Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:29:22.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The jugum and salinity tolerance of Greenfieldia (Brachiopoda: Late Silurian)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

A. J. Boucot
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Fernando Alvarez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo 33005, Spain
Arthur Leibold
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109 Current address, Amoco Corporation, Exploration and Production Sector, Houston, Texas 77253

Extract

While preparing the part of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology dealing with Greenfieldia, Alvarez had problems with the absence of information regarding its jugum. GRABAU (1910, in Grabau and Sherzer) described the smooth, subequally biconvex, small shell Greenfieldia whitfieldi, the type species of his Greenfieldia, from the Late Silurian Greenfield Dolomite of northern Ohio. Grabau (1910, p. 149) remarked that the brachidium was unknown, with only the presence of laterally directed spiralia (Grabau, Pl. XXX, fig. 9) being indicated but not discussed in the text. Grabau (1910) considered a questionable assignment of Greenfieldia to the meristelloid Hindella. Boucot et al. (1965, p. H662), Berry and Boucot (1970, p. 155) and Berdan (1972, p. 16) all illustrated the difficulty in discriminating between the Late Silurian Protathyris, whose jugum is known and athyroid in type, and Greenfieldia with its unknown jugum. Jones (1978, p. 10) further emphasized the difficulty in discriminating between Protathyris and Greenfieldia owing to ignorance of the latter's jugum. Modzalevskaya (1979, fig. 7) described a jugum from a form assigned to Greenfieldia. The complex form of the jugum she illustrated, featuring a number of recurving branches, is entirely unlike that of Greenfieldia although relatively similar to that of Protathyris.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berdan, J. M. 1972. Brachiopoda and Ostracoda of the Cobleskill Limestone (Upper Silurian) of central New York. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 730, 47 p.Google Scholar
Berry, W. B. N., and Boucot, A. J. 1970. Correlation of the North American Silurian Rocks. Geological Society of America Special Paper 102, 289 p.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J., Johnson, J. G., Pitrat, C. W., and Staton, R. D. 1965. Spiriferida, p. H632H728. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Sherzer, W. H. 1910. The Monroe Formation of southern Michigan and adjoining regions. Michigan Geological and Biological Survey, Publication 2, Geological series 1, 248 p.Google Scholar
Jones, B. 1978. Taxonomy and intraspecific variation of Protathyris praecursor Kozlowski, 1929 from the Upper Silurian of Somerset Island, Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 52:827.Google Scholar
Modzalevskaya, T. L. 1979. K Sistematike Paleozoiskikh Atiridid. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2:4863.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J. 1981. Silurian stratigraphy of eastern Linn and western Jones counties, Iowa, p. 138. In Geological Society of Iowa guidebook 35, 38 p.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J. 1983. Silurian benthic invertebrate associations of eastern Iowa and their paleoenvironmental significance. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, 71:2147.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J. 1987. Models for circulation patterns in epicontinental seas applied to Paleozoic facies of North American Craton. Paleoceanography, 2:229248.Google Scholar