Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:04:26.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First Paleontological record of larval brooding in the calyptraeid gastropod genus Crepidula Lamarck, 1799

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Gregory S. Herbert  and
Roger W. Portell
Gregory S. Herbert
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis 95616,
Roger W. Portell
Affiliation:
2Invertebrate Paleontology Division, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville 32611-7800,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies of larval development in the calyptraeid gastropod genus Crepidula Lamarck, 1799 have greatly enhanced the ability of systematists to delineate the Recent species in this challenging group. Although the simple, limpetlike growth form and near absence of surface ornamentation in adult Crepidula provide few diagnostic characters, larval developmental strategies (i.e., feeding or planktotrophic vs. nonfeeding or lecithotrophic larvae) appear to be stable within species and evolve rapidly, making them useful taxonomic tools. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of several species previously believed to possess multiple developmental modes—a condition known as poecilogony—found that these “species” are instead clades comprised of multiple cryptic species distinguishable only by larval type (e.g., Gallardo, 1977, 1979; Hoagland, 1977, 1984, 1986; Collin, 2000a, 2001).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , March 2004 , pp. 424 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, J. G., Portell, R. W., and Jones, D. S. 1999. Occurrence and significance of an early Pleistocene decapod crustacean fauna from southern Florida. Geological Society of America, Southeastern Section, Abstracts with Program, 31(3):1.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., and Riedel, F. 1994. Classification of fossil and Recent Calyptraeoidea (Caenogastropoda) with a discussion on neomesogastropod phylogeny. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 13:329–367.Google Scholar
Bruguiére, J.-G. 1789. Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire Naturelle des Vers, 1:1–344.Google Scholar
Burns, F. 1899. Viviparous Miocene Turritellidae. The Nautilus, 13:68–69.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. D. 1976. Paleoecology of the Lone Star Industries Pit, Yorktown Formation (Pliocene), Chuckatuck, Virginia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 184 p.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. D. 1993. Pliocene Molluscs from the Yorktown and Chowan River Formations in Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication 127, Charlottesville, Virginia, 259 p.Google Scholar
Chaparro, O. R., Oyarzun, R. F., Vergara, A. M., and Thompson, R. J. 1999. Energy investment in nurse eggs and egg capsules in Crepidula dilitata Lamarck (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) and its influence on the hatching size of the juvenile. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 232:261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, R. 2000a. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Crepidula plana (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) species complex in North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78:1500–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, R. 2000b. Sex change, reproduction, and development of Crepidula adunca and Crepidula lingulata (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae). The Veliger, 43:24–33.Google Scholar
Collin, R. 2001. The effects of mode of development on phylogeography and population structure of North Atlantic Crepidula (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae). Molecular Ecology, 10:2249–2262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, T. A. 1846. Descriptions of new species of fossil and Recent shells and corals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 3:26–27.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1996. Brooding in the late Cretaceous gastropod Gyrodes? Mississippi Geology, 17:56–58.Google Scholar
Gallardo, C. S. 1977. Two modes of development in the morphospecies Crepidula dilitata (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from southern Chile. Marine Biology, 39:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallardo, C. S. 1979. Especies gemelas del genero Crepidula (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) en la costa de Chile; una redescripción de Crepidula dilitata Lamarck y descripción de C. fecunda n. sp. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 14:215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallardo, C. S. 1996. Reproduction in Crepidula philippiana (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) from southern Chile. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 31:117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilprin, A. 1886. Explorations of the west coast of Florida and in the Okeechobee wilderness with special reference to the geology and zoology of the Floridian peninsula. