Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:49:46.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interreef crinoid fauna from the Mississinewa Shale Member of the Wabash Formation (Northern Indiana; Silurian; Echinodermata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

N. Gary Lane  and
William I. Ausich
N. Gary Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A true interreef crinoid fauna lacking components of reefal facies is reported from the Ludlovian of the Mississinewa Shale Member of the Wabash Formation in northern Indiana. The Mississinewa facies that contains this fauna is a dolomitic siltstone or a silty dolomite. The crinoid association reported is composed entirely of new species and is different from other reef and reef-associated, interreef, and non-reef crinoid associations. New species described, herein, include the following: Dimerocrinites (Eucrinus) ankylos n. sp., Periechocrinus shaveri n. sp., Bohemicocrinus? occidens n. sp., Macrostylocrinus styo n. sp., M. homalos n. sp., Gissocrinus hypselos n. sp., and Dendrocrinus diaphoros n. sp. This may be the first occurrence of Bohemicocrinus from outside Bohemia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1090 - 1106
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1878. Iconographia crinoideorum in stratis Suecia Siluricis fossilium. Samson and Wallin, Holmiae, 62 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Baumiller, T. K. 1993. Taphonomic method for determining muscular articulations in fossil crinoids. Palaios, 8:477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T., and Austin, T. Jr. 1843. Description of several new genera and species of Crinoidea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 1, 11(69):195–207.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1938. Pelmatozoa Palaeozoica, Fossilium Catalogus: I. Animalia, Pars 83, 194 p.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1893. The Crinoidea of Gotland, Part I, The Crinoidea Inadunata. K. Svenska Vetenskapsakad., Handl., 25(2):1–182.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa. British Association for the Advancement of Sciences Report, (1898):916–923.Google Scholar
Berry, W. B. N., and Boucot, A. J. 1970. Correlation of North American Silurian rocks. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 102, 289 p.Google Scholar
Bouska, J. 1944. Die Vertreter der Gattung Gissocrinus Angelin im böhmischen Silur. Tschech. Akad. Wiss. Mitteil. 44:584–593.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1981. Terminology and functional morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms. Lethaia, 14:343–370.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1985. Pelmatozoan echinoderms on Silurian bioherms in western New York and Ontario. Journal of Paleontology, 59:820–838.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Eckert, J. D. 1982. Paleoecology of a well-preserved crinoid colony from the Rochester Shale of Ontario. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, 131:1–20.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1848-1849. Index palaeontologicus, unter Mitwirkung der Herren Prof. H. R. Göppert and H. von Meyer. Handbuch einer Geschichte der Natur 5, Abt. 1, no. 1, 2, pt. 3; A–M, p. 1-775; N–Z, p. 776-1381. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Candia Carnevali, M. D., and Saita, A. 1985. Muscle system organization in the echinoderms: II Microscopic anatomy and functional significance of the muscle-ligament-skeleton system in the arm of the comatulids (Antedon mediterranea): Journal of Morphology, 185:59–74.Google Scholar
Droste, J. B., and Shaver, R. H. 1982. The Salina Group (Middle and Upper Silurian) of Indiana. Indiana Geological Survey Special Report, 24, 41 p.Google Scholar
Droste, J. B., and Shaver, R. H. 1985. Comparative stratigraphic framework for Silurian reefs—Michigan Basin to surrounding platforms, p. 73–93. In Cercone, K. R. and Budai, J. M. (eds.), Ordovician and Silurian rocks of the Michigan Basin and its margins. Michigan Basin Geological Society Special Paper, 4.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D. 1975. Some observations on the depositional environment and diagenesis of the Mississinewa Shale, p. 44–53. In Sunderman, J. A. and Mathews, G. W. (eds.), Silurian Reef and Interreef Environments with Emphasis on Interreef Petrology, Paleontology, Stratigraphy, and Sedimentation. Great Lakes Section SEPM 5th Annual Field Conference Guidebook.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D., and Prezbindowski, D. R. 1974. Niagaran (Middle Silurian) interreef fossil burial environments in Indiana. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 144:342–372.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Palaeontology of New York, Volume 2, Containing Descriptions of the Organic Remains of the Lower Middle Division of the New-York System. Natural History of New York, 6, 362 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1882. Descriptions of the species of fossils found in the Niagara group at Waldron, Indiana. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural History Annual Report, 11:217–345.Google Scholar
