scholar
Work, D. M., and Boardman, D. R. 1995. Ammonoids from the Robbins Shale Member, Lawrence Formation, Douglas Group of Kansas with implications for placement and correlation of the Missourian-Virgilian boundary. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 27:97.Google Scholar
Work, D. M., and Boardman, D. R. 1996. Ammonoid biostratigraphy across the Missourian-Virgilian boundary in the North American Midcontinent and north-central Texas. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 28:70.Google Scholar