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science of Philadelphia, 1:365–506.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K. E. 1977. Systematic review of fossil and Recent Crepidula and discussion of evolution of the Calyptraeidae. Malacologia, 16:353–420.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K. E. 1979. The behavior of three sympatric species of Crepidula (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) from the Atlantic, with implications for evolutionary ecology. The Nautilus, 94:143–149.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K. E. 1984. Use of molecular genetics to distinguish species of the gastropod genus Crepidula (Prosobranchia: Calyptraeidae). Malacologia, 25:607–628.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K. E. 1986. Patterns of encapsulation and brooding in the Calyptraeidae (Prosobranchia: Gastropoda). American Malacological Bulletin, 4:173–183.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K. E., and Coe, W. R. 1982. Larval development in Crepidula maculosa (Prosobranchia: Crepidulidae) from Florida. The Nautilus, 96:122.Google Scholar
Karlson, R. H., and Sullivan, J. A. 1989. Effects of pagurid density and size on the behavior of Crepidula convexa Say. The Nautilus, 103:85–88.Google Scholar
Kehayias, R. Z., Portell, R. W., and Jones, D. S. 2000. Paleoecology and predation of an unusual concentration of Turbo (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Plio-Pleistocene of southern Florida. Geological Society of America, Southeastern Section, Abstracts with Program, 32(2):29.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. 1799. Genera of Shells (translated by Gould, A. A.). Author, Boston, 108 p.Google Scholar
Lima, G. M., and Lutz, R. A. 1990. The relationship of larval shell morphology to mode of development in marine prosobranch gastropods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70:611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, (tenth edition). Volume 1. Author, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 2003. A review of the Recent and Late Cenozoic Calyptraeidae of New Zealand (Mollusca: Gastropoda). The Veliger, 46:117–144.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1971. An ovoviviparous gastropod (Turritellidae, Zeocolpus [sic]) from the upper Miocene of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 14:66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. III, and DuBar, J. R. 1988. Community replacement of a Pleistocene Crepidula biostrome. Lethaia, 21:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1958. Viviparous Turritella pilsbryi Gardner. Journal of Paleontology, 32:210–213.Google Scholar
Penchaszadeh, P. E., Pastorino, G., and Cledón, M. 2002. Crepidula dilitata Lamarck, 1822, truly living in the southwestern Atlantic. The Veliger, 45:172–174.Google Scholar
Russell, M. P., Huelsenbeck, J. P., and Lindberg, D. R. 1992. Experimental taphonomy of embryo preservation in a Cenozoic brooding bivalve. Lethaia, 25:353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, T. 1822. An account of some of the marine shells of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2:221–248.Google Scholar
Smith, J. T. 1986. Middle Tertiary rocky substrate mollusks from Baja California Sur, Mexico. American Malacological Bulletin, 4:1–12.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. I. 1825. A catalogue of the shells contained in the collection of the late Earl of Tankerville, arranged according to the Lamarckian conchological system; together with an Appendix, containing descriptions of many new species. Author, London, p. vii, xxxiv (Appendix).Google Scholar
Stingley, D. V. 1952. Crepidula maculosa Conrad. The Nautilus, 65:83–85.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. H. 1935. Ovoviviparous reproduction of Miocene Turritellidae. American Midland Naturalist (Notre Dame, Indiana), 16:107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tampa, A. 1976. Fossil eggs of the land snail genus Vallonia (Pulmonata: Valloniidae). The Nautilus, 90:5–7.Google Scholar
Thiriot-Quiévreux, C., and Scheltema, R. S. 1982. Planktonic larvae of New England gastropods. V. Bittium alternatum, Triphora nigrocincta, Cerithiopsis emersoni, Lunatia heros and Crepidula plana. Malacologia, 23:37–46.Google Scholar
Tucker, H. I., and Wilson, D. 1933. A second contribution to the Neogene paleontology of south Florida. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 18:1–21.Google Scholar
Walker, S. E. 1992. Criteria for recognizing marine hermit crabs in the fossil record using gastropod shells. Journal of Paleontology, 66:535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, D. M. 1989. Paleoecology of Crepidula (Mollusca: Gastropoda) beds, James City Formation (Pleistocene), North Carolina. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 22:69–92.Google Scholar