Indiana University Paleontological Seminar. 1980. Stratigraphy, structure, and zonation of large Silurian reef at Delphi, Indiana. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 64:115–131.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G., and Le Hon, H. S. 1854. Recherches sur les crinoïdes du terrain carbonifere de la Belgique. Royal Academié Belgique Mémoires, 28(3):217 p.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. 1948. Niagaran inter-reef formations. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, 4, 146 p.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. 1957. Niagaran reefs in the Great Lakes area, p. 215–248. In Ladd, H. S. (ed.), Treatise on marine ecology and Paleoecology, Geological Society of America Memoir 67(2).Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. Jr., and Meyer, D. L. 1974. Feeding posture of modern stalked crinoids. Nature, 247:394–396.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., Ausich, W. I., and Terry, R. E. 1990. Comparative taphonomy of echinoderms in carbonate facies: Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian) of Kentucky and Tennessee. Palaios, 4:533–552.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952. Crinoids, p. 604–652. In Moore, R. C., Lalicker, C. G., and Fisher, A. G. (eds.), Invertebrate Fossils, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and Classification of Paleozoic Crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1843. A Catalogue of British Fossils, 1st edition. London, 222 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1839. Crinoids, p. 670–675. In Murchison, R. I., (ed.), The Silurian System, Part I. Founded on geological researches in the counties of Solop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester, and Stafford; with descriptions of the coal-fields and overlying formations; Part II. Organiz remains. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1954. Periechocrinus versus Periechocrinites . Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 12, 7:687–688.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B., Noland, A. V., and Pollock, C. A. 1978. Conodonts from the Louisville Limestone and the Wabash Formation (Silurian) in Clark County, Indiana, and Jefferson County, Kentucky. Indiana Geological Survey Special Report, 16, 15 p.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. H., al, et. 1971. Silurian and Devonian stratigraphy of the Michigan Basin—a view from the southwest flank, p. 37–59. In Forsyth, J. L. (ed.), Geology of the Lake Erie Islands and Adjacent Shores. Michigan Basin Geological Society Guidebook.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. H., al, et. 1986. Compendium of Paleozoic rock-unit stratigraphy in Indiana—a revision. Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin, 59, 203 p.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian Crinoids. Smithsonian Institution Publication, 2871, 239 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe des Crinoïdes, p. 658–773. In Privteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, 3. Maisson and Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978a. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C., and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata, 2, volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978b. Camerata, p. T408–T518. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata, 2, volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Waagen, W., and Jahn, J. J. 1899. Classe des Echinodermes. Famille des Crinoïdes, 215 p. In Barrande, J., Systême silurien du centre de la Bohême, Recherches Paléontologiques. Řivnáč, Prague.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1879-1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Proceedings, pt. 1, 1879, p. 266–378 (1-153); pt. 2, 1881, p. 177-411 (1-237) pt. 3 (i), 1885, p. 225-364 (1-138); pt. 3 (ii), 1886, p. 64-226 (139-334).Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 1991. Guild structure and tiering in a high-diversity Silurian community, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Palaios, 6:465–478.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1900. The paleontology of the Niagaran Limestone in the Chicago area; the Crinoidea. Chicago Academy of Sciences, Natural History Bulletin, 4(1), 152 p.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J. 1983. Silurian benthic invertebrate associations of eastern Iowa and their paleoenvironmental significance. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Transactions, 71:21–47.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J., and Strimple, H. L. 1981. Early Silurian camerate crinoids of eastern Iowa. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 88:101–137.Google Scholar
Wood, G. D. 1975. Acritarchs and trilete spores from the Mississinewa Shale of northern Indiana, p. 91–94. In Sunderman, J. A. and Mathews, G. W. (eds.), Silurian reef and Interreef Environments with Emphasis on Interreef Petrology, Paleontology, Stratigraphy, and Sedimentation. Great Lakes Section SEPM 5th Annual Field Conference.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1876-1880. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Band 1, Palaeozoologie, 756 p.Google Scholar